Re: "Jewish Science"

Zeno <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 10:57:26 -0700

22 lines

Acadon

Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 03:04:06 GMT

39 lines

Acadon -- Mill on Liberty

AcadonBot <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 12:08:29 -0700

334 lines

Re: Acadon -- Wolf and Dog

Andrea Patten <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jun 2000 23:52:49 -0700

103 lines

Re: Ancient Ghosts and Future Visions

maf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 17:50:26 +0200

137 lines

Assad ha morit.

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jun 2000 13:23:25 -0700

19 lines

Attn: David G. Durand (estis: Re: In error)

Ken Caviness <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jun 2000 19:16:18 -0400

72 lines

Re: AUXLANG Digest - 11 Jun 2000 to 12 Jun 2000 (#2000-160)

Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 06:20:56 -0400

53 lines

Re: AUXLANG Digest - 11 Jun 2000 to 12 Jun 2000 (#2000-160)

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 07:00:01 -0700

87 lines

Re: AUXLANG Digest - 6 Jun 2000 to 7 Jun 2000 (#2000-155)

Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2000 10:15:17 -0400

105 lines

Re: AUXLANG Digest - 6 Jun 2000 to 7 Jun 2000 (#2000-155)

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2000 13:06:31 -0400

25 lines

Re: AUXLANG Digest - 6 Jun 2000 to 7 Jun 2000 (#2000-155)

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 07:36:48 -0700

37 lines

Auxlang listowner help needed

Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jun 2000 01:08:11 -0400

46 lines

Re: AUXLANG: Evaluating Latinate Roots for a Global IAL

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2000 07:57:40 GMT

37 lines

Re: AUXLANG: Evaluating Latinate Roots for a Global IAL

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2000 13:00:14 -0400

51 lines

Re: Big Six *long post*

Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 17:08:25 CDT

28 lines

Re: Big Six Resurrected! (or, phonolgy for a global IAL)

Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 04:39:55 GMT

63 lines

Combined Keys for a "26 language" dictionary.

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2000 07:17:21 -0700

67 lines

conlangs in SF (estis: Re: AUXLANG Digest - 11 Jun 2000 to 12 Jun 2000 (#2000-160))

Ken Caviness <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 10:29:18 -0400

65 lines

Re: decision between variants

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 07:46:01 GMT

35 lines

Re: decision between variants

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2000 12:33:53 GMT

49 lines

Re: decision between variants

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2000 06:39:09 -0700

26 lines

Re: decision between variants

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2000 10:25:54 -0700

58 lines

Re: decision between variants

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2000 15:17:46 -0400

37 lines

Re: decision between variants

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2000 16:06:43 -0400

40 lines

Defining and Defanging "Eurocentricity"

AcadonBot <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 15:46:59 -0700

449 lines

Re: Defining and Defanging "Eurocentricity"

AcadonBot <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 19:37:55 -0700

168 lines

Re: Evaluating Chinese (was Latinate) Roots for a Global IAL ///

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 8 Jun 2000 02:32:43 EDT

36 lines

Re: Evaluating Chinese (was Latinate) Roots for a Global IAL ///

Paul O Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2000 21:30:37 -0400

32 lines

Re: Evaluating Chinese (was Latinate) Roots for a Global IAL ///

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 06:45:57 -0700

52 lines

Re: Evaluating Latinate Roots for a Global IAL

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 8 Jun 2000 02:37:13 EDT

93 lines

Re: Evaluating Latinate Roots for a Global IAL

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2000 14:47:52 GMT

31 lines

Re: Evaluating Latinate Roots for a Global IAL

maf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 17:59:25 +0200

38 lines

Re: Evaluating Latinate Roots for a Global IAL

AcadonBot <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 11:12:44 -0700

28 lines

Re: Evaluating Latinate Roots for a Global IAL

Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jun 2000 02:28:05 GMT

75 lines

Re: Evaluating Latinate Roots for a Global IAL ///

Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2000 04:05:17 GMT

157 lines

Re: Evaluating Latinate Roots for a Global IAL ///

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2000 06:53:04 -0700

69 lines

Re: Evaluating Latinate Roots for a Global IAL ///

AcadonBot <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2000 08:32:42 -0700

48 lines

Re: Evaluating Latinate Roots for a Global IAL ///

Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 02:36:34 -0400

72 lines

Re: Evaluating Latinate Roots for a Global IAL ///

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 12:30:29 -0400

27 lines

Re: Evaluating Latinate Roots for a Global IAL ///

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 15:26:06 EDT

23 lines

Re: Evaluating Latinate Roots for a Global IAL ///

Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jun 2000 01:32:47 GMT

47 lines

Evaluating Roots for a Global IAL

AcadonBot <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2000 17:27:01 -0700

165 lines

Evaluating Roots for a Global IAL

AcadonBot <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 22:15:47 -0700

141 lines

Re: Experiment in At-Sight Readability: Phase Three? (was: Phase Two)

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2000 19:50:26 -0400

141 lines

Re: Experiment in At-Sight Readability: Phase Three? (was: Phase Two)

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 13:50:15 -0400

23 lines

Re: Experiment in At-Sight Readability: Phase Two (LONG)

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 15:18:39 EDT

25 lines

Re: Familiar suffices

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2000 19:18:54 +0200

32 lines

Re: Familiar suffices

Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jun 2000 01:54:14 GMT

63 lines

Re: Familiar suffices

Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jun 2000 03:50:48 GMT

66 lines

Re: Familiarity in a Diffuse Sense (long)

Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jun 2000 03:43:07 GMT

163 lines

Haggling Over History

Paul O Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 18:54:07 -0400

27 lines

Re: Haggling Over History

Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2000 01:09:22 GMT

34 lines

Re: Haggling Over History

Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2000 01:44:12 GMT

29 lines

Re: Haggling Over History

Paul O Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2000 20:33:53 -0400

39 lines

IAL 2000

Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 07:02:23 -0400

51 lines

Re: IAL page update and Glosa question

Paul O Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 19:46:02 -0400

41 lines

Re: IAL page update and Glosa question

Paul O Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2000 20:50:32 -0400

52 lines

Re: IALA Re: decision between variants

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 12:20:09 -0400

25 lines

Re: IALA Re: decision between variants

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 21:25:12 +0200

25 lines

In error

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 22:05:02 +0200

29 lines

Re: In error

AcadonBot <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 17:07:53 -0700

44 lines

Julius Lott

AcadonBot <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 22:58:19 -0700

48 lines

Re: Julius Lott

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jun 2000 18:39:26 +0200

26 lines

Julius Lott, a really great guy. In fact, one of the best.

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jun 2000 11:13:45 -0700

130 lines

Re: Julius Lott, a really great guy. In fact, one of the best.

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jun 2000 12:40:40 -0700

142 lines

Re: Julius Lott, a really great guy. In fact, one of the best.

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2000 10:09:08 -0700

78 lines

Re: Julius Lott, a really great guy. In fact, one of the best.

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2000 11:04:29 -0700

72 lines

Re: Julius Lott, a really great guy. In fact, one of the best.

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2000 16:56:08 -0700

352 lines

Re: Julius Lott, a really great guy. In fact, one of the best.

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2000 21:33:37 +0200

38 lines

Re: Julius Lott, a really great guy. In fact, one of the best.

Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jun 1999 00:26:02 -0400

26 lines

Re: Julius Lott, a really great guy. In fact, one of the best.

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 10:23:32 -0700

37 lines

Re: Julius Lott, a really great guy. In fact, one of the best.

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 11:07:17 -0700

57 lines

Re: Julius Lott, a really great guy. In fact, one of the best.

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 11:33:08 -0700

136 lines

Re: Julius Lott, a really great guy. In fact, one of the best.

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 15:06:00 -0400

32 lines

Re: Julius Lott, a really great guy. In fact, one of the best.

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 12:17:05 -0700

17 lines

Re: Julius Lott, a really great guy. In fact, one of the best.

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 16:58:05 -0400

28 lines

Re: Julius Lott, a really great guy. In fact, one of the best.

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 14:17:23 -0700

62 lines

Re: Julius Lott, a really great guy. In fact, one of the best.

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 18:53:00 -0400

52 lines

Re: Julius Lott, a really great guy. In fact, one of the best.

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2000 06:31:20 +0200

57 lines

Re: Julius Lott, a really great guy. In fact, one of the best.

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2000 08:38:40 +0200

130 lines

language jockeys

Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 06:40:41 -0400

35 lines

Lojban roots

Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 08:04:40 -0400

75 lines

Re: Lojban universals

maf <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jun 2000 11:11:42 +0200

58 lines

Re: Lojban universals

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jun 2000 14:45:53 +0200

21 lines

Re: Lojban universals

maf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2000 18:10:29 +0200

72 lines

Re: Lojban universals

Andrea Patten <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2000 19:26:55 -0700

19 lines

Lojban universals ( was Re: tones)

maf <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jun 2000 09:46:05 +0200

81 lines

Re: Lojban universals ( was Re: tones)

maf <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jun 2000 11:25:08 +0200

39 lines

Re: Lojban universals ( was Re: tones)

maf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2000 15:05:51 +0200

57 lines

Re: Lojban universals ( was Re: tones)

maf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2000 19:19:08 +0200

27 lines

Re: Max Talmey

Zeno <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 11:00:32 -0700

68 lines

Re: Max Talmey

Zeno <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 11:14:29 -0700

24 lines

Re: Max Talmey

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 21:44:50 +0200

22 lines

Re: Max Talmey

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jun 2000 11:41:46 +0200

35 lines

Re: most

Craig Bryant <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 11:33:25 -0400

14 lines

Re: most "successful" was Re: decision between variants

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2000 08:44:03 -0700

74 lines

Re: most "successful" was Re: decision between variants

Robert J. Petry, C.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2000 10:39:34 -0700

52 lines

Re: most "successful" was Re: decision between variants

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2000 15:40:20 -0400

41 lines

Re: most "successful" was Re: decision between variants

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2000 15:08:12 -0700

55 lines

Re: most "successful" was Re: decision between variants

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 06:41:04 -0700

82 lines

Re: most "successful" was Re: decision between variants

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 08:50:35 -0700

45 lines

Re: most "successful" was Re: decision between variants

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 13:41:37 -0400

23 lines

Re: most "successful" was Re: decision between variants

Pierpaolo Bernardi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2000 13:44:48 +0200

27 lines

Re: Most successful?

Pierpaolo Bernardi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 12:47:58 +0200

37 lines

Re: Most successful?

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 09:21:54 -0700

58 lines

Re: Most successful?

Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 13:47:06 -0400

32 lines

Re: Most successful?

Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2000 10:29:50 -0700

49 lines

Re: Next 25 Languages

Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2000 03:30:42 CDT

35 lines

Re: Next 25 Languages

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2000 15:17:30 GMT

27 lines

semantic universal

Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 07:36:04 -0400

41 lines

Top 25 Languages

AcadonBot <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jun 2000 20:52:54 -0700

101 lines

Two Suggestions / Requests

Paul O Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jun 2000 21:40:57 -0400

29 lines

WU: Re: Top 25 Languages

AcadonBot <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2000 06:54:44 -0700

54 lines