|
|
|
|
Size
|
Re: 三千汉字道, The Three Thousand Ha nz i Dao
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 13:56:18 -0700 |
61 lines |
Re: 三千汉字道, The Three Thousand Ha nz i Dao
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 26 May 2009 16:49:06 +0900 |
46 lines |
Re: 三千汉字道, The Three Thousand Ha nz i Dao
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 26 May 2009 09:25:55 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: 三千汉字道, The Three Thousand Ha nzi Dao
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 21:12:08 +0200 |
47 lines |
Re: 三千汉字道, The Three Thousand Hanzi Dao
|
Leo Ki <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 24 May 2009 13:14:20 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: 三千汉字道, The Three Thousand Hanzi Dao
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 13:28:02 +0900 |
52 lines |
Re: 三千汉字道, The Three Thousand Hanzi Dao
|
Leo Ki <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 09:14:35 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: 三千汉字道, The Three Thousand Hanzi Dao
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 09:47:51 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: "Conlanging: the not-so-secret vice", by Diana Slattery
|
Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 16:23:00 -0700 |
29 lines |
"Dat" and "wich"
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 26 May 2009 10:12:45 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: "Dat" and "wich"
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 26 May 2009 13:20:16 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: "Dat" and "wich"
|
Matthew Barnett <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 26 May 2009 18:56:00 +0100 |
64 lines |
Re: "Dat" and "wich"
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 26 May 2009 17:02:00 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: "Dat" and "wich"
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 26 May 2009 20:14:38 -0700 |
59 lines |
Re: "Dat" and "wich"
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 00:01:00 -0400 |
76 lines |
Re: "Dat" and "wich"
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 08:31:31 +0200 |
62 lines |
Re: "Dat" and "wich"
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 07:18:19 +0000 |
49 lines |
Re: "Dat" and "wich"
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 08:57:29 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: "Dat" and "wich"
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 10:57:08 -0700 |
43 lines |
1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 22 May 2009 15:15:04 +0900 |
31 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 22 May 2009 03:28:36 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 22 May 2009 09:25:10 -0700 |
74 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 22 May 2009 09:29:55 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 22 May 2009 13:51:19 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 22 May 2009 11:24:29 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 22 May 2009 15:42:01 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 22 May 2009 18:09:43 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 23 May 2009 07:16:54 +0200 |
42 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 22 May 2009 23:09:31 -0700 |
48 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 23 May 2009 03:11:58 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 23 May 2009 09:40:44 +0200 |
63 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
Risto Kupsala <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 23 May 2009 22:41:15 +0300 |
51 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 23 May 2009 16:18:37 -0400 |
61 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 23 May 2009 13:55:20 -0700 |
54 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 23 May 2009 18:04:22 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 23 May 2009 15:51:30 -0700 |
47 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
Risto Kupsala <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 24 May 2009 15:04:04 +0300 |
54 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 24 May 2009 14:45:09 +0200 |
38 lines |
Re: 1899 article: Volapuk has vanished.
|
Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 24 May 2009 18:11:16 -0400 |
53 lines |
A first chance to listen to Neo Patwa
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 26 May 2009 19:14:00 +0900 |
31 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
James Chandler <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 03:43:37 -0700 |
42 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
James Chandler <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 04:06:41 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 16:54:29 +0200 |
51 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 17:05:06 -0700 |
60 lines |
English - the world's IAL?
|
Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 26 May 2009 17:47:10 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 04:23:49 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
James Chandler <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 03:26:29 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 15:26:31 +0200 |
85 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 15:28:31 +0200 |
35 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 10:43:39 -0700 |
49 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 13:46:00 -0700 |
83 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 14:00:15 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 18:21:37 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 16:37:39 -0700 |
52 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 16:58:45 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 11:00:20 +0900 |
84 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 20:10:50 -0700 |
96 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 23:44:47 -0400 |
79 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 23:55:33 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 21:13:56 -0700 |
42 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 21:10:31 -0700 |
93 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 13:26:52 +0900 |
105 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 00:45:20 -0400 |
82 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 22:03:13 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 15:03:04 +0900 |
57 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 23:54:29 -0700 |
64 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 11:21:37 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Stephen L. Rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 09:20:43 -0700 |
85 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Stephen L. Rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 09:25:16 -0700 |
76 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 17:25:18 -0700 |
76 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 21:01:24 -0400 |
91 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 22:37:33 -0400 |
69 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 29 May 2009 11:45:42 +0900 |
49 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 23:19:31 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 20:33:47 -0700 |
54 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 20:40:41 -0700 |
142 lines |
Re: English - the world's IAL?
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 20:54:58 -0700 |
120 lines |
Re: Geocities to be killed this year?
|
James Chandler <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 23 May 2009 02:50:55 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Geocities to be killed this year?
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 23 May 2009 06:51:09 -0400 |
63 lines |
Geocities to be killed this year?
|
Bruce R. Gilson <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 22 May 2009 10:56:47 -0400 |
89 lines |
Re: Geocities to be killed this year?
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 22 May 2009 12:55:06 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: One examplary sentence in Esperanto
|
Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 17:08:04 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: One examplary sentence in Esperanto
|
Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 17:09:44 -0700 |
40 lines |
Re: One examplary sentence in Esperanto
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 19:24:33 -0700 |
45 lines |
Re: One examplary sentence in Esperanto
|
Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 20:29:13 -0700 |
32 lines |
One person's view of auxlangs
|
James Chandler <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 04:55:05 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: One person's view of auxlangs
|
Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 23:56:25 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: One person's view of auxlangs
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 09:47:46 +0200 |
41 lines |
Re: One person's view of auxlangs
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 16:49:18 +0900 |
42 lines |
Re: One person's view of auxlangs
|
James Chandler <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 04:09:49 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: One person's view of auxlangs
|
James Chandler <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 04:14:29 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: One person's view of auxlangs
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 17:02:00 +0200 |
52 lines |
Re: One person's view of auxlangs
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 09:51:16 -0700 |
46 lines |
Re: One person's view of auxlangs
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 10:04:07 -0700 |
51 lines |
Re: One person's view of auxlangs
|
Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 17:27:26 -0700 |
36 lines |
OT: What do YOU believe?
|
James Chandler <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 06:39:49 -0700 |
31 lines |
Qakwan
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 24 May 2009 20:22:26 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: Qakwan
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 24 May 2009 21:41:44 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: Qakwan
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 24 May 2009 22:17:38 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Qakwan
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 10:32:28 +0200 |
49 lines |
Re: Qakwan
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 07:55:41 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: Qakwan
|
Leo Ki <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 09:28:06 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: Qakwan
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 19:21:40 -0400 |
120 lines |
Re: Qakwan
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 19:53:23 -0400 |
70 lines |
Re: Qakwan
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 20:31:09 -0400 |
67 lines |
Re: Qakwan
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 20:55:39 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: Qakwan
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 26 May 2009 07:37:06 -0400 |
248 lines |
Re: Qakwan
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 26 May 2009 09:48:38 -0700 |
55 lines |
Re: Qakwan
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 26 May 2009 13:23:43 -0400 |
76 lines |
Re: Qakwan
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 26 May 2009 16:01:36 -0700 |
46 lines |
Re: Qakwan
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 26 May 2009 20:04:45 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: Qakwan
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 15:26:54 +0900 |
42 lines |
The months in komunikando
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 10:49:51 +0200 |
44 lines |
The new site I promised
|
Bruce R. Gilson <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 10:44:06 -0400 |
124 lines |
Re: The new site I promised
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 15:46:56 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: The Sambahsa thread
|
Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 21 May 2009 22:55:48 -0700 |
196 lines |
The Sambahsa thread
|
Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 23 May 2009 03:15:14 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: The Sambahsa thread
|
Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 13:40:30 -0400 |
26 lines |
Three
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 11:53:38 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Three
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 17:35:18 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Three
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 18:06:18 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: Three
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 16:41:17 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: Three
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 16:50:45 -0700 |
63 lines |
Re: Three
|
Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 20:09:29 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Three
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 27 May 2009 20:17:17 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: Three
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 01:01:06 -0400 |
78 lines |
Re: Three
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 10:03:37 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: Three
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 28 May 2009 09:40:02 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: Tones and Articles
|
Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 21 May 2009 22:47:15 -0700 |
234 lines |
Re: Tones and Articles (was: Re: The Sambahsa thread)
|
Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 21 May 2009 22:08:17 -0700 |
157 lines |
Will Machine Translation Render Us Obsolete
|
Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 23 May 2009 17:17:07 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Will Machine Translation Render Us Obsolete
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 23 May 2009 17:58:18 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: Will Machine Translation Render Us Obsolete
|
steve rice <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 23 May 2009 15:28:12 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: Will Machine Translation Render Us Obsolete
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 24 May 2009 08:26:35 +0200 |
65 lines |
Re: Will Machine Translation Render Us Obsolete
|
<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 24 May 2009 02:30:37 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: Will Machine Translation Render Us Obsolete
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 24 May 2009 09:10:13 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: Will Machine Translation Render Us Obsolete
|
Leo Ki <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 24 May 2009 05:22:04 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: Will Machine Translation Render Us Obsolete
|
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 13:24:40 +0900 |
54 lines |
Re: Will Machine Translation Render Us Obsolete
|
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 25 May 2009 11:00:07 +0200 |
69 lines |