|
|
|
|
Size
|
Re: "Ph.d. Diss" in
|
Kent W Hooper |
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:19:25 -0800 |
59 lines |
'TEI' as group of scholars vs. guidelines vs. organization (was Re: New article on TEI)
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:06:30 +0000 |
15 lines |
Re: 'TEI' as group of scholars vs. guidelines vs. organization (was Re: New article on TEI)
|
Lou |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:11:05 +0000 |
22 lines |
Re: 'TEI' as group of scholars vs. guidelines vs. organization (was Re: New article on TEI)
|
James Cummings |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:11:41 +0000 |
54 lines |
and - word-for-word-approach?
|
Gabriel Viehhauser |
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:03:56 +0100 |
120 lines |
Annoucement: LREC tutorial
|
Laurent Romary |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:57:29 +0100 |
412 lines |
application/tei+xml
|
Sigfrid Lundberg |
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:16:13 +0100 |
19 lines |
Re: application/tei+xml
|
Piotr Bański |
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:14:47 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: application/tei+xml
|
David Sewell |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:28:14 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: application/tei+xml
|
stuart yeates |
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:58:46 +1300 |
40 lines |
application/tei+xml redux
|
Brett Zamir |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:36:51 +0800 |
135 lines |
Re: application/tei+xml redux
|
David Sewell |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:26:32 -0500 |
77 lines |
Balisage student support awards
|
Wendell Piez |
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:36:23 -0400 |
123 lines |
Best place to put ?
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:17:34 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Laurent Romary |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:40:12 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:11:05 -0700 |
72 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Laurent Romary |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:25:48 +0100 |
81 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:30:50 -0700 |
105 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Piotr Bański |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:46:08 +0100 |
107 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
pboot |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:47:53 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Croenen, Godfried |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:10:52 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Laurent Romary |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:17:45 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Peter Boot |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:42:04 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Croenen, Godfried |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:43:44 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Torsten Schassan |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:09:13 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Piotr Bański |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:19:04 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Lou Burnard |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:47:41 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:01:19 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:15:06 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Piotr Bański |
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:35:10 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Martin Holmes |
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:38:00 -0700 |
77 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:08:46 +0000 |
60 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Piotr Bański |
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:07:54 +0100 |
82 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
James Cummings |
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:29:56 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Martin Holmes |
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:39:10 -0700 |
58 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Piotr Bański |
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:52:36 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Piotr Bański |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:12:36 +0200 |
27 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Martin Holmes |
Sun, 28 Mar 2010 21:04:48 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Peter Boot |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:39:44 +0200 |
31 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Martin Holmes |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 05:30:03 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Peter Boot |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:26:19 +0200 |
21 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Dot Porter |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:37:18 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: Best place to put ?
|
Peter Boot |
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:46:19 +0200 |
39 lines |
Corpora of Tribunal documents?
|
stuart yeates |
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:11:46 +1300 |
35 lines |
Dead links on ODD wikiepdia page
|
stuart yeates |
Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:41:21 +1300 |
23 lines |
declare formula notation TeX ?
|
Steffen Wolfrum |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:26:08 +0100 |
25 lines |
DH2010 registration
|
Spence, Paul |
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:38:31 +0000 |
29 lines |
discussion about specific element inclusion in a TEI ODD
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:10:43 +0000 |
24 lines |
Discussion about TEI ODD
|
Lou |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 17:31:00 +0000 |
44 lines |
DRHA 2010 reminder
|
Lou |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:41:28 +0000 |
18 lines |
DRHA Submission Deadline Extended
|
Lou Burnard |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:29:16 +0100 |
138 lines |
Empty space for initial in an MS
|
Gábor Tóth |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:49:35 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: Empty space for initial in an MS
|
John Young |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:07:09 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Empty space for initial in an MS
|
James Cummings |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:08:43 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: Empty space for initial in an MS
|
Gábor Tóth |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:33:34 +0000 |
75 lines |
Re: Empty space for initial in an MS
|
John Young |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:26:09 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: Empty space for initial in an MS
|
Matthew James Driscoll |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:39:56 +0100 |
163 lines |
Re: Empty space for initial in an MS
|
Notis Toufexis |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:24:43 +0100 |
191 lines |
Re: Empty space for initial in an MS
|
Lou Burnard |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:29:09 +0000 |
209 lines |
Re: Empty space for initial in an MS
|
Notis Toufexis |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:47:57 +0100 |
596 lines |
Re: Empty space for initial in an MS
|
John Young |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:15:11 +0000 |
312 lines |
Re: Empty space for initial in an MS
|
Dr. Herbert Wender |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:19:25 EDT |
133 lines |
Empty space for initial in an MS
|
Marcus Bingenheimer |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:07:38 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: Empty space for initial in an MS
|
Dr. Herbert Wender |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:53:58 EDT |
133 lines |
encoding annotations
|
Stine Brenna Taugbøl |
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:42:18 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: encoding annotations
|
Laurent Romary |
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:59:28 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: encoding annotations
|
Piotr Bański |
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:17:31 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: encoding annotations
|
Lou |
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:45:40 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: encoding annotations
|
Stine Brenna Taugbøl |
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:25:49 +0100 |
53 lines |
http://www.tei-c.org.uk/ dead?
|
Stuart Yeates |
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:08:33 +1300 |
16 lines |
Re: http://www.tei-c.org.uk/ dead?
|
Lou Burnard |
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:02:02 +0000 |
18 lines |
hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Lou |
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:23:22 +0000 |
142 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Paul F. Schaffner |
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:55:49 -0400 |
217 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Croenen, Godfried |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:45:08 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Lou |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:11:12 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Croenen, Godfried |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:14:01 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Lou |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:19:36 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Croenen, Godfried |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:23:11 +0000 |
60 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Croenen, Godfried |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:28:37 +0000 |
60 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Lou |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:31:02 +0000 |
81 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Lou |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:10:21 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Croenen, Godfried |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:15:12 +0000 |
21 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Croenen, Godfried |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:23:09 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Croenen, Godfried |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:25:44 +0000 |
74 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
John Young |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:00:10 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Laurent Romary |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:17:43 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Croenen, Godfried |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:06:54 +0000 |
66 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Gabriel Bodard |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:32:49 +0000 |
63 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Croenen, Godfried |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:44:50 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Lou |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:54:09 +0000 |
55 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Croenen, Godfried |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:04:59 +0000 |
78 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Lou Burnard |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:35:21 +0000 |
79 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Paul F. Schaffner |
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:38:02 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Lou |
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:50:41 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Elena Pierazzo |
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:05:43 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals
|
Martin Mueller |
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:21:38 -0500 |
77 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals: Dutch rules
|
Croenen, Godfried |
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:54:29 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: hyphenation (again) proposals: Dutch rules
|
Lou |
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:16:34 +0000 |
39 lines |
Internet draft revised
|
Sigfrid Lundberg |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:46:04 +0200 |
17 lines |
Re: Internet draft revised
|
stuart yeates |
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:40:51 +1300 |
48 lines |
Re: Internet draft revised
|
Lou Burnard |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:17:07 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Internet draft revised
|
Piotr Bański |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:07:16 +0200 |
55 lines |
Re: Internet draft revised
|
Lou Burnard |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:27:39 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: Internet draft revised
|
Piotr Bański |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:38:32 +0200 |
22 lines |
Re: Internet draft revised
|
Lou Burnard |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:47:28 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: Internet draft revised
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:08:06 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Internet draft revised
|
stuart yeates |
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:31:46 +1300 |
40 lines |
Re: Internet draft revised
|
Brett Zamir |
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:23:19 +0800 |
96 lines |
Re: Internet draft revised
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:16:58 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: Internet draft revised
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:34:00 -0700 |
38 lines |
last call for participation, TEI institute on manuscript materials
|
Julia Flanders |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:26:05 -0500 |
55 lines |
levels of abstraction of text
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:34:10 +0000 |
71 lines |
Re: levels of abstraction of text
|
stuart yeates |
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:35:43 +1300 |
71 lines |
Re: levels of abstraction of text
|
Michelle Dalmau |
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:55:19 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: levels of abstraction of text
|
Elizabeth McAulay |
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:12:48 -0700 |
101 lines |
Re: levels of abstraction of text
|
Patrick Sahle |
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:14:20 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: levels of abstraction of text
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:10:54 +0000 |
57 lines |
Re: levels of abstraction of text
|
stuart yeates |
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:44:01 +1300 |
30 lines |
Re: levels of abstraction of text
|
Lou Burnard |
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:28:09 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: levels of abstraction of text
|
Richard Light |
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:09:20 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: levels of abstraction of text
|
stuart yeates |
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:22:42 +1300 |
43 lines |
Re: levels of abstraction of text
|
Richard Light |
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:03:08 +0000 |
54 lines |
Re: levels of abstraction of text
|
Christian-Emil Ore |
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:19:42 +0100 |
120 lines |
Re: levels of abstraction of text
|
Patrick Sahle |
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:27:57 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: levels of abstraction of text
|
stuart yeates |
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:28:58 +1300 |
69 lines |
Ligatus Summer School 2010
|
Athanasios Velios |
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:20:22 +0000 |
179 lines |
Re: lingGrp/@domains
|
Piotr Bański |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:40:31 +0100 |
91 lines |
Re: linguistically annotated corpora in TEI
|
Piotr Bański |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:02:47 +0100 |
22 lines |
linguistically annotated corpora in TEI (was: project listings at tei-c)
|
Piotr Bański |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:01:43 +0100 |
79 lines |
Re: linguistically annotated corpora in TEI (was: project listings at tei-c)
|
Martin Mueller |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:45:53 -0500 |
93 lines |
Re: linguistically annotated corpora in TEI (was: project listings at tei-c)
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:52:35 +0000 |
32 lines |
[log in to unmask]
|
Piotr Bański |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:40:37 +0100 |
17 lines |
Re: [log in to unmask]
|
David Sewell |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:03:37 -0500 |
43 lines |
More on Soft Hyphen U+00AD
|
Deborah W. Anderson |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:54:10 -0800 |
70 lines |
Re: More on Soft Hyphen U+00AD
|
Lou Burnard |
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:59:15 +0000 |
29 lines |
New article on TEI
|
Edward Vanhoutte |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 08:43:50 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: New article on TEI
|
Dr. Herbert Wender |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 05:48:35 EST |
70 lines |
FW: New W3C Working Draft: for Bidi in HTML
|
Deborah W. Anderson |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:53:06 -0800 |
52 lines |
ODD - Adding an attribute from a foreign namespace (and defined in an external XSD)
|
Maik Stührenberg |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:42:48 +0100 |
111 lines |
Re: ODD - Adding an attribute from a foreign namespace (and defined in an external XSD)
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:37:34 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: ODD - Adding an attribute from a foreign namespace (and defined in an external XSD)
|
Maik Stührenberg |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:38:56 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: ODD - Adding an attribute from a foreign namespace (and defined in an external XSD)
|
Lou Burnard |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:01:19 +0000 |
65 lines |
Re: ODD - Adding an attribute from a foreign namespace (and defined in an external XSD)
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:06:05 -0800 |
64 lines |
Re: ODD - Adding an attribute from a foreign namespace (and defined in an external XSD)
|
Maik Stührenberg |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:04:36 +0100 |
108 lines |
ODD and combine attribute
|
Desenclos Camille |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:40:19 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: ODD and combine attribute
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:12:10 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: ODD and combine attribute
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:01:51 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals
|
Ian Rons |
Mon, 1 Mar 2010 08:24:32 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals
|
Syd Bauman |
Mon, 1 Mar 2010 22:13:13 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:36:16 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:50:18 +0000 |
65 lines |
Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:55:22 +0000 |
82 lines |
Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals
|
Wendell Piez |
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 11:31:00 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: Programmers and documentation
|
James Cummings |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:11:51 +0000 |
56 lines |
Re: Programmers and documentation (was: TEI as format for teaching materials?)
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 20:25:08 -0800 |
58 lines |
Re: Programmers and documentation (was: TEI as format for teaching materials?)
|
Stuart Yeates |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 20:29:39 +1300 |
31 lines |
Re: Programmers and documentation (was: TEI as format for teaching materials?)
|
Notis Toufexis |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:55:53 +0100 |
110 lines |
project listings at tei-c
|
Piotr Bański |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:52:39 +0100 |
71 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
Elizabeth McAulay |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:34:40 -0700 |
86 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:12:26 -0700 |
109 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
Elizabeth McAulay |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:26:56 -0700 |
110 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
O'Donnell, Dan |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:46:37 -0600 |
137 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
Dot Porter |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:47:57 -0400 |
129 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
Ondine LeBlanc |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:54:08 -0400 |
136 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
Gabriel Bodard |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:05:07 +0000 |
147 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:15:47 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
David Sewell |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:22:28 -0400 |
170 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
Piotr Bański |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:25:43 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
Martin Mueller |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:00:04 -0500 |
99 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
Gabriel Bodard |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:23:05 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
stuart yeates |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:58:11 +1300 |
35 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
Piotr Bański |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:46:40 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:44:04 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
Martin Mueller |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:44:32 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
stuart yeates |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:07:07 +1300 |
33 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
Elizabeth McAulay |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:53:27 -0700 |
90 lines |
Re: project listings at tei-c
|
Dot Porter |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:46:27 -0400 |
113 lines |
Recognizing TEI, xmlns, P4 vs P5 and the injection of executable XML
|
Sigfrid Lundberg |
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:43:35 +0200 |
44 lines |
Re: Recognizing TEI, xmlns, P4 vs P5 and the injection of executable XML
|
stuart yeates |
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 07:42:39 +1300 |
29 lines |
Re: Recognizing TEI, xmlns, P4 vs P5 and the injection of executable XML
|
stuart yeates |
Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:35:05 +1300 |
39 lines |
Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header
|
Michelle Dalmau |
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:50:20 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header
|
Jarom McDonald |
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:47:49 -0700 |
63 lines |
Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header
|
Lou |
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:28:34 +0000 |
91 lines |
Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header
|
stuart yeates |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 07:47:40 +1300 |
49 lines |
Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header
|
Richard Light |
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:08:13 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header
|
stuart yeates |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 08:08:19 +1300 |
53 lines |
Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header
|
Michelle Dalmau |
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:01:12 -0500 |
71 lines |
Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:06:23 +0000 |
83 lines |
Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header
|
Laurent Romary |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:24:33 +0100 |
278 lines |
Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:56:07 +0000 |
18 lines |
Reminder: Balisage papers due April 16
|
B Tommie Usdin |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:15:23 -0400 |
35 lines |
Roma error on attribute change
|
Christiane Fritze |
Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:40:06 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Roma error on attribute change
|
Ian Rons |
Mon, 1 Mar 2010 09:47:56 -0500 |
15 lines |
Roma on Ubuntu
|
Ian Rons |
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:23:46 -0500 |
31 lines |
Roma problem
|
Torsten Schassan |
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:18:57 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: Roma problem
|
James Cummings |
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:09:14 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Roma problem
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:05:40 +0000 |
40 lines |
Some dimensions of polygone discourse
|
Dr. Herbert Wender |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:27:54 EDT |
384 lines |
Some fun with client-side XQuery
|
Brett Zamir |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:44:21 +0800 |
79 lines |
Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery
|
Piotr Bański |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:55:16 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery
|
James Cummings |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:55:22 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery
|
Piotr Bański |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:22:57 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery
|
Brett Zamir |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:08:41 +0800 |
79 lines |
Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery
|
James Cummings |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:59:41 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery
|
Brett Zamir |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:26:08 +0800 |
303 lines |
Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery
|
Brett Zamir |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:42:10 +0800 |
46 lines |
SV: and - word-for-word-approach?
|
Matthew James Driscoll |
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:05:35 +0100 |
304 lines |
Re: SV: and - word-for-word-approach?
|
Gabriel Viehhauser |
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:57:21 +0100 |
225 lines |
Re: SV: and - word-for-word-approach?
|
Peter Boot |
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:11:41 +0100 |
103 lines |
SV: application/tei+xml
|
Sigfrid Lundberg |
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:01:34 +0100 |
79 lines |
SV: application/tei+xml
|
Sigfrid Lundberg |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:34:30 +0200 |
100 lines |
SVN (was: What happened to dicteg?)
|
Piotr Bański |
Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:05:11 +0100 |
56 lines |
Symposium on TEI and Scholarly Publishing * Dublin, Ireland * 28 April 2010
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:53:34 +0000 |
41 lines |
Syntactica Open Source TEI Integrator
|
Ward Johnson |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 17:39:27 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: Syntactica Open Source TEI Integrator
|
Stuart Yeates |
Sat, 6 Mar 2010 16:50:00 +1300 |
25 lines |
TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Iftikhar Zaman |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:04:19 +0500 |
113 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:08:22 -0800 |
158 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Martin Mueller |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:33:51 -0600 |
26 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
ehrbar |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:40:37 -0700 |
45 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:51:26 -0800 |
67 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
James Cummings |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 19:13:12 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Martin Mueller |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:37:31 -0600 |
68 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Wendell Piez |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:33:26 -0500 |
84 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Wendell Piez |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:47:40 -0500 |
63 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Martin Mueller |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:23:04 -0600 |
45 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 19:24:35 -0800 |
29 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
stuart yeates |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:58:29 +1300 |
54 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Martin Mueller |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:19:54 -0600 |
28 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 20:38:57 -0800 |
32 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Stuart Yeates |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 21:43:06 +1300 |
39 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:54:44 +0000 |
65 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
James Cummings |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:44:49 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:52:14 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Thomas Crombez |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:59:49 +0100 |
79 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Lou |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:23:48 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Martin Mueller |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:42:39 -0600 |
63 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Martin Mueller |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:15:35 -0600 |
156 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Piotr Bański |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:13:39 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Wendell Piez |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:52:54 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Stuart Yeates |
Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:16:05 +1300 |
23 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Stuart Yeates |
Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:22:41 +1300 |
26 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sat, 6 Mar 2010 10:45:57 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Stuart Yeates |
Sun, 7 Mar 2010 08:37:18 +1300 |
31 lines |
Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?
|
Thomas Crombez |
Sat, 6 Mar 2010 21:16:43 +0100 |
180 lines |
TEI DTD problem
|
Tomaz Erjavec |
Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:24:09 +0100 |
52 lines |
Re: TEI DTD problem
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:41:09 +0000 |
62 lines |
Re: TEI DTD problem
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:14:32 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: TEI DTD problem
|
Lou Burnard |
Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:20:00 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Pablo Rodríguez |
Mon, 1 Mar 2010 17:52:49 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:24:41 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Pablo Rodríguez |
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 22:21:11 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 22:32:52 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Pablo Rodríguez |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:43:06 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Barry Cornelius |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:05:58 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Pablo Rodríguez |
Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:46:11 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:34:50 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release
|
Pablo Rodríguez |
Sun, 7 Mar 2010 18:59:54 +0100 |
57 lines |
tei releases on Sourceforge
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:32:30 +0000 |
20 lines |
URL correction
|
Brett Zamir |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:05:26 +0800 |
20 lines |
Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply
|
Deborah W. Anderson |
Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:28:46 -0800 |
204 lines |
Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply
|
stuart yeates |
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:09:52 +1300 |
229 lines |
Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply
|
Lou Burnard |
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:48:18 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply
|
Gabriel Bodard |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:10:44 +0000 |
256 lines |
Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply
|
John Young |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:58:11 +0000 |
335 lines |
Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply
|
Espen S. Ore |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:40:31 +0100 |
345 lines |
Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply
|
Martin Mueller |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:39:14 -0600 |
269 lines |
Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply
|
Gabriel Bodard |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:55:25 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply
|
Martin Mueller |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:21:11 -0600 |
62 lines |
Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply
|
Lou Burnard |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:09:20 +0000 |
36 lines |
Using to encode polygon points
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:13:35 -0800 |
64 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 23:36:25 +0000 |
88 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 21:27:26 -0800 |
77 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Øyvind Eide |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:07:23 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:38:09 +0000 |
53 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Lou Burnard |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:28:33 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Elena Pierazzo |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:17:26 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:08:04 +0000 |
55 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Lou |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:23:30 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Dot Porter |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:23:01 -0500 |
74 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:35:32 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Lou |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:40:26 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:49:38 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Lou |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:52:10 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Øyvind Eide |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:58:23 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Espen S. Ore |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:15:52 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:26:10 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Dot Porter |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:27:33 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Dot Porter |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:37:42 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:41:23 -0800 |
37 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:46:15 -0800 |
32 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:48:41 -0800 |
27 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:48:47 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:53:30 -0800 |
42 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:57:22 -0800 |
29 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:09:14 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Dot Porter |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:14:00 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Syd Bauman |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:51:09 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:46:52 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Syd Bauman |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:56:57 -0500 |
16 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Dot Porter |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:58:10 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:58:34 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:56:47 -0800 |
44 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Wendell Piez |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:15:41 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
stuart yeates |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:17:22 +1300 |
34 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
stuart yeates |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:20:39 +1300 |
33 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:29:50 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:37:17 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
stuart yeates |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:30:51 +1300 |
35 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:06:49 -0800 |
41 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Lou Burnard |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:11:29 +0000 |
49 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:44:19 +0000 |
57 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
stuart yeates |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:29:48 +1300 |
40 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:29:01 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:42:13 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:28:34 -0800 |
33 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
James Cummings |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:56:31 +0000 |
57 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Wendell Piez |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:48:33 -0500 |
65 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Hugh Cayless |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:19:59 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Hugh Cayless |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:20:21 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:45:13 -0800 |
134 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Hugh Cayless |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:40:28 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:03:55 -0800 |
67 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
stuart yeates |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:52:03 +1300 |
33 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Lou Burnard |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:12:57 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Wendell Piez |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:10:55 -0500 |
92 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:51:41 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Wendell Piez |
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:23:28 -0400 |
82 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:13:40 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Wendell Piez |
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:10:36 -0400 |
112 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:39:21 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Wendell Piez |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:05:55 -0400 |
94 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:06:27 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:48:46 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Wendell Piez |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:25:03 -0400 |
66 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:28:59 -0700 |
90 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Wendell Piez |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:58:16 -0400 |
112 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:17:04 -0700 |
146 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Wendell Piez |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:37:51 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:46:52 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Dr. Herbert Wender |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:47:10 EDT |
50 lines |
Re: Using to encode polygon points
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:04:23 +0000 |
33 lines |
What happened to dicteg?
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 12:28:13 -0800 |
38 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:32:39 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
Piotr Bański |
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:56:45 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 13:00:57 -0800 |
64 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:01:17 +0000 |
88 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:27:15 -0800 |
104 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
James Cummings |
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 12:03:30 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 05:47:14 -0800 |
51 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
James Cummings |
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:40:24 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:57:42 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
Julia Flanders |
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:19:41 -0500 |
84 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
Lou Burnard |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:37:01 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
Julia Flanders |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:38:14 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
Lou |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:35:59 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
Julia Flanders |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:20:47 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
Martin Holmes |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:59:42 -0800 |
44 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
Lou |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:13:42 +0000 |
53 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
Schlitz, Stephanie |
Sat, 6 Mar 2010 08:28:59 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: What happened to dicteg?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:19:47 +0000 |
35 lines |
White space handling in different contexts
|
Dr. Herbert Wender |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:22:27 EDT |
117 lines |
Re: White space handling in different contexts
|
James Cummings |
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:49:26 +0000 |
71 lines |
Re: White space handling in different contexts
|
Gabriel Bodard |
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:49:35 +0000 |
59 lines |
Re: White space handling in different contexts
|
Dr. Herbert Wender |
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:42:26 EDT |
55 lines |
Re: White space handling in different contexts
|
Lou |
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:58:03 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: White space handling in different contexts
|
Elena Pierazzo |
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:02:08 +0000 |
82 lines |
Re: White space handling in different contexts
|
Bertrand Gaiffe |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:28:37 +0200 |
120 lines |
Re: White space handling in different contexts
|
George Cristian Bina |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:26:54 +0300 |
64 lines |
Re: White space handling in different contexts
|
Lavrentev Alexey |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:41:58 +0200 |
31 lines |
Re: White space handling in different contexts
|
Lou |
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:03:46 +0100 |
28 lines |
xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas
|
George Cristian Bina |
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:21:35 +0200 |
27 lines |
Re: xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas
|
Piotr Bański |
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:33:57 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas
|
Piotr Bański |
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:34:21 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:53:09 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas
|
Piotr Bański |
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:29:19 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas
|
George Cristian Bina |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:39:43 +0200 |
79 lines |
Re: xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:49:50 +0000 |
31 lines |
xsl stylesheets and teitoepub
|
George Smith |
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:32:32 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: xsl stylesheets and teitoepub
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:16:11 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: xsl stylesheets and teitoepub
|
Dr. George Smith |
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:55:37 +0100 |
90 lines |
Re: xsl stylesheets and teitoepub
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:23:17 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: xsl stylesheets and teitoepub
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:35:54 +0000 |
21 lines |
Re: xsl stylesheets and teitoepub
|
stuart yeates |
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:37:15 +1300 |
29 lines |
Re: xsltdoc
|
Heiden Serge |
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:30:16 +0100 |
95 lines |
Re: xsltdoc
|
Stuart Yeates |
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:46:33 +1300 |
16 lines |
Re: xsltdoc
|
Piotr Bański |
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:24:21 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: xsltdoc
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:27:28 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: xsltdoc
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:03:45 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: xsltdoc
|
Stuart Yeates |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:37:55 +1300 |
19 lines |
Re: xsltdoc
|
Piotr Bański |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:00:13 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: xsltdoc
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:42:03 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: xsltdoc
|
David Sewell |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:15:42 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: xsltdoc
|
Serge Heiden |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:50:17 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: xsltdoc
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:57:24 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: xsltdoc
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:04:22 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: xsltdoc
|
Serge Heiden |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:42:29 +0100 |
81 lines |
Re: xsltdoc
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:15:14 +0000 |
33 lines |
You are Not a Gadget, by Jaron Lanier
|
Charles Muller |
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:34:03 +0900 |
88 lines |
Re: You are Not a Gadget, by Jaron Lanier
|
Patrick Durusau |
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:26:50 -0400 |
146 lines |
Re: You are Not a Gadget, by Jaron Lanier
|
Charles Muller |
Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:22:09 +0900 |
52 lines |
Re: You are Not a Gadget, by Jaron Lanier
|
Charles Muller |
Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:39:39 +0900 |
74 lines |
[ann] oXygen XML Editor 11.2
|
George Cristian Bina |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:29:57 +0200 |
52 lines |