|
|
|
|
Size
|
"Ph.d. Diss" in
|
Charles Muller |
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:32:53 +0900 |
46 lines |
Re: "Ph.d. Diss" in
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:48:57 -0800 |
76 lines |
Re: "Ph.d. Diss" in
|
Laurent Romary |
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:56:03 +0100 |
102 lines |
Re: "Ph.d. Diss" in
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:51:01 +0000 |
41 lines |
2 Digital Humanities Jobs
|
James Cummings |
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:14:36 +0000 |
77 lines |
2010 DHO Summer School - Registration Now Open
|
Susan Schreibman |
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:10:02 +0000 |
179 lines |
a choice problem
|
Lou Burnard |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:02:51 +0000 |
91 lines |
Re: a choice problem
|
Gabriel Bodard |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:59:56 +0000 |
121 lines |
Re: a choice problem
|
Lou Burnard |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:18:49 +0000 |
118 lines |
Re: a choice problem
|
Syd Bauman |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:51:28 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: a choice problem
|
Lou |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:59:26 +0000 |
64 lines |
Re: a choice problem
|
O'Donnell, Dan |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:49:18 -0700 |
127 lines |
Re: a choice problem
|
Martin Mueller |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:35:54 -0600 |
106 lines |
Re: a choice problem
|
Lou |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:19:24 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: a choice problem
|
Lou |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:21:32 +0000 |
17 lines |
Re: a choice problem
|
O'Donnell, Dan |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:42:02 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: a choice problem
|
Werner Wegstein |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:36:17 +0100 |
171 lines |
Re: a choice problem
|
Martin Mueller |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:42:22 -0600 |
73 lines |
Re: a choice problem
|
James Cummings |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:49:42 +0000 |
66 lines |
Re: a choice problem
|
John Young |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:08:23 +0000 |
88 lines |
Re: a choice problem
|
Brett Barney |
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:12:02 -0600 |
186 lines |
bibls examples and mappings
|
stuart yeates |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:54:25 +1300 |
29 lines |
Re: bibls examples and mappings
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:40:03 +0000 |
44 lines |
Brown University Center for Digital Scholarship
|
Julia Flanders |
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:29:37 -0500 |
39 lines |
bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")
|
Syd Bauman |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:39:23 -0500 |
73 lines |
Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:29:40 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")
|
John A. Walsh |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:15:33 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:16:20 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")
|
John A. Walsh |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:11:23 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")
|
Syd Bauman |
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:07:32 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")
|
Syd Bauman |
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:35:35 -0500 |
87 lines |
Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:09:07 +0000 |
47 lines |
FW: Call for Participation: XML for the Long Haul, 2 August 2010 Montreal
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:59:57 +0000 |
126 lines |
Re: FW: Call for Participation: XML for the Long Haul, 2 August 2010 Montreal
|
Peter Flynn |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:01:11 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Call for Teaching and Learning Resources
|
Florence Clavaud (Ecole nationale des Chartes) |
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:32:00 +0100 |
84 lines |
Call for Teaching and Learning Resources
|
Marcus Bingenheimer |
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:02:12 +0100 |
41 lines |
Ducange schema
|
Lou |
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:58:15 +0000 |
15 lines |
Re: Ducange schema
|
Martin Holmes |
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:20:39 -0800 |
31 lines |
Re: Ducange schema
|
Croenen, Godfried |
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:23:39 +0000 |
61 lines |
Re: Ducange schema
|
Martin Holmes |
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:27:07 -0800 |
27 lines |
Re: Ducange schema
|
Paul Caton |
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:38:10 -0800 |
52 lines |
Re: Ducange schema
|
"Frédéric Glorieux (École nationale des chartes)" |
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:52:34 +0100 |
54 lines |
editor for large xml files?
|
Birnbaum, David J |
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:33:01 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
George Cristian Bina |
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:33:23 +0200 |
41 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
Stuart Yeates |
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:18:18 +1300 |
24 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
Peter Flynn |
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:51:00 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
Stuart Yeates |
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:07:07 +1300 |
19 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
Richard MAHONEY |
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:54:12 +1300 |
47 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
Peter Flynn |
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:24:12 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
Peter Baker |
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:39:06 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
Richard MAHONEY |
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:58:47 +1300 |
54 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
Andreas Roehler |
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:01:45 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
George Cristian Bina |
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:02:33 +0200 |
63 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
Andreas Roehler |
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:03:22 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
Stuart Yeates |
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:08:42 +1300 |
22 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
Andreas Roehler |
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:47:20 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
James Cummings |
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:15:03 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
Timothy Lepczyk |
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:36:02 -0600 |
34 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
Stuart Yeates |
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:28:48 +1300 |
23 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
Charles Muller |
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:16:34 +0900 |
49 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
Andreas Roehler |
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:27:51 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: editor for large xml files?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:25:28 +0000 |
29 lines |
First folio of Shakespeare
|
Gary Hoffman |
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:56:18 -0600 |
18 lines |
Re: First folio of Shakespeare
|
James Cummings |
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:53:18 +0000 |
55 lines |
Index levels, P4 to P5
|
Charles Muller |
Sun, 7 Feb 2010 16:48:47 +0900 |
28 lines |
Re: Index levels, P4 to P5
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 7 Feb 2010 11:47:41 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Index levels, P4 to P5
|
Charles Muller |
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:05:10 +0900 |
54 lines |
Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Matthew James Driscoll |
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:06:39 +0100 |
288 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:32:16 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Birnbaum, David J |
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:06:24 -0500 |
706 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:03:17 -0800 |
90 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
James Cummings |
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:08:57 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
stuart yeates |
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:33:47 +1300 |
47 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Lou Burnard |
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:56:32 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
John Young |
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:11:10 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
stuart yeates |
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:53:32 +1300 |
48 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Athanasios Velios |
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:21:08 +0000 |
94 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Christian-Emil Ore |
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:41:45 +0100 |
113 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:52:01 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Heiden Serge |
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:19:55 +0100 |
87 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Martin Holmes |
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 07:07:49 -0800 |
28 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Matthew James Driscoll |
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:39:03 +0100 |
327 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Stuart Yeates |
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:34:48 +1300 |
25 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Martin Holmes |
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:03:33 -0800 |
26 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Laurent Romary |
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:58:30 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Matthew James Driscoll |
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:43:44 +0100 |
124 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Charles Muller |
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:07:31 +0900 |
43 lines |
Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Laurent Romary |
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:56:42 +0100 |
103 lines |
job offer: research assistant at the German Text Archive in Berlin, Germany
|
Oliver Duntze |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:11:11 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: Join Us to Plan a Service for Publishing TEI Documents
|
Thomas Crombez |
Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:00:05 +0100 |
54 lines |
lingGrp/@domains
|
Tomaz Erjavec |
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:33:50 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: lingGrp/@domains
|
Lou |
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:36:37 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: lingGrp/@domains
|
Lou |
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:52:29 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: lingGrp/@domains
|
Tomaz Erjavec |
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:01:03 +0100 |
76 lines |
Re: lingGrp/@domains
|
Syd Bauman |
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:45:49 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: lingGrp/@domains
|
Lou Burnard |
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:30:24 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:54:23 +0000 |
111 lines |
Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses
|
Lou Burnard |
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:20:22 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses
|
Christian Wittern |
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:24:06 +0900 |
35 lines |
Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:36:37 +0000 |
87 lines |
Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses
|
Piotr Bański |
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:42:05 +0100 |
113 lines |
Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:09:09 +0000 |
57 lines |
Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses
|
Laurent Romary |
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:31:26 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:45:34 +0000 |
89 lines |
Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses
|
Christian-Emil Ore |
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:40:17 +0100 |
116 lines |
location of interpGrp (was Re: Quick question)
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:19:18 +0000 |
78 lines |
Re: Markup benefits [was: Subscriber benefits]
|
Wendell Piez |
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:37:13 -0500 |
77 lines |
maxOccurs, upper bound?
|
Julia Flanders |
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:49:06 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?
|
Syd Bauman |
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:04:18 -0500 |
108 lines |
Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:39:45 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?
|
Lou Burnard |
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:48:04 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:05:55 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?
|
Julia Flanders |
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:17:00 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:06:13 +0000 |
53 lines |
Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?
|
James Cummings |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:48:49 +0000 |
70 lines |
Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:04:04 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?
|
Syd Bauman |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:56:04 -0500 |
32 lines |
name vs. persName class memberships
|
Markus Flatscher |
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:09:07 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: name vs. persName class memberships
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:31:21 -0800 |
108 lines |
Re: name vs. persName class memberships
|
Markus Flatscher |
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:14:01 -0500 |
53 lines |
on ODD def of enumerated attr vals
|
Syd Bauman |
Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:12:52 -0500 |
249 lines |
Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals
|
Lou Burnard |
Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:34:22 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals
|
stuart yeates |
Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:19:22 +1300 |
45 lines |
Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals
|
Syd Bauman |
Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:21:29 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals
|
Syd Bauman |
Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:36:39 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:39:40 +0000 |
56 lines |
PDF of guidelines damaged
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:47:29 +0000 |
14 lines |
Re: PDF of guidelines damaged
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:01:08 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: PDF of guidelines damaged
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:28:12 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: PDF of guidelines damaged
|
Pablo Rodríguez |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:55:37 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: PDF of guidelines damaged
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:50:05 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: PDF of guidelines damaged
|
Pablo Rodríguez |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:52:28 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: PDF of guidelines damaged
|
Piotr Bański |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:00:18 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: PDF of guidelines damaged
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:13:07 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: PDF of guidelines damaged
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:17:54 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: PDF of guidelines damaged
|
Pablo Rodríguez |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:15:19 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: PDF of guidelines damaged
|
Karl Eichwalder |
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:47:16 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: PDF of guidelines damaged
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:24:46 +0000 |
28 lines |
Position Opening: DHO IT Manager
|
Susan Schreibman |
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:16:39 +0000 |
154 lines |
Postdoc Positions Available
|
Susan Schreibman |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:08:41 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: Quick question
|
Espen S. Ore |
Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:28:25 +0100 |
20 lines |
Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?
|
Julia Flanders |
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:14:48 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:59:49 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?
|
Julia Flanders |
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:21:27 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:37:57 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?
|
O'Donnell, Dan |
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:13:27 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?
|
Lou Burnard |
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:03:59 +0000 |
23 lines |
SV: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Matthew James Driscoll |
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:59:48 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: SV: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature
|
Christian-Emil Ore |
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:15:34 +0100 |
54 lines |
TEI Extension for Literary Analysis
|
Mandell, Laura C. Dr. |
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:31:15 -0500 |
189 lines |
TEI members meeting 2010: call for proposals
|
Christian Wittern |
Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:28:25 +0900 |
129 lines |
TEI members meeting 2010: call for workshop proposals
|
Christian Wittern |
Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:33:16 +0900 |
82 lines |
TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:16:01 +0000 |
92 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Stuart Yeates |
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:15:53 +1300 |
26 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:58:30 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
stuart yeates |
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:28:07 +1300 |
36 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:35:07 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Ian Rons |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:33:38 -0500 |
15 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Pablo Rodríguez |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:27:06 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:20:13 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Ian Rons |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:31:48 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Ian Rons |
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:49:39 -0500 |
14 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Dr. Herbert Wender |
Sun, 28 Feb 2010 10:31:35 EST |
71 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:43:13 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Pablo Rodríguez |
Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:09:14 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:15:36 +0000 |
28 lines |
use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem)
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:13:16 +0000 |
107 lines |
Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem)
|
Lou |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:53:49 +0000 |
151 lines |
Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem)
|
Martin Mueller |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:35:19 -0600 |
113 lines |
Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem)
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:35:48 +0000 |
87 lines |
Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem)
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:15:54 +0000 |
32 lines |
Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?
|
Joe Wicentowski |
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:48:59 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?
|
James Cummings |
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:40:15 +0000 |
71 lines |
Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?
|
Gabriel Bodard |
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:42:36 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?
|
Syd Bauman |
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:01:52 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?
|
Espen S. Ore |
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:09:37 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?
|
George Cristian Bina |
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:27:13 +0200 |
89 lines |
Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?
|
Martin Mueller |
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:37:28 -0600 |
94 lines |
Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?
|
James Cummings |
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:41:06 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?
|
O'Donnell, Dan |
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:14:06 -0700 |
79 lines |
Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?
|
John Young |
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:49:37 +0000 |
107 lines |
Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?
|
George Cristian Bina |
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:32:24 +0200 |
137 lines |
Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?
|
Wendell Piez |
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:43:51 -0500 |
71 lines |
Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?
|
John Young |
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:03:57 +0000 |
84 lines |
Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?
|
O'Donnell, Dan |
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:34:16 -0700 |
109 lines |
Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?
|
George Cristian Bina |
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:19:42 +0200 |
35 lines |
Zotero output 2 TEI
|
Paul Caton |
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:18:24 -0800 |
32 lines |
Re: Zotero output 2 TEI
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:56:54 -0800 |
45 lines |
Re: Zotero output 2 TEI
|
stuart yeates |
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:01:30 +1300 |
30 lines |
Re: Zotero output 2 TEI
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:45:42 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: Zotero output 2 TEI
|
Stuart Yeates |
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:41:38 +1300 |
49 lines |
Re: Zotero output 2 TEI
|
Paul Caton |
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:12:28 -0800 |
138 lines |
Re: Zotero output 2 TEI
|
Stuart Yeates |
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:37:19 +1300 |
31 lines |
Re: Zotero output 2 TEI
|
Peter Flynn |
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:25:06 +0000 |
31 lines |
Fwd: Zotero output 2 TEI
|
Greg Schofield |
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:19:04 +0000 |
165 lines |
Re: Zotero output 2 TEI
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:22:56 +0000 |
77 lines |
Re: Zotero output 2 TEI
|
Stuart Yeates |
Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:03:23 +1300 |
27 lines |