|
|
|
|
Size
|
Re: = La pregunta del million de dollares o de euros
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:15:18 -0500 |
17 lines |
Re: = La pregunta del million de dollares o de euros
|
pracrito <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:12:21 +0100 |
45 lines |
A few more web sites in or relating to Esperanto
|
Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:16:40 -0800 |
91 lines |
An example of English at work as an auxlang...
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:11:41 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: An example of English at work as an auxlang...
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 04:45:35 -0500 |
29 lines |
Basta! (era: Comme entrer en Lingua Mundi sans payer?
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:22:41 -0500 |
61 lines |
Berendt: Why Did He Go To the Trouble?
|
Paul O. BARTLETT <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 22 Feb 2003 18:58:27 -0500 |
116 lines |
Re: Berendt: Why Did He Go To the Trouble?
|
Michael Farris <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 23 Feb 2003 20:07:09 +0100 |
60 lines |
Codification de Windows Sera Aperte al Governo de China
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:47:11 -0500 |
43 lines |
Comme entrer en Lingua Mundi sans payer?
|
pracrito <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:19:57 -0000 |
71 lines |
Comme entrer en Lingua Mundi sans payer? (il était: the future of Spanish).
|
pracrito <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:48:21 +0100 |
164 lines |
Re: Comme entrer en Lingua Mundi sans payer? (il était: the future of Spanish).
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:06:45 -0500 |
37 lines |
Conlangs conceived by Chinese people
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:31:31 -0500 |
18 lines |
Re: Conlangs conceived by Chinese people
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:03:44 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Conlangs conceived by Chinese people
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:34:11 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Conlangs conceived by Chinese people
|
Michael Farris <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:38:36 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: Conlangs conceived by Chinese people
|
Jacques DEHEE <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:31:37 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: Conlangs conceived by Chinese people
|
Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:42:30 -0800 |
46 lines |
Re: Conlangs conceived by Chinese people
|
Paul O. BARTLETT <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:30:42 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: Conlangs conceived by Chinese people
|
Paul O. BARTLETT <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:13:39 -0500 |
279 lines |
Re: Conlangs conceived by Chinese people
|
pracrito <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:59:12 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: Conlangs conceived by Chinese people
|
Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:57:07 -0800 |
61 lines |
Re: Conlangs conceived by Chinese people
|
pracrito <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 01:56:38 +0100 |
86 lines |
Re: Conlangs conceived by Chinese people
|
Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:50:39 -0800 |
63 lines |
Re: Conlangs conceived by Chinese people
|
pracrito <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 04:07:46 +0100 |
84 lines |
discussion group
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:53:24 -0500 |
17 lines |
Re: discussion group
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:29:12 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: discussion group
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 05:04:02 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: discussion group
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:26:52 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: discussion group
|
Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:56:22 -0800 |
66 lines |
Re: IAL project based on African languages?
|
Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:41:13 -0800 |
67 lines |
IAL project based on African languages? (Re[2]: [AUXLANG] Conlangs conceived by Chinese people)
|
Rodrigo Portela Sánchez <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 00:05:06 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: IAL project based on African languages? (Re[2]: [AUXLANG] Conlangs conceived by Chinese people)
|
Paul O. BARTLETT <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:34:54 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: IAL project based on African languages? (Re[2]: [AUXLANG] Conlangs conceived by Chinese people)
|
Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:50:03 -0600 |
39 lines |
Re: IAL project based on African languages? (Re[2]: [AUXLANG] Conlangs conceived by Chinese people)
|
Rex May - Baloo <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:04:44 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: IAL project based on African languages? (Re[2]: [AUXLANG] Conlangs conceived by Chinese people)
|
Rob H <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 17:24:12 -0800 |
41 lines |
Re: IAL project based on African languages? (Re[2]: [AUXLANG] Conlangs conceived by Chinese people)
|
Paul O. BARTLETT <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:28:10 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: IAL project based on African languages? (Re[2]: [AUXLANG] Conlangs conceived by Chinese people)
|
Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:07:36 -0600 |
60 lines |
Re: IAL project based on African languages? (Re[2]: [AUXLANG] Conlangs conceived by Chinese people)
|
Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:48:08 -0600 |
49 lines |
Re: IAL project based on African languages? (Re[2]: [AUXLANG] Conlangs conceived by Chinese people)
|
Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 21:00:09 -0600 |
60 lines |
Ido discussion lists
|
James Chandler <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:24:01 +0000 |
98 lines |
Re: Ido discussion lists
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:41:08 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Ido discussion lists
|
James Chandler <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 21:00:46 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: Ido discussion lists
|
Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:03:28 -0800 |
55 lines |
Interlingua and others (was: My present of conlangs
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:13:03 -0500 |
167 lines |
Re: Interlingua and others (was: My present of conlangs
|
Javier BF <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 02:08:54 +0100 |
218 lines |
Re: Interlingua and others (was: My present of conlangs
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 21:58:33 -0500 |
65 lines |
La pregunta del millón de dólares o de euros (era: Optimum conlang alphabet).
|
pracrito <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 01:43:24 +0100 |
502 lines |
Lingua Mundi still lives!
|
pracrito <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 23:27:09 +0100 |
199 lines |
Re: Lingua Mundi still lives!
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:42:51 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Lingua Mundi still lives!
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 21:21:13 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: Lingua Mundi still lives!
|
Rex May - Baloo <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:47:48 -0700 |
54 lines |
Re: Lingua Mundi still lives!
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 00:55:03 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: Lingua Mundi still lives!
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:04:54 +0100 |
51 lines |
My present of conlangs
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:44:35 -0500 |
141 lines |
Re: My present of conlangs
|
Javier BF <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:20:09 +0100 |
128 lines |
Re: My present of conlangs
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:07:33 +0100 |
127 lines |
Re: My present of conlangs
|
Donald J. Harlow <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 08:45:41 -0800 |
61 lines |
Re: My present of conlangs
|
Michael Farris <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 22:23:22 +0100 |
44 lines |
NEW INITIATIVES
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 23:52:45 -0500 |
19 lines |
nomail
|
Rob H <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:28:27 -0800 |
27 lines |
Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 05:18:48 -0500 |
17 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:57:42 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:08:19 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Michael Farris <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:44:38 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Donald J. Harlow <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:01:47 -0800 |
44 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Donald J. Harlow <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:08:27 -0800 |
60 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Rex May - Baloo <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:57:36 -0700 |
69 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Paul O. BARTLETT <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:36:32 -0500 |
58 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:27:04 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 18:54:16 -0600 |
41 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:47:30 -0800 |
57 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:23:01 -0600 |
44 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:31:45 -0600 |
38 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:28:07 -0800 |
43 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:29:26 -0800 |
55 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:24:02 -0600 |
43 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:40:35 -0600 |
41 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 18:40:17 -0800 |
58 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 18:45:12 -0800 |
60 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 21:37:27 -0600 |
38 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 21:38:32 -0600 |
38 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:54:11 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:49:22 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:24:53 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:23:10 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:48:50 +0100 |
71 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Rex May - Baloo <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 07:00:36 -0700 |
62 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:10:08 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:15:51 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:19:12 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:10:42 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:11:39 +0100 |
52 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Javier BF <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:53:51 +0100 |
66 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Javier BF <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:37:58 +0100 |
92 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
pracrito <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 01:20:04 +0100 |
146 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:05:18 -0600 |
75 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Paul O. BARTLETT <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:08:32 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:14:01 -0600 |
40 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:20:39 -0600 |
65 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Paul O. BARTLETT <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:31:59 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Javier BF <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 04:02:15 +0100 |
75 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Michael Farris <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:09:13 +0100 |
79 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 03:36:18 -0600 |
47 lines |
Re: Optimum conlang alphabet
|
Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:15:27 +0100 |
88 lines |
Preconceived Stagnation ( Re: the future of Spanish
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:01:06 -0500 |
56 lines |
RV: subjunctivo
|
Paideia Academia Europeana de la Education <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:07:28 +0100 |
278 lines |
Re: RV: subjunctivo
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 04:57:03 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: RV: subjunctivo
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:25:20 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: RV: subjunctivo
|
Paul O. BARTLETT <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:41:42 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: Sia
|
Paideia Academia Europeana de la Education <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:44:54 +0100 |
85 lines |
Re: Sia
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:53:07 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: Sia
|
Paideia Academia Europeana de la Education <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:16:03 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: Sia
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:35:32 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: Sia
|
Paideia Academia Europeana de la Education <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:36:24 +0100 |
40 lines |
Sia ( Re: RV: subjunctivo
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 08:20:09 -0500 |
37 lines |
SIMPATIA
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:47:00 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: SIMPATIA
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:28:25 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: SIMPATIA
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 08:15:52 -0500 |
81 lines |
Re: SIMPATIA
|
Paideia Academia Europeana de la Education <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:45:49 +0100 |
60 lines |
TECH (not the conlang): Unicode fonts (Re: Re: Optimum conlang alphabet)
|
Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 22:03:14 -0600 |
63 lines |
Thanks
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:30:51 -0500 |
19 lines |
the future of conlangs
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:24:05 -0500 |
74 lines |
the future of Spanish
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:12:13 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: the future of Spanish
|
Paul O. BARTLETT <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:39:23 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: the future of Spanish
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:44:44 -0500 |
96 lines |
Re: the future of Spanish
|
Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:56:44 -0800 |
68 lines |
Re: the future of Spanish
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 08:12:44 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: the future of Spanish
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:52:10 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: the future of Spanish
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:35:28 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: the future of Spanish
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:20:44 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: the future of Spanish
|
pracrito <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:18:40 +0100 |
632 lines |
Re: the future of Spanish
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:10:51 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: the future of Spanish
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:50:49 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: the future of Spanish
|
Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:19:23 -0800 |
60 lines |
the present of conlangs
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:00:20 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: the present of conlangs
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:37:27 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: the present of conlangs
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 16:30:06 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: the present of conlangs
|
Donald J. HARLOW <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:38:58 -0800 |
65 lines |
Re: the present of conlangs
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:18:26 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: the present of conlangs
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:21:08 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: the present of conlangs
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:05:54 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: the present of conlangs
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 02:33:39 -0500 |
86 lines |
Re: the present of conlangs
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:17:34 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: the present of conlangs
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:42:00 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: the present of conlangs
|
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:15:02 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: the present of conlangs
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 08:53:33 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: the present of conlangs
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:32:49 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: the present of conlangs
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:39:39 -0500 |
46 lines |
Un ration ( Re: Sia
|
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:51:16 -0500 |
45 lines |
Want to use Romanica
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:05:18 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Want to use Romanica
|
Paideia Academia Europeana de la Education <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 22:29:38 +0100 |
72 lines |
Re: Want to use Romanica
|
Paul O. BARTLETT <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:21:23 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: Want to use Romanica
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 08:26:03 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: Want to use Romanica
|
Paideia Academia Europeana de la Education <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:06:31 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Want to use Romanica
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:00:19 +0100 |
100 lines |
Re: Want to use Romanica
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:11:53 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: Want to use Romanica
|
Paideia Academia Europeana de la Education <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 01:19:32 +0100 |
105 lines |
Re: Want to use Romanica
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:36:08 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: Want to use Romanica
|
Paideia Academia Europeana de la Education <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:29:46 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: Want to use Romanica
|
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:30:24 +0100 |
44 lines |
