Conlang Mailing List – February 2001, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (11 messages)
• #@%$! VCR
• 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (17 messages)
• A DISTURBING proposal!
• A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (2 messages)
• A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux)
• Active case-marking natlangs (8 messages)
• An arabo-romance conlang? (5 messages)
• Babel Text in Feringistani (3 messages)
• Back again, with YANC (2 messages)
• Bad Latin (3 messages)
• Blade II language: The price of conlanging (12 messages)
• CHAT Middle Initials (2 messages)
• CHAT: "Y'all" (2 messages)
• CHAT: Re: Middle Initials (7 messages)
• CHAT: Re: The importance of watching soap operas
• CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (4 messages)
• Conlang book (10 messages)
• conlang classification and productivity (12 messages)
• conlang links
• conlang links - where are they? (27 messages)
• de re lyanjenorum
• Dreams (Was: Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!)) (4 messages)
• first lang test (10 messages)
• Fractured translations (2 messages)
• god I suck!
• Going on a trip...
• irrregular plurals
• L1 test (Was: Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (2 messages)
• Language universal? (14 messages)
• Latin (was Language universal?) (10 messages)
• Middle Initials (14 messages)
• Modal adverbs! (2 messages)
• My conlang's Legratec rating (Was: Re: conlang classification and productivity) (2 messages)
• My Language Site
• new Unicode fonts [was: Re: USAGE: Western Usonian /a/]
• nhwolgadhus mis moreil (4 messages)
• Pain sounds (was: Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (2 messages)
• Personal langs and converse of aux
• R: first lang test
• R: Latin (was Language universal?)
• R: Re: Latin (was Language universal?) (2 messages)
• R: To Elliott Lash, re: Silindion
• Rinya is up! (was: Re: conlang links - where are they?)
• SILINDION: Personal Pronouns
• Speaking Conlang To Kids
• Specifics (2 messages)
• Specifics (was Re: Personal langs and convers
• SV: conlang links - where are they? (2 messages)
• teaching kids langs (3 messages)
• The amazing Dr. Smith (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs) (3 messages)
• The chant of the dog's gravestone (3 messages)
• The Conlanger Code v1.1 (2 messages)
• The importance of watching soap operas (Was "A DISTURBING ...") (13 messages)
• THEORY: Re: Active case-marking natlangs (3 messages)
• To Elliott Lash, re: Silindion (2 messages)
• USAGE: Western Usonian /a/ (6 messages)
• What ME Disturbing? (was Personal langs et al...)
• Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (3 messages)

1. "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!)
   • Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (32 lines)
     From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (22 lines)
     From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (15 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (18 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (26 lines)
     From: Keolah Kedaire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (25 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (20 lines)
     From: SMITH,MARCUS ANTHONY <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (25 lines)
     From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (28 lines)
     From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (37 lines)
     From: E-Ching Ng <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (43 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

2. #@%$! VCR
   • #@%$! VCR (33 lines)
     From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>

3. 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?)
   • 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (112 lines)
     From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (26 lines)
     From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (27 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (35 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (39 lines)
     From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (39 lines)
     From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (23 lines)
     From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (29 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (23 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (20 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (40 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (23 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (18 lines)
     From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (31 lines)
     From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (24 lines)
     From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (34 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st person vocative (was: Language universal?) (62 lines)
     From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>

4. A DISTURBING proposal!
   • Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (34 lines)
     From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>

5. A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
   • Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (28 lines)
     From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux) (54 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

6. A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux)
   • Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse ofaux) (48 lines)
     From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>

7. Active case-marking natlangs
   • Re: Active case-marking natlangs (200 lines)
     From: Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Active case-marking natlangs (39 lines)
     From: Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Active case-marking natlangs (18 lines)
     From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Active case-marking natlangs (22 lines)
     From: SMITH,MARCUS ANTHONY <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Active case-marking natlangs (28 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Active case-marking natlangs (58 lines)
     From: Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Active case-marking natlangs (69 lines)
     From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Active case-marking natlangs (66 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

8. An arabo-romance conlang?
   • Re: An arabo-romance conlang? (73 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An arabo-romance conlang? (52 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An arabo-romance conlang? (42 lines)
     From: Leo Caesius <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An arabo-romance conlang? (177 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An arabo-romance conlang? (75 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>

9. Babel Text in Feringistani
   • Babel Text in Feringistani (118 lines)
     From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Babel Text in Feringistani (31 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Babel Text in Feringistani (58 lines)
     From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>

10. Back again, with YANC
    • Re: Back again, with YANC (30 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Back again, with YANC (49 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

11. Bad Latin
    • Re: Bad Latin (42 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Bad Latin (49 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Bad Latin (72 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>

12. Blade II language: The price of conlanging
    • Re: Blade II language: The price of conlanging (40 lines)
      From: Dan Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Blade II language: The price of conlanging (58 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Blade II language: The price of conlanging (99 lines)
      From: Levi Caddell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Blade II language: The price of conlanging (82 lines)
      From: Mario Bonassin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Blade II language: The price of conlanging (101 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Blade II language: The price of conlanging (167 lines)
      From: Levi Caddell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Blade II language: The price of conlanging (124 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Blade II language: The price of conlanging (27 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Blade II language: The price of conlanging (32 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Blade II language: The price of conlanging (152 lines)
      From: Levi Caddell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Blade II language: The price of conlanging (26 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Blade II language: The price of conlanging (30 lines)
      From: Dan Seriff <[log in to unmask]>

13. CHAT Middle Initials
    • Re: CHAT Middle Initials (42 lines)
      From: Jean Lansford <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT Middle Initials (53 lines)
      From: Jean Lansford <[log in to unmask]>

14. CHAT: "Y'all"
    • CHAT: "Y'all" (34 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: "Y'all" (44 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>

15. CHAT: Re: Middle Initials
    • CHAT: Re: Middle Initials (64 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Re: Middle Initials (45 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Re: Middle Initials (37 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
    • CHAT: Re: Middle Initials (65 lines)
      From: Dan Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Re: Middle Initials (85 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Re: Middle Initials (75 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Re: Middle Initials (45 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>

16. CHAT: Re: The importance of watching soap operas
    • CHAT: Re: The importance of watching soap operas (43 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>

17. CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
    • Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (28 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (27 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (45 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (61 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

18. Conlang book
    • Re: Conlang book (37 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang book (28 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang book (54 lines)
      From: E-Ching Ng <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang book (55 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang book (25 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang book (38 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang book (64 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang book (15 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang book (37 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang book (19 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

19. conlang classification and productivity
    • Re: conlang classification and productivity (62 lines)
      From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang classification and productivity (29 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang classification and productivity (47 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang classification and productivity (35 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang classification and productivity (59 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang classification and productivity (74 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang classification and productivity (39 lines)
      From: dirk elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang classification and productivity (26 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang classification and productivity (60 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang classification and productivity (45 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang classification and productivity (70 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang classification and productivity (73 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>

20. conlang links
    • Re: conlang links (80 lines)
      From: Jim Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

21. conlang links - where are they?
    • conlang links - where are they? (105 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (29 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (20 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (119 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (20 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (29 lines)
      From: David Stokes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (28 lines)
      From: Dan Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (103 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (113 lines)
      From: Mario Bonassin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (70 lines)
      From: Tommaso R. Donnarumma <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (25 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (54 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (29 lines)
      From: Keolah Kedaire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (30 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (25 lines)
      From: Tommaso R. Donnarumma <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (40 lines)
      From: Tommaso R. Donnarumma <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (23 lines)
      From: Rick Morneau <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (30 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (42 lines)
      From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (45 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (20 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (35 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (71 lines)
      From: Tommaso R. Donnarumma <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (42 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (57 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (56 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang links - where are they? (33 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>

22. de re lyanjenorum
    • de re lyanjenorum (49 lines)
      From: Matt McLauchlin <[log in to unmask]>

23. Dreams (Was: Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!))
    • Dreams (Was: Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!)) (40 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dreams (Was: Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!)) (39 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dreams (Was: Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!)) (29 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Dreams (Was: Re: "first language" test (was Re: A DISTURBING proposal!)) (45 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>

24. first lang test
    • Re: first lang test (34 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: first lang test (39 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: first lang test (23 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: first lang test (18 lines)
      From: SMITH,MARCUS ANTHONY <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: first lang test (35 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: first lang test (27 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: first lang test (31 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: first lang test (27 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: first lang test (23 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: first lang test (45 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

25. Fractured translations
    • Fractured translations (72 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fractured translations (51 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

26. god I suck!
    • god I suck! (19 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

27. Going on a trip...
    • Going on a trip... (40 lines)
      From: nicole perrin <[log in to unmask]>

28. irrregular plurals
    • Re: irrregular plurals (40 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>

29. L1 test (Was: Re: A DISTURBING proposal!)
    • L1 test (Was: Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (39 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: L1 test (Was: Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (23 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>

30. Language universal?
    • Re: Language universal? (21 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language universal? (24 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language universal? (20 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language universal? (20 lines)
      From: Luís Henrique <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language universal? (28 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language universal? (31 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language universal? (64 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language universal? (81 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language universal? (26 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language universal? (37 lines)
      From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language universal? (28 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language universal? (55 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language universal? (24 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language universal? (36 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>

31. Latin (was Language universal?)
    • Re: Latin (was Language universal?) (95 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin (was Language universal?) (64 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin (was Language universal?) (33 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin (was Language universal?) (49 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin (was Language universal?) (30 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin (was Language universal?) (30 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin (was Language universal?) (36 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin (was Language universal?) (55 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin (was Language universal?) (29 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin (was Language universal?) (67 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>

32. Middle Initials
    • Middle Initials (42 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Middle Initials (43 lines)
      From: Jean Lansford <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Middle Initials (51 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Middle Initials (43 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Middle Initials (44 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Middle Initials (45 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Middle Initials (68 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Middle Initials (35 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Middle Initials (39 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Middle Initials (58 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Middle Initials (37 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Middle Initials (46 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Middle Initials (43 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Middle Initials (36 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>

33. Modal adverbs!
    • Re: Modal adverbs! (33 lines)
      From: Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Modal adverbs! (28 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

34. My conlang's Legratec rating (Was: Re: conlang classification and productivity)
    • My conlang's Legratec rating (Was: Re: conlang classification and productivity) (68 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: My conlang's Legratec rating (Was: Re: conlang classification and productivity) (33 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>

35. My Language Site
    • My Language Site (30 lines)
      From: Eruanno the Linguist ( AKA Teorondron ) <[log in to unmask]>

36. new Unicode fonts [was: Re: USAGE: Western Usonian /a/]
    • new Unicode fonts [was: Re: USAGE: Western Usonian /a/] (39 lines)
      From: dirk elzinga <[log in to unmask]>

37. nhwolgadhus mis moreil
    • nhwolgadhus mis moreil (98 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: nhwolgadhus mis moreil (104 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: nhwolgadhus mis moreil (47 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: nhwolgadhus mis moreil (36 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

38. Pain sounds (was: Re: A DISTURBING proposal!)
    • Re: Pain sounds (was: Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (62 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pain sounds (was: Re: A DISTURBING proposal!) (67 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>

39. Personal langs and converse of aux
    • Re: Personal langs and converse of aux (33 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

40. R: first lang test
    • R: first lang test (55 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>

41. R: Latin (was Language universal?)
    • R: Latin (was Language universal?) (68 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>

42. R: Re: Latin (was Language universal?)
    • R: Re: Latin (was Language universal?) (62 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: R: Re: Latin (was Language universal?) (71 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>

43. R: To Elliott Lash, re: Silindion
    • R: To Elliott Lash, re: Silindion (31 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>

44. Rinya is up! (was: Re: conlang links - where are they?)
    • Rinya is up! (was: Re: conlang links - where are they?) (70 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>

45. SILINDION: Personal Pronouns
    • SILINDION: Personal Pronouns (133 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>

46. Speaking Conlang To Kids
    • Re: Speaking Conlang To Kids (39 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>

47. Specifics
    • Re: Specifics (58 lines)
      From: Brian Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Specifics (59 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>

48. Specifics (was Re: Personal langs and convers
    • Re: Specifics (was Re: Personal langs and convers (31 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>

49. SV: conlang links - where are they?
    • SV: conlang links - where are they? (124 lines)
      From: Mefistofeles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: SV: conlang links - where are they? (19 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

50. teaching kids langs
    • teaching kids langs (15 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: teaching kids langs (28 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: teaching kids langs (33 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

51. The amazing Dr. Smith (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs)
    • The amazing Dr. Smith (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs) (106 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The amazing Dr. Smith (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs) (72 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The amazing Dr. Smith (was Re: Active case-marking natlangs) (175 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

52. The chant of the dog's gravestone
    • Re: The chant of the dog's gravestone (69 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The chant of the dog's gravestone (48 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The chant of the dog's gravestone (67 lines)
      From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>

53. The Conlanger Code v1.1
    • Re: The Conlanger Code v1.1 (25 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Conlanger Code v1.1 (29 lines)
      From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>

54. The importance of watching soap operas (Was "A DISTURBING ...")
    • The importance of watching soap operas (Was "A DISTURBING ...") (70 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The importance of watching soap operas (Was "A DISTURBING ...") (25 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The importance of watching soap operas (Was "A DISTURBING ...") (25 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The importance of watching soap operas (Was "A DISTURBING ...") (32 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The importance of watching soap operas (Was "A DISTURBING ...") (25 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The importance of watching soap operas (Was "A DISTURBING ...") (32 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The importance of watching soap operas (Was "A DISTURBING ...") (32 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The importance of watching soap operas (Was "A DISTURBING ...") (32 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The importance of watching soap operas (Was "A DISTURBING ...") (45 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The importance of watching soap operas (Was "A DISTURBING ...") (38 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The importance of watching soap operas (Was "A DISTURBING ...") (52 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The importance of watching soap operas (Was "A DISTURBING ...") (35 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The importance of watching soap operas (Was "A DISTURBING ...") (27 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

55. THEORY: Re: Active case-marking natlangs
    • THEORY: Re: Active case-marking natlangs (195 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Re: Active case-marking natlangs (59 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Re: Active case-marking natlangs (198 lines)
      From: Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]>

56. To Elliott Lash, re: Silindion
    • To Elliott Lash, re: Silindion (25 lines)
      From: T. Leigh/M. Carchrie <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: To Elliott Lash, re: Silindion (14 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>

57. USAGE: Western Usonian /a/
    • Re: USAGE: Western Usonian /a/ (31 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Western Usonian /a/ (27 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Western Usonian /a/ (40 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Western Usonian /a/ (31 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Western Usonian /a/ (53 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Western Usonian /a/ (47 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>

58. What ME Disturbing? (was Personal langs et al...)
    • Re: What ME Disturbing? (was Personal langs et al...) (47 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

59. Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
    • Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (31 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (51 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101) (45 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>