Conlang
Mailing List February 2001, week 1
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!)
(2 messages)
"Lative" case (was Re: Conlang book)
/p/ versus devoiced b?
(2 messages)
3rd -us neuters in Romance (was: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101))
3rd declension -us neuters (was Re: Worse Greek 102 (...))
(3 messages)
<No subject>
A disturbing proposal
(2 messages)
A DISTURBING proposal!
A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
(16 messages)
A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux)
(7 messages)
A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converseofaux)
Active case-marking natlangs
(5 messages)
Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?)
Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed in anconlang classificatory system?)
(3 messages)
Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed inanconlang classificatory system?)
(2 messages)
Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is neededinanconlang classificatory system?)
Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What isneeded in anconlang classificatory system?)
An arabo-romance conlang?
(9 messages)
ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(26 messages)
apostrophes in transliteration (stress in Tokana)
(4 messages)
Back again, with YANC
(6 messages)
Bad Latin 101: The Double-Plural of Neuter Nouns
(4 messages)
Bantu & losing tones, was: niKòmbá changes
Blade II language: The price of conlanging
CHAT Jargon-mangling (was: Worse Greek 102)
(3 messages)
CHAT: multilingual families
CHAT: my conlanger code
CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(10 messages)
CHAT: Rhinocerotes (was: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101))
(3 messages)
Code
(12 messages)
Code (was: What is needed in a conlang classification....)
(2 messages)
Code (was: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?)
(3 messages)
Conlang book
(30 messages)
conlang classification and productivity
conlanger code
(8 messages)
elvish tidbit
(3 messages)
Enochian (was Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?)
(3 messages)
Enochian; Christianhood and conlanging
(7 messages)
first lang test
(4 messages)
Kash Morphology: Nouns and pronouns
(3 messages)
Kash phonology III
Language universal?
(13 messages)
Latin (was Language universal?)
(2 messages)
Local cases - lots of them (was Re: Conlang book)
Modal adverbs!
(2 messages)
My Book
(2 messages)
Newbie here
(16 messages)
OT: Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
Pain sounds (was: Re: A DISTURBING proposal!)
(2 messages)
Paralinguistic grunts
past tense formation
Personal langs and converse of aux
(28 messages)
query: mixing natlangs
R: Conlang book
R: Re: Conlang book
R: Re: past tense formation
(2 messages)
R: Typologic survey, part II
Speaking Conlang To Kids
(4 messages)
Speaking Conlang to Lovers (was Re: Speaking Conlang To Kids)
Specifics (was Re: Personal langs and convers
Spoken Thoughts = Amaapare / Amennapare
The Conlanger Code v1.1
(3 messages)
the dirt on Korean "glottalized/tensified" stops
THEORY: What is an active language (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs)
(3 messages)
THEORY: What is an active language?
(4 messages)
Tokana: active? (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs)
(3 messages)
Typologic survey, part II
(7 messages)
Typologic survey, parts I and II...and a new conlang [Veldane'as Lingwas]
und we me gseht
(2 messages)
Updated the homepage!
USAGE: Western Usonian /a/
(5 messages)
Vaiysi grammar revised: sintax
Vaiysi grammar revised: verbs
Vampire dialogue again
Varabhán Kínnan
Viruses (Virii? :-P) (Was: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) )
Vocatives (was Re: Newbie here)
What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(10 messages)
What ME Disturbing? (was Personal langs et al...)
(4 messages)
Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(51 messages)
"first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!)
"first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!)
(45 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!)
(36 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
"Lative" case (was Re: Conlang book)
"Lative" case (was Re: Conlang book)
(70 lines)
From:
Dan Seriff <
[log in to unmask]
>
/p/ versus devoiced b?
Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?
(51 lines)
From:
Oskar Gudlaugsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
3rd -us neuters in Romance (was: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101))
3rd -us neuters in Romance (was: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101))
(77 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
3rd declension -us neuters (was Re: Worse Greek 102 (...))
3rd declension -us neuters (was Re: Worse Greek 102 (...))
(32 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3rd declension -us neuters (was Re: Worse Greek 102 (...))
(49 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 3rd declension -us neuters (was Re: Worse Greek 102 (...))
(60 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
<No subject>
(20 lines)
From:
Leo Caesius <
[log in to unmask]
>
A disturbing proposal
Re: A disturbing proposal
(80 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A disturbing proposal
(108 lines)
From:
Brian Phillips <
[log in to unmask]
>
A DISTURBING proposal!
Re: A DISTURBING proposal!
(40 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
(108 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
(62 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
(162 lines)
From:
E-Ching Ng <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
(97 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
(27 lines)
From:
SMITH,MARCUS ANTHONY <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
(60 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
(33 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
(105 lines)
From:
Luís Henrique <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
(93 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
(24 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
(189 lines)
From:
Levi Caddell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
(36 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
(74 lines)
From:
Levi Caddell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
(41 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
(92 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux)
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux)
(88 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux)
(45 lines)
From:
SMITH,MARCUS ANTHONY <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux)
(32 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux)
(36 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux)
(145 lines)
From:
Levi Caddell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux)
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux)
(44 lines)
From:
Luís Henrique <
[log in to unmask]
>
A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converseofaux)
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converseofaux)
(40 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Active case-marking natlangs
Re: Active case-marking natlangs
(89 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs
(95 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs
(57 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs
(200 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs
(48 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?)
Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?)
(68 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed in anconlang classificatory system?)
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed in anconlang classificatory system?)
(51 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed in anconlang classificatory system?)
(47 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed in anconlang classificatory system?)
(56 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed inanconlang classificatory system?)
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed inanconlang classificatory system?)
(113 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed inanconlang classificatory system?)
(76 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is neededinanconlang classificatory system?)
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is neededinanconlang classificatory system?)
(32 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What isneeded in anconlang classificatory system?)
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What isneeded in anconlang classificatory system?)
(151 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
An arabo-romance conlang?
Re: An arabo-romance conlang?
(136 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An arabo-romance conlang?
(36 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An arabo-romance conlang?
(48 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An arabo-romance conlang?
(26 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An arabo-romance conlang?
(34 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An arabo-romance conlang?
(22 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An arabo-romance conlang?
(51 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An arabo-romance conlang?
(30 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An arabo-romance conlang?
(57 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
ANN: Kura 1.0 released
ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(107 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(42 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(59 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(26 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(35 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(22 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(37 lines)
From:
Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(22 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(36 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(33 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(24 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(31 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(28 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(13 lines)
From:
Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(37 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(37 lines)
From:
Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(25 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(30 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(34 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(31 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(39 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(42 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(19 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(35 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(16 lines)
From:
Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <
[log in to unmask]
>
apostrophes in transliteration (stress in Tokana)
Re: apostrophes in transliteration (stress in Tokana)
(24 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: apostrophes in transliteration (stress in Tokana)
(44 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: apostrophes in transliteration (stress in Tokana)
(52 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: apostrophes in transliteration (stress in Tokana)
(28 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back again, with YANC
Back again, with YANC
(41 lines)
From:
Keolah Kedaire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again, with YANC
(42 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again, with YANC
(28 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again, with YANC
(27 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again, with YANC
(24 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back again, with YANC
(24 lines)
From:
Keolah Kedaire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Bad Latin 101: The Double-Plural of Neuter Nouns
Bad Latin 101: The Double-Plural of Neuter Nouns
(44 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bad Latin 101: The Double-Plural of Neuter Nouns
(31 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bad Latin 101: The Double-Plural of Neuter Nouns
(30 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bad Latin 101: The Double-Plural of Neuter Nouns
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Bantu & losing tones, was: niKòmbá changes
Bantu & losing tones, was: niKòmbá changes
(53 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Blade II language: The price of conlanging
Blade II language: The price of conlanging
(63 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT Jargon-mangling (was: Worse Greek 102)
CHAT Jargon-mangling (was: Worse Greek 102)
(25 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Jargon-mangling (was: Worse Greek 102)
(32 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Jargon-mangling (was: Worse Greek 102)
(40 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: multilingual families
CHAT: multilingual families
(75 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: my conlanger code
CHAT: my conlanger code
(23 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(25 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(17 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(28 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(26 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(25 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(33 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(33 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(29 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Rhinocerotes (was: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101))
CHAT: Rhinocerotes (was: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101))
(25 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Rhinocerotes (was: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101))
(35 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Rhinocerotes (was: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101))
(23 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Code
Re: Code
(33 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code
(37 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code
(31 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code
(21 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code
(32 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code
(29 lines)
From:
Patrick Jarrett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code
(37 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code
(28 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code
(37 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code
(35 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code
(21 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Code (was: What is needed in a conlang classification....)
Re: Code (was: What is needed in a conlang classification....)
(14 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code (was: What is needed in a conlang classification....)
(42 lines)
From:
Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Code (was: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?)
Re: Code (was: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?)
(20 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code (was: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?)
(38 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code (was: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?)
(29 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang book
Conlang book
(43 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Conlang book
(29 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(30 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(34 lines)
From:
Dan Seriff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(32 lines)
From:
The Gray Wizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(19 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Conlang book
(23 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Conlang book
(19 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(47 lines)
From:
The Gray Wizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(27 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(31 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(54 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(83 lines)
From:
Tero Vilkesalo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(27 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(50 lines)
From:
Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang book
(27 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Conlang book
(27 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(62 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(26 lines)
From:
Tommaso R. Donnarumma <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(36 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(25 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(32 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(42 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(20 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(18 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Conlang book
(29 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book
(18 lines)
From:
Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <
[log in to unmask]
>
conlang classification and productivity
conlang classification and productivity
(67 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
conlanger code
conlanger code
(44 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
conlanger code
(19 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlanger code
(27 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlanger code
(16 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlanger code
(23 lines)
From:
Tommaso R. Donnarumma <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlanger code
(15 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlanger code
(15 lines)
From:
Jim Hopkins <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlanger code
(19 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
elvish tidbit
elvish tidbit
(41 lines)
From:
Mario Bonassin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: elvish tidbit
(21 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: elvish tidbit
(44 lines)
From:
Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Enochian (was Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?)
Enochian (was Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?)
(38 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Enochian (was Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?)
(39 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Enochian (was Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?)
(14 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Enochian; Christianhood and conlanging
Re: Enochian; Christianhood and conlanging
(59 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Enochian; Christianhood and conlanging
(26 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Enochian; Christianhood and conlanging
(36 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Enochian; Christianhood and conlanging
(41 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Enochian; Christianhood and conlanging
(26 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Enochian; Christianhood and conlanging
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Enochian; Christianhood and conlanging
(23 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
first lang test
first lang test
(40 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: first lang test
(43 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: first lang test
(45 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: first lang test
(90 lines)
From:
E-Ching Ng <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kash Morphology: Nouns and pronouns
Kash Morphology: Nouns and pronouns
(77 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kash Morphology: Nouns and pronouns
(83 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kash Morphology: Nouns and pronouns
(21 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kash phonology III
Kash phonology III
(60 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language universal?
Language universal?
(37 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language universal?
(46 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language universal?
(42 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language universal?
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language universal?
(31 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language universal?
(64 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language universal?
(72 lines)
From:
Tommaso R. Donnarumma <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language universal?
(58 lines)
From:
Tero Kukkonen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language universal?
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language universal?
(39 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language universal?
(34 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language universal?
(72 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language universal?
(110 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Latin (was Language universal?)
Re: Latin (was Language universal?)
(65 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin (was Language universal?)
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Local cases - lots of them (was Re: Conlang book)
Local cases - lots of them (was Re: Conlang book)
(51 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Modal adverbs!
Modal adverbs!
(74 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Modal adverbs!
(30 lines)
From:
Dan Seriff <
[log in to unmask]
>
My Book
Re: My Book
(44 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Book
(44 lines)
From:
Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Newbie here
Newbie here
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie here
(44 lines)
From:
Tommaso R. Donnarumma <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie here
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie here
(21 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie here
(73 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie here
(66 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie here
(71 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie here
(119 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie here
(44 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie here
(99 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie here
(20 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie here
(31 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie here
(36 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie here
(36 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie here
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newbie here
(39 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
OT: Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released
(41 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pain sounds (was: Re: A DISTURBING proposal!)
Pain sounds (was: Re: A DISTURBING proposal!)
(21 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pain sounds (was: Re: A DISTURBING proposal!)
(21 lines)
From:
Keolah Kedaire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Paralinguistic grunts
Paralinguistic grunts
(29 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
past tense formation
Re: past tense formation
(21 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Personal langs and converse of aux
Personal langs and converse of aux
(175 lines)
From:
Brian Phillips <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(83 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(57 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(43 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(49 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(31 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(32 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(25 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(41 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(49 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(49 lines)
From:
E-Ching Ng <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(57 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(38 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(37 lines)
From:
E-Ching Ng <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(28 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(48 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(32 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(36 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(40 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(33 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(29 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(43 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(27 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(57 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux
(47 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
query: mixing natlangs
query: mixing natlangs
(26 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
R: Conlang book
R: Conlang book
(24 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
R: Re: Conlang book
R: Re: Conlang book
(29 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
R: Re: past tense formation
R: Re: past tense formation
(39 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: R: Re: past tense formation
(46 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
R: Typologic survey, part II
R: Typologic survey, part II
(48 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Speaking Conlang To Kids
Speaking Conlang To Kids
(41 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Speaking Conlang To Kids
(35 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Speaking Conlang To Kids
(21 lines)
From:
Karen Robinson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Speaking Conlang To Kids
(52 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Speaking Conlang to Lovers (was Re: Speaking Conlang To Kids)
Speaking Conlang to Lovers (was Re: Speaking Conlang To Kids)
(39 lines)
From:
David Stokes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Specifics (was Re: Personal langs and convers
Specifics (was Re: Personal langs and convers
(67 lines)
From:
Brian Phillips <
[log in to unmask]
>
Spoken Thoughts = Amaapare / Amennapare
Spoken Thoughts = Amaapare / Amennapare
(22 lines)
From:
Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Conlanger Code v1.1
The Conlanger Code v1.1
(14 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Conlanger Code v1.1
(30 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Conlanger Code v1.1
(54 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
the dirt on Korean "glottalized/tensified" stops
the dirt on Korean "glottalized/tensified" stops
(37 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: What is an active language (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs)
THEORY: What is an active language (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs)
(66 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: What is an active language (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs)
(81 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: What is an active language (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs)
(30 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: What is an active language?
Re: THEORY: What is an active language?
(133 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: What is an active language?
(33 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: What is an active language?
(36 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: What is an active language?
(23 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tokana: active? (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs)
Tokana: active? (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs)
(263 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana: active? (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs)
(71 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana: active? (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs)
(37 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Typologic survey, part II
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(95 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(65 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(82 lines)
From:
O'Connell James <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(128 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(69 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(39 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typologic survey, part II
(146 lines)
From:
The Gray Wizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Typologic survey, parts I and II...and a new conlang [Veldane'as Lingwas]
Re: Typologic survey, parts I and II...and a new conlang [Veldane'as Lingwas]
(99 lines)
From:
Cian Ross <
[log in to unmask]
>
und we me gseht
Re: und we me gseht
(42 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: und we me gseht
(57 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Updated the homepage!
Updated the homepage!
(25 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Western Usonian /a/
USAGE: Western Usonian /a/
(60 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Western Usonian /a/
(34 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Western Usonian /a/
(33 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Western Usonian /a/
(35 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Western Usonian /a/
(37 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vaiysi grammar revised: sintax
Vaiysi grammar revised: sintax
(71 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vaiysi grammar revised: verbs
Vaiysi grammar revised: verbs
(157 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vampire dialogue again
Re: Vampire dialogue again
(37 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Varabhán Kínnan
Varabhán Kínnan
(72 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Viruses (Virii? :-P) (Was: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) )
Viruses (Virii? :-P) (Was: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) )
(33 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vocatives (was Re: Newbie here)
Vocatives (was Re: Newbie here)
(83 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(37 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(44 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(142 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(45 lines)
From:
Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(33 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(36 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(16 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(26 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?
(114 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
What ME Disturbing? (was Personal langs et al...)
What ME Disturbing? (was Personal langs et al...)
(99 lines)
From:
Brian Phillips <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What ME Disturbing? (was Personal langs et al...)
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What ME Disturbing? (was Personal langs et al...)
(39 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What ME Disturbing? (was Personal langs et al...)
(46 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(73 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(27 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(19 lines)
From:
Luís Henrique <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(49 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(28 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(30 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(39 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(32 lines)
From:
Luís Henrique <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(12 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(21 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(23 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(22 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(31 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(30 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(24 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(19 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(31 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(19 lines)
From:
SMITH,MARCUS ANTHONY <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(28 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(70 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(22 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(23 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(35 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(24 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(23 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(26 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(18 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(24 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(15 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(23 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(57 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(29 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(23 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(38 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(38 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(54 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(66 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(50 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(24 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(49 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(64 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(39 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(31 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(42 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(72 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(28 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
(63 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU