Conlang Mailing List -- February 2001, week 1

Conlang Mailing List – February 2001, week 1

Sort by

Author | Date | Topic
Chronologically | Most recent first

Options

Show author | Hide author

Navigation

Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives

Re: /p/ versus devoiced b? (52 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Typologic survey, part II (95 lines)
From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
Bad Latin 101: The Double-Plural of Neuter Nouns (44 lines)
From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (33 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (35 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Typologic survey, part II (65 lines)
From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Vampire dialogue again (37 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Vaiysi grammar revised: verbs (157 lines)
From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My Book (44 lines)
From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Varabhán Kínnan (72 lines)
From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Bantu & losing tones, was: niKòmbá changes (53 lines)
From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
Re: My Book (44 lines)
From: Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <[log in to unmask]>
Re: An arabo-romance conlang? (136 lines)
From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (37 lines)
From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
R: Re: past tense formation (39 lines)
From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
the dirt on Korean "glottalized/tensified" stops (37 lines)
From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Typologic survey, part II (82 lines)
From: O'Connell James <[log in to unmask]>
Re: An arabo-romance conlang? (36 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (44 lines)
From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
Re: An arabo-romance conlang? (48 lines)
From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: R: Re: past tense formation (46 lines)
From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
Kash phonology III (60 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
ANN: Kura 1.0 released (107 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (73 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (142 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: An arabo-romance conlang? (26 lines)
From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (42 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (45 lines)
From: Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Typologic survey, part II (128 lines)
From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
Re: An arabo-romance conlang? (34 lines)
From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Code (was: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?) (20 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Code (was: What is needed in a conlang classification....) (14 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Typologic survey, part II (69 lines)
From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (27 lines)
From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (33 lines)
From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bad Latin 101: The Double-Plural of Neuter Nouns (31 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (59 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (26 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bad Latin 101: The Double-Plural of Neuter Nouns (30 lines)
From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (36 lines)
From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
conlanger code (44 lines)
From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Re: past tense formation (21 lines)
From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (16 lines)
From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (35 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (33 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
CHAT: Rhinocerotes (was: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)) (25 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
conlanger code (19 lines)
From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (26 lines)
From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (19 lines)
From: Luís Henrique <[log in to unmask]>
Re: An arabo-romance conlang? (22 lines)
From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
Re: conlanger code (27 lines)
From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
Re: An arabo-romance conlang? (51 lines)
From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
Re: An arabo-romance conlang? (30 lines)
From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Code (33 lines)
From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Code (37 lines)
From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
Vaiysi grammar revised: sintax (71 lines)
From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Code (was: What is needed in a conlang classification....) (42 lines)
From: Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <[log in to unmask]>
CHAT: my conlanger code (23 lines)
From: dirk elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
Re: conlanger code (16 lines)
From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Code (was: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?) (38 lines)
From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (22 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (37 lines)
From: Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (49 lines)
From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Code (was: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?) (29 lines)
From: Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (22 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Typologic survey, part II (39 lines)
From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
Re: An arabo-romance conlang? (57 lines)
From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (28 lines)
From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (30 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (39 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Code (31 lines)
From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (32 lines)
From: Luís Henrique <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (12 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Enochian (was Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?) (38 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?) (68 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed in anconlang classificatory system?) (51 lines)
From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (21 lines)
From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (23 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Enochian (was Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?) (39 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
<No subject> (20 lines)
From: Leo Caesius <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (22 lines)
From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
Re: /p/ versus devoiced b? (51 lines)
From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
Viruses (Virii? :-P) (Was: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) ) (33 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (31 lines)
From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (30 lines)
From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Kash Morphology: Nouns and pronouns (77 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Rhinocerotes (was: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)) (35 lines)
From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Newbie here (41 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
R: Typologic survey, part II (48 lines)
From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Newbie here (44 lines)
From: Tommaso R. Donnarumma <[log in to unmask]>
Re: conlanger code (23 lines)
From: Tommaso R. Donnarumma <[log in to unmask]>
Re: conlanger code (15 lines)
From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Code (21 lines)
From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Code (32 lines)
From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Code (29 lines)
From: Patrick Jarrett <[log in to unmask]>
Re: conlanger code (15 lines)
From: Jim Hopkins <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (24 lines)
From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
Re: apostrophes in transliteration (stress in Tokana) (24 lines)
From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
Re: apostrophes in transliteration (stress in Tokana) (44 lines)
From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system? (114 lines)
From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (19 lines)
From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (31 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (19 lines)
From: SMITH,MARCUS ANTHONY <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Code (37 lines)
From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (28 lines)
From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Newbie here (43 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Code (28 lines)
From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (70 lines)
From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Code (37 lines)
From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
Re: und we me gseht (42 lines)
From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Newbie here (21 lines)
From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Code (42 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Newbie here (73 lines)
From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: apostrophes in transliteration (stress in Tokana) (52 lines)
From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: apostrophes in transliteration (stress in Tokana) (28 lines)
From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
3rd declension -us neuters (was Re: Worse Greek 102 (...)) (32 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (22 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Kash Morphology: Nouns and pronouns (83 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: conlanger code (19 lines)
From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (23 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (36 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Enochian (was Re: What is needed in an conlang classificatory system?) (14 lines)
From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Typologic survey, parts I and II...and a new conlang [Veldane'as Lingwas] (99 lines)
From: Cian Ross <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Newbie here (66 lines)
From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (35 lines)
From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Code (35 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: 3rd declension -us neuters (was Re: Worse Greek 102 (...)) (49 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Newbie here (71 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (33 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (24 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Newbie here (119 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
3rd -us neuters in Romance (was: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)) (77 lines)
From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed in anconlang classificatory system?) (47 lines)
From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Newbie here (44 lines)
From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (31 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (28 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (13 lines)
From: Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Kash Morphology: Nouns and pronouns (21 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (37 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Typologic survey, part II (146 lines)
From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (37 lines)
From: Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed in anconlang classificatory system?) (56 lines)
From: Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Newbie here (99 lines)
From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What isneeded in anconlang classificatory system?) (151 lines)
From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Newbie here (20 lines)
From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed inanconlang classificatory system?) (113 lines)
From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Vocatives (was Re: Newbie here) (83 lines)
From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Code (21 lines)
From: [log in to unmask]
Re: Enochian; Christianhood and conlanging (59 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (25 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (30 lines)
From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
Personal langs and converse of aux (175 lines)
From: Brian Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
OT: Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (41 lines)
From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (24 lines)
From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (23 lines)
From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is needed inanconlang classificatory system?) (76 lines)
From: Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (26 lines)
From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (18 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Rhinocerotes (was: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)) (23 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (24 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (15 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Enochian; Christianhood and conlanging (26 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (37 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (34 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (31 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (23 lines)
From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (was Re: What is neededinanconlang classificatory system?) (32 lines)
From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (89 lines)
From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Enochian; Christianhood and conlanging (36 lines)
From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Enochian; Christianhood and conlanging (41 lines)
From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Newbie here (31 lines)
From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: und we me gseht (57 lines)
From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (39 lines)
From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (57 lines)
From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (29 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Newbie here (36 lines)
From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
CHAT Jargon-mangling (was: Worse Greek 102) (25 lines)
From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (23 lines)
From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT Jargon-mangling (was: Worse Greek 102) (32 lines)
From: dirk elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (38 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (38 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (54 lines)
From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (66 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Conlang book (43 lines)
From: [log in to unmask]
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (50 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (29 lines)
From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (24 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (58 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Newbie here (36 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Newbie here (45 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (49 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (30 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (42 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (35 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (64 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (34 lines)
From: Dan Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (32 lines)
From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
Tokana: active? (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs) (263 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
THEORY: What is an active language (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs) (66 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (39 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (31 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (42 lines)
From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (19 lines)
From: [log in to unmask]
Re: CHAT Jargon-mangling (was: Worse Greek 102) (40 lines)
From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (23 lines)
From: [log in to unmask]
Re: Conlang book (19 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Enochian; Christianhood and conlanging (26 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (47 lines)
From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (83 lines)
From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tokana: active? (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs) (71 lines)
From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (25 lines)
From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (27 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (57 lines)
From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Newbie here (39 lines)
From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (43 lines)
From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (49 lines)
From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Enochian; Christianhood and conlanging (39 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: THEORY: What is an active language? (133 lines)
From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (42 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: THEORY: What is an active language? (33 lines)
From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (31 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
"Lative" case (was Re: Conlang book) (70 lines)
From: Dan Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (31 lines)
From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bad Latin 101: The Double-Plural of Neuter Nouns (26 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (17 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (32 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (28 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (25 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (19 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (72 lines)
From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (54 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
elvish tidbit (41 lines)
From: Mario Bonassin <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (41 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: elvish tidbit (21 lines)
From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: 3rd declension -us neuters (was Re: Worse Greek 102 (...)) (60 lines)
From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (95 lines)
From: Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Re: THEORY: What is an active language (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs) (81 lines)
From: Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (49 lines)
From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: THEORY: What is an active language? (36 lines)
From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: THEORY: What is an active language? (23 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (83 lines)
From: Tero Vilkesalo <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (27 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: THEORY: What is an active language (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs) (30 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Enochian; Christianhood and conlanging (23 lines)
From: [log in to unmask]
R: Re: Conlang book (29 lines)
From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
R: Conlang book (24 lines)
From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
The Conlanger Code v1.1 (14 lines)
From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
Back again, with YANC (41 lines)
From: Keolah Kedaire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: elvish tidbit (44 lines)
From: Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (50 lines)
From: Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (49 lines)
From: E-Ching Ng <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (57 lines)
From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (34 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Language universal? (37 lines)
From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (57 lines)
From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (38 lines)
From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language universal? (46 lines)
From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (37 lines)
From: E-Ching Ng <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Back again, with YANC (42 lines)
From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Spoken Thoughts = Amaapare / Amennapare (22 lines)
From: Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <[log in to unmask]>
Re: The Conlanger Code v1.1 (30 lines)
From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (58 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (35 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
query: mixing natlangs (26 lines)
From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (28 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (28 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (26 lines)
From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (48 lines)
From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language universal? (42 lines)
From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (25 lines)
From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (32 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Back again, with YANC (28 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (50 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: The Conlanger Code v1.1 (54 lines)
From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tokana: active? (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs) (37 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language universal? (47 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Conlang book (27 lines)
From: [log in to unmask]
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (36 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language universal? (31 lines)
From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
Re: ANN: Kura 1.0 released (16 lines)
From: Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (200 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Active case-marking natlangs (48 lines)
From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (108 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (33 lines)
From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (40 lines)
From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux) (88 lines)
From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (33 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux) (45 lines)
From: SMITH,MARCUS ANTHONY <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (62 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Back again, with YANC (27 lines)
From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux) (32 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (162 lines)
From: E-Ching Ng <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (97 lines)
From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converseofaux) (40 lines)
From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux) (36 lines)
From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (27 lines)
From: SMITH,MARCUS ANTHONY <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (63 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Speaking Conlang To Kids (41 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (33 lines)
From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (60 lines)
From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (29 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (27 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (33 lines)
From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (62 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (22 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (22 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Back again, with YANC (24 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language universal? (64 lines)
From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (26 lines)
From: Tommaso R. Donnarumma <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language universal? (72 lines)
From: Tommaso R. Donnarumma <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (43 lines)
From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (27 lines)
From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (36 lines)
From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Latin (was Language universal?) (65 lines)
From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (105 lines)
From: Luís Henrique <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language universal? (58 lines)
From: Tero Kukkonen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Latin (was Language universal?) (34 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
What ME Disturbing? (was Personal langs et al...) (99 lines)
From: Brian Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
Updated the homepage! (25 lines)
From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
CHAT: multilingual families (75 lines)
From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (93 lines)
From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Speaking Conlang To Kids (35 lines)
From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
conlang classification and productivity (67 lines)
From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
USAGE: Western Usonian /a/ (60 lines)
From: dirk elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (57 lines)
From: dirk elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (24 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
first lang test (40 lines)
From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux) (145 lines)
From: Levi Caddell <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Speaking Conlang To Kids (21 lines)
From: Karen Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Back again, with YANC (24 lines)
From: Keolah Kedaire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (29 lines)
From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (189 lines)
From: Levi Caddell <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Western Usonian /a/ (34 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (36 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (74 lines)
From: Levi Caddell <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (40 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
"first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (45 lines)
From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux) (50 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Specifics (was Re: Personal langs and convers (67 lines)
From: Brian Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux) (44 lines)
From: Luís Henrique <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (40 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (41 lines)
From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (25 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (38 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Pain sounds (was: Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (21 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language universal? (47 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (32 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Pain sounds (was: Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (21 lines)
From: Keolah Kedaire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: What ME Disturbing? (was Personal langs et al...) (58 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (46 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Modal adverbs! (74 lines)
From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: What ME Disturbing? (was Personal langs et al...) (39 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: What ME Disturbing? (was Personal langs et al...) (46 lines)
From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language universal? (39 lines)
From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: first lang test (43 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language universal? (34 lines)
From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (42 lines)
From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (92 lines)
From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A disturbing proposal (80 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (20 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Western Usonian /a/ (33 lines)
From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (47 lines)
From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Speaking Conlang To Kids (52 lines)
From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (18 lines)
From: [log in to unmask]
Re: USAGE: Western Usonian /a/ (35 lines)
From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
Local cases - lots of them (was Re: Conlang book) (51 lines)
From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Western Usonian /a/ (37 lines)
From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (36 lines)
From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Speaking Conlang to Lovers (was Re: Speaking Conlang To Kids) (39 lines)
From: David Stokes <[log in to unmask]>
Re: first lang test (45 lines)
From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language universal? (72 lines)
From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Language universal? (110 lines)
From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Modal adverbs! (30 lines)
From: Dan Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (29 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: A disturbing proposal (108 lines)
From: Brian Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
Re: first lang test (90 lines)
From: E-Ching Ng <[log in to unmask]>
Paralinguistic grunts (29 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Conlang book (18 lines)
From: Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <[log in to unmask]>
Blade II language: The price of conlanging (63 lines)
From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>

Back to the main CONLANG page

LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU