Conlang Mailing List – February 2000, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "To be" or not "to be"?
• "To be" or not "to be"? (was Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep) (3 messages)
• Characters on the list (was: deep flutes) (4 messages)
• CHAT: Pinyin Reformed (Re: John Cowan mangles Pinyin again) (2 messages)
• CHAT: Re: Conlang dreams revisited
• CHAT: Re: Conlang dreams revisited, and Memorization (2 messages)
• CHAT: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes)
• CONLANG Digest - 5 Feb 2000 to 6 Feb 2000 (#2000-38) (4 messages)
• Four, was Re: "Sentient" (3 messages)
• in absentia
• John Cowan mangles Pinyin again (4 messages)
• Marking and Imperatives (4 messages)
• Memorization (conlang version) (11 messages)
• Nasal semivowels/fricatives? (6 messages)
• New lang (got bored) (4 messages)
• P.S. (Chinese and stuff) (2 messages)
• RV: Ubykh vowels (2 messages)
• test
• That pesky H again (was: varia)
• The Starling's Song Revisited
• Tirelat's newly found activeness (4 messages)
• TRANS: Let there be light
• TRANS: love is the law (16 messages)
• TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes) (15 messages)
• TRANS: Without Words, Without Silence (2 messages)
• Trigger systems (7 messages)
• USAGE: Louis? C'est lui (2 messages)
• [conculture] Memorization (conculture version) (7 messages)

1. "To be" or not "to be"?
   • Re: "To be" or not "to be"? (58 lines)
     From: DOUGLAS KOLLER <[log in to unmask]>

2. "To be" or not "to be"? (was Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep)
   • Re: "To be" or not "to be"? (was Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep) (154 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "To be" or not "to be"? (was Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep) (42 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "To be" or not "to be"? (was Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep) (191 lines)
     From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>

3. Characters on the list (was: deep flutes)
   • Characters on the list (was: deep flutes) (43 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters on the list (was: deep flutes) (33 lines)
     From: Daniel A. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters on the list (was: deep flutes) (35 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters on the list (was: deep flutes) (47 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

4. CHAT: Pinyin Reformed (Re: John Cowan mangles Pinyin again)
   • CHAT: Pinyin Reformed (Re: John Cowan mangles Pinyin again) (47 lines)
     From: Daniel A. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Pinyin Reformed (Re: John Cowan mangles Pinyin again) (28 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

5. CHAT: Re: Conlang dreams revisited
   • Re: CHAT: Re: Conlang dreams revisited (31 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

6. CHAT: Re: Conlang dreams revisited, and Memorization
   • Re: CHAT: Re: Conlang dreams revisited, and Memorization (41 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Re: Conlang dreams revisited, and Memorization (32 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

7. CHAT: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes)
   • CHAT: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes) (20 lines)
     From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

8. CONLANG Digest - 5 Feb 2000 to 6 Feb 2000 (#2000-38)
   • Re: CONLANG Digest - 5 Feb 2000 to 6 Feb 2000 (#2000-38) (19 lines)
     From: yl-ruil <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CONLANG Digest - 5 Feb 2000 to 6 Feb 2000 (#2000-38) (27 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CONLANG Digest - 5 Feb 2000 to 6 Feb 2000 (#2000-38) (42 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CONLANG Digest - 5 Feb 2000 to 6 Feb 2000 (#2000-38) (29 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

9. Four, was Re: "Sentient"
   • Re: Four, was Re: "Sentient" (25 lines)
     From: Ajin-Kwai <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Four, was Re: "Sentient" (23 lines)
     From: Ajin-Kwai <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Four, was Re: "Sentient" (28 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

10. in absentia
    • in absentia (64 lines)
      From: yl-ruil <[log in to unmask]>

11. John Cowan mangles Pinyin again
    • Re: John Cowan mangles Pinyin again (38 lines)
      From: Daniel A. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: John Cowan mangles Pinyin again (49 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: John Cowan mangles Pinyin again (74 lines)
      From: DOUGLAS KOLLER <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: John Cowan mangles Pinyin again (23 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

12. Marking and Imperatives
    • Re: Marking and Imperatives (40 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Marking and Imperatives (41 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Marking and Imperatives (35 lines)
      From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Marking and Imperatives (35 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

13. Memorization (conlang version)
    • Memorization (conlang version) (33 lines)
      From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Memorization (conlang version) (23 lines)
      From: Brad Coon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Memorization (conlang version) (46 lines)
      From: Ajin-Kwai <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Memorization (conlang version) (36 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Memorization (conlang version) (35 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Memorization (conlang version) (31 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Memorization (conlang version) (29 lines)
      From: Keolah Kedaire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Memorization (conlang version) (41 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Memorization (conlang version) (34 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Memorization (conlang version) (38 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Memorization (conlang version) (36 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>

14. Nasal semivowels/fricatives?
    • Nasal semivowels/fricatives? (23 lines)
      From: Markus Miekk-oja <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nasal semivowels/fricatives? (36 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nasal semivowels/fricatives? (33 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nasal semivowels/fricatives? (48 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nasal semivowels/fricatives? (33 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nasal semivowels/fricatives? (23 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

15. New lang (got bored)
    • New lang (got bored) (29 lines)
      From: Keolah Kedaire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New lang (got bored) (27 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New lang (got bored) (35 lines)
      From: Keolah Kedaire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New lang (got bored) (29 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

16. P.S. (Chinese and stuff)
    • P.S. (Chinese and stuff) (29 lines)
      From: Daniel A. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: P.S. (Chinese and stuff) (38 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

17. RV: Ubykh vowels
    • RV: Ubykh vowels (28 lines)
      From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: RV: Ubykh vowels (27 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

18. test
    • test (15 lines)
      From: Fabian van-de-l'Isle <[log in to unmask]>

19. That pesky H again (was: varia)
    • Re: That pesky H again (was: varia) (39 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

20. The Starling's Song Revisited
    • Re: The Starling's Song Revisited (222 lines)
      From: DOUGLAS KOLLER <[log in to unmask]>

21. Tirelat's newly found activeness
    • Re: Tirelat's newly found activeness (123 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tirelat's newly found activeness (98 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tirelat's newly found activeness (60 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tirelat's newly found activeness (40 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

22. TRANS: Let there be light
    • TRANS: Let there be light (35 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>

23. TRANS: love is the law
    • TRANS: love is the law (42 lines)
      From: Ajin-Kwai <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: love is the law (54 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: love is the law (31 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: love is the law (35 lines)
      From: Ajin-Kwai <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: love is the law (39 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: love is the law (66 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: love is the law (30 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: TRANS: love is the law (27 lines)
      From: yl-ruil <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: love is the law (34 lines)
      From: Daniel A. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: love is the law (38 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: love is the law (40 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: love is the law (23 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: love is the law (31 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: love is the law (28 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: TRANS: love is the law (35 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: love is the law (42 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

24. TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes)
    • Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes) (110 lines)
      From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes) (55 lines)
      From: Ajin-Kwai <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes) (81 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes) (43 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes) (38 lines)
      From: Keolah Kedaire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes) (26 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes) (21 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes) (28 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes) (34 lines)
      From: Ajin-Kwai <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes) (86 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes) (43 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes) (40 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes) (65 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes) (97 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: something slightly more deep (was: TRANS: flutes) (166 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>

25. TRANS: Without Words, Without Silence
    • Re: TRANS: Without Words, Without Silence (69 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TRANS: Without Words, Without Silence (34 lines)
      From: Ajin-Kwai <[log in to unmask]>

26. Trigger systems
    • Trigger systems (95 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Trigger systems (27 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Trigger systems (35 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Trigger systems (33 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Trigger systems (42 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Trigger systems (60 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Trigger systems (36 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

27. USAGE: Louis? C'est lui
    • Re: USAGE: Louis? C'est lui (33 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Louis? C'est lui (24 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

28. [conculture] Memorization (conculture version)
    • Re: [conculture] Memorization (conculture version) (33 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [conculture] Memorization (conculture version) (34 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [conculture] Memorization (conculture version) (43 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [conculture] Memorization (conculture version) (32 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [conculture] Memorization (conculture version) (19 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [conculture] Memorization (conculture version) (24 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [conculture] Memorization (conculture version) (34 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>