LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for TEI-L Archives


TEI-L Archives

TEI-L Archives


February 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Ph.d. Diss" in <biblStruct> (4 messages)
2 Digital Humanities Jobs (1 message)
2010 DHO Summer School - Registration Now Open (1 message)
a choice problem (15 messages)
bibls examples and mappings (2 messages)
Brown University Center for Digital Scholarship (1 message)
bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?") (8 messages)
Call for Participation: XML for the Long Haul, 2 August 2010 Montreal (2 messages)
Call for Teaching and Learning Resources (2 messages)
Ducange schema (6 messages)
editor for large xml files? (20 messages)
First folio of Shakespeare (2 messages)
Index levels, P4 to P5 (3 messages)
Indicating the presence or absence of a feature (21 messages)
job offer: research assistant at the German Text Archive in Berlin, Germany (1 message)
Join Us to Plan a Service for Publishing TEI Documents (1 message)
lingGrp/@domains (6 messages)
linking between critical edition and witnesses (9 messages)
location of interpGrp (was Re: Quick question) (1 message)
Markup benefits [was: Subscriber benefits] (1 message)
maxOccurs, upper bound? (10 messages)
name vs. persName class memberships (3 messages)
on ODD def of enumerated attr vals (6 messages)
PDF of guidelines damaged (12 messages)
Position Opening: DHO IT Manager (1 message)
Postdoc Positions Available (1 message)
Quick question (1 message)
Roma using outdated tei-odds schema? (6 messages)
SV: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature (2 messages)
TEI Extension for Literary Analysis (1 message)
TEI members meeting 2010: call for proposals (1 message)
TEI members meeting 2010: call for workshop proposals (1 message)
TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release (14 messages)
use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) (5 messages)
Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode? (15 messages)
Zotero output 2 TEI (11 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TEI-L Home

TEI-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Ph.d. Diss" in <biblStruct>

"Ph.d. Diss" in

Charles Muller

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:32:53 +0900

46 lines

Re: "Ph.d. Diss" in

Martin Holmes

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:48:57 -0800

76 lines

Re: "Ph.d. Diss" in

Laurent Romary

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:56:03 +0100

102 lines

Re: "Ph.d. Diss" in

Kevin Hawkins

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:51:01 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

2 Digital Humanities Jobs

2 Digital Humanities Jobs

James Cummings

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:14:36 +0000

77 lines

New Thread

2010 DHO Summer School - Registration Now Open

2010 DHO Summer School - Registration Now Open

Susan Schreibman

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:10:02 +0000

179 lines

New Thread

a choice problem

a choice problem

Lou Burnard

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:02:51 +0000

91 lines

Re: a choice problem

Gabriel Bodard

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:59:56 +0000

121 lines

Re: a choice problem

Lou Burnard

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:18:49 +0000

118 lines

Re: a choice problem

Syd Bauman

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:51:28 -0500

48 lines

Re: a choice problem

Lou

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:59:26 +0000

64 lines

Re: a choice problem

O'Donnell, Dan

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:49:18 -0700

127 lines

Re: a choice problem

Martin Mueller

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:35:54 -0600

106 lines

Re: a choice problem

Lou

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:19:24 +0000

46 lines

Re: a choice problem

Lou

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:21:32 +0000

17 lines

Re: a choice problem

O'Donnell, Dan

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:42:02 -0700

43 lines

Re: a choice problem

Werner Wegstein

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:36:17 +0100

171 lines

Re: a choice problem

Martin Mueller

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:42:22 -0600

73 lines

Re: a choice problem

James Cummings

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:49:42 +0000

66 lines

Re: a choice problem

John Young

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:08:23 +0000

88 lines

Re: a choice problem

Brett Barney

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:12:02 -0600

186 lines

New Thread

bibls examples and mappings

bibls examples and mappings

stuart yeates

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:54:25 +1300

29 lines

Re: bibls examples and mappings

Kevin Hawkins

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:40:03 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

Brown University Center for Digital Scholarship

Brown University Center for Digital Scholarship

Julia Flanders

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:29:37 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

Syd Bauman

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:39:23 -0500

73 lines

Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

Sebastian Rahtz

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:29:40 +0000

42 lines

Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

John A. Walsh

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:15:33 -0500

50 lines

Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

Sebastian Rahtz

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:16:20 +0000

30 lines

Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

John A. Walsh

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:11:23 -0500

55 lines

Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

Syd Bauman

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:07:32 -0500

32 lines

Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

Syd Bauman

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:35:35 -0500

87 lines

Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

Sebastian Rahtz

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:09:07 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

Call for Participation: XML for the Long Haul, 2 August 2010 Montreal

FW: Call for Participation: XML for the Long Haul, 2 August 2010 Montreal

Kevin Hawkins

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:59:57 +0000

126 lines

Re: FW: Call for Participation: XML for the Long Haul, 2 August 2010 Montreal

Peter Flynn

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:01:11 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

Call for Teaching and Learning Resources

Re: Call for Teaching and Learning Resources

Florence Clavaud (Ecole nationale des Chartes)

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:32:00 +0100

84 lines

Call for Teaching and Learning Resources

Marcus Bingenheimer

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:02:12 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Ducange schema

Ducange schema

Lou

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:58:15 +0000

15 lines

Re: Ducange schema

Martin Holmes

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:20:39 -0800

31 lines

Re: Ducange schema

Croenen, Godfried

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:23:39 +0000

61 lines

Re: Ducange schema

Martin Holmes

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:27:07 -0800

27 lines

Re: Ducange schema

Paul Caton

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:38:10 -0800

52 lines

Re: Ducange schema

"Frédéric Glorieux (École nationale des chartes)"

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:52:34 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

editor for large xml files?

editor for large xml files?

Birnbaum, David J

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:33:01 -0500

19 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

George Cristian Bina

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:33:23 +0200

41 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Stuart Yeates

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:18:18 +1300

24 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Peter Flynn

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:51:00 +0000

28 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Stuart Yeates

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:07:07 +1300

19 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Richard MAHONEY

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:54:12 +1300

47 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Peter Flynn

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:24:12 +0000

27 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Peter Baker

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:39:06 -0500

28 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Richard MAHONEY

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:58:47 +1300

54 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Andreas Roehler

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:01:45 +0100

50 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

George Cristian Bina

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:02:33 +0200

63 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Andreas Roehler

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:03:22 +0100

38 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Stuart Yeates

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:08:42 +1300

22 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Andreas Roehler

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:47:20 +0100

58 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

James Cummings

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:15:03 +0000

43 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Timothy Lepczyk

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:36:02 -0600

34 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Stuart Yeates

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:28:48 +1300

23 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Charles Muller

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:16:34 +0900

49 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Andreas Roehler

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:27:51 +0100

67 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:25:28 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

First folio of Shakespeare

First folio of Shakespeare

Gary Hoffman

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:56:18 -0600

18 lines

Re: First folio of Shakespeare

James Cummings

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:53:18 +0000

55 lines

New Thread

Index levels, P4 to P5

Index levels, P4 to P5

Charles Muller

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 16:48:47 +0900

28 lines

Re: Index levels, P4 to P5

Sebastian Rahtz

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 11:47:41 +0000

38 lines

Re: Index levels, P4 to P5

Charles Muller

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:05:10 +0900

54 lines

New Thread

Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Matthew James Driscoll

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:06:39 +0100

288 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:32:16 +0000

30 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Birnbaum, David J

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:06:24 -0500

706 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Martin Holmes

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:03:17 -0800

90 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

James Cummings

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:08:57 +0000

52 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

stuart yeates

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:33:47 +1300

47 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Lou Burnard

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:56:32 +0000

34 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

John Young

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:11:10 +0000

28 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

stuart yeates

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:53:32 +1300

48 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Athanasios Velios

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:21:08 +0000

94 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Christian-Emil Ore

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:41:45 +0100

113 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Sebastian Rahtz

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:52:01 +0000

26 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Heiden Serge

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:19:55 +0100

87 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Martin Holmes

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 07:07:49 -0800

28 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Matthew James Driscoll

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:39:03 +0100

327 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Stuart Yeates

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:34:48 +1300

25 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Martin Holmes

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:03:33 -0800

26 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Laurent Romary

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:58:30 +0100

35 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Matthew James Driscoll

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:43:44 +0100

124 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Charles Muller

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:07:31 +0900

43 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Laurent Romary

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:56:42 +0100

103 lines

New Thread

job offer: research assistant at the German Text Archive in Berlin, Germany

job offer: research assistant at the German Text Archive in Berlin, Germany

Oliver Duntze

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:11:11 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

Join Us to Plan a Service for Publishing TEI Documents

Re: Join Us to Plan a Service for Publishing TEI Documents

Thomas Crombez

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:00:05 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

lingGrp/@domains

lingGrp/@domains

Tomaz Erjavec

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:33:50 +0100

44 lines

Re: lingGrp/@domains

Lou

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:36:37 +0000

46 lines

Re: lingGrp/@domains

Lou

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:52:29 +0000

58 lines

Re: lingGrp/@domains

Tomaz Erjavec

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:01:03 +0100

76 lines

Re: lingGrp/@domains

Syd Bauman

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:45:49 -0500

37 lines

Re: lingGrp/@domains

Lou Burnard

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:30:24 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

linking between critical edition and witnesses

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Kevin Hawkins

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:54:23 +0000

111 lines

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Lou Burnard

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:20:22 +0000

45 lines

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Christian Wittern

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:24:06 +0900

35 lines

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Kevin Hawkins

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:36:37 +0000

87 lines

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Piotr Bański

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:42:05 +0100

113 lines

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Kevin Hawkins

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:09:09 +0000

57 lines

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Laurent Romary

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:31:26 +0100

68 lines

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Kevin Hawkins

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:45:34 +0000

89 lines

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Christian-Emil Ore

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:40:17 +0100

116 lines

New Thread

location of interpGrp (was Re: Quick question)

location of interpGrp (was Re: Quick question)

Kevin Hawkins

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:19:18 +0000

78 lines

New Thread

Markup benefits [was: Subscriber benefits]

Re: Markup benefits [was: Subscriber benefits]

Wendell Piez

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:37:13 -0500

77 lines

New Thread

maxOccurs, upper bound?

maxOccurs, upper bound?

Julia Flanders

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:49:06 -0500

19 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

Syd Bauman

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:04:18 -0500

108 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

Sebastian Rahtz

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:39:45 +0000

28 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

Lou Burnard

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:48:04 +0000

29 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

Sebastian Rahtz

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:05:55 +0000

37 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

Julia Flanders

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:17:00 -0500

37 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

Sebastian Rahtz

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:06:13 +0000

53 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

James Cummings

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:48:49 +0000

70 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

Sebastian Rahtz

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:04:04 +0000

41 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

Syd Bauman

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:56:04 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

name vs. persName class memberships

name vs. persName class memberships

Markus Flatscher

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:09:07 -0500

67 lines

Re: name vs. persName class memberships

Martin Holmes

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:31:21 -0800

108 lines

Re: name vs. persName class memberships

Markus Flatscher

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:14:01 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Syd Bauman

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:12:52 -0500

249 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Lou Burnard

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:34:22 +0000

37 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

stuart yeates

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:19:22 +1300

45 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Syd Bauman

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:21:29 -0500

31 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Syd Bauman

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:36:39 -0500

61 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Sebastian Rahtz

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:39:40 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

PDF of guidelines damaged

PDF of guidelines damaged

Kevin Hawkins

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:47:29 +0000

14 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Sebastian Rahtz

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:01:08 +0000

27 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Sebastian Rahtz

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:28:12 +0000

31 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Pablo Rodríguez

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:55:37 +0100

62 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Sebastian Rahtz

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:50:05 +0000

37 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Pablo Rodríguez

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:52:28 +0100

51 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Piotr Bański

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:00:18 +0100

32 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Sebastian Rahtz

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:13:07 +0000

36 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Sebastian Rahtz

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:17:54 +0000

45 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Pablo Rodríguez

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:15:19 +0100

39 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Karl Eichwalder

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:47:16 +0100

34 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Sebastian Rahtz

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:24:46 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

Position Opening: DHO IT Manager

Position Opening: DHO IT Manager

Susan Schreibman

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:16:39 +0000

154 lines

New Thread

Postdoc Positions Available

Postdoc Positions Available

Susan Schreibman

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:08:41 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

Quick question

Re: Quick question

Espen S. Ore

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:28:25 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?

Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?

Julia Flanders

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:14:48 -0500

20 lines

Re: Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:59:49 +0000

34 lines

Re: Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?

Julia Flanders

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:21:27 -0500

39 lines

Re: Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:37:57 +0000

25 lines

Re: Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?

O'Donnell, Dan

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:13:27 -0700

50 lines

Re: Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?

Lou Burnard

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:03:59 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

SV: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

SV: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Matthew James Driscoll

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:59:48 +0100

43 lines

Re: SV: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Christian-Emil Ore

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:15:34 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

TEI Extension for Literary Analysis

TEI Extension for Literary Analysis

Mandell, Laura C. Dr.

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:31:15 -0500

189 lines

New Thread

TEI members meeting 2010: call for proposals

TEI members meeting 2010: call for proposals

Christian Wittern

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:28:25 +0900

129 lines

New Thread

TEI members meeting 2010: call for workshop proposals

TEI members meeting 2010: call for workshop proposals

Christian Wittern

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:33:16 +0900

82 lines

New Thread

TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:16:01 +0000

92 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Stuart Yeates

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:15:53 +1300

26 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:58:30 +0000

37 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

stuart yeates

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:28:07 +1300

36 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:35:07 +0000

28 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Ian Rons

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:33:38 -0500

15 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Pablo Rodríguez

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:27:06 +0100

31 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:20:13 +0000

28 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Ian Rons

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:31:48 -0500

22 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Ian Rons

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:49:39 -0500

14 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Dr. Herbert Wender

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 10:31:35 EST

71 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:43:13 +0000

30 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Pablo Rodríguez

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:09:14 +0100

39 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:15:36 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem)

use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem)

Kevin Hawkins

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:13:16 +0000

107 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem)

Lou

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:53:49 +0000

151 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem)

Martin Mueller

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:35:19 -0600

113 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem)

Kevin Hawkins

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:35:48 +0000

87 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem)

Kevin Hawkins

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:15:54 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

Joe Wicentowski

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:48:59 -0500

34 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

James Cummings

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:40:15 +0000

71 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

Gabriel Bodard

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:42:36 +0000

37 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

Syd Bauman

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:01:52 -0500

30 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

Espen S. Ore

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:09:37 +0100

32 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

George Cristian Bina

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:27:13 +0200

89 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

Martin Mueller

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:37:28 -0600

94 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

James Cummings

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:41:06 +0000

41 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

O'Donnell, Dan

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:14:06 -0700

79 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

John Young

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:49:37 +0000

107 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

George Cristian Bina

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:32:24 +0200

137 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

Wendell Piez

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:43:51 -0500

71 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

John Young

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:03:57 +0000

84 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

O'Donnell, Dan

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:34:16 -0700

109 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

George Cristian Bina

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:19:42 +0200

35 lines

New Thread

Zotero output 2 TEI

Zotero output 2 TEI

Paul Caton

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:18:24 -0800

32 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

Martin Holmes

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:56:54 -0800

45 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

stuart yeates

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:01:30 +1300

30 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

Sebastian Rahtz

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:45:42 +0000

30 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

Stuart Yeates

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:41:38 +1300

49 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

Paul Caton

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:12:28 -0800

138 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

Stuart Yeates

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:37:19 +1300

31 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

Peter Flynn

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:25:06 +0000

31 lines

Fwd: Zotero output 2 TEI

Greg Schofield

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:19:04 +0000

165 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

Kevin Hawkins

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:22:56 +0000

77 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

Stuart Yeates

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:03:23 +1300

27 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager