LISTSERV 16.0 - AUXLANG Archives

Pierpaolo Bernardi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 10:55:04 +0200

116 lines

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 13:10:07 -0400

28 lines

Mon, 29 May 2000 19:30:03 +0200

53 lines

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 12:57:56 -0700

22 lines

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 13:22:49 -0700

63 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 22:01:57 +0200

24 lines

caviness <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 00:59:35 -0400

26 lines

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 22:40:53 -0700

42 lines

Pierpaolo Bernardi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 16:31:46 +0200

120 lines

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 08:50:35 -0700

92 lines

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 09:18:33 -0700

89 lines

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 09:34:23 -0700

54 lines

Pierpaolo Bernardi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 18:50:00 +0200

157 lines

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 10:07:39 -0700

159 lines

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 10:25:51 -0700

177 lines

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 17:01:54 -0700

133 lines

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 18:15:47 -0700

185 lines

Pierpaolo Bernardi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 11:02:41 +0200

39 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 18:38:52 +0200

27 lines

Re: A thought: /lj/ or /j/?

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 12:29:56 -0700

35 lines

A thought: /lj/ or /j/?

Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 21:22:26 CDT

30 lines

Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 03:28:14 GMT

64 lines

Re: A thought: /lj/ or /j/?

Pierpaolo Bernardi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 12:00:20 +0200

31 lines

A whole nother little experiment

Charles George Haberl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 16:49:45 -0400

37 lines

Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 17:16:53 -0400

43 lines

Zeno <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 21:49:42 -0700

35 lines

Pierpaolo Bernardi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 12:20:48 +0200

38 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 19:21:22 +0200

31 lines

Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 21:56:01 CDT

19 lines

AUXLANG Digest - 25 May 2000 to 26 May 2000 (#2000-143)

Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 23:31:04 -0400

28 lines

ancient history?

Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 00:40:50 -0400

53 lines

Re: ancient history?

Paul O Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 17:31:30 -0400

23 lines

Re: AUXLANG Digest - 25 May 2000 to 26 May 2000 (#2000-143)

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 10:27:18 GMT

38 lines

Re: AUXLANG Digest - 25 May 2000 to 26 May 2000 (#2000-143)

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 11:31:14 -0700

39 lines

AUXLANG Digest - 26 May 2000 to 27 May 2000 (#2000-144)

Re: AUXLANG Digest - 26 May 2000 to 27 May 2000 (#2000-144)

Ken Caviness <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 12:44:02 -0400

33 lines

AUXLANG Digest - 29 May 2000 to 30 May 2000 (#2000-147)

Re: AUXLANG Digest - 29 May 2000 to 30 May 2000 (#2000-147)

Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 05:41:01 -0400

50 lines

Bingo! "Li Verita pri ILA."

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 19:28:51 +0200

46 lines

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 08:03:22 GMT

49 lines

Paul O Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 21:03:08 -0400

63 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 19:55:11 +0200

16 lines

Cease & Desist?? ;-) and "a little experiment".

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 12:22:08 -0700

25 lines

Re: Cease & Desist?? ;-) and "a little experiment".

Pierpaolo Bernardi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 11:16:16 +0200

57 lines

Re: Cease & Desist?? ;-) and "a little experiment".

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 12:52:32 -0700

22 lines

Chinese and IAL

Pierpaolo Bernardi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 11:26:24 +0200

29 lines

Pierpaolo Bernardi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 11:35:54 +0200

57 lines

Ken Caviness <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 11:19:41 -0400

75 lines

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 09:37:45 -0700

106 lines

Cleaned up a bit... Re: A whole nother little experiment

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 08:01:17 +0200

64 lines

Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 17:20:55 -0400

32 lines

compounds

Re: compounds

Andrea Patten <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 09:16:42 -0700

68 lines

English spelling reform

Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 05:09:23 -0400

34 lines

Re: English spelling reform

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 10:06:42 -0700

39 lines

Re: English spelling reform

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 20:10:48 +0300

30 lines

Fwd: Favor!

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 09:07:59 GMT

158 lines

Re: Fwd: Favor!

Paul O Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 21:27:20 -0400

37 lines

I'm new. What's going on?

Re: I'm new. What's going on?

Pierpaolo Bernardi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 18:07:33 +0200

50 lines

IAL not phoneme but

Mon, 29 May 2000 11:30:46 +0200

77 lines

Pierpaolo Bernardi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 12:03:25 +0200

31 lines

Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 15:35:13 GMT

34 lines

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 09:28:17 -0700

43 lines

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 13:19:33 -0400

19 lines

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 10:07:17 GMT

99 lines

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 11:46:38 GMT

36 lines

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 11:53:19 GMT

38 lines

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 11:55:54 GMT

38 lines

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 12:36:40 GMT

40 lines

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 06:34:50 -0700

33 lines

Pierpaolo Bernardi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 18:23:27 +0200

33 lines

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 13:24:03 -0400

33 lines

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 08:07:51 GMT

42 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 09:27:34 +0200

24 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 08:09:55 +0200

41 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 08:22:43 +0200

20 lines

Ka-boing!

Re: Ka-boing!

Last installment (estis: Re: A little experiment.)

Mon, 29 May 2000 11:51:21 +0200

30 lines

Lango on the web

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 12:13:30 GMT

31 lines

Re: Lango on the web

Zeno <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 11:34:34 -0700

136 lines

Re: Lango on the web

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 12:27:16 -0700

22 lines

Language Universals

Re: Language Universals

Andrea Patten <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 11:21:29 -0700

47 lines

Ken Caviness <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 10:17:23 -0400

177 lines

Li signification del stupidita' del propaganda contra Interlingua

Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 23:26:15 -0400

45 lines

Loglan reunited?

Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 04:33:28 -0400

108 lines

minder Re: History is bunk

Re: minder Re: History is bunk

Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 May 1999 02:13:31 -0400

33 lines

Moving onwards. What's the message?

Re: Moving onwards. What's the message?

Charles George Haberl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 23:35:02 -0400

157 lines

Re: Moving onwards. What's the message?

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 13:15:51 -0400

14 lines

Mr. Wu and Madam Yi -- in Romance

AcadonBot <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 10:27:18 -0700

37 lines

Re: Mr. Wu and Madam Yi -- in Romance

Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 21:12:13 CDT

28 lines

Re: Mr. Wu and Madam Yi -- in Romance

Pierpaolo Bernardi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 15:10:14 +0200

77 lines

Nov format

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 12:50:11 -0700

20 lines

Nove Dominios?

Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 22:47:50 -0400

93 lines

Re: Nove Dominios?

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 20:11:33 -0700

49 lines

Oh no,I have another thought. Was: Re:Movingonwards.What'sthemessage?

Re: Oh no,I have another thought. Was: Re:Movingonwards.What'sthemessage?

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 20:19:24 +0200

43 lines

prise Re: Oh no,I have another thought.

Re: prise Re: Oh no,I have another thought.

Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 May 1999 02:21:29 -0400

45 lines

pseudo-pscience

Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 07:01:45 -0400

58 lines

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 08:33:00 -0700

105 lines

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 10:45:44 -0700

63 lines

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 18:04:11 -0400

44 lines

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 15:57:36 -0700

105 lines

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 19:39:05 -0400

48 lines

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 17:16:34 -0700

99 lines

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 20:58:21 -0400

74 lines

pseudo-pscientist ( Re: pseudo-pscience

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 19:33:25 -0700

85 lines

Re: pseudo-pscientist ( Re: pseudo-pscience

Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 23:45:14 -0400

36 lines

reply to Don H

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 08:15:53 GMT

31 lines

Re: reply to Don H

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 06:27:11 -0700

34 lines

ReRe: Do I Disagree with all of Bob Petry's Positions?

Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 May 1999 02:51:51 -0400

32 lines

Shopping by language

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 15:19:07 -0700

36 lines

so much for "at sight readability"

Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 07:59:17 -0400

55 lines

Sorry Danny :-)

Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 03:30:39 GMT

21 lines

Re: Sorry Danny :-)

Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 04:06:45 CDT

34 lines

Spelling Errors

Re: Spelling Errors

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 21:02:52 +0200

46 lines

Re: Spelling Errors

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 21:17:45 +0200

76 lines

spelling reform?

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 12:58:37 -0400

63 lines

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 12:02:42 GMT

51 lines

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 12:20:23 GMT

40 lines

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 12:39:19 GMT

29 lines

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 09:05:18 -0700

41 lines

Paul O Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 21:37:29 -0400

22 lines

spite Re: humor at Petry's expense

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 19:58:45 +0200

22 lines

Re: spite Re: humor at Petry's expense

Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 May 1999 02:34:55 -0400

49 lines

The IAL agenda (was Re: Do I Disagree with all of Bob Petry's Positions?