|
|
|
|
Size
|
element?
|
John P. McCaskey |
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:11:10 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: element?
|
Syd Bauman |
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:49:28 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: element?
|
John P. McCaskey |
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:33:20 -0400 |
96 lines |
Re: element?
|
Lou Burnard |
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:03:02 +0000 |
59 lines |
Re: element?
|
John P. McCaskey |
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:25:30 -0400 |
26 lines |
inside
|
Martin Holmes |
Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:40:54 -0800 |
35 lines |
Re: inside
|
Martin Mueller |
Sat, 10 Mar 2012 02:12:41 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: inside
|
Laurent Romary |
Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:11:52 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: inside
|
Martin Holmes |
Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:27:51 -0800 |
49 lines |
Re: inside
|
Lou Burnard |
Sat, 10 Mar 2012 21:19:15 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: inside
|
Martin Holmes |
Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:09:36 -0700 |
74 lines |
Re: inside
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 11 Mar 2012 23:19:07 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: inside
|
Martin Holmes |
Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:21:46 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: inside
|
Martin Mueller |
Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:31:19 -0500 |
167 lines |
Re: inside
|
Jens Østergaard Petersen |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:31:06 +0100 |
185 lines |
Re: inside
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 05:17:13 -0700 |
192 lines |
Re: inside
|
Martin Mueller |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:19:43 -0500 |
286 lines |
Re: inside
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:37:44 -0700 |
304 lines |
Re: inside
|
Jens Østergaard Petersen |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:04:21 +0100 |
313 lines |
Re: inside
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:37:11 -0700 |
329 lines |
Re: inside
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:33:07 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: inside
|
Lou Burnard |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:41:47 +0000 |
162 lines |
Re: inside
|
Martin Holmes |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:41:16 -0700 |
228 lines |
Re: inside
|
John A. Walsh |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:02:42 -0400 |
257 lines |
Re: inside
|
Lou Burnard |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:02:50 +0000 |
273 lines |
Re: inside
|
Jens Østergaard Petersen |
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:54:02 +0100 |
110 lines |
@notBefore vs @from
|
Tomaz Erjavec |
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:44:25 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: @notBefore vs @from
|
Michael Piotrowski |
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:05:34 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: @notBefore vs @from
|
Syd Bauman |
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:39:19 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: @notBefore vs @from
|
Tomaz Erjavec |
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 20:54:54 +0100 |
65 lines |
A text's nickname
|
John P. McCaskey |
Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:18:41 -0700 |
23 lines |
Re: A text's nickname
|
Laurent Romary |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:32:48 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: A text's nickname
|
John P. McCaskey |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:07:20 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: A text's nickname
|
Paul F. Schaffner |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:30:10 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: A text's nickname
|
John P. McCaskey |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:31:09 -0700 |
53 lines |
Advice needed for critical apparatus encoding
|
Joe Easterly |
Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:07:47 -0400 |
142 lines |
Re: Advice needed for critical apparatus encoding
|
Lou Burnard |
Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:47:27 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Advice needed for critical apparatus encoding
|
James Cummings |
Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:56:06 +0100 |
127 lines |
Re: Advice needed for critical apparatus encoding
|
Joe Easterly |
Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:15:17 -0400 |
179 lines |
Re: Anonymous placeNames and (persNames)
|
Martin de la Iglesia |
Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:46:45 +0200 |
106 lines |
Re: Anonymous placeNames and (persNames)
|
Lou Burnard |
Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:58:18 +0100 |
51 lines |
Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:36:05 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:46:47 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:34:42 -0700 |
52 lines |
Re: Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?
|
Lavrentev Alexey |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:45:30 +0100 |
78 lines |
Re: Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:14:39 +0000 |
89 lines |
Re: Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:17:44 -0700 |
100 lines |
Re: Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:31:55 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:49:55 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?
|
Serge Heiden |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:14:16 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:31:25 -0700 |
73 lines |
Re: Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?
|
Serge Heiden |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:10:46 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:24:32 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?
|
Lavrentev Alexey |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:25:25 +0100 |
174 lines |
Re: Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?
|
Laurent Romary |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:04:04 +0100 |
195 lines |
Re: Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?
|
Lou Burnard |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:52:20 +0000 |
84 lines |
Re: Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?
|
Laurent Romary |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:02:00 +0100 |
96 lines |
Blog post on some of @rend discussion
|
James Cummings |
Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:44:45 +0100 |
63 lines |
Canonical equivalents for TITE's and
|
Gerrit Brüning |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:15:28 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: Canonical equivalents for TITE's and
|
Lou Burnard |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:44:35 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: Canonical equivalents for TITE's and
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:45:55 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: Canonical equivalents for TITE's and
|
Gerrit Brüning |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:03:44 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: Canonical equivalents for TITE's and
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:15:51 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: Canonical equivalents for TITE's and
|
Gerrit Brüning |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:23:29 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: Canonical equivalents for TITE's and
|
Lou Burnard |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:44:39 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Canonical equivalents for TITE's and
|
Gerrit Brüning |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:34:11 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Canonical equivalents for TITE's and
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:39:15 -0400 |
34 lines |
Canonical values for
|
John P. McCaskey |
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:36:13 -0800 |
66 lines |
Re: Canonical values for
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:01:22 -0800 |
54 lines |
Re: Canonical values for
|
Stuart A. Yeates |
Fri, 9 Mar 2012 08:20:57 +1300 |
33 lines |
Re: Canonical values for
|
John P. McCaskey |
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 11:57:27 -0800 |
39 lines |
Re: Canonical values for
|
Paul F. Schaffner |
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 21:19:55 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: Canonical values for
|
Conal Tuohy |
Fri, 9 Mar 2012 15:53:44 +1100 |
46 lines |
Re: Canonical values for
|
Laurent Romary |
Fri, 9 Mar 2012 07:26:23 +0100 |
125 lines |
Re: Canonical values for
|
Lou Burnard |
Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:27:01 +0000 |
59 lines |
Re: Canonical values for
|
James Cummings |
Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:17:14 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Canonical values for
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:44:26 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: Canonical values for
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:20:59 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Canonical values for
|
John P. McCaskey |
Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:57:46 -0800 |
69 lines |
captions for tables and lists (redux)
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 00:35:56 -0500 |
76 lines |
Re: captions for tables and lists (redux)
|
Martin Holmes |
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 05:10:10 -0800 |
106 lines |
Re: captions for tables and lists (redux)
|
Paul F. Schaffner |
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:20:16 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: captions for tables and lists (redux)
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:25:07 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: captions for tables and lists (redux)
|
James Cummings |
Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:48:59 +0000 |
47 lines |
CfP ESTS conference: Editing Fundamentals (Nov. 22-24, Amsterdam)
|
Peter Boot |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:48:12 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: class of
|
Syd Bauman |
Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:06:45 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: class of
|
Martin Holmes |
Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:27:13 -0700 |
25 lines |
Re: class of
|
Syd Bauman |
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:58:07 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: class of
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:35:33 +0000 |
42 lines |
class of
|
Syd Bauman |
Sun, 18 Mar 2012 18:06:50 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: class of
|
Martin Holmes |
Sun, 18 Mar 2012 16:24:20 -0700 |
51 lines |
Re: class of
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:44:18 +0000 |
19 lines |
content model of
|
Daniel Schopper |
Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:26:34 +0200 |
29 lines |
Re: content model of
|
Martin Mueller |
Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:13:17 +0000 |
63 lines |
Re: content model of
|
Lou Burnard |
Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:21:29 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: content model of
|
Daniel Schopper |
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:43:08 +0200 |
23 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:18:49 -0700 |
94 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend
|
Paul F. Schaffner |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:24:57 -0400 |
113 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:17:06 -0700 |
156 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend
|
Conal Tuohy |
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:32:44 +1100 |
25 lines |
CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:00:50 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:23:13 -0700 |
95 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:58:03 -0400 |
15 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
John A. Walsh |
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 20:51:18 -0400 |
80 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Martin Mueller |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 02:28:56 +0000 |
130 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:13:27 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
John A. Walsh |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:07:06 -0400 |
92 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
David Sewell |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:30:42 -0400 |
115 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:42:25 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:53:55 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Laurent Romary |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:54:00 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
O'Donnell, Dan |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:31:20 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
John A. Walsh |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:34:31 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:56:27 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Lou Burnard |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:56:37 +0000 |
80 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
O'Donnell, Dan |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:06:42 +0000 |
56 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
O'Donnell, Dan |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:14:12 +0000 |
95 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:16:37 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
O'Donnell, Dan |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:24:04 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
John A. Walsh |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:24:36 -0400 |
107 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:31:13 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
John A. Walsh |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:33:18 -0400 |
111 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Jarom McDonald |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:33:21 -0600 |
34 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
O'Donnell, Dan |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:54:54 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:02:02 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
O'Donnell, Dan |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:11:00 +0000 |
120 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
O'Donnell, Dan |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:22:27 +0000 |
126 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Jarom McDonald |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:22:44 -0600 |
53 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
John A. Walsh |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:37:34 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Martin Mueller |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:57:17 +0000 |
74 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
O'Donnell, Dan |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:01:57 +0000 |
85 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
O'Donnell, Dan |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:23:36 +0000 |
99 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Lou Burnard |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:43:04 +0000 |
77 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
O'Donnell, Dan |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:44:56 +0000 |
132 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
O'Donnell, Dan |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:01:45 +0000 |
84 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Paul F. Schaffner |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:42:33 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Conal Tuohy |
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:14:44 +1100 |
46 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:33:50 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Daniel O'Donnell |
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:44:53 -0600 |
51 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Conal Tuohy |
Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:36:21 +1100 |
58 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:10:00 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Martin Holmes |
Sun, 25 Mar 2012 07:46:01 -0700 |
64 lines |
CSS in @rend (was: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
Paul F. Schaffner |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:13:42 -0400 |
96 lines |
Re: CSS in @rend (was: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?)
|
John A. Walsh |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:50:48 -0400 |
94 lines |
DC-2012 EXTENDED CfP DEADLINE: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications
|
DCMI Announce |
Mon, 12 Mar 2012 05:11:53 -0700 |
362 lines |
DCMI-UK REGIONAL MEETING: Registration Open for "Five Years ON" Seminar at British Library
|
DCMI Announce |
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:36:47 -0700 |
186 lines |
Digital.Humanities@Oxford Summer School 2012
|
James Cummings |
Tue, 6 Mar 2012 23:07:02 +0000 |
57 lines |
Re: Encoding bilingual edition
|
Tamás Kende |
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 08:22:13 +0100 |
325 lines |
Re: Encoding bilingual edition
|
Laurent Romary |
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:12:44 +0100 |
358 lines |
Re: Encoding bilingual edition
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 04:56:25 -0800 |
175 lines |
Re: Encoding bilingual edition
|
Tamás Kende |
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:21:40 +0100 |
490 lines |
Re: Encoding epithets in a personography
|
Lou Burnard |
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 10:53:01 +0000 |
81 lines |
Encoding the absence of an alternative encoding
|
Christof Schoech |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:20:44 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Encoding the absence of an alternative encoding
|
Lou Burnard |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:03:27 +0000 |
54 lines |
Re: Encoding the absence of an alternative encoding
|
Roberto Rosselli Del Turco |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:41:31 +0100 |
74 lines |
Encoding the absence of an alternative encoding
|
Christof Schöch |
Sun, 18 Mar 2012 12:27:24 +0100 |
21 lines |
floating text
|
Patrik, Linda |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:36:41 +0000 |
111 lines |
Four-part antilabai
|
Gerrit Brüning |
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:26:37 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Four-part antilabai
|
Lou Burnard |
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:33:09 +0000 |
34 lines |
fs vs ana (was Re: Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?)
|
Lavrentev Alexey |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:10:20 +0100 |
367 lines |
Re: fs vs ana (was Re: Attribute for storing the original form of a modernized word?)
|
Laurent Romary |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:51:00 +0100 |
518 lines |
generating TEI from proprietary XML
|
Mandy Neumann |
Tue, 6 Mar 2012 11:04:05 +0100 |
66 lines |
Re: generating TEI from proprietary XML
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:29:08 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: generating TEI from proprietary XML
|
Øyvind Eide |
Tue, 6 Mar 2012 11:44:07 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: generating TEI from proprietary XML
|
Chris Martin |
Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:36:51 +0000 |
78 lines |
Re: generating TEI from proprietary XML
|
Stefan Majewski |
Tue, 6 Mar 2012 12:29:33 +0100 |
78 lines |
Re: generating TEI from proprietary XML
|
James Cummings |
Tue, 6 Mar 2012 11:35:16 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: generating TEI from proprietary XML
|
Croenen, Godfried |
Tue, 6 Mar 2012 12:27:57 +0000 |
90 lines |
Re: generating TEI from proprietary XML
|
Ute Recker-Hamm |
Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:19:40 +0100 |
2975 lines |
Re: generating TEI from proprietary XML
|
Conal Tuohy |
Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:10:50 +1100 |
288 lines |
Re: generating TEI from proprietary XML
|
Conal Tuohy |
Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:58:24 +1100 |
16 lines |
Handling historical spelling variation
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 10:50:28 -0800 |
32 lines |
Re: Handling historical spelling variation
|
Sabine Bartsch |
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:09:56 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: Handling historical spelling variation
|
Janusz S. Bień |
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:40:18 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: Handling historical spelling variation
|
Chad Black |
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:40:05 -0700 |
49 lines |
Re: Handling historical spelling variation
|
Cristina Sánchez-Marco |
Fri, 2 Mar 2012 01:38:23 +0100 |
131 lines |
Re: Handling historical spelling variation
|
Christof Schoech |
Fri, 2 Mar 2012 08:39:25 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: Handling historical spelling variation
|
Michael Piotrowski |
Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:19:10 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: Handling historical spelling variation
|
Martin Holmes |
Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:09:11 -0800 |
78 lines |
Re: Handling historical spelling variation
|
Christian Thomas |
Tue, 6 Mar 2012 05:48:05 -0500 |
66 lines |
Re: Handling historical spelling variation
|
Janusz S. Bień |
Tue, 6 Mar 2012 12:21:22 +0100 |
76 lines |
Re: Handling historical spelling variation
|
Marie-Helene Lay |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:12:24 +0100 |
338 lines |
how to encode a contract
|
Tamás Kende |
Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:19:29 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: how to encode a contract
|
Peter Boot |
Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:59:09 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: how to encode a contract
|
stuart yeates |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:37:44 +1300 |
71 lines |
Re: how to encode a contract
|
Tamás Kende |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:19:54 +0100 |
133 lines |
Re: how to encode a contract
|
Peter Boot |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:08:12 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: how to encode a contract
|
Tamás Kende |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:42:09 +0100 |
87 lines |
Re: how to encode a contract
|
Peter Boot |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:22:00 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: how to encode a contract
|
Tamás Kende |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:41:54 +0100 |
123 lines |
http://smellofbooks.com/
|
Lou Burnard |
Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:22:51 +0100 |
14 lines |
Re: http://smellofbooks.com/
|
Jens Østergaard Petersen |
Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:36:13 +0200 |
19 lines |
Information Technologies and Textual Heritage (Petrozavodsk, Russia)
|
Kevin Hawkins |
Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:12:05 -0500 |
28 lines |
Introductory TEI workshops at Brown: 2012 schedule
|
Julia Flanders |
Sun, 4 Mar 2012 22:01:33 -0500 |
54 lines |
JADH-2102 Call for Papers
|
Charles Muller |
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:06:46 +0900 |
175 lines |
journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Jens Østergaard Petersen |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:36:15 +0100 |
19 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Markus Flatscher |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:44:53 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Jens Østergaard Petersen |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:20:18 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
James Cummings |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:29:06 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Marjorie Burghart |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:25:50 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Jens Østergaard Petersen |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:41:37 +0100 |
93 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Markus Flatscher |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:46:20 -0400 |
73 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Jens Østergaard Petersen |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:50:19 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Daniel O'Donnell |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:52:33 -0600 |
71 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Daniel O'Donnell |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:56:45 -0600 |
64 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Daniel O'Donnell |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:02:01 -0600 |
82 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Jens Østergaard Petersen |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:02:35 +0100 |
85 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Daniel O'Donnell |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:06:20 -0600 |
69 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:06:59 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Daniel O'Donnell |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:08:03 -0600 |
43 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Markus Flatscher |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:08:01 -0400 |
95 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
James Cummings |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:15:26 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
John A. Walsh |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:16:00 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:19:33 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
James Cummings |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:29:00 +0000 |
88 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Daniel O'Donnell |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:21:37 -0600 |
106 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:18:22 -0700 |
48 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Michelle Dalmau |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:37:37 -0400 |
61 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Nahuel ANGELINETTI |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:56:54 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Jens Østergaard Petersen |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:33:10 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: journal publication with TEI - experience anyone?
|
Nahuel ANGELINETTI |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:01:32 +0100 |
27 lines |
New Edition of The Swinburne Project
|
John Walsh |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:27:24 -0400 |
169 lines |
OxGarage, i18ned, release as Debian/Ubuntu package
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:09:46 +0000 |
46 lines |
Position Available: Manager, Infrastructure and Applications Support at the California Digital Library, University of California
|
Lisa Schiff |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:17:09 +0000 |
469 lines |
Printing error: rotated letter
|
Gerrit Brüning |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:24:58 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: Printing error: rotated letter
|
Peter Boot |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:45:20 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: Printing error: rotated letter
|
Gerrit Brüning |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:56:19 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Printing error: rotated letter
|
Lou Burnard |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:01:18 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: Printing error: rotated letter
|
Paul F. Schaffner |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:51:42 -0400 |
76 lines |
Re: Printing error: rotated letter
|
Christian Thomas |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:15:29 +0100 |
110 lines |
Re: Printing error: rotated letter
|
Gerrit Brüning |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:50:49 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: Printing error: rotated letter
|
Conal Tuohy |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:18:12 +1100 |
51 lines |
Re: Printing error: rotated letter
|
Conal Tuohy |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:51:16 +1100 |
72 lines |
Project Officer position at Trinity College Dublin for EU digital infrastructure
|
susan schreibman |
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:14:00 +0000 |
115 lines |
proposal for a floating div
|
Martin Mueller |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:18:04 -0500 |
238 lines |
Re: proposal for a floating div
|
James Cummings |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:48:34 +0000 |
136 lines |
q vs quote (was Re: inside )
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:28:06 +0000 |
88 lines |
question about Roma's Sanity Checker
|
Dana Dorman |
Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:25:19 -0400 |
148 lines |
Re: question about Roma's Sanity Checker
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:07:57 +0000 |
102 lines |
Re: question about Roma's Sanity Checker
|
Dana Dorman |
Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:59:03 -0400 |
509 lines |
question on back and appendices
|
Pablo Rodríguez |
Sun, 18 Mar 2012 19:51:20 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: question on back and appendices
|
PC Thoms |
Sun, 18 Mar 2012 18:03:04 -0230 |
121 lines |
Re: question on back and appendices
|
Syd Bauman |
Sun, 18 Mar 2012 18:01:52 -0400 |
122 lines |
Re: question on back and appendices
|
Pablo Rodríguez |
Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:16:22 +0200 |
75 lines |
Re: question on back and appendices
|
Pablo Rodríguez |
Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:58:05 +0200 |
48 lines |
Reminder: Essays for Scholarly Editing
|
Andrew Jewell |
Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:06:36 -0500 |
100 lines |
Save the Date: TEI Conference and Members' Meeting 2012
|
Pierazzo, Elena |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:49:03 +0000 |
418 lines |
Re: some questions
|
Daniel Schopper |
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:27:01 +0100 |
102 lines |
Re: some questions
|
Lauranne BERTRAND |
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:44:39 +0100 |
339 lines |
Re: some questions
|
Martin Holmes |
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:15:09 -0800 |
140 lines |
standards and guidelines
|
Birnbaum, David J |
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:50:09 -0500 |
49 lines |
Taking TEI Further: TEI Customization (deadline, April 1)
|
Julia Flanders |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:25:16 -0400 |
52 lines |
TEI Conference and Members' Meeting - Call for workshops and tutorials
|
Pierazzo, Elena |
Sun, 25 Mar 2012 07:50:29 +0100 |
602 lines |
TEI Conference and Members' Meeting 2012: Call for Papers
|
Pierazzo, Elena |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:48:08 +0000 |
662 lines |
TEI Lite: front and back matter
|
Pablo Rodríguez |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:39:07 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: TEI Lite: front and back matter
|
Rebecca Welzenbach |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:10:32 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: TEI Lite: front and back matter
|
Marjorie Burghart |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:09:59 +0100 |
95 lines |
Re: TEI Lite: front and back matter
|
Pablo Rodríguez |
Sun, 18 Mar 2012 19:08:17 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: TEI Lite: front and back matter
|
Pablo Rodríguez |
Sun, 18 Mar 2012 19:23:44 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: TEI Lite: front and back matter
|
Lou Burnard |
Sun, 18 Mar 2012 18:59:46 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: TEI Lite: front and back matter
|
Pablo Rodríguez |
Sun, 25 Mar 2012 17:31:59 +0200 |
32 lines |
TEI store to go down this evening (Mountain time)
|
Daniel O'Donnell |
Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:19:58 -0600 |
28 lines |
TEI Technical Council teleconference minutes 2012-02-28
|
James Cummings |
Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:54:35 +0000 |
29 lines |
Who are the Digital Humanities?
|
Lou Burnard |
Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:46:42 +0100 |
13 lines |
Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
John P. McCaskey |
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 19:16:30 -0400 |
17 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Lou Burnard |
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:43:43 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Conal Tuohy |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:33:11 +1100 |
37 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
John P. McCaskey |
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:31:54 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:24:44 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
John P. McCaskey |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:09:03 -0400 |
80 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:49:01 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
John P. McCaskey |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:00:13 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
John P. McCaskey |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:16:04 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:20:43 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
John P. McCaskey |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:42:05 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:50:07 +0000 |
64 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:57:05 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
John P. McCaskey |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:48:51 -0400 |
67 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:53:49 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
James Cummings |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:48:36 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
John A. Walsh |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:29:15 -0400 |
70 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
David Sewell |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:48:51 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Martin Holmes |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:36:40 -0700 |
79 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 22:46:02 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
John A. Walsh |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:33:58 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Lou Burnard |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 23:53:17 +0000 |
60 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
John A. Walsh |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:23:36 -0400 |
210 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
James Cummings |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:30:09 +0000 |
71 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
John A. Walsh |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 21:50:40 -0400 |
104 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Conal Tuohy |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:38:51 +1100 |
35 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
James Cummings |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:13:34 +0000 |
120 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:13:43 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:29:20 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:30:40 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
John A. Walsh |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 05:52:27 -0400 |
122 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:25:15 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Martin de la Iglesia |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:20:18 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
John A. Walsh |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 07:35:30 -0400 |
139 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Martin de la Iglesia |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:18:34 +0100 |
227 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Martin de la Iglesia |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:29:57 +0100 |
113 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 05:36:21 -0700 |
121 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Lou Burnard |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:45:35 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Martin de la Iglesia |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:50:46 +0100 |
125 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
John A. Walsh |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:05:46 -0400 |
91 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
John A. Walsh |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:08:56 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:54:42 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Martin Mueller |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:28:10 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Lou Burnard |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:41:19 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Lou Burnard |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:43:37 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:51:42 -0700 |
92 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Martin Holmes |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:56:14 -0700 |
65 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
John A. Walsh |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:09:01 -0400 |
76 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
John P. McCaskey |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:22:46 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Why no space, etc. in DIV's @type?
|
Paul F. Schaffner |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:03:45 -0400 |
107 lines |
Workshop on data modeling in the humanities: join the virtual audience
|
Julia Flanders |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:18:54 -0400 |
61 lines |
Xinclude 1.1
|
WHITE N. |
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:16:27 -0000 |
48 lines |
Re: Xinclude 1.1
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 11:11:43 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Xinclude 1.1
|
Syd Bauman |
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 06:58:38 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Xinclude 1.1
|
Piotr Bański |
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:36:25 +0100 |
73 lines |
Re: Xinclude 1.1
|
Jens Østergaard Petersen |
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:50:32 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: Xinclude 1.1
|
Sebastian Rahtz |
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:03:48 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Xinclude 1.1
|
Jens Østergaard Petersen |
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:24:21 +0100 |
87 lines |
Re: Xinclude 1.1
|
WHITE N. |
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 17:00:01 -0000 |
71 lines |
Re: Xinclude 1.1
|
Hugh Cayless |
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:11:05 -0500 |
128 lines |
Re: Xinclude 1.1
|
WHITE N. |
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 17:30:36 -0000 |
97 lines |
Re: Xinclude 1.1
|
Serge Heiden |
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 21:27:53 +0100 |
121 lines |
Re: Xinclude 1.1
|
Jens Østergaard Petersen |
Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:10:46 +0100 |
89 lines |
Re: Xinclude 1.1
|
WHITE N. |
Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:11:32 -0000 |
29 lines |
Re: Xinclude 1.1
|
Jens Østergaard Petersen |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:58:22 +0100 |
64 lines |
[ANN] BaseX 7.2: The EDBT Release
|
Christian Grün |
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:12:15 +0100 |
46 lines |
[ANN] Foreign Relations of the United States e-book initiative
|
Joe Wicentowski |
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:11:33 -0500 |
53 lines |
[ANN] Position - Historian/Technical Editor - Foreign Relations series
|
Joe Wicentowski |
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:57:00 -0400 |
32 lines |