Conlang
Mailing List May 2000, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
!!! * highly interesting recommended book * !!!
(2 messages)
"organic/non-organic intelligence gender" <was Re: Ladan and woman's speak>
"organic/non-organic intelligence gender" <was Re: Ladan andwoman's speak>
(2 messages)
"organic/non-organic intelligence gender" <was Re: Ladanandwoman's speak>
"organic/non-organic intelligence gender" <was Re:Ladanandwoman's speak>
"organic/non-organic intelligence gender" <wasRe:Ladanandwoman's speak>
(G)Jarrda update
A Unicode editor
an ol' hoary classic: DO YOU HAVE A SPELL CHEQUER?
(2 messages)
CHAT: "John Doe" equivalents sought
(11 messages)
CHAT: Re: French pronunciation
(4 messages)
Cho-ba and Osëweb pages
(2 messages)
Clefts and Pseudoclefts
(4 messages)
Clefts and Pseudoclefts (longish)
(2 messages)
CONLANG Digest
(3 messages)
CONLANG Digest - 24 May 2000 to 25 May 2000 (#2000-143)
conlang update
(2 messages)
Dutch [was Re: French pronunciation (Was: Re: Fw: [wika] Boreanesian)]
(3 messages)
Extinguishing the Elves (was: Ogoneking the Consonants)
(2 messages)
Father/Motherland
(15 messages)
Fourth person was Re: CONLANG Digest
(3 messages)
French pronunciation (Was: Re: Fw: [wika] Boreanesian)
(7 messages)
From the backlog
(2 messages)
Gender (was: Láadan and woman's speak)
Gender of the ancestors (was: Laádan and woman's speak)
(2 messages)
Genders (was Re: Láadan and woman's speak_
(6 messages)
Genders (was Re: Láadan and woman's speak_
hello!
Hi everyone! I'm able to post at last!
(3 messages)
I don't give a rat's ass.
(13 messages)
interesting conlang/conculture-relateable quote
Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
(16 messages)
Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies withlotsa diacritics)
(2 messages)
Kisuna font
Kisuna, a language with six segmental phonemes: preliminary sketch
(7 messages)
Kisuna,a language with six segmental phonemes: preliminary sketch
(3 messages)
Láadan and woman's speak
(44 messages)
Láadan and woman's speak
(3 messages)
Land of the Lost Language
(4 messages)
lateral fricative (was: Láadan and woman's speak)
(2 messages)
lateral fricative (was: Láadan and woman's speak)
(2 messages)
Mnau Clause Patterns
(5 messages)
more English orthography
(2 messages)
mostly OFF: Re: CONLANG Digest
New Translation Relay
OFF: Trinity
Ogoneking the Consonants
(6 messages)
Orthographies with lotsa diacritics (was: Ogoneking the Consonants)
(3 messages)
pirate "Jolly Roger" <was Re: The Bogan Commentaries>
R: Fourth person was Re: CONLANG Digest
R: Re: Father/Motherland
Re(2): Láadan and woman's speak
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(5 messages)
Recent news of Gz^rod|in
Reflexive possessives & the like, was: Re: CONLANG Digest...)
rotatin' Shakiespear on a log <was Re: From the backlog>
Serbian saying (English translation)
(2 messages)
Skerre conlang presention
Sorting out those phonetics
(3 messages)
Sorting out those phonetics.
(2 messages)
testing, testing
(2 messages)
The Bogan Commentaries
(7 messages)
THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(32 messages)
This subject should've been changed aeons ago. (Re: Is Microsoft conquering...)
W Syllabry (was Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics (was: Ogoneking theConsonants))
(2 messages)
Whose is who's? (was: CONLANG Digest - 24 May 2000 to 25 May 2000 (#2000-143))
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(20 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
!!! * highly interesting recommended book * !!!
!!! * highly interesting recommended book * !!!
(40 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: !!! * highly interesting recommended book * !!!
(43 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
"organic/non-organic intelligence gender" <was Re: Ladan and woman's speak>
Re: "organic/non-organic intelligence gender" <was Re: Ladan and woman's speak>
(33 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
"organic/non-organic intelligence gender" <was Re: Ladan andwoman's speak>
Re: "organic/non-organic intelligence gender" <was Re: Ladan andwoman's speak>
(36 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "organic/non-organic intelligence gender" <was Re: Ladan andwoman's speak>
(34 lines)
From:
Markus Miekk-oja <
[log in to unmask]
>
"organic/non-organic intelligence gender" <was Re: Ladanandwoman's speak>
Re: "organic/non-organic intelligence gender" <was Re: Ladanandwoman's speak>
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
"organic/non-organic intelligence gender" <was Re:Ladanandwoman's speak>
Re: "organic/non-organic intelligence gender" <was Re:Ladanandwoman's speak>
(41 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
"organic/non-organic intelligence gender" <wasRe:Ladanandwoman's speak>
Re: "organic/non-organic intelligence gender" <wasRe:Ladanandwoman's speak>
(45 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
(G)Jarrda update
(G)Jarrda update
(32 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Unicode editor
A Unicode editor
(26 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
an ol' hoary classic: DO YOU HAVE A SPELL CHEQUER?
an ol' hoary classic: DO YOU HAVE A SPELL CHEQUER?
(31 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: an ol' hoary classic: DO YOU HAVE A SPELL CHEQUER?
(15 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: "John Doe" equivalents sought
Re: CHAT: "John Doe" equivalents sought
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "John Doe" equivalents sought
(26 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "John Doe" equivalents sought
(39 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "John Doe" equivalents sought
(25 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "John Doe" equivalents sought
(24 lines)
From:
Gustavo Eulalio <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "John Doe" equivalents sought
(25 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "John Doe" equivalents sought
(27 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "John Doe" equivalents sought
(121 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "John Doe" equivalents sought
(20 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "John Doe" equivalents sought
(28 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "John Doe" equivalents sought
(25 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Re: French pronunciation
CHAT: Re: French pronunciation
(40 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: French pronunciation
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: French pronunciation
(23 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: French pronunciation
(44 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cho-ba and Osëweb pages
Cho-ba and Osëweb pages
(32 lines)
From:
callanish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cho-ba and Osëweb pages
(20 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Clefts and Pseudoclefts
Clefts and Pseudoclefts
(48 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Clefts and Pseudoclefts
(46 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Clefts and Pseudoclefts
(27 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Clefts and Pseudoclefts
(20 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Clefts and Pseudoclefts (longish)
Re: Clefts and Pseudoclefts (longish)
(70 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Clefts and Pseudoclefts (longish)
(52 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest
Re: CONLANG Digest
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(174 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest
(47 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 24 May 2000 to 25 May 2000 (#2000-143)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 24 May 2000 to 25 May 2000 (#2000-143)
(80 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
conlang update
conlang update
(38 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: conlang update
(36 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dutch [was Re: French pronunciation (Was: Re: Fw: [wika] Boreanesian)]
Re: Dutch [was Re: French pronunciation (Was: Re: Fw: [wika] Boreanesian)]
(39 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dutch [was Re: French pronunciation (Was: Re: Fw: [wika] Boreanesian)]
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dutch [was Re: French pronunciation (Was: Re: Fw: [wika] Boreanesian)]
(23 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Extinguishing the Elves (was: Ogoneking the Consonants)
Extinguishing the Elves (was: Ogoneking the Consonants)
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Extinguishing the Elves (was: Ogoneking the Consonants)
(41 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Father/Motherland
Father/Motherland
(29 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Father/Motherland
(48 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Father/Motherland
(35 lines)
From:
Carlos Eugenio Thompson (EDC) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Father/Motherland
(24 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Father/Motherland
(31 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Father/Motherland
(33 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Father/Motherland
(36 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Father/Motherland
(27 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Father/Motherland
(38 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Father/Motherland
(65 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Father/Motherland
(28 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Father/Motherland
(44 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Father/Motherland
(41 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Father/Motherland
(27 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Father/Motherland
(20 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fourth person was Re: CONLANG Digest
Fourth person was Re: CONLANG Digest
(68 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fourth person was Re: CONLANG Digest
(59 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fourth person was Re: CONLANG Digest
(29 lines)
From:
Markus Miekk-oja <
[log in to unmask]
>
French pronunciation (Was: Re: Fw: [wika] Boreanesian)
Re: French pronunciation (Was: Re: Fw: [wika] Boreanesian)
(41 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French pronunciation (Was: Re: Fw: [wika] Boreanesian)
(51 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French pronunciation (Was: Re: Fw: [wika] Boreanesian)
(17 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French pronunciation (Was: Re: Fw: [wika] Boreanesian)
(38 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French pronunciation (Was: Re: Fw: [wika] Boreanesian)
(46 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French pronunciation (Was: Re: Fw: [wika] Boreanesian)
(26 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French pronunciation (Was: Re: Fw: [wika] Boreanesian)
(29 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
From the backlog
From the backlog
(51 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: From the backlog
(45 lines)
From:
Carlos Eugenio Thompson (EDC) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gender (was: Láadan and woman's speak)
Gender (was: Láadan and woman's speak)
(55 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gender of the ancestors (was: Laádan and woman's speak)
Re: Gender of the ancestors (was: Laádan and woman's speak)
(53 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gender of the ancestors (was: Laádan and woman's speak)
(71 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Genders (was Re: Láadan and woman's speak_
Genders (was Re: Láadan and woman's speak_
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genders (was Re: Láadan and woman's speak_
(44 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genders (was Re: Láadan and woman's speak_
(44 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genders (was Re: Láadan and woman's speak_
(37 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genders (was Re: Láadan and woman's speak_
(30 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Genders (was Re: Láadan and woman's speak_
(25 lines)
From:
John Mietus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Genders (was Re: Láadan and woman's speak_
Re: Genders (was Re: Láadan and woman's speak_
(36 lines)
From:
J. Barefoot <
[log in to unmask]
>
hello!
hello!
(17 lines)
From:
Andre Militante <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hi everyone! I'm able to post at last!
Hi everyone! I'm able to post at last!
(99 lines)
From:
Andre Militante <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hi everyone! I'm able to post at last!
(34 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hi everyone! I'm able to post at last!
(60 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
I don't give a rat's ass.
I don't give a rat's ass.
(20 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: I don't give a rat's ass.
(42 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I don't give a rat's ass.
(35 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I don't give a rat's ass.
(52 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I don't give a rat's ass.
(24 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I don't give a rat's ass.
(34 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I don't give a rat's ass.
(24 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I don't give a rat's ass.
(15 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I don't give a rat's ass.
(28 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I don't give a rat's ass.
(33 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I don't give a rat's ass.
(19 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I don't give a rat's ass.
(39 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I don't give a rat's ass.
(38 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
interesting conlang/conculture-relateable quote
interesting conlang/conculture-relateable quote
(15 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
(83 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
(76 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
(95 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
(107 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
(34 lines)
From:
Brad Coon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
(90 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
(59 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
(50 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
(31 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
(31 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
(34 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
(38 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
(40 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
(51 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
(49 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics)
(24 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies withlotsa diacritics)
Re: Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies withlotsa diacritics)
(49 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is Microsoft conquering the world?! (Re: Orthographies withlotsa diacritics)
(58 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kisuna font
Kisuna font
(39 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kisuna, a language with six segmental phonemes: preliminary sketch
Kisuna, a language with six segmental phonemes: preliminary sketch
(97 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kisuna, a language with six segmental phonemes: preliminary sketch
(35 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kisuna, a language with six segmental phonemes: preliminary sketch
(92 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kisuna, a language with six segmental phonemes: preliminary sketch
(31 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kisuna, a language with six segmental phonemes: preliminary sketch
(41 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kisuna, a language with six segmental phonemes: preliminary sketch
(92 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kisuna, a language with six segmental phonemes: preliminary sketch
(130 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kisuna,a language with six segmental phonemes: preliminary sketch
Re: Kisuna,a language with six segmental phonemes: preliminary sketch
(49 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kisuna,a language with six segmental phonemes: preliminary sketch
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kisuna,a language with six segmental phonemes: preliminary sketch
(44 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Láadan and woman's speak
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(27 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(40 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(47 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(41 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(33 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
RE: Láadan and woman's speak
(32 lines)
From:
Carlos Eugenio Thompson (EDC) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(23 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(31 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(28 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(26 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): Láadan and woman's speak
(33 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(28 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(28 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): Láadan and woman's speak
(25 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(34 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(20 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(52 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(32 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(34 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(39 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(31 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(24 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(40 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(34 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(53 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(51 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(34 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(66 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(27 lines)
From:
SMITH,MARCUS ANTHONY <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(80 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(35 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(58 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(25 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(70 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(42 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(29 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(54 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(60 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(41 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(43 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Láadan and woman's speak
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(42 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(32 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(47 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Land of the Lost Language
Land of the Lost Language
(22 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Land of the Lost Language
(10 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Land of the Lost Language
(32 lines)
From:
John Mietus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Land of the Lost Language
(28 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
lateral fricative (was: Láadan and woman's speak)
Re: lateral fricative (was: Láadan and woman's speak)
(39 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: lateral fricative (was: Láadan and woman's speak)
(20 lines)
From:
DOUGLAS KOLLER <
[log in to unmask]
>
lateral fricative (was: Láadan and woman's speak)
lateral fricative (was: Láadan and woman's speak)
(77 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: lateral fricative (was: Láadan and woman's speak)
(54 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mnau Clause Patterns
Mnau Clause Patterns
(205 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mnau Clause Patterns
(27 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mnau Clause Patterns
(46 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mnau Clause Patterns
(45 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mnau Clause Patterns
(157 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
more English orthography
Re: more English orthography
(29 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: more English orthography
(19 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
mostly OFF: Re: CONLANG Digest
mostly OFF: Re: CONLANG Digest
(110 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Translation Relay
New Translation Relay
(23 lines)
From:
nicole perrin <
[log in to unmask]
>
OFF: Trinity
OFF: Trinity
(88 lines)
From:
Daniel A. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ogoneking the Consonants
Ogoneking the Consonants
(28 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ogoneking the Consonants
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ogoneking the Consonants
(44 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ogoneking the Consonants
(31 lines)
From:
P. M. ARKTAYG <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ogoneking the Consonants
(25 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ogoneking the Consonants
(25 lines)
From:
P. M. ARKTAYG <
[log in to unmask]
>
Orthographies with lotsa diacritics (was: Ogoneking the Consonants)
Orthographies with lotsa diacritics (was: Ogoneking the Consonants)
(49 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics (was: Ogoneking the Consonants)
(23 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics (was: Ogoneking the Consonants)
(41 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
pirate "Jolly Roger" <was Re: The Bogan Commentaries>
Re: pirate "Jolly Roger" <was Re: The Bogan Commentaries>
(25 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
R: Fourth person was Re: CONLANG Digest
R: Fourth person was Re: CONLANG Digest
(52 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
R: Re: Father/Motherland
R: Re: Father/Motherland
(26 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): Láadan and woman's speak
Re: Re(2): Láadan and woman's speak
(22 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
Re: Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(27 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Láadan and woman's speak
Re: Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(23 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(22 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(57 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re: Láadan and woman's speak
(36 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Recent news of Gz^rod|in
Recent news of Gz^rod|in
(68 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Reflexive possessives & the like, was: Re: CONLANG Digest...)
Reflexive possessives & the like, was: Re: CONLANG Digest...)
(77 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
rotatin' Shakiespear on a log <was Re: From the backlog>
rotatin' Shakiespear on a log <was Re: From the backlog>
(26 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Serbian saying (English translation)
Serbian saying (English translation)
(13 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Serbian saying (English translation)
(20 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Skerre conlang presention
Skerre conlang presention
(34 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sorting out those phonetics
Re: Sorting out those phonetics
(24 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sorting out those phonetics
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sorting out those phonetics
(19 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sorting out those phonetics.
Re: Sorting out those phonetics.
(22 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sorting out those phonetics.
(28 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
testing, testing
testing, testing
(15 lines)
From:
Andre Militante <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: testing, testing
(26 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Bogan Commentaries
The Bogan Commentaries
(190 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Bogan Commentaries
(63 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Bogan Commentaries
(28 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Bogan Commentaries
(29 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Bogan Commentaries
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Bogan Commentaries
(19 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Bogan Commentaries
(18 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(61 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(46 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(89 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(98 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(30 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(68 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(24 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(64 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(26 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(72 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(30 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(26 lines)
From:
Carlos Eugenio Thompson (EDC) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(75 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(62 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(51 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(44 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(24 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(32 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(33 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(44 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(33 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(50 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(39 lines)
From:
Jonathan Chang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(94 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(79 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(46 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(70 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(48 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(173 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Languages divided by politics and religion
(42 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
This subject should've been changed aeons ago. (Re: Is Microsoft conquering...)
This subject should've been changed aeons ago. (Re: Is Microsoft conquering...)
(24 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
W Syllabry (was Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics (was: Ogoneking theConsonants))
W Syllabry (was Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics (was: Ogoneking theConsonants))
(125 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: W Syllabry (was Re: Orthographies with lotsa diacritics (was: Ogoneking theConsonants))
(27 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Whose is who's? (was: CONLANG Digest - 24 May 2000 to 25 May 2000 (#2000-143))
Whose is who's? (was: CONLANG Digest - 24 May 2000 to 25 May 2000 (#2000-143))
(116 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU