Conlang
Mailing List January 2001, week 5
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
/p/ versus devoiced b?
(10 messages)
An arabo-romance conlang?
Another unknown language query
(2 messages)
apostrophes in transliteration (stress in Tokana)
(2 messages)
CHAT: Geek Code
Committed: (was Printed Conlang stuff?)
Conlang book?
Etymological Dict. of IE Roots
Heichi: Compound words
Info Needed: "Blade" and "Dark Skies" (longish)
(3 messages)
Kash phonology II
Lateral fricatives
Latin question
(2 messages)
My Book
(3 messages)
New typescript for Gevey
niKòmbá changes
niKòmbá: conlang sketch
(2 messages)
OT: RPGs (was Re: Conlangs in RPGs...)
past tense formation
(6 messages)
Pater Noster in many languages
(4 messages)
phonology ?
(4 messages)
R: Re: Vaiysi grammar revised: nouns and adjectives
R: Typologic survey, part I
shdeete
slightly of topic: Re: Vampire dialogue again
THEORY: Unknown Language Confuser!
(7 messages)
topic/compliment & Sanskrit script
(2 messages)
Typologic survey, part I
(8 messages)
Typologic survey, part II
(23 messages)
Typologic survey, parts I and II
Typological Survey Part I
(2 messages)
Typological Survey Part II
Unknown Language Identifier!
(43 messages)
Vaiysi Grammar revised : Intro and phonology
Vaiysi grammar revised: nouns and adjectives
(2 messages)
Vaiysi grammar revised: pronouns and prepositions
Vampire dialogue again
(3 messages)
Vampire technology - offshoot of Vampire dialog
(2 messages)
Voynich was: Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(6 messages)
What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(8 messages)
Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?)
(12 messages)
/p/ versus devoiced b?
Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?
(24 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?
(55 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?
(33 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?
(34 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?
(82 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?
(32 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?
(51 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?
(66 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?
(47 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
An arabo-romance conlang?
Re: An arabo-romance conlang?
(28 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Another unknown language query
Another unknown language query
(21 lines)
From:
Eli Naeher <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another unknown language query
(38 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
apostrophes in transliteration (stress in Tokana)
Re: apostrophes in transliteration (stress in Tokana)
(20 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: apostrophes in transliteration (stress in Tokana)
(64 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Geek Code
CHAT: Geek Code
(16 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Committed: (was Printed Conlang stuff?)
Re: Committed: (was Printed Conlang stuff?)
(30 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang book?
Re: Conlang book?
(279 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Etymological Dict. of IE Roots
Etymological Dict. of IE Roots
(14 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Heichi: Compound words
Re: Heichi: Compound words
(17 lines)
From:
Tommaso R. Donnarumma <
[log in to unmask]
>
Info Needed: "Blade" and "Dark Skies" (longish)
Re: Info Needed: "Blade" and "Dark Skies" (longish)
(45 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Info Needed: "Blade" and "Dark Skies" (longish)
(28 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Info Needed: "Blade" and "Dark Skies" (longish)
(43 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kash phonology II
Kash phonology II
(62 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lateral fricatives
Re: Lateral fricatives
(25 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Latin question
Latin question
(16 lines)
From:
Eli Naeher <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin question
(36 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
My Book
My Book
(30 lines)
From:
Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Book
(47 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Book
(66 lines)
From:
Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <
[log in to unmask]
>
New typescript for Gevey
New typescript for Gevey
(25 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
niKòmbá changes
niKòmbá changes
(80 lines)
From:
David Stokes <
[log in to unmask]
>
niKòmbá: conlang sketch
niKòmbá: conlang sketch
(168 lines)
From:
David Stokes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: niKòmbá: conlang sketch
(43 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: RPGs (was Re: Conlangs in RPGs...)
Re: OT: RPGs (was Re: Conlangs in RPGs...)
(24 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
past tense formation
past tense formation
(74 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: past tense formation
(28 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: past tense formation
(86 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: past tense formation
(70 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: past tense formation
(70 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: past tense formation
(54 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pater Noster in many languages
Pater Noster in many languages
(19 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pater Noster in many languages
(49 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pater Noster in many languages
(29 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pater Noster in many languages
(38 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
phonology ?
phonology ?
(17 lines)
From:
Mario Bonassin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonology ?
(26 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonology ?
(41 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonology ?
(36 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
R: Re: Vaiysi grammar revised: nouns and adjectives
R: Re: Vaiysi grammar revised: nouns and adjectives
(239 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
R: Typologic survey, part I
R: Typologic survey, part I
(56 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
shdeete
Re: shdeete
(42 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
slightly of topic: Re: Vampire dialogue again
slightly of topic: Re: Vampire dialogue again
(38 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Unknown Language Confuser!
THEORY: Unknown Language Confuser!
(66 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Unknown Language Confuser!
(31 lines)
From:
The Gray Wizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Unknown Language Confuser!
(34 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Unknown Language Confuser!
(43 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Unknown Language Confuser!
(23 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Unknown Language Confuser!
(48 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Unknown Language Confuser!
(24 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
topic/compliment & Sanskrit script
Re: topic/compliment & Sanskrit script
(36 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: topic/compliment & Sanskrit script
(40 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Typologic survey, part I
Re: Typologic survey, part I
(67 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part I
(57 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part I
(58 lines)
From:
Luís Henrique <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part I
(57 lines)
From:
Tommaso R. Donnarumma <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part I
(48 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part I
(64 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part I
(86 lines)
From:
The Gray Wizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part I
(74 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Typologic survey, part II
Typologic survey, part II
(54 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(69 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(47 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(59 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(86 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(46 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(46 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(81 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(26 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(125 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(57 lines)
From:
Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(62 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(52 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(53 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(55 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(59 lines)
From:
Luís Henrique <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(55 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(61 lines)
From:
Tommaso R. Donnarumma <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(57 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(49 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(48 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(61 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(40 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Typologic survey, parts I and II
Typologic survey, parts I and II
(114 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Typological Survey Part I
Re: Typological Survey Part I
(12 lines)
From:
Ajin Kwai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Typological Survey Part I
(64 lines)
From:
Ajin Kwai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Typological Survey Part II
Typological Survey Part II
(139 lines)
From:
Ajin Kwai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Unknown Language Identifier!
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(25 lines)
From:
Mario Bonassin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(40 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(91 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(52 lines)
From:
Patrick Jarrett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(39 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(34 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(18 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(65 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(81 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(29 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(84 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(31 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(19 lines)
From:
James O'Connell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(34 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(28 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(22 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(36 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(29 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(54 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(56 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(77 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(97 lines)
From:
The Gray Wizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(42 lines)
From:
The Gray Wizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(52 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(36 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(18 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(35 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(15 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(30 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(49 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(28 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(25 lines)
From:
Luís Henrique <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(39 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(30 lines)
From:
Luís Henrique <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(24 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(22 lines)
From:
Luís Henrique <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(34 lines)
From:
Terrence Donnelly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(41 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(22 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vaiysi Grammar revised : Intro and phonology
Vaiysi Grammar revised : Intro and phonology
(206 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vaiysi grammar revised: nouns and adjectives
Vaiysi grammar revised: nouns and adjectives
(190 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vaiysi grammar revised: nouns and adjectives
(197 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vaiysi grammar revised: pronouns and prepositions
Vaiysi grammar revised: pronouns and prepositions
(87 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vampire dialogue again
Re: Vampire dialogue again
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vampire dialogue again
(31 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vampire dialogue again
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vampire technology - offshoot of Vampire dialog
Vampire technology - offshoot of Vampire dialog
(31 lines)
From:
Patrick Jarrett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vampire technology - offshoot of Vampire dialog
(25 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Voynich was: Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
Voynich was: Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(56 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Voynich was: Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(31 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Voynich was: Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(14 lines)
From:
Luís Henrique <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Voynich was: Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(29 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Voynich was: Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(31 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Voynich was: Re: Unknown Language Identifier!
(33 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(25 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(96 lines)
From:
Luís Henrique <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(56 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(47 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(57 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(37 lines)
From:
Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(95 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(38 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?)
Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?)
(26 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?)
(31 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?)
(35 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?)
(27 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?)
(39 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?)
(19 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?)
(25 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?)
(30 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?)
(36 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?)
(19 lines)
From:
Pavel A. da Mek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?)
(19 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?)
(33 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU