Conlang Mailing List – December 2000, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• .lv? (was: RE: mathematics) (3 messages)
• /owt/ and /nowt/ (3 messages)
• A new Indo-European subfamily in China (3 messages)
• An African con-script of 1949
• another silly phonology question
• Any T-Shirt News?? (4 messages)
• Arveuneic Part Three (3 messages)
• Back! (3 messages)
• character sets (was: ConGermanicRomanceLang?) (5 messages)
• CHAT (FLORIDA-GATE): was Putting the duh in Florida (4 messages)
• CHAT (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida (14 messages)
• CHAT: mathematics (2 messages)
• CHAT: Re: Punic sources (5 messages)
• CHAT: SWP anecdotes (was: RE: (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in (4 messages)
• CHAT: SWP anecdotes (was: RE: (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida) (6 messages)
• ConGermanicRomanceLang? (29 messages)
• CONLANG timeline
• Conorthography (phonology)
• Folks in London? (2 messages)
• Have Yourself a Merry Saturnalia.... (10 messages)
• IPA tone numbers? (3 messages)
• Kura for Windows
• Kura shows interlinear text again. (2 messages)
• obscure material (2 messages)
• Obscure material
• obscure material
• P.S. on E-o
• Punic sources (8 messages)
• R: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (2 messages)
• R: Conorthography (phonology)
• Romaunt days (was: A funny linguistic subway experience &c) (4 messages)
• Taiwan
• Translation question (2 messages)
• You guys'll laugh at this
• [humour] Wanna speak languages?
• [[log in to unmask]: Programming in Latin] (2 messages)

1. .lv? (was: RE: mathematics)
   • .lv? (was: RE: mathematics) (25 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: .lv? (was: RE: mathematics) (52 lines)
     From: Mikael Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: .lv? (was: RE: mathematics) (67 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

2. /owt/ and /nowt/
   • /owt/ and /nowt/ (26 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /owt/ and /nowt/ (19 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /owt/ and /nowt/ (34 lines)
     From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>

3. A new Indo-European subfamily in China
   • Re: A new Indo-European subfamily in China (35 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A new Indo-European subfamily in China (34 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A new Indo-European subfamily in China (40 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>

4. An African con-script of 1949
   • An African con-script of 1949 (12 lines)
     From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>

5. another silly phonology question
   • Re: another silly phonology question (28 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

6. Any T-Shirt News??
   • Any T-Shirt News?? (20 lines)
     From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Any T-Shirt News?? (19 lines)
     From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Any T-Shirt News?? (40 lines)
     From: nicole perrin <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Any T-Shirt News?? (23 lines)
     From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>

7. Arveuneic Part Three
   • Re: Arveuneic Part Three (124 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Arveuneic Part Three (140 lines)
     From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Arveuneic Part Three (21 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

8. Back!
   • Back! (65 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Back! (39 lines)
     From: dirk elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Back! (57 lines)
     From: Katherine Kiblinger Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

9. character sets (was: ConGermanicRomanceLang?)
   • character sets (was: ConGermanicRomanceLang?) (40 lines)
     From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: character sets (was: ConGermanicRomanceLang?) (43 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: character sets (was: ConGermanicRomanceLang?) (53 lines)
     From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: character sets (was: ConGermanicRomanceLang?) (34 lines)
     From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: character sets (was: ConGermanicRomanceLang?) (101 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

10. CHAT (FLORIDA-GATE): was Putting the duh in Florida
    • Re: CHAT (FLORIDA-GATE): was Putting the duh in Florida (37 lines)
      From: LeoMoser([log in to unmask]) <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT (FLORIDA-GATE): was Putting the duh in Florida (31 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT (FLORIDA-GATE): was Putting the duh in Florida (31 lines)
      From: LeoMoser([log in to unmask]) <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT (FLORIDA-GATE): was Putting the duh in Florida (27 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

11. CHAT (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida
    • Re: CHAT (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida (26 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida (32 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida (43 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida (26 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida (36 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida (55 lines)
      From: LeoMoser([log in to unmask]) <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida (24 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida (33 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida (36 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida (52 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida (22 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida (54 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida (61 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida (27 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>

12. CHAT: mathematics
    • Re: CHAT: mathematics (87 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: mathematics (40 lines)
      From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>

13. CHAT: Re: Punic sources
    • CHAT: Re: Punic sources (60 lines)
      From: Microtonal <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Re: Punic sources (65 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Re: Punic sources (61 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Re: Punic sources (25 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Re: Punic sources (49 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>

14. CHAT: SWP anecdotes (was: RE: (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in
    • Re: CHAT: SWP anecdotes (was: RE: (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in (18 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: SWP anecdotes (was: RE: (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in (28 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: SWP anecdotes (was: RE: (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in (29 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: SWP anecdotes (was: RE: (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in (21 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

15. CHAT: SWP anecdotes (was: RE: (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida)
    • CHAT: SWP anecdotes (was: RE: (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida) (45 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: SWP anecdotes (was: RE: (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida) (45 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: SWP anecdotes (was: RE: (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida) (35 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: SWP anecdotes (was: RE: (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida) (32 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: SWP anecdotes (was: RE: (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida) (43 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: SWP anecdotes (was: RE: (POLITICS!!!): Putting the duh in Florida) (32 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

16. ConGermanicRomanceLang?
    • ConGermanicRomanceLang? (26 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (76 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (21 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (29 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (16 lines)
      From: E-Ching Ng <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (27 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (30 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (30 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (48 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (53 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (25 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (29 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (54 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (32 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (23 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (20 lines)
      From: E-Ching Ng <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (26 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (41 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (40 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (21 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (32 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (36 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (17 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (22 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (15 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (26 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (25 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (27 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (19 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

17. CONLANG timeline
    • Re: CONLANG timeline (26 lines)
      From: P. M. ARKTAYG <[log in to unmask]>

18. Conorthography (phonology)
    • Re: Conorthography (phonology) (51 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

19. Folks in London?
    • Folks in London? (27 lines)
      From: David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Folks in London? (28 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>

20. Have Yourself a Merry Saturnalia....
    • Have Yourself a Merry Saturnalia.... (28 lines)
      From: DOUGLAS KOLLER <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Have Yourself a Merry Saturnalia.... (17 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Have Yourself a Merry Saturnalia.... (29 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Have Yourself a Merry Saturnalia.... (46 lines)
      From: Patrick Jarrett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Have Yourself a Merry Saturnalia.... (38 lines)
      From: Mikael Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Have Yourself a Merry Saturnalia.... (37 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Have Yourself a Merry Saturnalia.... (20 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Have Yourself a Merry Saturnalia.... (23 lines)
      From: Matthew Kehrt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Have Yourself a Merry Saturnalia.... (28 lines)
      From: Mikael Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Have Yourself a Merry Saturnalia.... (27 lines)
      From: James <[log in to unmask]>

21. IPA tone numbers?
    • IPA tone numbers? (16 lines)
      From: E-Ching Ng <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA tone numbers? (33 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA tone numbers? (33 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>

22. Kura for Windows
    • Kura for Windows (23 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>

23. Kura shows interlinear text again.
    • Kura shows interlinear text again. (19 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kura shows interlinear text again. (26 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>

24. obscure material
    • obscure material (18 lines)
      From: Andrew Strader <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: obscure material (22 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

25. Obscure material
    • Obscure material (39 lines)
      From: Maggie Carchrie <[log in to unmask]>

26. obscure material
    • Re: obscure material (46 lines)
      From: DOUGLAS KOLLER <[log in to unmask]>

27. P.S. on E-o
    • Re: P.S. on E-o (21 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>

28. Punic sources
    • Punic sources (29 lines)
      From: David Stokes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Punic sources (29 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Punic sources (43 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Punic sources (20 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Punic sources (31 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Punic sources (53 lines)
      From: Microtonal <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Punic sources (94 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Punic sources (27 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>

29. R: ConGermanicRomanceLang?
    • R: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (89 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: R: ConGermanicRomanceLang? (23 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>

30. R: Conorthography (phonology)
    • R: Conorthography (phonology) (294 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>

31. Romaunt days (was: A funny linguistic subway experience &c)
    • Re: Romaunt days (was: A funny linguistic subway experience &c) (39 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Romaunt days (was: A funny linguistic subway experience &c) (36 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Romaunt days (was: A funny linguistic subway experience &c) (29 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Romaunt days (was: A funny linguistic subway experience &c) (52 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>

32. Taiwan
    • Taiwan (40 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>

33. Translation question
    • Re: Translation question (25 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Translation question (51 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>

34. You guys'll laugh at this
    • You guys'll laugh at this (18 lines)
      From: Morgan Palaeo Associates <[log in to unmask]>

35. [humour] Wanna speak languages?
    • [humour] Wanna speak languages? (18 lines)
      From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>

36. [[log in to unmask]: Programming in Latin]
    • Re: [[log in to unmask]: Programming in Latin] (22 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [[log in to unmask]: Programming in Latin] (29 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>