LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for TEI-L Archives


TEI-L Archives

TEI-L Archives


December 2007


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

<g> for standard but poorly-supported Unicode representation (5 messages)
<rendition> applicable to multiple documents (1 message)
A message from Master Foo (1 message)
Amendments to TEI-C Bylaws Approved (1 message)
Best way to encode bibliographic references in prose text? (10 messages)
Call for Nominations: TEI-C Council Chair (1 message)
CIDOC 2008 in Athens, The Digital Curation of Cultural Heritage (1 message)
Digitization Programmer position (1 message)
frequences (4 messages)
Ideas about cross-archival search and retrieval (2 messages)
Image Markup Tool 1.7 released (3 messages)
IT Manager – Digital Humanities Observa tory (DHO), Dublin, Ireland (1 message)
marking up words allegedly left out by printer (6 messages)
P5 --> Atom? (5 messages)
Pizza chef gone? (8 messages)
Positions: School of Library, Archival and Information Studies, UBC, Canada (1 message)
return to sender, return to list (was Re: [TEI-L] xmltex and TEI) (4 messages)
Stylesheets and bibliography (6 messages)
TEI in Russia? (2 messages)
Tool Developer's Survey (1 message)
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES: Martin and Bernard Breslauer Professorship in Bibliography (Vacancy) (2 messages)
What's the appropriate attribute for this? (40 messages)
XML 2007 (2 messages)
xmltex and TEI (9 messages)
XqUSEme - XQuery extension for Firefox (1 message)
[ANN] oXygen XML editor 9.1 with TEI P5 1.0 (1 message)
[Fwd: Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?] (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TEI-L Home

TEI-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

<g> for standard but poorly-supported Unicode representation

for standard but poorly-supported Unicode representation

Brett Zamir

Mon, 10 Dec 2007 06:51:25 +0800

28 lines

Re: for standard but poorly-supported Unicode representation

Conal Tuohy

Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:11:08 +1300

46 lines

Re: for standard but poorly-supported Unicode representation

Brett Zamir

Mon, 10 Dec 2007 07:57:13 +0800

140 lines

Re: for standard but poorly-supported Unicode representation

Lou Burnard

Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:40:27 +0000

164 lines

for standard but poorly-supported Unicode representation

Marcus Bingenheimer

Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:53:14 +0800

129 lines

New Thread

<rendition> applicable to multiple documents

Re: applicable to multiple documents

David Sewell

Sun, 2 Dec 2007 20:44:33 -0500

97 lines

New Thread

A message from Master Foo

A message from Master Foo

Lou Burnard

Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:33:02 +0000

11 lines

New Thread

Amendments to TEI-C Bylaws Approved

Amendments to TEI-C Bylaws Approved

Daniel O'Donnell

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:28:00 -0700

50 lines

New Thread

Best way to encode bibliographic references in prose text?

Best way to encode bibliographic references in prose text?

Markus Flatscher

Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:03:47 +0100

194 lines

Re: Best way to encode bibliographic references in prose text?

Conal Tuohy

Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:30:29 +1300

76 lines

Re: Best way to encode bibliographic references in prose text?

Ron Van den Branden

Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:39:42 +0100

27 lines

Re: Best way to encode bibliographic references in prose text?

Lou's Laptop

Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:16:28 +0000

38 lines

Re: Best way to encode bibliographic references in prose text?

Martin Holmes

Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:58:31 -0800

43 lines

Re: Best way to encode bibliographic references in prose text?

Lou Burnard

Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:24:23 +0000

27 lines

Re: Best way to encode bibliographic references in prose text?

Ron Van den Branden

Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:41:48 +0100

31 lines

Re: Best way to encode bibliographic references in prose text?

Martin Holmes

Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:52:22 -0800

44 lines

Re: Best way to encode bibliographic references in prose text?

Dot Porter

Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:59:52 -0500

69 lines

Re: Best way to encode bibliographic references in prose text?

Lou Burnard

Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:56:34 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

Call for Nominations: TEI-C Council Chair

Call for Nominations: TEI-C Council Chair

Daniel O'Donnell

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:27:29 -0700

56 lines

New Thread

CIDOC 2008 in Athens, The Digital Curation of Cultural Heritage

CIDOC 2008 in Athens, The Digital Curation of Cultural Heritage

Christian-Emil Ore

Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:15:27 +0100

160 lines

New Thread

Digitization Programmer position

Fwd: Digitization Programmer position

Dot Porter

Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:59:29 -0500

99 lines

New Thread

frequences

frequences

J-Luc Benoit

Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:06:30 +0100

18 lines

Re: frequences

Syd Bauman

Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:38:09 -0500

27 lines

Re: frequences

Lou's Laptop

Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:00:37 +0000

27 lines

Re: frequences

Janusz S. Bień

Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:19:57 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

Ideas about cross-archival search and retrieval

Ideas about cross-archival search and retrieval

Joe Wicentowski

Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:55:05 -0500

72 lines

Re: Ideas about cross-archival search and retrieval

Wright, Deborah K.

Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:17:00 -0500

219 lines

New Thread

Image Markup Tool 1.7 released

Image Markup Tool 1.7 released

Martin Holmes

Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:28:41 -0800

28 lines

Re: Image Markup Tool 1.7 released

Daniel O'Donnell

Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:07:41 -0700

40 lines

Re: Image Markup Tool 1.7 released

Martin Holmes

Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:27:20 -0800

54 lines

New Thread

IT Manager – Digital Humanities Observa tory (DHO), Dublin, Ireland

IT Manager – Digital Humanities Observa tory (DHO), Dublin, Ireland

Susan Schreibman

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:51:35 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

marking up words allegedly left out by printer

marking up words allegedly left out by printer

Ralf Stephan

Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:37:10 +0100

29 lines

Re: marking up words allegedly left out by printer

Peter Boot

Sun, 30 Dec 2007 13:12:52 +0100

42 lines

Re: marking up words allegedly left out by printer

Gabriel BODARD

Sun, 30 Dec 2007 12:36:54 +0000

46 lines

Re: marking up words allegedly left out by printer

Ralf Stephan

Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:25:45 +0100

35 lines

Re: marking up words allegedly left out by printer

Gabriel BODARD

Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:54:00 +0000

59 lines

Re: marking up words allegedly left out by printer

Ralf Stephan

Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:16:45 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

P5 --> Atom?

P5 --> Atom?

Daniel O'Donnell

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:46:53 -0700

29 lines

Re: P5 --> Atom?

Sebastian Rahtz

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:45:25 +0000

29 lines

Re: P5 --> Atom?

Sebastian Rahtz

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:29:52 +0000

26 lines

Re: P5 --> Atom?

Sebastian Rahtz

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:30:34 +0000

21 lines

Re: P5 --> Atom?

Daniel O'Donnell

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:58:51 -0700

44 lines

New Thread

Pizza chef gone?

Pizza chef gone?

Gabriel Bodard

Thu, 6 Dec 2007 12:46:33 +0000

34 lines

Re: Pizza chef gone?

Elena Pierazzo

Thu, 6 Dec 2007 15:08:59 +0000

125 lines

Re: Pizza chef gone?

Lou Burnard

Thu, 6 Dec 2007 15:57:58 +0000

60 lines

Re: Pizza chef gone?

Christine Ruotolo

Thu, 6 Dec 2007 10:54:19 -0500

68 lines

Re: Pizza chef gone?

Daniel O'Donnell

Thu, 6 Dec 2007 09:16:02 -0700

89 lines

Re: Pizza chef gone?

Gabriel Bodard

Thu, 6 Dec 2007 17:21:14 +0000

82 lines

Re: Pizza chef gone?

Sebastian Rahtz

Fri, 7 Dec 2007 13:08:23 +0000

19 lines

Re: Pizza chef gone?

Dan O'Donnell

Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:25:54 -0700

35 lines

New Thread

Positions: School of Library, Archival and Information Studies, UBC, Canada

Positions: School of Library, Archival and Information Studies, UBC, Canada

Randy Preston

Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:05:34 -0800

98 lines

New Thread

return to sender, return to list (was Re: [TEI-L] xmltex and TEI)

return to sender, return to list (was Re: [TEI-L] xmltex and TEI)

Syd Bauman

Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:35:42 -0500

55 lines

Re: return to sender, return to list (was Re: [TEI-L] xmltex and TEI)

Pablo Rodríguez

Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:00:38 +0100

47 lines

Re: return to sender, return to list (was Re: [TEI-L] xmltex and TEI)

Lou Burnard

Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:33:55 +0000

63 lines

Re: return to sender, return to list (was Re: [TEI-L] xmltex and TEI)

Linde Brocato

Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:06:42 -0600

62 lines

New Thread

Stylesheets and bibliography

Stylesheets and bibliography

Dubinsky Leonid

Sun, 2 Dec 2007 00:25:15 -0500

61 lines

Re: Stylesheets and bibliography

Markus Hoenicka

Sun, 2 Dec 2007 12:35:57 +0100

94 lines

Re: Stylesheets and bibliography

Sebastian Rahtz

Sun, 2 Dec 2007 13:19:58 +0000

87 lines

Re: Stylesheets and bibliography

Dubinsky Leonid

Sun, 2 Dec 2007 20:53:21 -0500

29 lines

Re: Stylesheets and bibliography

Dubinsky Leonid

Sun, 2 Dec 2007 23:06:52 -0500

81 lines

Re: Stylesheets and bibliography

Sebastian Rahtz

Mon, 3 Dec 2007 08:55:43 +0000

51 lines

New Thread

TEI in Russia?

TEI in Russia?

Gabriel Bodard

Thu, 6 Dec 2007 12:16:10 +0000

34 lines

Re: TEI in Russia?

Alexey LAVRENTEV

Thu, 6 Dec 2007 15:49:12 +0100

67 lines

New Thread

Tool Developer's Survey

Tool Developer's Survey

Susan Schreibman

Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:48:11 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES: Martin and Bernard Breslauer Professorship in Bibliography (Vacancy)

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES: Martin and Bernard Breslauer Professorship in Bibliography (Vacancy)

Daniel O'Donnell

Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:42:16 -0700

67 lines

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES: Martin and Bernard Breslauer Professorship in Bibliography (Vacancy)

Daniel O'Donnell

Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:39:13 -0700

54 lines

New Thread

What's the appropriate attribute for this?

What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Martin Holmes

Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:15:05 -0800

121 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Dot Porter

Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:13:32 -0500

155 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Lou Burnard

Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:18:54 +0000

163 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Martin Holmes

Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:54:58 -0800

208 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Conal Tuohy

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:52:34 +1300

93 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Arianna Ciula

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:58:47 +0000

172 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Lou Burnard

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:39:16 +0000

96 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Lou Burnard

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:47:53 +0000

46 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Arianna Ciula

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:21:48 +0000

49 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Lou Burnard

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:27:12 +0000

26 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Dot Porter

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:23:33 -0500

47 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Dot Porter

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:31:19 -0500

47 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Lou Burnard

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:01:55 +0000

44 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Lou Burnard

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:26:28 +0000

47 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Martin Holmes

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:44:44 -0800

136 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Martin Holmes

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:46:29 -0800

23 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Martin Holmes

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:49:36 -0800

28 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Martin Holmes

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:08:24 -0800

63 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Lou Burnard

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:15:16 +0000

101 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Martin Holmes

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:36:16 -0800

90 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Martin Holmes

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:53:30 -0800

158 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Dot Porter

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:44:18 -0500

85 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Martin Holmes

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:58:21 -0800

36 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Arianna Ciula

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:05:24 +0000

44 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Sebastian Rahtz

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:08:39 +0000

24 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

David Sewell

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:23:45 -0500

38 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Ron Van den Branden

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:59:05 +0100

27 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Martin Holmes

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:23:46 -0800

43 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Martin Holmes

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:26:13 -0800

48 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Martin Holmes

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:35:53 -0800

76 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Dot Porter

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:47:35 -0500

99 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Sebastian Rahtz

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:05:13 +0000

26 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Martin Holmes

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:39:52 -0800

101 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Conal Tuohy

Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:23:34 +1300

32 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Dot Porter

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:03:03 -0500

50 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Conal Tuohy

Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:35:23 +1300

111 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Conal Tuohy

Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:23:58 +1300

91 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

M. Alan Thomas II

Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:36:10 -0500

66 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Dot Porter

Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:04:46 -0500

142 lines

Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?

Martin Holmes

Fri, 21 Dec 2007 05:46:18 -0800

59 lines

New Thread

XML 2007

XML 2007

Hope Greenberg

Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:54:19 -0500

22 lines

Re: XML 2007

Wendell Piez

Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:32:30 -0500

90 lines

New Thread

xmltex and TEI

xmltex and TEI

Pablo Rodríguez

Thu, 6 Dec 2007 17:20:39 +0100

28 lines

Re: xmltex and TEI

Sebastian Rahtz

Thu, 6 Dec 2007 22:46:33 +0000

45 lines

Re: xmltex and TEI

Pablo Rodríguez

Sun, 9 Dec 2007 16:31:14 +0100

65 lines

Re: xmltex and TEI

Sebastian Rahtz

Sun, 9 Dec 2007 22:02:51 +0000

127 lines

Re: xmltex and TEI

Pablo Rodríguez

Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:26:44 +0100

78 lines

Re: xmltex and TEI

Sebastian Rahtz

Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:06:45 +0000

24 lines

Re: xmltex and TEI

Steffen Wolfrum

Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:52:44 +0100

33 lines

Re: xmltex and TEI

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:28:30 +0000

25 lines

Re: xmltex and TEI

Pablo Rodríguez

Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:50:17 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

XqUSEme - XQuery extension for Firefox

XqUSEme - XQuery extension for Firefox

Brett Zamir

Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:32:24 +0800

46 lines

New Thread

[ANN] oXygen XML editor 9.1 with TEI P5 1.0

[ANN] oXygen XML editor 9.1 with TEI P5 1.0

George Cristian Bina

Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:02:32 +0200

41 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?]

[Fwd: Re: What's the appropriate attribute for this?]

Lou Burnard

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:25:38 +0000

42 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager