Conlang Mailing List – July 2000, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• /H/ (was: An Unknown Conlang) (5 messages)
• An Unknown Conlang (6 messages)
• Bye bye, My Crow Soft (new e-mail/homepage)
• Case Name (4 messages)
• CHAT: Re: Ave Maria (11 messages)
• CONLANG Digest - 4 Jul 2000 to 5 Jul 2000 (#2000-181) (4 messages)
• Crazy Ideas, Part 1
• Danish: tonal suffices? (16 messages)
• Early Arabic sounds, was: New to the List, too
• I'm going to camp, I'll be gone for 6 weeks.
• IE genders (was: WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC?)
• Juggling Consonants and Vowels (2 messages)
• Leaving for holidays
• My new homepage URL (10 messages)
• New Lang: Díp Stul
• R: An Unknown Conlang (4 messages)
• R: Comments required ... please : )
• R: Re: /H/ (was: An Unknown Conlang)
• R: Re: R: An Unknown Conlang
• R: Re: the i-language
• R: Re: this is a test (2 messages)
• REe:this is a test
• Rumil's tengwar (8 messages)
• Silver Latin (was: CHAT: Re: Ave Maria)
• Success and Failure (7 messages)
• TAN CHAT: synaesthesia (was OT CHAT: Asperger's syndrome)
• the i-language (10 messages)
• THEORY: Parts of speech, was: Syntaxy-Turvy
• this is a test (2 messages)
• Web address (3 messages)
• WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (18 messages)

1. /H/ (was: An Unknown Conlang)
   • Re: /H/ (was: An Unknown Conlang) (34 lines)
     From: DOUGLAS KOLLER <[log in to unmask]>
   • /H/ (was: An Unknown Conlang) (28 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /H/ (was: An Unknown Conlang) (31 lines)
     From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /H/ (was: An Unknown Conlang) (46 lines)
     From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /H/ (was: An Unknown Conlang) (56 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

2. An Unknown Conlang
   • An Unknown Conlang (75 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Unknown Conlang (29 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Unknown Conlang (37 lines)
     From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Unknown Conlang (38 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Unknown Conlang (42 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Unknown Conlang (28 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>

3. Bye bye, My Crow Soft (new e-mail/homepage)
   • Bye bye, My Crow Soft (new e-mail/homepage) (22 lines)
     From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

4. Case Name
   • Case Name (29 lines)
     From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Name (55 lines)
     From: David E. Bell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Name (32 lines)
     From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Name (31 lines)
     From: Brad Coon <[log in to unmask]>

5. CHAT: Re: Ave Maria
   • CHAT: Re: Ave Maria (75 lines)
     From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Re: Ave Maria (47 lines)
     From: DOUGLAS KOLLER <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Re: Ave Maria (43 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Re: Ave Maria (50 lines)
     From: DOUGLAS KOLLER <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Re: Ave Maria (114 lines)
     From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Re: Ave Maria (76 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Re: Ave Maria (74 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Re: Ave Maria (88 lines)
     From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Re: Ave Maria (48 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Re: Ave Maria (54 lines)
     From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Re: Ave Maria (32 lines)
     From: DOUGLAS KOLLER <[log in to unmask]>

6. CONLANG Digest - 4 Jul 2000 to 5 Jul 2000 (#2000-181)
   • Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Jul 2000 to 5 Jul 2000 (#2000-181) (59 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Jul 2000 to 5 Jul 2000 (#2000-181) (41 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Jul 2000 to 5 Jul 2000 (#2000-181) (23 lines)
     From: Jonathan Chang <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Jul 2000 to 5 Jul 2000 (#2000-181) (38 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

7. Crazy Ideas, Part 1
   • Crazy Ideas, Part 1 (61 lines)
     From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

8. Danish: tonal suffices?
   • Re: Danish: tonal suffices? (41 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Danish: tonal suffices? (63 lines)
     From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Danish: tonal suffices? (67 lines)
     From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Danish: tonal suffices? (40 lines)
     From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Danish: tonal suffices? (57 lines)
     From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Danish: tonal suffices? (114 lines)
     From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Danish: tonal suffices? (47 lines)
     From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Danish: tonal suffices? (32 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Danish: tonal suffices? (39 lines)
     From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Danish: tonal suffices? (25 lines)
     From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Danish: tonal suffices? (23 lines)
     From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Danish: tonal suffices? (32 lines)
     From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Danish: tonal suffices? (29 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Danish: tonal suffices? (26 lines)
     From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Danish: tonal suffices? (54 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Danish: tonal suffices? (54 lines)
     From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

9. Early Arabic sounds, was: New to the List, too
   • Re: Early Arabic sounds, was: New to the List, too (44 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

10. I'm going to camp, I'll be gone for 6 weeks.
    • I'm going to camp, I'll be gone for 6 weeks. (23 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>

11. IE genders (was: WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC?)
    • IE genders (was: WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC?) (57 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>

12. Juggling Consonants and Vowels
    • Juggling Consonants and Vowels (53 lines)
      From: Vima Kadphises <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Juggling Consonants and Vowels (52 lines)
      From: dirk elzinga <[log in to unmask]>

13. Leaving for holidays
    • Leaving for holidays (23 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

14. My new homepage URL
    • My new homepage URL (32 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: My new homepage URL (26 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: My new homepage URL (21 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: My new homepage URL (24 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: My new homepage URL (29 lines)
      From: Fabian <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: My new homepage URL (25 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: My new homepage URL (32 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: My new homepage URL (36 lines)
      From: nicole perrin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: My new homepage URL (39 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: My new homepage URL (29 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

15. New Lang: Díp Stul
    • New Lang: Díp Stul (164 lines)
      From: Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]>

16. R: An Unknown Conlang
    • R: An Unknown Conlang (92 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: R: An Unknown Conlang (35 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: R: An Unknown Conlang (138 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: R: An Unknown Conlang (33 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

17. R: Comments required ... please : )
    • Re: R: Comments required ... please : ) (42 lines)
      From: Tim Smith <[log in to unmask]>

18. R: Re: /H/ (was: An Unknown Conlang)
    • R: Re: /H/ (was: An Unknown Conlang) (21 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>

19. R: Re: R: An Unknown Conlang
    • R: Re: R: An Unknown Conlang (26 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>

20. R: Re: the i-language
    • R: Re: the i-language (34 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>

21. R: Re: this is a test
    • R: Re: this is a test (30 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: R: Re: this is a test (27 lines)
      From: Daniel Seriff <[log in to unmask]>

22. REe:this is a test
    • REe:this is a test (42 lines)
      From: David E. Bell <[log in to unmask]>

23. Rumil's tengwar
    • Rumil's tengwar (764 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rumil's tengwar (29 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rumil's tengwar (42 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rumil's tengwar (110 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rumil's tengwar (31 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rumil's tengwar (21 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rumil's tengwar (17 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rumil's tengwar (48 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>

24. Silver Latin (was: CHAT: Re: Ave Maria)
    • Silver Latin (was: CHAT: Re: Ave Maria) (32 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>

25. Success and Failure
    • Success and Failure (62 lines)
      From: Joe Mondello <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Success and Failure (107 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Success and Failure (139 lines)
      From: Joe Mondello <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Success and Failure (31 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Success and Failure (40 lines)
      From: Joe Mondello <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Success and Failure (110 lines)
      From: Ajin-Kwai <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Success and Failure (159 lines)
      From: Joe Mondello <[log in to unmask]>

26. TAN CHAT: synaesthesia (was OT CHAT: Asperger's syndrome)
    • Re: TAN CHAT: synaesthesia (was OT CHAT: Asperger's syndrome) (48 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

27. the i-language
    • the i-language (26 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: the i-language (75 lines)
      From: nicole perrin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: the i-language (37 lines)
      From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: the i-language (32 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: the i-language (31 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: the i-language (28 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: the i-language (32 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: the i-language (33 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: the i-language (30 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: the i-language (37 lines)
      From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>

28. THEORY: Parts of speech, was: Syntaxy-Turvy
    • Re: THEORY: Parts of speech, was: Syntaxy-Turvy (90 lines)
      From: Ed Heil <[log in to unmask]>

29. this is a test
    • this is a test (10 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: this is a test (21 lines)
      From: Daniel Seriff <[log in to unmask]>

30. Web address
    • Web address (30 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Web address (24 lines)
      From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Web address (24 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

31. WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC?
    • WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (56 lines)
      From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (31 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (54 lines)
      From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (33 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (78 lines)
      From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (31 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (55 lines)
      From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (61 lines)
      From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (59 lines)
      From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (39 lines)
      From: DOUGLAS KOLLER <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (105 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (64 lines)
      From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (19 lines)
      From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (25 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (98 lines)
      From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (25 lines)
      From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (38 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: WHICH IS MORE GERMANIC? (52 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>