|
|
|
|
Size
|
a TEI to HTML question
|
Martin Mueller |
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:18:34 +0000 |
108 lines |
Re: a TEI to HTML question
|
stuart yeates |
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:27:32 +1300 |
28 lines |
Re: a TEI to HTML question
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:37:45 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: a TEI to HTML question
|
John A. Walsh |
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:27:50 -0500 |
135 lines |
Re: a TEI to HTML question
|
Brett Zamir |
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:45:02 +0800 |
160 lines |
Re: a TEI to HTML question
|
Jens Østergaard Petersen |
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:40:06 +0100 |
248 lines |
Re: a TEI to HTML question
|
Brett Zamir |
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:54:43 +0800 |
318 lines |
Re: a TEI to HTML question
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:09:47 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: a TEI to HTML question
|
Tim Finney |
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:05:28 -0200 |
76 lines |
Re: a TEI to HTML question
|
Jens Østergaard Petersen |
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:47:26 +0100 |
400 lines |
ACH Microgrant Call
|
Susan Schreibman |
Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:09:30 +0000 |
132 lines |
are @rend values on inherited?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 09:13:39 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Laurent Romary |
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:23:19 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Barry Cornelius |
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 09:55:06 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Ron Van den Branden |
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 11:07:16 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Lou Burnard |
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:20:23 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Franz Fischer |
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 11:34:29 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Lou Burnard |
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:41:19 +0000 |
70 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Tom De Herdt |
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:10:17 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Syd Bauman |
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:42:21 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
McAulay, Elizabeth |
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 09:22:14 -0800 |
40 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Paul F. Schaffner |
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:23:40 -0500 |
108 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
McAulay, Elizabeth |
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 11:35:37 -0800 |
109 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Martin Holmes |
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 15:29:20 -0800 |
43 lines |
Fw: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Lou Burnard |
Sat, 7 Jan 2012 00:20:25 +0000 |
82 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
McAulay, Elizabeth |
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:42:26 -0800 |
94 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
John A. Walsh |
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:34:14 -0800 |
68 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Martin Mueller |
Sat, 7 Jan 2012 02:08:32 +0000 |
204 lines |
Re: Fw: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Martin Holmes |
Sat, 7 Jan 2012 10:25:37 -0800 |
68 lines |
Re: Fw: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Lou Burnard |
Sat, 7 Jan 2012 18:42:09 +0000 |
96 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
John A. Walsh |
Sat, 7 Jan 2012 10:52:39 -0800 |
91 lines |
Re: Fw: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Martin Holmes |
Sat, 7 Jan 2012 14:14:43 -0800 |
120 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Martin Holmes |
Sat, 7 Jan 2012 14:17:39 -0800 |
102 lines |
Re: Fw: are @rend values on inherited?
|
John T Young |
Sun, 8 Jan 2012 13:46:04 +0000 |
163 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
John T Young |
Sun, 8 Jan 2012 14:03:44 +0000 |
122 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 8 Jan 2012 17:39:16 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Fw: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Wendell Piez |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:20:23 -0500 |
75 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Syd Bauman |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:20:37 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:27:34 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: are @rend values on inherited?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:32:53 +0000 |
45 lines |
Balisage 2012 Call for Participation
|
Tommie Usdin |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:45:01 -0500 |
55 lines |
Call for Essays and Editions
|
Amanda Gailey |
Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:19:56 -0600 |
96 lines |
Content model of
|
Pierazzo, Elena |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:40:17 +0000 |
75 lines |
Re: Content model of
|
Gabriel Bodard |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:53:12 +0000 |
68 lines |
Re: Content model of
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:03:25 +0000 |
66 lines |
Re: Content model of
|
Syd Bauman |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:46:31 -0500 |
39 lines |
Directionality of text
|
Christian Wittern |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:34:31 +0900 |
30 lines |
Re: Directionality of text
|
Martin Holmes |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 05:52:24 -0800 |
59 lines |
Re: Directionality of text
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:33:47 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Directionality of text
|
Robert Whalen |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:39:01 -0500 |
218 lines |
Re: Directionality of text
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:48:06 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Directionality of text
|
Markus Flatscher |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:55:57 -0500 |
85 lines |
Re: Directionality of text
|
Martin Holmes |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:28:21 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: Directionality of text
|
Laurent Romary |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:33:25 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: Directionality of text
|
Robert Whalen |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:43:57 -0500 |
275 lines |
Re: Directionality of text
|
Christian Wittern |
Sat, 14 Jan 2012 07:41:03 +0900 |
72 lines |
Re: Directionality of text
|
stuart yeates |
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:04:37 +1300 |
30 lines |
Re: Directionality of text
|
Martin Holmes |
Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:24:06 -0800 |
49 lines |
Re: Directionality of text
|
stuart yeates |
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:31:07 +1300 |
29 lines |
eText != Electronic Textbooks, Sigh
|
Michelle Dalmau |
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:29:56 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: eText != Electronic Textbooks, Sigh
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:24:02 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: eText != Electronic Textbooks, Sigh
|
Lou Burnard |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:36:12 +0000 |
63 lines |
Re: eText != Electronic Textbooks, Sigh
|
Michelle Dalmau |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:40:01 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: eText != Electronic Textbooks, Sigh
|
David Sewell |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:48:43 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: eText != Electronic Textbooks, Sigh
|
Sarah Wells |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:04:24 -0500 |
101 lines |
Re: eText != Electronic Textbooks, Sigh
|
Michelle Dalmau |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:18:28 -0500 |
112 lines |
Re: eText != Electronic Textbooks, Sigh
|
Martin Mueller |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:46:11 +0000 |
141 lines |
Re: eText != Electronic Textbooks, Sigh
|
Cogdill, Sharon E. |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:45:53 +0000 |
248 lines |
Re: eText != Electronic Textbooks, Sigh
|
Hope Greenberg |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:55:13 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: eText != Electronic Textbooks, Sigh
|
Lou Burnard |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:00:07 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: eText != Electronic Textbooks, Sigh
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:24:40 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: eText != Electronic Textbooks, Sigh
|
Hope Greenberg |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:36:34 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: eText != Electronic Textbooks, Sigh
|
Efraim Feinstein |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:36:19 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: eText != Electronic Textbooks, Sigh
|
stuart yeates |
Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:10:24 +1300 |
46 lines |
Guidelines transformation error
|
Torsten Schassan |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:44:20 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error
|
Lou Burnard |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:24:10 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error
|
Torsten Schassan |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:37:47 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:08:46 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 05:20:12 -0800 |
41 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:39:51 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 05:53:48 -0800 |
39 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error
|
Lou Burnard |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:04:02 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error
|
Lothar Lemnitzer |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:59:17 +0100 |
119 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error
|
Ron Van den Branden |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:39:57 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error
|
Sarah Wells |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:44:19 -0500 |
89 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error
|
Markus Flatscher |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:51:42 -0500 |
104 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:19:51 -0800 |
128 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error
|
Piotr Bański |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:44:01 +0100 |
135 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:01:42 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error
|
Piotr Bański |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:24:07 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error: SOLVED!
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:51:59 -0800 |
142 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error: SOLVED!
|
David Sewell |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:01:37 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error: SOLVED!
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:12:10 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error: SOLVED!
|
Sarah Wells |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:13:29 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error: SOLVED!
|
Gabriel Bodard |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:18:32 +0000 |
54 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error: SOLVED!
|
James Cummings |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:20:37 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error: SOLVED!
|
James Cummings |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:31:10 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error: SOLVED!
|
James Cummings |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:37:36 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error: SOLVED!
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:09:46 -0800 |
56 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error: SOLVED!
|
Sarah Wells |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:34:39 -0500 |
82 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error: SOLVED!
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:30:02 -0800 |
75 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error: SOLVED!
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:48:20 -0800 |
82 lines |
Re: Guidelines transformation error: SOLVED!
|
James Cummings |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:03:46 +0000 |
33 lines |
imprints in incunabula
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:17:43 +0000 |
54 lines |
Re: imprints in incunabula
|
Sebastiaan Verweij |
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:43:07 +0000 |
218 lines |
Re: Interedition: *REMINDER* Call for Papers Symposium 'Scholarly Digital Editions, Tools and Infrastructure', 19-20 March 2012, The Hague, The Netherlands
|
Syd Bauman |
Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:32:32 -0500 |
98 lines |
Job offer, Berlin, Germany
|
Markus Schnoepf |
Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:17:41 +0100 |
58 lines |
job opening: web applications developer for TEI publishing project
|
Julia Flanders |
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:55:48 -0500 |
37 lines |
lucene/Solr import filters
|
Mylonas, Elli |
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 11:26:55 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: lucene/Solr import filters
|
stuart yeates |
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 08:54:00 +1300 |
44 lines |
Minor error in Guidelines
|
Christian Wittern |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:06:07 +0900 |
25 lines |
Re: Minor error in Guidelines
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:01:25 -0800 |
45 lines |
Re: Minor error in Guidelines
|
Christian Wittern |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:11:52 +0900 |
39 lines |
Re: Minor error in Guidelines
|
Martin Holmes |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 05:11:27 -0800 |
43 lines |
Roma Error
|
Scott Vanderbilt (TEI-L) |
Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:43:29 -0800 |
53 lines |
Re: Roma Error
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 2 Jan 2012 20:49:43 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: Roma Error
|
Scott Vanderbilt (TEI-L) |
Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:53:46 -0800 |
27 lines |
Re: Roma Error
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 2 Jan 2012 21:00:35 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Roma Error
|
Scott Vanderbilt (TEI-L) |
Mon, 2 Jan 2012 13:06:21 -0800 |
29 lines |
Re: Roma Error
|
Scott Vanderbilt (TEI-L) |
Mon, 2 Jan 2012 13:10:07 -0800 |
30 lines |
svn tags on sourceforge
|
Peter Stadler |
Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:06:35 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: svn tags on sourceforge
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:17:13 +0000 |
26 lines |
TAPAS: TEI Archiving, Publishing and Access Service
|
Julia Flanders |
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:51:46 -0500 |
57 lines |
TEI by Example
|
Brett Barney |
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:32:38 -0600 |
47 lines |
Re: TEI by Example
|
Lou Burnard |
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:29:57 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: TEI by Example
|
Brett Barney |
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:59:42 -0600 |
91 lines |
Re: TEI by Example
|
ron.vandenbranden@home |
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:39:58 +0100 |
74 lines |
TEI I18N
|
Serge Heiden |
Sun, 1 Jan 2012 11:49:56 +0100 |
135 lines |
TEI I18N: Spanish added...
|
Alejandro Bia |
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:03:58 +0100 |
503 lines |
tei stylesheets, release 6.5
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 3 Jan 2012 12:33:39 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: tei stylesheets, release 6.5
|
Mandell, Laura |
Tue, 3 Jan 2012 16:50:46 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: underline and
|
Martin de la Iglesia |
Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:08:30 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: underline and
|
Sebastiaan Verweij |
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:14:49 +0000 |
61 lines |
Re: Version 2.0.0 is online!
|
Martin de la Iglesia |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:42:30 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: Version 2.0.0 is online!
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:57:34 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: Version 2.0.0 is online!
|
Laurent Romary |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:01:56 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: Version 2.0.0 is online!
|
Martin de la Iglesia |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:16:49 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: Version 2.0.0 is online!
|
Laurent Romary |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:38:20 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: Version 2.0.0 is online!
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:39:07 +0000 |
28 lines |
version 2.0.1 p5subset.xml states "edition 2.0.0"
|
Peter Stadler |
Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:27:40 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: version 2.0.1 p5subset.xml states "edition 2.0.0"
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:45:12 -0800 |
34 lines |
Re: version 2.0.1 p5subset.xml states "edition 2.0.0"
|
Peter Stadler |
Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:01:34 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: version 2.0.1 p5subset.xml states "edition 2.0.0"
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:16:53 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: version 2.0.1 p5subset.xml states "edition 2.0.0"
|
Peter Stadler |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:13:22 +0100 |
43 lines |
Workshop: Knowledge Organization and Data Modeling in the Humanities
|
Julia Flanders |
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:42:05 -0500 |
73 lines |
XSLT workshop: March 8-10, 2012, Brown University
|
Julia Flanders |
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:01:20 -0500 |
35 lines |