Conlang
Mailing List March 2000, week 1
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"the"
(4 messages)
10-year anniversary (was Re: CHAT: Re: More enter-bringings)
(8 messages)
<No subject>
A poem by Ryokun
(5 messages)
Amman-Iar stress & gemination
An alternative IPA font!
Are/our/hour
(5 messages)
balancing theory and practice; FAQ?
(2 messages)
Betreft: Labiodental approximant?
Betreft: Re: Bob's Introduction
(2 messages)
Bob's Introduction
(22 messages)
Canada Uber Alles
Cases
(2 messages)
CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(24 messages)
CHAT: "have a nice day"
(85 messages)
CHAT: "have a nice day" (was: Re: Bob's Introduction)
(2 messages)
CHAT: long streets
(2 messages)
CHAT: long streets (and 2pl pronouns)
(2 messages)
CHAT: Need help naming a musical instrument
(4 messages)
CHAT: Re: Bob's Introduction
(2 messages)
CHAT: Re: More enter-bringings
(2 messages)
CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...
(3 messages)
CHAT: sluttishness (was: RE: Bob's Introduction)
(8 messages)
CHAT: The American Revolution = World War II? (was Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day")
CHAT: the ear, nose, and throat doctor
(3 messages)
CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(20 messages)
CHAT: The Mexican War (was Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day")
CONLANG Digest - 2 Mar 2000 to 3 Mar 2000 (#2000-64)
CONLANG Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-61)
(6 messages)
CONLANG Digest - 3 Mar 2000 to 6 Mar 2000 (#2000-65)
Dhammapada
Have a nice day, and other things...
Kelen
Kemrese proverb, was Re: Brezhoneg Proverbs
Labiodental approximant
(2 messages)
Labiodental approximant?
(6 messages)
Language sketch -- Lassaptakl
(5 messages)
liking (was: Re: Have a nice day, and other things...)
(3 messages)
Loglan Web Pages Have Moved
Mixed-case orthography
(18 messages)
More enter-bringings
(14 messages)
Names for derivative forms - request for comments PLEASE :)
Nasals (again!) and a stress-question
(3 messages)
New Rokbeigalmki Webpage Under Construction
(2 messages)
pharyngeals and the tongue root
Phenomena
(34 messages)
Pitakosilano (was Betreft: Re: Bob's Introduction)
Ptauti and RE: interfix/infix
(2 messages)
SciFi Dreams of Univeral Translation
Simple but Complicated (was: phonology and inventory)
(2 messages)
Talarian script.
(3 messages)
test
TEST TEST TEST
(2 messages)
THEORY: phonology and inventory
(2 messages)
THEORY: Yivríndil phonology problems
Time to play Identify Those Phones, and a bi
Time to play Identify Those Phones, and a bit of a pharyngeal question
(10 messages)
Time to play Identify Those Phones,and a bit of a pharyngeal question
TRANS: from the Dhammapada
(2 messages)
TRANS: Motherhood (was: Re: Have a nice day, and other things...)
translation (finally in Mungayöd) the dog in the tree
translation (was: Re: CHAT: "have a nice day")
(5 messages)
translation: can't read my own diacritics!
Unicode Charts (was Re: Mixed-case orthography)
USAGE: Norwegian "w" (was: Labiodental approximant?)
USAGE: that's (was: RE: CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...)
Verbal system in Itakian
(7 messages)
Very odd occurances with the list.
(4 messages)
Website update
(2 messages)
World War, was Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
[Fwd: Re: More enter-bringings]
(5 messages)
"the"
Re: "the"
(58 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "the"
(47 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "the"
(49 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "the"
(41 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
10-year anniversary (was Re: CHAT: Re: More enter-bringings)
10-year anniversary (was Re: CHAT: Re: More enter-bringings)
(42 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 10-year anniversary (was Re: CHAT: Re: More enter-bringings)
(21 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 10-year anniversary (was Re: CHAT: Re: More enter-bringings)
(31 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 10-year anniversary (was Re: CHAT: Re: More enter-bringings)
(36 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 10-year anniversary (was Re: CHAT: Re: More enter-bringings)
(44 lines)
From:
Daniel Seriff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 10-year anniversary (was Re: CHAT: Re: More enter-bringings)
(30 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 10-year anniversary (was Re: CHAT: Re: More enter-bringings)
(33 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 10-year anniversary (was Re: CHAT: Re: More enter-bringings)
(30 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
<No subject>
(10 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
A poem by Ryokun
Re: A poem by Ryokun
(60 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A poem by Ryokun
(36 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A poem by Ryokun
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A poem by Ryokun
(60 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A poem by Ryokun
(60 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Amman-Iar stress & gemination
Re: Amman-Iar stress & gemination
(232 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
An alternative IPA font!
An alternative IPA font!
(54 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Are/our/hour
Are/our/hour
(26 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are/our/hour
(30 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are/our/hour
(19 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are/our/hour
(33 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are/our/hour
(45 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
balancing theory and practice; FAQ?
Re: balancing theory and practice; FAQ?
(23 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: balancing theory and practice; FAQ?
(23 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Betreft: Labiodental approximant?
Betreft: Labiodental approximant?
(40 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Betreft: Re: Bob's Introduction
Betreft: Re: Bob's Introduction
(20 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Betreft: Re: Bob's Introduction
(29 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Bob's Introduction
Re: Bob's Introduction
(33 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(48 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(25 lines)
From:
yl-ruil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(17 lines)
From:
yl-ruil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(25 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(26 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(28 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(22 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(26 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(29 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(30 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(38 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(20 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(24 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(27 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(35 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(27 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(28 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(30 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(33 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(33 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bob's Introduction
(29 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Canada Uber Alles
Canada Uber Alles
(59 lines)
From:
yl-ruil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cases
Re: Cases
(37 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cases
(47 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(32 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(34 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(22 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(16 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(57 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(26 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(28 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(31 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(54 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(38 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(59 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(34 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(44 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(25 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(35 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(19 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: "have a nice day"
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(30 lines)
From:
yl-ruil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(24 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(44 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(32 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(44 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(27 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(47 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(34 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(25 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(24 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(30 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(15 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(15 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(39 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(23 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(29 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(26 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(22 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(31 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(24 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(31 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(29 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(22 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(54 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(36 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(27 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(22 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(44 lines)
From:
B Elliott Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(53 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(63 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(37 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(42 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(40 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(23 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(41 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(15 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(16 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(19 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(30 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(28 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(26 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(21 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(51 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(28 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(23 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(25 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(31 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(47 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(33 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(31 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(34 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(26 lines)
From:
yl-ruil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(26 lines)
From:
yl-ruil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(28 lines)
From:
Jesse S. Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(21 lines)
From:
B Elliott Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(28 lines)
From:
B Elliott Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(23 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(42 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(27 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(28 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(19 lines)
From:
yl-ruil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(32 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(34 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(23 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(34 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(29 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(37 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(36 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(35 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(28 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(19 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(43 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(32 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(27 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(41 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(49 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
(23 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: "have a nice day" (was: Re: Bob's Introduction)
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day" (was: Re: Bob's Introduction)
(19 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "have a nice day" (was: Re: Bob's Introduction)
(22 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: long streets
Re: CHAT: long streets
(23 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: long streets
(29 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: long streets (and 2pl pronouns)
Re: CHAT: long streets (and 2pl pronouns)
(38 lines)
From:
Jesse S. Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: long streets (and 2pl pronouns)
(30 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Need help naming a musical instrument
CHAT: Need help naming a musical instrument
(43 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Need help naming a musical instrument
(59 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Need help naming a musical instrument
(20 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Need help naming a musical instrument
(53 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Re: Bob's Introduction
CHAT: Re: Bob's Introduction
(39 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: Bob's Introduction
(45 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Re: More enter-bringings
CHAT: Re: More enter-bringings
(53 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: More enter-bringings
(34 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...
Re: CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...
(50 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...
(37 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: sluttishness (was: RE: Bob's Introduction)
CHAT: sluttishness (was: RE: Bob's Introduction)
(36 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: sluttishness (was: RE: Bob's Introduction)
(33 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: sluttishness (was: RE: Bob's Introduction)
(29 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: sluttishness (was: RE: Bob's Introduction)
(22 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: sluttishness (was: RE: Bob's Introduction)
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: sluttishness (was: RE: Bob's Introduction)
(40 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: sluttishness (was: RE: Bob's Introduction)
(29 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: sluttishness (was: RE: Bob's Introduction)
(20 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: The American Revolution = World War II? (was Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day")
CHAT: The American Revolution = World War II? (was Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day")
(74 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: the ear, nose, and throat doctor
CHAT: the ear, nose, and throat doctor
(23 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the ear, nose, and throat doctor
(26 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the ear, nose, and throat doctor
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(30 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(29 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(41 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(32 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(24 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(23 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(42 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(30 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(24 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(31 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(28 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(33 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(28 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(39 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(23 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the gay Canadian (was: "have a nice day")
(25 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: The Mexican War (was Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day")
CHAT: The Mexican War (was Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day")
(46 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 2 Mar 2000 to 3 Mar 2000 (#2000-64)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 2 Mar 2000 to 3 Mar 2000 (#2000-64)
(52 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-61)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-61)
(34 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-61)
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-61)
(39 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-61)
(44 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-61)
(32 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-61)
(14 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 3 Mar 2000 to 6 Mar 2000 (#2000-65)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 3 Mar 2000 to 6 Mar 2000 (#2000-65)
(27 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dhammapada
Dhammapada
(15 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Have a nice day, and other things...
Have a nice day, and other things...
(44 lines)
From:
Mia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kelen
Kelen
(26 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kemrese proverb, was Re: Brezhoneg Proverbs
Kemrese proverb, was Re: Brezhoneg Proverbs
(31 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Labiodental approximant
Re: Labiodental approximant
(21 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Labiodental approximant
(26 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Labiodental approximant?
Labiodental approximant?
(29 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Labiodental approximant?
(34 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Labiodental approximant?
(45 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Labiodental approximant?
(44 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Labiodental approximant?
(33 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Labiodental approximant?
(15 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language sketch -- Lassaptakl
Language sketch -- Lassaptakl
(208 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language sketch -- Lassaptakl
(35 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language sketch -- Lassaptakl
(49 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language sketch -- Lassaptakl
(109 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language sketch -- Lassaptakl
(28 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
liking (was: Re: Have a nice day, and other things...)
liking (was: Re: Have a nice day, and other things...)
(32 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: liking (was: Re: Have a nice day, and other things...)
(29 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: liking (was: Re: Have a nice day, and other things...)
(50 lines)
From:
Mia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Loglan Web Pages Have Moved
Loglan Web Pages Have Moved
(17 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mixed-case orthography
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(74 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(38 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(29 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(83 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(64 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(27 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(19 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(76 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(25 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(32 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(25 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(32 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(28 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(28 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(28 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed-case orthography
(38 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
More enter-bringings
More enter-bringings
(58 lines)
From:
Jesse S. Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More enter-bringings
(75 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More enter-bringings
(25 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More enter-bringings
(28 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More enter-bringings
(30 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More enter-bringings
(24 lines)
From:
yl-ruil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More enter-bringings
(40 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More enter-bringings
(35 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More enter-bringings
(24 lines)
From:
Brad Coon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More enter-bringings
(33 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More enter-bringings
(54 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More enter-bringings
(17 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More enter-bringings
(24 lines)
From:
yl-ruil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More enter-bringings
(25 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Names for derivative forms - request for comments PLEASE :)
Names for derivative forms - request for comments PLEASE :)
(131 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nasals (again!) and a stress-question
Nasals (again!) and a stress-question
(49 lines)
From:
Markus Miekk-oja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nasals (again!) and a stress-question
(30 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nasals (again!) and a stress-question
(58 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Rokbeigalmki Webpage Under Construction
New Rokbeigalmki Webpage Under Construction
(27 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Rokbeigalmki Webpage Under Construction
(42 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
pharyngeals and the tongue root
pharyngeals and the tongue root
(29 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phenomena
Phenomena
(40 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(24 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(31 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(32 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(53 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(22 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(36 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(49 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(43 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(24 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(31 lines)
From:
nicole perrin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(41 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(37 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(32 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(27 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(44 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(39 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(20 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(53 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(48 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(33 lines)
From:
yl-ruil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(25 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(51 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(18 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(31 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(33 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(18 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(34 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(38 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(56 lines)
From:
Jesse S. Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(32 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(28 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phenomena
(38 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pitakosilano (was Betreft: Re: Bob's Introduction)
Pitakosilano (was Betreft: Re: Bob's Introduction)
(43 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ptauti and RE: interfix/infix
Ptauti and RE: interfix/infix
(53 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ptauti and RE: interfix/infix
(28 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
SciFi Dreams of Univeral Translation
SciFi Dreams of Univeral Translation
(167 lines)
From:
Acadon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Simple but Complicated (was: phonology and inventory)
Simple but Complicated (was: phonology and inventory)
(114 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Simple but Complicated (was: phonology and inventory)
(24 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Talarian script.
Talarian script.
(14 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Talarian script.
(25 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Talarian script.
(19 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
test
test
(25 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
TEST TEST TEST
TEST TEST TEST
(18 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEST TEST TEST
(26 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: phonology and inventory
Re: THEORY: phonology and inventory
(33 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: phonology and inventory
(55 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Yivríndil phonology problems
THEORY: Yivríndil phonology problems
(99 lines)
From:
Jesse S. Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Time to play Identify Those Phones, and a bi
Re: Time to play Identify Those Phones, and a bi
(42 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Time to play Identify Those Phones, and a bit of a pharyngeal question
Time to play Identify Those Phones, and a bit of a pharyngeal question
(27 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Time to play Identify Those Phones, and a bit of a pharyngeal question
(45 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Time to play Identify Those Phones, and a bit of a pharyngeal question
(69 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Time to play Identify Those Phones, and a bit of a pharyngeal question
(61 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Time to play Identify Those Phones, and a bit of a pharyngeal question
(59 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Time to play Identify Those Phones, and a bit of a pharyngeal question
(34 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Time to play Identify Those Phones, and a bit of a pharyngeal question
(55 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Time to play Identify Those Phones, and a bit of a pharyngeal question
(72 lines)
From:
Sven Sommerfeld <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Time to play Identify Those Phones, and a bit of a pharyngeal question
(54 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Time to play Identify Those Phones, and a bit of a pharyngeal question
(51 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Time to play Identify Those Phones,and a bit of a pharyngeal question
Re: Time to play Identify Those Phones,and a bit of a pharyngeal question
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
TRANS: from the Dhammapada
TRANS: from the Dhammapada
(39 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANS: from the Dhammapada
(53 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
TRANS: Motherhood (was: Re: Have a nice day, and other things...)
Re: TRANS: Motherhood (was: Re: Have a nice day, and other things...)
(86 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
translation (finally in Mungayöd) the dog in the tree
Re: translation (finally in Mungayöd) the dog in the tree
(54 lines)
From:
Daniel Seriff <
[log in to unmask]
>
translation (was: Re: CHAT: "have a nice day")
translation (was: Re: CHAT: "have a nice day")
(55 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: translation (was: Re: CHAT: "have a nice day")
(53 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: translation (was: Re: CHAT: "have a nice day")
(39 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: translation (was: Re: CHAT: "have a nice day")
(47 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: translation (was: Re: CHAT: "have a nice day")
(70 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
translation: can't read my own diacritics!
Re: translation: can't read my own diacritics!
(28 lines)
From:
Daniel Seriff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Unicode Charts (was Re: Mixed-case orthography)
Unicode Charts (was Re: Mixed-case orthography)
(47 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Norwegian "w" (was: Labiodental approximant?)
USAGE: Norwegian "w" (was: Labiodental approximant?)
(29 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: that's (was: RE: CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...)
USAGE: that's (was: RE: CHAT: Re: the surprise that is at me...)
(32 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Verbal system in Itakian
Verbal system in Itakian
(165 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal system in Itakian
(51 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal system in Itakian
(65 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal system in Itakian
(29 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal system in Itakian
(32 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal system in Itakian
(38 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal system in Itakian
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Very odd occurances with the list.
Very odd occurances with the list.
(20 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Very odd occurances with the list.
(32 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Very odd occurances with the list.
(26 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Very odd occurances with the list.
(22 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Website update
Website update
(25 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Website update
(26 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
World War, was Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
World War, was Re: CHAT: "have a Canadian day"
(41 lines)
From:
Brad Coon <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Fwd: Re: More enter-bringings]
[Fwd: Re: More enter-bringings]
(34 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: Re: More enter-bringings]
(39 lines)
From:
Brad Coon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: Re: More enter-bringings]
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: Re: More enter-bringings]
(50 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: Re: More enter-bringings]
(28 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU