|
|
|
|
Size
|
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:38:20 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:06:20 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:48:40 -0700 |
61 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:40:53 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:01:33 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:09:43 +0200 |
54 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:23:14 +0900 |
59 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:09:55 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Rex May <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:27:31 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:24:15 -0000 |
64 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:16:20 +0200 |
67 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:25:18 +0200 |
38 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:54:27 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Rex May <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:20:56 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:02:16 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:10:34 -0400 |
73 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:15:32 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:09:57 +1000 |
96 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Rex May <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:39:00 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:56:33 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:14:01 +0200 |
52 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:55:37 +0900 |
107 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:59:00 +0900 |
59 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
James Chandler <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:50:07 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:08:54 +0200 |
53 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:24:13 +0900 |
68 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:26:53 +0200 |
61 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:26:20 -0000 |
41 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:50:27 -0000 |
63 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:00:58 -0000 |
60 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:04:51 +0200 |
44 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:04:27 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Rex May <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:29:24 -0400 |
90 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:01:44 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:10:49 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:14:33 -0400 |
74 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:20:22 -0400 |
67 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Rex May <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:40:44 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:01:24 +0200 |
50 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:50:29 -0400 |
150 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:12:43 +0900 |
105 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:33:51 -0400 |
111 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:49:07 +0900 |
91 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
James Chandler <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:24:34 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:40:28 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:56:17 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:01:27 -0700 |
55 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:18:45 -0700 |
62 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:32:54 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:48:15 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:01:44 +0200 |
48 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:23:46 -0000 |
103 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:34:00 -0000 |
60 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:47:08 -0000 |
71 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:03:44 -0000 |
67 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:07:54 +0900 |
92 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:26:04 +0900 |
76 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:53:49 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:09:58 -0400 |
79 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:08:44 -0000 |
46 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:56:13 -0400 |
126 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:06:19 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:09:41 -0700 |
56 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:22:38 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Rex May <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:33:45 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Rex May <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:32:26 -0400 |
76 lines |
Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)
|
Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:57:00 +1000 |
126 lines |
Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)
|
Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:18:50 +1000 |
167 lines |
Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)
|
Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:45:40 +1000 |
160 lines |
Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:40:29 +0900 |
80 lines |
Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:46:48 +0900 |
73 lines |
Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:43:24 +0200 |
73 lines |
Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:53:21 +0200 |
78 lines |
Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:31:15 +0200 |
58 lines |
Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:00:29 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:06:52 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:17:46 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:22:45 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:39:20 -0700 |
64 lines |
Re: Another polysemy question
|
Risto Kupsala <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:21:17 +0300 |
50 lines |
Re: Another polysemy question
|
[log in to unmask] |
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:49:02 -0400 |
55 lines |
Re: Another polysemy question
|
Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:47:37 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: Another polysemy question
|
Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:03:02 -0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Another polysemy question
|
Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:38:24 -0000 |
59 lines |
Re: Another polysemy question
|
Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:16:15 +0100 |
49 lines |
Assimilation (< "Artificial" prejudice)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:19:26 -0400 |
70 lines |
Re: Assimilation (< "Artificial" prejudice)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:43:11 +0200 |
43 lines |
Re: Assimilation (< "Artificial" prejudice)
|
Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:55:04 -0000 |
57 lines |
Re: Assimilation (< "Artificial" prejudice)
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:32:45 +0900 |
80 lines |
Re: Assimilation (< "Artificial" prejudice)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:59:23 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: Assimilation (< "Artificial" prejudice)
|
Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:54:24 -0000 |
65 lines |
Re: Assimilation (< "Artificial" prejudice)
|
MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:05:14 +0900 |
73 lines |
Re: Assimilation (< "Artificial" prejudice)
|
Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:29:16 -0000 |
89 lines |
Re: Assimilation (< "Artificial" prejudice)
|
MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:57:48 +0900 |
76 lines |
English not even close to becoming the world's second language
|
MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:19:07 +0900 |
27 lines |
Re: English not even close to becoming the world's second language
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:24:24 +0200 |
47 lines |
Re: English not even close to becoming the world's second language
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:05:57 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: English not even close to becoming the world's second language
|
MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:14:31 +0900 |
48 lines |
Esperantaj Salutkartoj
|
Rex May <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:43:44 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: Esperantaj Salutkartoj
|
Rex May <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:21:23 -0400 |
28 lines |
Fwd: Re: Good arguments about the spelling reform issue
|
Leo Moser <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:20:39 -0400 |
106 lines |
Re: Fwd: Re: Good arguments about the spelling reform issue
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:17:32 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: Fwd: Re: Good arguments about the spelling reform issue
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:00:42 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: Good arguments about the spelling reform issue
|
Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:07:57 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: Good arguments about the spelling reform issue
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:27:54 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: Good arguments about the spelling reform issue
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 09:39:40 +0200 |
74 lines |
Re: Good arguments about the spelling reform issue
|
Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:18:32 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: La retirada del quechua como idi oma of icial de Ecu a d or molesta a los indígenas
|
Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:11:00 +0100 |
91 lines |
Re: La retirada del quechua como idi oma of icial de Ecu a d or molesta a los indígenas
|
[log in to unmask] |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:02:04 -0400 |
149 lines |
Re: La retirada del quechua como idi oma oficial de Ecu a d or molesta a los indígenas
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:43:02 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: La retirada del quechua como idi oma oficial de Ecu ad or molesta a los indígenas
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:10:34 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: La retirada del quechua como idi oma oficial de Ecuad or molesta a los indígenas
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:49:30 -0400 |
43 lines |
La retirada del quechua como idi oma oficial de Ecuador molesta a los indígenas
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:52:26 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: La retirada del quechua como idi oma oficial de Ecuador molesta a los indígenas
|
Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:41:48 +0100 |
32 lines |
Looking for Don Harlow's disabled link.
|
Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 06:16:47 -0400 |
34 lines |
OT: UN (< "Artificial" prejudice)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:06:59 -0400 |
49 lines |
OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:47:50 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:26:25 +0200 |
56 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:14:31 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:08:26 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:14:02 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:30:11 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:54:25 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:18:13 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:18:37 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 02:25:17 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:38:25 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:02:03 +0900 |
60 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:18:21 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:17:58 -0400 |
63 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:38:56 -0400 |
103 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:00:16 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:36:58 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:33:31 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:06:27 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Rex May <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:20:47 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:12:00 -0400 |
114 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Matthew Barnett <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 02:25:39 +0100 |
110 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:27:26 -0400 |
95 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:33:27 +0900 |
40 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:31:48 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:33:48 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:50:15 -0400 |
70 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Rex May <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:30:09 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:40:04 -0700 |
56 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:04:07 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:17:45 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:23:12 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:20:11 +0900 |
67 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:34:20 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:16:57 +0900 |
75 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:43:50 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:07:33 +0900 |
75 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:52:15 +0200 |
33 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:25:07 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:02:29 -0700 |
73 lines |
Re: Pragmatics [WAS Re: "one" vs. "a(n)"]
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:19:51 +0200 |
65 lines |
Re: Pragmatics [WAS Re: "one" vs. "a(n)"]
|
Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:30:54 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: Pragmatics [WAS Re: "one" vs. "a(n)"]
|
Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:59:16 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: Pragmatics [WAS Re: "one" vs. "a(n)"]
|
Franz Sledge <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:00:28 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: Pragmatics [WAS Re: "one" vs. "a(n)"]
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:54:18 +0200 |
48 lines |
Re: Pragmatics [WAS Re: "one" vs. "a(n)"]
|
Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:15:45 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Pragmatics [WAS Re: "one" vs. "a(n)"]
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:07:03 +0200 |
57 lines |
Re: Pragmatics [WAS Re: "one" vs. "a(n)"]
|
Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:33:06 +0100 |
67 lines |
Some more IAL Wikipedia stats
|
MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:04:42 +0900 |
133 lines |
Re: Some more IAL Wikipedia stats
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:14:40 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: Speed (< "Artificial" prejudice)
|
Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:15:17 +1000 |
249 lines |
Re: Speed (< "Artificial" prejudice)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:54:36 -0400 |
187 lines |
Tone (< "Artificial" prejudice)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:14:50 -0400 |
80 lines |
Re: Tone (< "Artificial" prejudice)
|
Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:07:02 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: Tone (< "Artificial" prejudice)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:52:27 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: UN < "Artificial" prejudice
|
James Chandler <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:19:49 -0700 |
26 lines |
UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:29:42 -0700 |
69 lines |
Re: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Rex May <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:34:48 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:28:20 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Rex May <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:43:57 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:51:07 -0400 |
87 lines |
Re: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Rex May <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:13:06 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:14:54 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:24:18 -0700 |
48 lines |
Re: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:30:51 +0900 |
63 lines |
Re: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:38:58 +0200 |
75 lines |
Re: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:42:54 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:52:25 -0400 |
55 lines |
Re: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:14:47 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:49:20 +0200 |
62 lines |
Re: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:21:26 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:17:29 +0200 |
57 lines |
Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?
|
Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:35:08 +1000 |
139 lines |
Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?
|
Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:52:25 +1000 |
159 lines |
Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:17:59 +0200 |
73 lines |
Re: Why does anyone learn Esperanto?
|
James Chandler <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 02:03:37 -0700 |
40 lines |
Why does anyone learn Esperanto?
|
Matthew Barnett <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:42:38 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: Why does anyone learn Esperanto?
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:03:47 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: Why does anyone learn Esperanto?
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:31:06 -0700 |
59 lines |
Re: Why does anyone learn Esperanto?
|
Antony Alexander <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:31:05 -0400 |
103 lines |
Re: Why does anyone learn Esperanto?
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:50:55 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: Why does anyone learn Esperanto?
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:11:10 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: Why does anyone learn Esperanto?
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:22:51 +0200 |
51 lines |
Re: Why does anyone learn Esperanto?
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:33:35 +0200 |
60 lines |
Re: Why does anyone learn Esperanto?
|
MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 18:11:36 +0900 |
38 lines |
Re: Why does anyone learn Esperanto?
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 09:42:06 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: Why does anyone learn Esperanto?
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:52:39 -0400 |
69 lines |
Re: Why does anyone learn Esperanto?
|
Rex May <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:52:06 -0400 |
21 lines |