|
|
|
|
Size
|
Re: 2 problems in both Romas
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:05:33 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: 2 problems in both Romas
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:31:26 +0000 |
32 lines |
usage
|
Joe Wicentowski |
Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:33:45 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: usage
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:00:40 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: usage
|
Laurent Romary |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:00:40 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: usage
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:56:43 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: usage
|
Laurent Romary |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:11:51 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: usage
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:21:01 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: usage
|
Laurent Romary |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:27:54 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: usage
|
Øyvind Eide |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:38:52 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: usage
|
Laurent Romary |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:51:52 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: usage
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:58:39 +0000 |
22 lines |
Re: usage
|
Syd Bauman |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:04:01 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: usage
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:15:37 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: usage
|
Syd Bauman |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:11:42 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: usage
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:21:02 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: usage
|
Syd Bauman |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:08:30 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: usage
|
James Cummings |
Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:06:23 +0000 |
63 lines |
@rend and CSS
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:09:04 -0800 |
33 lines |
Re: @rend and CSS
|
Lou Burnard |
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:58:12 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: @rend and CSS
|
David Sewell |
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:05:15 -0500 |
80 lines |
Re: @rend and CSS
|
Greg Murray |
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:22:49 -0600 |
43 lines |
Re: @rend and CSS
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:43:45 -0800 |
74 lines |
Re: @rend and CSS
|
Peter Boot |
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:20:00 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: @rend and CSS
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:42:11 -0800 |
72 lines |
Re: @rend and CSS
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:01:46 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: @rend and CSS
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:39:03 -0800 |
72 lines |
Re: @rend and CSS
|
Brett Zamir |
Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:14:37 +0800 |
82 lines |
Re: @rend and CSS
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:59:42 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: @rend and CSS
|
stuart yeates |
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:18:02 +1300 |
30 lines |
Re: @rend and CSS
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:29:25 -0800 |
73 lines |
Re: @rend and CSS
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:53:11 -0800 |
83 lines |
Re: @rend and CSS
|
stuart yeates |
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:29:49 +1300 |
78 lines |
Re: @rend and CSS
|
Martin Holmes |
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:14:09 -0800 |
83 lines |
@resp in
|
Dieter Köhler |
Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:36:04 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: @resp in
|
Syd Bauman |
Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:41:30 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: @resp in
|
Lou Burnard |
Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:47:58 +0000 |
61 lines |
adding an attribute class to att.global?
|
Efraim Feinstein |
Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:53:24 -0500 |
73 lines |
Re: adding an attribute class to att.global?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:35:08 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: adding an attribute class to att.global?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:35:14 +0000 |
34 lines |
Complex text versioning
|
Efraim Feinstein |
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:55:47 -0500 |
155 lines |
Digital Philology Conference in Verona, 15-6th January 2009
|
Roberto Rosselli Del Turco |
Wed, 7 Jan 2009 09:18:55 +0100 |
128 lines |
DRHA2009 - cfp
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:26:17 +0000 |
117 lines |
Encoding of a pre-existing critical apparatus
|
Marjorie Burghart |
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:22:43 +0100 |
189 lines |
Re: Encoding of a pre-existing critical apparatus
|
James Cummings |
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:18:38 +0000 |
123 lines |
Forme-work?
|
Robert Whalen |
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:14:22 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:29:51 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
Paul F. Schaffner |
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:36:48 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
Robert Whalen |
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:38:32 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
Syd Bauman |
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:15:58 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
Robert Whalen |
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:09:53 -0500 |
264 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:07:19 -0800 |
43 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
James Cummings |
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:32:04 +0000 |
59 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
Brett Zamir |
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:31:28 +0800 |
66 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:35:35 -0800 |
79 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
Lou Burnard |
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:37:32 +0000 |
21 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:41:58 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:44:31 -0800 |
38 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:17:33 -0800 |
96 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
Brett Zamir |
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:53:00 +0800 |
200 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:09:19 -0800 |
122 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
Brett Zamir |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:20:38 +0800 |
354 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
Martin Holmes |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:19:28 -0800 |
55 lines |
Re: Forme-work?
|
Brett Zamir |
Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:28:04 +0800 |
118 lines |
how to refer to categories from self defined taxonomies
|
LUX, Veronika |
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:38:10 +0100 |
312 lines |
include self-made module
|
Dieter Van Uytvanck |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:42:00 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: include self-made module
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:05:42 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: include self-made module
|
Dieter Van Uytvanck |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:20:03 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: include self-made module
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:10:24 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: include self-made module
|
Dieter Van Uytvanck |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:30:00 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: include self-made module
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:33:19 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: include self-made module
|
Laurent Romary |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:21:42 +0100 |
37 lines |
Interesting markup issue
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:17:32 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: Interesting markup issue
|
Syd Bauman |
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:12:25 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: Interesting markup issue
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:30:35 -0800 |
82 lines |
Re: Interesting markup issue
|
Syd Bauman |
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:58:38 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Interesting markup issue
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:00:50 -0800 |
49 lines |
Interrupted paragraphs
|
stuart yeates |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:57:59 +1300 |
39 lines |
Re: Interrupted paragraphs
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:58:33 +0000 |
37 lines |
Marking up erroneous page numbers
|
Martin Holmes |
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:14:39 -0800 |
38 lines |
Re: Marking up erroneous page numbers
|
Robert Whalen |
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:33:10 -0500 |
178 lines |
Re: Marking up erroneous page numbers
|
Amanda Gailey |
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:46:57 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: Marking up erroneous page numbers
|
John Carlson |
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:56:40 -0500 |
120 lines |
Re: Marking up erroneous page numbers
|
Martin Holmes |
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:22:59 -0800 |
93 lines |
Re: Marking up erroneous page numbers
|
Paul F. Schaffner |
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:44:09 -0500 |
77 lines |
Re: Marking up erroneous page numbers
|
Markus Flatscher |
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:48:43 -0500 |
188 lines |
Re: Marking up erroneous page numbers
|
Robert Whalen |
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:56:31 -0500 |
371 lines |
metricalizer
|
Klemens Bobenhausen |
Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:50:08 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: metricalizer
|
Daniel Paul O'Donnell |
Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:51:32 -0700 |
32 lines |
Omission in near() when used in mixed content
|
Stefan Majewski |
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:01:24 +0100 |
72 lines |
Re: Omission in near() when used in mixed content
|
Stefan Majewski |
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:06:07 +0100 |
17 lines |
position of figure in div
|
Martin Mueller |
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:34:36 -0600 |
42 lines |
Re: position of figure in div
|
Paul F. Schaffner |
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:23:20 -0500 |
97 lines |
Re: position of figure in div
|
Martin Mueller |
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:40:37 -0600 |
110 lines |
Problem understanding oXygen error message re schema language
|
Wright, Deborah K. |
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:54:22 -0500 |
121 lines |
Re: Problem understanding oXygen error message re schema language
|
Syd Bauman |
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:40:09 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: Problem understanding oXygen error message re schema language
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:42:37 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Problem understanding oXygen error message re schema language
|
George Cristian Bina |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:52:30 +0200 |
109 lines |
repetition in the description of @place
|
Dot Porter |
Tue, 6 Jan 2009 22:38:54 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: repetition in the description of @place
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:07:33 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: repetition in the description of @place
|
Syd Bauman |
Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:53:00 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: repetition in the description of @place
|
Lou Burnard |
Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:53:12 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: review of TEI Tite, a specification for encoding vendors
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:59:28 -0500 |
73 lines |
Roma: pdf documentation failed
|
Christiane Fritze |
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:03:21 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: Roma: pdf documentation failed
|
Laurent Romary |
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:30:57 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Roma: pdf documentation failed
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:02:18 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: Roma: pdf documentation failed
|
Christiane Fritze |
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:19:16 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Roma: pdf documentation failed
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:33:05 +0000 |
34 lines |
Serious problem on web Roma
|
Dot Porter |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:37:59 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: Serious problem on web Roma
|
Piotr Bański |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:50:44 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: Serious problem on web Roma
|
Dot Porter |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:56:03 +0000 |
91 lines |
Re: Serious problem on web Roma
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:15:48 +0000 |
21 lines |
Re: Serious problem on web Roma
|
Dot Porter |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:25:25 +0000 |
41 lines |
should decoNote be a member of model.noteLike?
|
Dot Porter |
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:38:54 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: should decoNote be a member of model.noteLike?
|
Lou's Laptop |
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:08:52 +0000 |
37 lines |
Sigla in manuscript description files
|
Tara Andrews |
Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:37:49 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: Sigla in manuscript description files
|
Dot Porter |
Thu, 1 Jan 2009 15:55:27 -0500 |
78 lines |
Re: Sigla in manuscript description files
|
Tara Andrews |
Thu, 1 Jan 2009 22:53:55 +0000 |
94 lines |
smart tei->html transform for addSpan?
|
stuart yeates |
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:57:58 +1300 |
44 lines |
Re: smart tei->html transform for addSpan?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:43:40 +0000 |
53 lines |
soft hyphens and other ignorable features
|
Martin Mueller |
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:19:26 -0600 |
49 lines |
Re: soft hyphens and other ignorable features
|
marie-luce.demonet |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:13:56 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: soft hyphens and other ignorable features
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:06:11 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: soft hyphens and other ignorable features
|
Wegstein |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:10:50 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: soft hyphens and other ignorable features
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:37:00 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: soft hyphens and other ignorable features
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:09:45 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: soft hyphens and other ignorable features
|
Paul F. Schaffner |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:48:19 -0500 |
97 lines |
Re: soft hyphens and other ignorable features
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:04:32 +0000 |
24 lines |
Spring School announcement on Digital Editions (in German)
|
Christiane Fritze |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:39:16 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: stand-off markup: tools and projects?
|
Ron Van Den Branden |
Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:30:56 -0500 |
39 lines |
SV: usage
|
Matthew James Driscoll |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:47:19 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: SV: usage
|
Lou Burnard |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:01:10 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: SV: usage
|
Syd Bauman |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:04:45 -0500 |
24 lines |
Synchronizing a TEI transcription to an audio recording
|
Greg Murray |
Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:09:33 -0600 |
29 lines |
Re: Synchronizing a TEI transcription to an audio recording
|
Bernd Moos |
Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:33:38 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: Synchronizing a TEI transcription to an audio recording
|
McAulay, Elizabeth |
Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:44:05 -0800 |
105 lines |
Re: Synchronizing a TEI transcription to an audio recording
|
Lou Burnard |
Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:42:52 +0000 |
148 lines |
Re: Synchronizing a TEI transcription to an audio recording
|
Bertrand Gaiffe |
Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:18:33 +0100 |
164 lines |
TEI and Fedora3 content models
|
Donald Moses |
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:54:02 -0400 |
81 lines |
TEI P5 release 1.3.0
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:18:38 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: TEI P5 release 1.3.0
|
Syd Bauman |
Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:24:40 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: TEI P5 release 1.3.0
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:56:30 +0000 |
35 lines |
use to encode explicit?
|
Dot Porter |
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:54:33 -0600 |
32 lines |
Re: use to encode explicit?
|
Amanda Gailey |
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:42:38 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: use to encode explicit?
|
Dot Porter |
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:44:04 -0600 |
68 lines |
Re: use to encode explicit?
|
Martin Mueller |
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:27:04 -0600 |
40 lines |
Re: use to encode explicit?
|
Lou Burnard |
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:31:48 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: use to encode explicit?
|
Paul F. Schaffner |
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:30:13 -0500 |
89 lines |
Re: use to encode explicit?
|
Lou Burnard |
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:57:13 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: use to encode explicit?
|
Torsten Schassan |
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:15:24 +0100 |
79 lines |
Re: use to encode explicit?
|
Dot Porter |
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:29:03 +0000 |
93 lines |
Re: use to encode explicit?
|
Lou Burnard |
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:38:27 +0000 |
92 lines |
Re: use to encode explicit?
|
Martin Mueller |
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:14:59 -0600 |
101 lines |
Re: use to encode explicit?
|
Lou Burnard |
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:23:23 +0000 |
112 lines |
Re: use to encode explicit?
|
John Tone Young |
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:57:50 +0000 |
145 lines |
Re: using
|
Paul F. Schaffner |
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:27:51 -0500 |
32 lines |
What elements should include att.declaring ?
|
Efraim Feinstein |
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:53:45 -0500 |
68 lines |
Re: What elements should include att.declaring ?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:52:45 +0000 |
22 lines |
Re: What elements should include att.declaring ?
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:02:29 +0000 |
22 lines |
Re: What elements should include att.declaring ?
|
Efraim Feinstein |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:47:06 -0500 |
24 lines |
witDetail, and punctuation in text criticism
|
Tara L Andrews |
Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:10:28 +0000 |
62 lines |
Re: witDetail, and punctuation in text criticism
|
Syd Bauman |
Sat, 3 Jan 2009 16:03:48 -0500 |
18 lines |
Re: witDetail, and punctuation in text criticism
|
Peter Boot |
Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:56:00 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: witDetail, and punctuation in text criticism
|
Tara Andrews |
Wed, 7 Jan 2009 20:22:47 +0000 |
198 lines |
Re: witDetail, and punctuation in text criticism
|
Stine Brenna Taugbøl |
Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:09:56 +0100 |
139 lines |
Workshop Announcement
|
Bill Walker |
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:49:42 -0600 |
267 lines |
Workshop Announcement
|
Bill Walker |
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:57:12 -0600 |
265 lines |