Conlang
Mailing List February 2000, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
(and yet) Some (more) examples
<No subject>
(3 messages)
A battle hymn in G'amah
A Peace Force Officer's Guide to Glug
(7 messages)
Another new lang
anymore (was: Re: the surprise that is at me...)
(10 messages)
balancing theory and practice; FAQ?
(3 messages)
Betreft: Re: More wierd phonemes
(3 messages)
Betreft: Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(2 messages)
Bob's Introduction
(2 messages)
Boreanesian /3/ (was Re: Paucity of Phonemes...
(5 messages)
CHAT: Lx humor
CHAT: RE: Importance of stress
CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...
(8 messages)
CHAT: Travel time, again!
CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2000 to 22 Feb 2000 (#2000-54)
CONLANG Digest - 24 Feb 2000 to 25 Feb 2000 (#2000-57)
conlang dreams
Conlang Spelling Conventions (was: OFF: More Pinyin reform...)
(3 messages)
death of Dr. James Cooke Brown, inventor of Loglan
English Sound Structure
Examples
(3 messages)
Fw: lincos?
(5 messages)
G'amah antipassive
(4 messages)
G'amah particles
I'm back, and I have questions....
(2 messages)
Interesting affixes
Interesting dialectal discoveries in W
L/R dialectal variation in W
Ladefoged
(8 messages)
Last bug fixed -- Tech Phonology 1.0 final release is ready!
Lojban question
Mixed-case orthography
(12 messages)
More wierd phonemes
(25 messages)
motion verbs in Tokana
(13 messages)
motion verbs in Tokana + Lojban question
Nasal semivowels/fricatives?
New Language Sketch
(4 messages)
New Language, minimal phonology
(8 messages)
Not So (was: Strange sounds)
obscene linguistics.
OFF: More Pinyin reform...
(13 messages)
oh no, not Tech phonology again
(9 messages)
Paucity of Phonemes (was Re: Thagojian phonology...
(9 messages)
Pharyngealization (was: Thagojian phonology)
Phoneme distribution
(6 messages)
phonology tutorial?
recommended texts
Strange sounds
(2 messages)
Stress and syllables
(2 messages)
Teeth (was: More weird phonemes)
Teeth (was: Re: More wierd phonemes)
(3 messages)
Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(20 messages)
the surprise that is at me...
(5 messages)
THEORY/CHAT: RE: English Sound Structure
THEORY: universalism in phonology
topicalization
(3 messages)
TRANS: guess!
(4 messages)
Unvoived (was: Re: Another new lang)
USAGE: h&ppi? (was: RE: Importance of stress)
(10 messages)
your mail
(2 messages)
(and yet) Some (more) examples
Re: (and yet) Some (more) examples
(163 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
<No subject>
(57 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
(62 lines)
From:
The Gray Wizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
(78 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
A battle hymn in G'amah
A battle hymn in G'amah
(175 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Peace Force Officer's Guide to Glug
A Peace Force Officer's Guide to Glug
(273 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Peace Force Officer's Guide to Glug
(28 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Peace Force Officer's Guide to Glug
(28 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Peace Force Officer's Guide to Glug
(28 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Peace Force Officer's Guide to Glug
(16 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Peace Force Officer's Guide to Glug
(46 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Peace Force Officer's Guide to Glug
(11 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Another new lang
Re: Another new lang
(43 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
anymore (was: Re: the surprise that is at me...)
Re: anymore (was: Re: the surprise that is at me...)
(27 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: anymore (was: Re: the surprise that is at me...)
(36 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: anymore (was: Re: the surprise that is at me...)
(36 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: anymore (was: Re: the surprise that is at me...)
(23 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: anymore (was: Re: the surprise that is at me...)
(47 lines)
From:
nicole perrin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: anymore (was: Re: the surprise that is at me...)
(35 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: anymore (was: Re: the surprise that is at me...)
(30 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: anymore (was: Re: the surprise that is at me...)
(24 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: anymore (was: Re: the surprise that is at me...)
(44 lines)
From:
John Fisher <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: anymore (was: Re: the surprise that is at me...)
(30 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
balancing theory and practice; FAQ?
balancing theory and practice; FAQ?
(54 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: balancing theory and practice; FAQ?
(43 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: balancing theory and practice; FAQ?
(24 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Betreft: Re: More wierd phonemes
Betreft: Re: More wierd phonemes
(67 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Betreft: Re: More wierd phonemes
(19 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Betreft: Re: More wierd phonemes
(25 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Betreft: Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
Betreft: Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(27 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Betreft: Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(40 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Bob's Introduction
Bob's Introduction
(50 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(35 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Boreanesian /3/ (was Re: Paucity of Phonemes...
Boreanesian /3/ (was Re: Paucity of Phonemes...
(72 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Boreanesian /3/ (was Re: Paucity of Phonemes...
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Boreanesian /3/ (was Re: Paucity of Phonemes...
(26 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Boreanesian /3/ (was Re: Paucity of Phonemes...
(55 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Boreanesian /3/ (was Re: Paucity of Phonemes...
(26 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Lx humor
CHAT: Lx humor
(45 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: RE: Importance of stress
Re: CHAT: RE: Importance of stress
(43 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...
CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...
(31 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...
(32 lines)
From:
B Elliott Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...
(26 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...
(35 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...
(31 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...
(29 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...
(30 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...
(32 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Travel time, again!
CHAT: Travel time, again!
(30 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2000 to 22 Feb 2000 (#2000-54)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 21 Feb 2000 to 22 Feb 2000 (#2000-54)
(45 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 24 Feb 2000 to 25 Feb 2000 (#2000-57)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 24 Feb 2000 to 25 Feb 2000 (#2000-57)
(27 lines)
From:
Fredrik Ekman <
[log in to unmask]
>
conlang dreams
conlang dreams
(39 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Spelling Conventions (was: OFF: More Pinyin reform...)
Conlang Spelling Conventions (was: OFF: More Pinyin reform...)
(37 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Spelling Conventions (was: OFF: More Pinyin reform...)
(25 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Spelling Conventions (was: OFF: More Pinyin reform...)
(30 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
death of Dr. James Cooke Brown, inventor of Loglan
Re: death of Dr. James Cooke Brown, inventor of Loglan
(78 lines)
From:
Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) <
[log in to unmask]
>
English Sound Structure
English Sound Structure
(36 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Examples
Re: Examples
(58 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Examples
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Examples
(42 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fw: lincos?
Fw: lincos?
(32 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fw: lincos?
(31 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fw: lincos?
(22 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fw: lincos?
(26 lines)
From:
nicole perrin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fw: lincos?
(53 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
G'amah antipassive
G'amah antipassive
(55 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: G'amah antipassive
(62 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: G'amah antipassive
(48 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: G'amah antipassive
(26 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
G'amah particles
G'amah particles
(178 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
I'm back, and I have questions....
I'm back, and I have questions....
(130 lines)
From:
yl-ruil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I'm back, and I have questions....
(31 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Interesting affixes
Interesting affixes
(39 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Interesting dialectal discoveries in W
Interesting dialectal discoveries in W
(45 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
L/R dialectal variation in W
L/R dialectal variation in W
(32 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ladefoged
Ladefoged
(29 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ladefoged
(30 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ladefoged
(32 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ladefoged
(34 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ladefoged
(29 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ladefoged
(35 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ladefoged
(49 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ladefoged
(30 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Last bug fixed -- Tech Phonology 1.0 final release is ready!
Last bug fixed -- Tech Phonology 1.0 final release is ready!
(34 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lojban question
Re: Lojban question
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mixed-case orthography
Mixed-case orthography
(46 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(39 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(49 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(58 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(34 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(48 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(26 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(55 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(48 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(29 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(30 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(54 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
More wierd phonemes
More wierd phonemes
(39 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(60 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(62 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(52 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(56 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(12 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(30 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(24 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(29 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(21 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(23 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(36 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(30 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(24 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(20 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(19 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(29 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(58 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(29 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(21 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(24 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More wierd phonemes
(62 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
motion verbs in Tokana
motion verbs in Tokana
(82 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: motion verbs in Tokana
(74 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: motion verbs in Tokana
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: motion verbs in Tokana
(90 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: motion verbs in Tokana
(45 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: motion verbs in Tokana
(159 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: motion verbs in Tokana
(67 lines)
From:
Brad Coon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: motion verbs in Tokana
(31 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: motion verbs in Tokana
(28 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: motion verbs in Tokana
(50 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: motion verbs in Tokana
(70 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: motion verbs in Tokana
(34 lines)
From:
Brad Coon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: motion verbs in Tokana
(49 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
motion verbs in Tokana + Lojban question
Re: motion verbs in Tokana + Lojban question
(31 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nasal semivowels/fricatives?
Re: Nasal semivowels/fricatives?
(37 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Language Sketch
New Language Sketch
(99 lines)
From:
nicole perrin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Language Sketch
(47 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Language Sketch
(47 lines)
From:
nicole perrin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Language Sketch
(22 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Language, minimal phonology
New Language, minimal phonology
(60 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Language, minimal phonology
(50 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Language, minimal phonology
(23 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Language, minimal phonology
(39 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Language, minimal phonology
(63 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Language, minimal phonology
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Language, minimal phonology
(19 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Language, minimal phonology
(48 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Not So (was: Strange sounds)
Not So (was: Strange sounds)
(48 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
obscene linguistics.
obscene linguistics.
(959 lines)
From:
B Elliott Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
OFF: More Pinyin reform...
OFF: More Pinyin reform...
(98 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OFF: More Pinyin reform...
(69 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OFF: More Pinyin reform...
(56 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OFF: More Pinyin reform...
(54 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OFF: More Pinyin reform...
(73 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OFF: More Pinyin reform...
(93 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OFF: More Pinyin reform...
(65 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OFF: More Pinyin reform...
(58 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OFF: More Pinyin reform...
(45 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OFF: More Pinyin reform...
(32 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OFF: More Pinyin reform...
(19 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OFF: More Pinyin reform...
(28 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OFF: More Pinyin reform...
(28 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
oh no, not Tech phonology again
oh no, not Tech phonology again
(115 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again
(44 lines)
From:
Kenji Schwarz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again
(37 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again
(34 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again
(47 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again
(16 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again
(67 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again
(59 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Paucity of Phonemes (was Re: Thagojian phonology...
Paucity of Phonemes (was Re: Thagojian phonology...
(53 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paucity of Phonemes (was Re: Thagojian phonology...
(32 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paucity of Phonemes (was Re: Thagojian phonology...
(39 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paucity of Phonemes (was Re: Thagojian phonology...
(28 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paucity of Phonemes (was Re: Thagojian phonology...
(24 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paucity of Phonemes (was Re: Thagojian phonology...
(37 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paucity of Phonemes (was Re: Thagojian phonology...
(37 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paucity of Phonemes (was Re: Thagojian phonology...
(28 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paucity of Phonemes (was Re: Thagojian phonology...
(29 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pharyngealization (was: Thagojian phonology)
Pharyngealization (was: Thagojian phonology)
(26 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phoneme distribution
Phoneme distribution
(25 lines)
From:
Fredrik Ekman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phoneme distribution
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phoneme distribution
(40 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phoneme distribution
(67 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phoneme distribution
(76 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phoneme distribution
(48 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
phonology tutorial?
phonology tutorial?
(30 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
recommended texts
recommended texts
(19 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Strange sounds
Strange sounds
(33 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strange sounds
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Stress and syllables
Stress and syllables
(23 lines)
From:
Fredrik Ekman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress and syllables
(36 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Teeth (was: More weird phonemes)
Re: Teeth (was: More weird phonemes)
(37 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Teeth (was: Re: More wierd phonemes)
Teeth (was: Re: More wierd phonemes)
(32 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Teeth (was: Re: More wierd phonemes)
(32 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Teeth (was: Re: More wierd phonemes)
(24 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(139 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(217 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(51 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(51 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(64 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(296 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(32 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(25 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(83 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(21 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(33 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(37 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(24 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(28 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(56 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(22 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(19 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian phonology (was Re: oh no, not Tech phonology again)
(36 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
the surprise that is at me...
the surprise that is at me...
(931 lines)
From:
B Elliott Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the surprise that is at me...
(40 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the surprise that is at me...
(28 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the surprise that is at me...
(26 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the surprise that is at me...
(27 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY/CHAT: RE: English Sound Structure
THEORY/CHAT: RE: English Sound Structure
(48 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: universalism in phonology
THEORY: universalism in phonology
(51 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
topicalization
topicalization
(63 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: topicalization
(25 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: topicalization
(23 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
TRANS: guess!
Re: TRANS: guess!
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANS: guess!
(20 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANS: guess!
(88 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANS: guess!
(115 lines)
From:
John Fisher <
[log in to unmask]
>
Unvoived (was: Re: Another new lang)
Unvoived (was: Re: Another new lang)
(19 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: h&ppi? (was: RE: Importance of stress)
Re: USAGE: h&ppi? (was: RE: Importance of stress)
(48 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: h&ppi? (was: RE: Importance of stress)
(26 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: h&ppi? (was: RE: Importance of stress)
(37 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: h&ppi? (was: RE: Importance of stress)
(38 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: h&ppi? (was: RE: Importance of stress)
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: h&ppi? (was: RE: Importance of stress)
(26 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: h&ppi? (was: RE: Importance of stress)
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: h&ppi? (was: RE: Importance of stress)
(24 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: h&ppi? (was: RE: Importance of stress)
(62 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: h&ppi? (was: RE: Importance of stress)
(26 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
your mail
Re: your mail
(109 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: your mail
(34 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU