Conlang Mailing List – January 2001, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show contributor list | Hide contributor list

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

List of contributors:

• Ajin Kwai <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
• D Tse <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> (12 messages)
• David Stokes <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
• dirk elzinga <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Eli Naeher <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
• Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
• J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• James O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
• Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
• jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• John Cowan <[log in to unmask]> (10 messages)
• Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Luís Henrique <[log in to unmask]> (7 messages)
• Mangiat <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Mario Bonassin <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
• Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]> (10 messages)
• Patrick Jarrett <[log in to unmask]>
• Patrick Jarrett <[log in to unmask]>
• Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Pavel A. da Mek <[log in to unmask]>
• Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
• Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Terrence Donnelly <[log in to unmask]>
• The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Tommaso R. Donnarumma <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]> (8 messages)

1. Ajin Kwai <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Typological Survey Part I (12 lines)
     Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 05:14:49 -0800
   • Typological Survey Part I (64 lines)
     Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 05:29:16 -0800
   • Typological Survey Part II (139 lines)
     Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:10:49 -0800

2. Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
   • slightly of topic: Re: Vampire dialogue again (38 lines)
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:16:27 -0600
   • Re: Typologic survey, part II (40 lines)
     Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:49:40 -0600
   • Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?) (26 lines)
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:19:32 -0600

3. Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (36 lines)
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:14:26 -0800
   • Re: Voynich was: Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (31 lines)
     Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:44:23 -0800

4. Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Typologic survey, part I (64 lines)
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:44:53 +0100
   • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (34 lines)
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:41:12 +0100
   • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (18 lines)
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:45:22 +0100
   • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (31 lines)
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:32:33 +0100
   • Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?) (27 lines)
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:49:27 +0100

5. Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (91 lines)
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:53:48 +0100

6. D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: phonology ? (26 lines)
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:08:18 +1100
   • Re: Typologic survey, part II (52 lines)
     Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:43:44 +1100
   • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (15 lines)
     Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:14:07 +1100
   • Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?) (19 lines)
     Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:17:59 +1100
   • Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?) (19 lines)
     Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:19:37 +1100

7. Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
   • past tense formation (74 lines)
     Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:19:55 -0000
   • Re: past tense formation (70 lines)
     Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:25:14 -0000
   • Typologic survey, parts I and II (114 lines)
     Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:51:27 -0000

8. Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (39 lines)
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:59:05 +0200
   • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (49 lines)
     Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:23:18 +0200

9. daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Pater Noster in many languages (49 lines)
     Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:29:16 +0100
   • Re: Typologic survey, part II (55 lines)
     Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:24:04 +0100
   • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (65 lines)
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:14:22 +0100
   • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (81 lines)
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:15:00 +0100
   • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (77 lines)
     Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 00:29:28 +0100
   • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (28 lines)
     Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:39:28 +0100

10. Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: /p/ versus devoiced b? (82 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:06:55 -0600
    • Re: /p/ versus devoiced b? (47 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:14:36 -0600
    • CHAT: Geek Code (16 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:44:56 -0600
    • Pater Noster in many languages (19 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:33:36 -0600
    • Re: Pater Noster in many languages (38 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:59:16 -0600
    • Re: phonology ? (41 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:00:41 -0600
    • Re: topic/compliment & Sanskrit script (40 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:51:43 -0600
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (55 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:07:01 -0600
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (18 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:41:38 -0600
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (35 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:00:43 -0600
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (30 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:21:46 -0600
    • Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (38 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:44:58 -0600

11. David Stokes <[log in to unmask]>
    • niKòmbá changes (80 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:31:46 -0500
    • niKòmbá: conlang sketch (168 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:14:51 -0500

12. Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (52 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:34:47 -0500

13. dirk elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: /p/ versus devoiced b? (51 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:23:47 -0700
    • Re: Typologic survey, part I (48 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:28:08 -0700
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (57 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:07:14 -0700
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (84 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:23:36 -0700
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (54 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:24:44 -0700
    • Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (56 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:23:40 -0700

14. Eli Naeher <[log in to unmask]>
    • Another unknown language query (21 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:26:13 -0800
    • Latin question (16 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:57:33 -0800

15. Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: past tense formation (70 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:30:05 -0600
    • Re: topic/compliment & Sanskrit script (36 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:03:25 -0600
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (24 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:32:17 -0600
    • Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?) (35 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:15:43 -0600
    • Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?) (39 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:36:01 -0600
    • Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?) (36 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:02:14 -0600

16. Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <[log in to unmask]>
    • My Book (30 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:45:20 -0000
    • Re: My Book (66 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 21:04:31 -0000
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (57 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 03:32:40 -0000
    • Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (37 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:41:11 -0000

17. H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Unknown Language Confuser! (34 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:22:31 -0500
    • Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (47 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:38:44 -0500

18. Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Unknown Language Confuser! (43 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:19:10 -0500

19. Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Committed: (was Printed Conlang stuff?) (30 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:02:30 +0100
    • Re: OT: RPGs (was Re: Conlangs in RPGs...) (24 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:17:00 +0100
    • Re: shdeete (42 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:57:32 +0100
    • Re: Typologic survey, part I (67 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:49:13 +0100
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (69 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:46:19 +0100
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (40 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:55:53 +0100

20. Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (125 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:06:21 +0100

21. J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: past tense formation (86 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:45:18 -0800
    • Re: THEORY: Unknown Language Confuser! (48 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:23:36 -0800
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (36 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:40:10 -0800
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (29 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:55:14 -0800
    • Re: Vaiysi grammar revised: nouns and adjectives (197 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:46:28 -0800

22. James O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (19 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:08:28 -0000

23. Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Unknown Language Confuser! (24 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 21:05:06 EST

24. jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typologic survey, part I (74 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:00:01 -0800
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (81 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:47:18 -0800
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (26 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:54:33 -0800
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (56 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:52:09 -0800
    • Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (95 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:25:52 -0800

25. John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: /p/ versus devoiced b? (24 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:50:30 -0500
    • Re: An arabo-romance conlang? (28 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:40:04 -0500
    • Re: Lateral fricatives (25 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:38:32 -0500
    • Re: Typologic survey, part I (57 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:26:38 -0500
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (49 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:12:55 -0500
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (29 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:01:13 -0500
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (37 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:09:21 -0500
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (34 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:37:16 -0500
    • Re: Vampire dialogue again (40 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:37:51 -0500
    • Re: Vampire dialogue again (37 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:18:12 -0500

26. Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: /p/ versus devoiced b? (33 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:43:13 -0000
    • THEORY: Unknown Language Confuser! (66 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 02:27:04 -0000

27. Luís Henrique <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typologic survey, part I (58 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:27:30 -0500
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (59 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:21:00 -0500
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (25 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:04:43 -0500
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (30 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:23:36 -0500
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (22 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:29:00 -0500
    • Re: Voynich was: Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (14 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:56:17 -0500
    • Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (96 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:07:55 -0500

28. Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang book? (279 lines)
      Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 21:00:16 +0100
    • R: Re: Vaiysi grammar revised: nouns and adjectives (239 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:05:38 +0100
    • R: Typologic survey, part I (56 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:57:00 +0100
    • Vaiysi Grammar revised : Intro and phonology (206 lines)
      Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:24:00 +0100
    • Vaiysi grammar revised: nouns and adjectives (190 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:59:33 +0100
    • Vaiysi grammar revised: pronouns and prepositions (87 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:05:56 +0100

29. Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pater Noster in many languages (29 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:54:41 -0800
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (53 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:01:47 -0800

30. Mario Bonassin <[log in to unmask]>
    • phonology ? (17 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 02:14:18 -0600
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (25 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 01:02:59 -0600

31. Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: apostrophes in transliteration (stress in Tokana) (20 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:36:54 -0800
    • Re: apostrophes in transliteration (stress in Tokana) (64 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:49:22 -0800
    • Re: past tense formation (54 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:03:04 -0800
    • Re: Vampire technology - offshoot of Vampire dialog (25 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:06:08 -0800

32. Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: /p/ versus devoiced b? (23 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:41:20 -0500
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (46 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:29:55 -0500
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (46 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:32:55 -0500
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (20 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:47:36 -0500
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (20 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:47:31 -0500
    • Re: Vampire dialogue again (31 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:28:33 -0500

33. Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (41 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 22:12:28 -0500

34. Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Another unknown language query (38 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:50:28 -0600
    • Re: My Book (47 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:54:03 -0600
    • Re: THEORY: Unknown Language Confuser! (23 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:58:19 -0600
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (48 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:17:22 -0600
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (34 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:33:54 -0600
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (39 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:20:14 -0600
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (22 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 21:32:08 -0600
    • Voynich was: Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (56 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:32:04 -0600
    • Re: Voynich was: Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (33 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:52:35 -0600
    • Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?) (31 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:34:47 -0600

35. Patrick Jarrett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (52 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 06:25:24 -0500

36. Patrick Jarrett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Vampire technology - offshoot of Vampire dialog (31 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:20:11 -0500

37. Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Info Needed: "Blade" and "Dark Skies" (longish) (45 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:51:07 -0500
    • Re: Info Needed: "Blade" and "Dark Skies" (longish) (43 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 19:30:36 -0500

38. Pavel A. da Mek <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?) (19 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:56:25 +0100

39. Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin question (36 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:42:55 +0000
    • Re: phonology ? (36 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:42:55 +0000

40. Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
    • New typescript for Gevey (25 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 21:56:53 +0000
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (61 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:37:02 +0000
    • Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (57 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:30:29 +0000

41. Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (59 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:05:05 -0500

42. Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Etymological Dict. of IE Roots (14 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 00:57:28 -0500
    • Kash phonology II (62 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 00:59:45 -0500
    • Re: niKòmbá: conlang sketch (43 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 01:12:54 -0500
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (62 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:48:44 -0500
    • Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?) (25 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 00:49:44 -0500

43. Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Info Needed: "Blade" and "Dark Skies" (longish) (28 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:01:16 -0500
    • Re: past tense formation (28 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:27:30 -0500
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (86 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:04:27 -0500
    • Re: Voynich was: Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (29 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:54:50 -0500
    • Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?) (30 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:09:02 -0500
    • Re: Whispered voicing ( was: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?) (33 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:06:47 -0500

44. taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Typologic survey, part II (54 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:08:51 +0100
    • What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (25 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:19:20 +0100

45. Terrence Donnelly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (34 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:36:30 -0600

46. The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Unknown Language Confuser! (31 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:16:56 -0500
    • Re: Typologic survey, part I (86 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:51:18 -0500
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (97 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:12:26 -0500
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (42 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:26:38 -0500

47. Tommaso R. Donnarumma <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Heichi: Compound words (17 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:50:33 +0100
    • Re: Typologic survey, part I (57 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:06:44 +0100
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (61 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:00:05 +0100

48. Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: /p/ versus devoiced b? (55 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:21:40 -0500
    • Re: /p/ versus devoiced b? (34 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:39:16 -0500
    • Re: /p/ versus devoiced b? (32 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:49:24 -0500
    • Re: /p/ versus devoiced b? (66 lines)
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:46:44 -0500
    • Re: Typologic survey, part II (47 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:04:20 -0500
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (28 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:32:26 -0500
    • Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (22 lines)
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:33:42 -0500
    • Re: Voynich was: Re: Unknown Language Identifier! (31 lines)
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:02:36 -0500