Conlang
Mailing List May 2000, week 2
Sort by
Author
| Date |
Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Re: Headfirst Again
(90 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Morae (was: Re: Lurkers, poetic forms)
(52 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: imagining language(s)
(50 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello? and a question
(54 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(60 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Betreft: Conlang Presentation (all participants of the Starling's SongRelay concerned)
(69 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: imagining language(s) & more on Synthrax
(60 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: O-ogonek
(38 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
3rd-person imperative
(46 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(122 lines)
From:
John Mietus <
[log in to unmask]
>
R: Re: PinYin - Reformed Latin-script Mandarin writing
(23 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
R: Re: Phonology and Questions
(23 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(87 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(34 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(33 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Reformed Latin-script writing for natlangs
(26 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello? and a question
(32 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology and Questions
(27 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Frog Man Vowels (Old Norse o-ogonek/Danish accents)
(30 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello? and a question
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telek Verbs
(45 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(98 lines)
From:
Carlos Eugenio Thompson (EDC) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: O-ogonek
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello? and a question
(32 lines)
From:
Carlos Eugenio Thompson (EDC) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: O-ogonek
(30 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telek Verbs
(45 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: R: Re: Phonology and Questions
(23 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(76 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(27 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Script evolution
(30 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(33 lines)
From:
Carlos Eugenio Thompson (EDC) <
[log in to unmask]
>
R: Re: Morae (was: Re: Lurkers, poetic forms)
(23 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
(LONG) on conlang software (was Re: Lojban program and conlang software ideas)
(270 lines)
From:
Brook Conner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Grinding it out slowly (YANC in progress)
(126 lines)
From:
M. Sherryandra Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3rd-person imperative
(25 lines)
From:
M. Sherryandra Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3rd-person imperative
(49 lines)
From:
Daniel Seriff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: O-ogonek
(92 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3rd-person imperative
(59 lines)
From:
Matthew Faupel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Celtic substrate (was: CHAT: RE: Italian Particles)
(22 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: By.: Loose Chippings
(19 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: R: Re: Morae (was: Re: Lurkers, poetic forms)
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(41 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello? and a question
(30 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(30 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Conculture] Conproverbs
(118 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Script evolution
(54 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: O-ogonek
(22 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: O-ogonek
(50 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: O-ogonek
(37 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Celtic substrate (was: CHAT: RE: Italian Particles)
(36 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: O-ogonek
(54 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANS: Fw: names of ants
(38 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Reformed Latin-script writing for natlangs
(65 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Frog Man Vowels (Old Norse o-ogonek/Danish accents)
(29 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Good news and bad news, concerning "I Love You"...
(26 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(39 lines)
From:
John Mietus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Script evolution
(36 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology and Questions
(32 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(184 lines)
From:
John Mietus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3rd-person imperative
(143 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello? and a question
(22 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology and Questions
(27 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Grinding it out slowly (YANC in progress)
(17 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Frog Man Vowels (Old Norse o-ogonek/Danish accents)
(28 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(24 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3rd-person imperative
(32 lines)
From:
Brad Coon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(23 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology and Questions
(17 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3rd-person imperative
(29 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Re-formed" Latin-script writing
(25 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FW: Tall, thin screen
(43 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
3d person imperative
(53 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3rd-person imperative
(23 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3rd-person imperative
(50 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Morae (was: Re: Lurkers, poetic forms)
(54 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: imagining language(s) & more on Synthrax
(39 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3rd-person imperative
(42 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(68 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology and Questions
(32 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
a Doth emManthi -- The Book of Charms
(41 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(159 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: orthographic borrowings
(35 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Great Moments in Con/Auxlang Filmmaking
(51 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unamerican
(41 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(41 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(35 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Script evolution
(26 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Script evolution
(39 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology and Questions
(26 lines)
From:
John Mietus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(53 lines)
From:
John Mietus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(30 lines)
From:
John Mietus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Grinding it out slowly (YANC in progress)
(15 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
A'stou part I
(187 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(59 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3rd-person imperative
(39 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: O-ogonek
(22 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3d person imperative
(32 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Exercise in orthographic aesthetics
(78 lines)
From:
yl-ruil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3rd-person imperative
(25 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Re-formed" Latin-script writing
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exercise in orthographic aesthetics
(29 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exercise in orthographic aesthetics
(36 lines)
From:
Carlos Eugenio Thompson (EDC) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Re-formed" Latin-script writing
(60 lines)
From:
AcadonBot <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exercise in orthographic aesthetics
(22 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Grinding it out slowly (YANC in progress)
(27 lines)
From:
M. Sherryandra Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Correction to yesterday's post--
(21 lines)
From:
M. Sherryandra Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exercise in orthographic aesthetics
(89 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exercise in orthographic aesthetics
(34 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
monkeyin' around (quotes in Flemish & Negerhollands [a Dutch creole])
(26 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Request for a lost font...
(16 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Hello? and a question
(104 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3rd-person imperative
(36 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Survival of the fittest (was: Religion etc.)
(23 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Finally, a script for Mun'gayöd
(40 lines)
From:
Daniel Seriff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: O-ogonek
(37 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3d person imperative
(50 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exercise in orthographic aesthetics
(34 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese dialects (was "re-formed" Latin Scripts)
(33 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese "languages"
(46 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Carasha'n
(24 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Script evolution
(60 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exercise in orthographic aesthetics
(35 lines)
From:
nicole perrin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exercise in orthographic aesthetics
(21 lines)
From:
Carlos Eugenio Thompson (EDC) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Script evolution
(36 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exercise in orthographic aesthetics
(34 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese "languages"
(28 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exercise in orthographic aesthetics
(92 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unamerican
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Request for a lost font...
(24 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(30 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a Doth emManthi -- The Book of Charms
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a Doth emManthi -- The Book of Charms
(26 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese "languages"
(79 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: orthographic borrowings
(29 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(27 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kolagian Unicode fonts
(40 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A'stou part I
(69 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exercise in orthographic aesthetics
(41 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: orthographic borrowings
(32 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Request for a lost font...
(23 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: orthographic borrowings
(30 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Finally, a script for Mun'gayöd
(31 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Your Help Appreciated
(71 lines)
From:
John Mietus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Finally, a script for Mun'gayöd
(20 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: O-ogonek
(27 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(60 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese "languages"
(23 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonemic spellin of "science"
(21 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: orthographic borrowings
(30 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(38 lines)
From:
Brad Coon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonemic spellin of "science"
(29 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonemic spellin of "science"
(19 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
3rd-person imperative
(15 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3rd-person imperative (fwd)
(36 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonemic spellin of "science"
(32 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonemic spellin of "science"
(36 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(51 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
External History of WatakassÃ
(83 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Number nine, number nine.,..
(36 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
alternative vocabulary/alternative worldviews... was Re: phonemic spellin of "science"
(39 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonemic spellin of "science"
(60 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3rd-person imperative (fwd)
(41 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Number nine, number nine.,..
(35 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonemic spellin of "science"
(32 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(35 lines)
From:
Brad Coon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(37 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonemic spellin of "science"
(24 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(29 lines)
From:
Brad Coon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 8 May
(251 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exercise in orthographic aesthetics
(36 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 8 May
(23 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(34 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonemic spellin of "science"
(38 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonemic spellin of "science"
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Number eight! (was: Re: Number nine, number nine.,..)
(51 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Das Chinesische Pidgin Englisch _Ham Soi_
(33 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: alternative vocabulary/alternative worldviews... was Re: phonemic spellin of "science"
(34 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Number nine, number nine.,..
(24 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Number eight! (was: Re: Number nine, number nine.,..)
(40 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A'stou part I
(104 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
R: Re: 3rd-person imperative
(22 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: R: Re: 3rd-person imperative
(23 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: orthographic borrowings
(31 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonemic spellin of "science"
(25 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
De gustibus (was: phonemic spellin of "science")
(24 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Das Chinesische Pidgin Englisch _Ham Soi_
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: De gustibus (was: phonemic spellin of "science")
(31 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telek Verbs
(117 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rokbeigalmki Logographs
(509 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese "languages"
(26 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exercise in orthographic aesthetics
(37 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3rd-person imperative
(27 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Finally, a script for Mun'gayöd
(32 lines)
From:
Kenji Schwarz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Das Chinesische Pidgin Englisch _Ham Soi_
(47 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A'stou part I
(24 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 8 May
(72 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
veddy ;) interesting idea for possible applied conlanging
(19 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Reformed Latin-script writing for natlangs
(29 lines)
From:
LIJESH KRISHNAN <
[log in to unmask]
>
Regarding "Number Nine"...
(43 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Hindilish" & "Hinglish"
(38 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Reformed Latin-script writing for natlangs
(46 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regarding "Number Nine"...
(21 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ideas for a conlang-friendly Unicode text editor (long)
(169 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 8 May
(31 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telek Verbs
(89 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'ing "Number Nine"...
(26 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regarding "Number Nine"...
(29 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regarding "Number Nine"...
(30 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ideas for a conlang-friendly Unicode text editor (long)
(16 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Reformed Latin-script writing for natlangs
(38 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Reformed Latin-script writing for natlangs
(38 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A'stou part I
(33 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 8 May
(30 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 8 May
(44 lines)
From:
Carlos Eugenio Thompson (EDC) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 8 May
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 8 May
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fw: Abbott and Costello learn Hebrew
(244 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
is this working?
(18 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: is this working?
(75 lines)
From:
Gressett, David <
[log in to unmask]
>
Carashán, the solution
(167 lines)
From:
yl-ruil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: is this working?
(37 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Carashán, the solution
(63 lines)
From:
AcadonBot <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Carashán, the solution
(24 lines)
From:
M. Sherryandra Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ideas for a conlang-friendly Unicode text editor (long)
(35 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Carashn, the solution
(21 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
interesting language
(23 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the interesting language
(41 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): Carashán, the solution
(27 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 9 May 2000
(190 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ideas for a conlang-friendly Unicode text editor (long)
(11 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Re(2): Carashán, the solution
(30 lines)
From:
AcadonBot <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 8 May
(31 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: interesting language
(30 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 8 May
(15 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: CONLANG Digest - 9 May 2000
(66 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 9 May 2000
(33 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): Re(2): Carashán, the solution
(49 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
a lil bit o' Jabberwocky in National Romanization Mandarin
(20 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 9 May 2000
(24 lines)
From:
John Mietus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chinese "languages"
(17 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 9 May 2000
(26 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 9 May 2000
(30 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese +ACI-languages+ACI-
(31 lines)
From:
AcadonBot <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 9 May 2000
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 10 May 2000 (still mainly English)
(156 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 10 May 2000 (still mainly English)
(103 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 10 May 2000 (still mainly English)
(24 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ideas for a conlang-friendly Unicode text editor (long)
(17 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Pronunciation of Slough
(23 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Pronunciation of Slough
(31 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: English spelling reform`
(95 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 10 May 2000 (still mainly English)
(78 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(73 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regarding "Number Nine"...
(46 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Reformed Latin-script writing for natlangs
(31 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Survival of the fittest (was: Religion etc.)
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Reformed Latin-script writing for natlangs
(22 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Artlang-driven English spelling reform
(42 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Survival of the fittest (was: Religion etc.)
(20 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
"Frogman" -- an IE language!
(115 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Artlang-driven English spelling reform
(29 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: English spelling reform`
(33 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
VB: Sum: Inventing Languages
(356 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(98 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: English spelling reform`
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Artlang-driven English spelling reform
(122 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Artlang-driven English spelling reform
(28 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(29 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regarding "Number Nine"...
(25 lines)
From:
nicole perrin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Frogman" -- an IE language!
(19 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Frogman" -- an IE language!
(18 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regarding "Number Nine"...
(37 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Artlang-driven English spelling reform
(74 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exercise in orthographic aesthetics
(30 lines)
From:
LIJESH KRISHNAN <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Hindilish" & "Hinglish"
(75 lines)
From:
LIJESH KRISHNAN <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Frogman" -- an IE language!
(19 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Hindilish" & "Hinglish"
(23 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Frogman" -- an IE language!
(28 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(80 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Frogman" -- an IE language!
(24 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(31 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
multiple responses
(10 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
catching up
(31 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Frogman" -- an IE language!
(35 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
PIE Sound changes
(23 lines)
From:
John Mietus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Hindilish" & "Hinglish"
(40 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sinthrax=> Lingu Frakas...question re: TMA (tenses, mood & aspects)
(25 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(22 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Frogman" -- an IE language!
(31 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(20 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Hindilish" & "Hinglish"
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sinthrax=> Lingu Frakas...question re: TMA (tenses,mood & aspects)
(44 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Frogman" -- an IE language!
(71 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(21 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(33 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Microsoft has an Indic Font!!
(19 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
P.S. (Indic font)
(10 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello? and a question
(36 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: fluency of Mainland Chinese English-speakers (was Re: "Hindilish" & "Hinglish")
(20 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lingua Frakas...question re: TMA (tenses,mood & aspects)
(46 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Hindilish" & "Hinglish"
(41 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lingua Frakas...question re: TMA (tenses,mood & aspects)
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lingua Frakas...question re: TMA (tenses,mood & aspects)
(21 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dael
(14 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Island
(72 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Island
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Island
(32 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(107 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sinthrax=> Lingu Frakas...question re: TMA (tenses, mood & aspects)
(111 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Island
(55 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lingua Frakas...question re: TMA (tenses,mood & aspects)
(49 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(24 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Island
(26 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Island
(25 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Island
(17 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lingua Frakas...question re: TMA (tenses,mood & aspects)
(19 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: beyond _tera_[Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(15 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lingu Frakas...question re: TMA (tenses, mood & aspects)
(37 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lingua Frakas...TMA (tenses,mood & aspects)
(20 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Island
(20 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lingua Frakas...TMA (tenses,mood & aspects)
(23 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Island
(24 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Island
(28 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: beyond _tera_[Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(29 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lingua Frakas...TMA (tenses,mood & aspects)
(31 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sinthrax=> Lingu Frakas...question re: TMA (tenses,mood & aspects)
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Hindilish" & "Hinglish"
(39 lines)
From:
LIJESH KRISHNAN <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: beyond _tera_[Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Island
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: beyond _tera_[Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(23 lines)
From:
nicole perrin <
[log in to unmask]
>
New list: Conlangs_in_use
(38 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Island
(27 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Hindilish" & "Hinglish"
(45 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New list: Conlangs_in_use
(23 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: beyond _tera_[Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(43 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Island
(36 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lingua Frakas...TMA (tenses,mood & aspects)
(22 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: beyond _tera_[Fwd: dozenal and hexadecimal digits]
(17 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lingua Frakas...TMA (tenses,mood & aspects)
(24 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Island
(20 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU