Conlang
Mailing List – May 2001, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
/Z/ etc. (and proto-hadwan)
A Word Of Advice
(2 messages)
Almaqerin
(6 messages)
Am I missing something?
(6 messages)
applications
(10 messages)
barbarisms
(5 messages)
barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and
(4 messages)
barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and properly modern)
(5 messages)
barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc
(3 messages)
CHAT: barbarisms
CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc
(7 messages)
Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h
(6 messages)
Conlang book: any interest?
Conlang book: Read this if you want your conlang(s) included
Conlang fluency
Essential Explanations
(5 messages)
genre (was: Woody or tinny?)
(8 messages)
Hawaii (was: Tekem)
Ill Bethisad obituary
Iltârer Verbs
Iltârer website debut
japanese
(8 messages)
Jelbäzech nouns
Le schwa français (was: barbarisms)
Message for Andreas Johansson and Matthew Swadener
(2 messages)
More vocabulary building
(2 messages)
Name barbarisms
(16 messages)
Oops
Perhaps a new topic of discussion
(3 messages)
Question about German
(12 messages)
R: Re: Question about German
(2 messages)
R: Re: Some questions about Romance langs
(2 messages)
R: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
(13 messages)
Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available/elenyo
rhotic retroflexion (was: CHAT: iron worlds (etc..
(5 messages)
Roman Syllabary
(5 messages)
Roman syllabary goes alphanumerical ...
self designations
(18 messages)
self designations - Druni
Some new Brithenig words? Narbonosc help?
Some questions about Romance langs
(8 messages)
TECH: Charset encodings (was Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h)
(2 messages)
Tekem, the language (aka deriving verbs from nouns)
(5 messages)
The joys of (re-)discovery
Tshirt Refunds
(5 messages)
Underspecified verbs?
(5 messages)
Unilang report
(4 messages)
valency question
What have I done???!!!!
(9 messages)
Woody or tinny?
(32 messages)
Yivríndil (for the book)
Yoon Ha Lee's engagement
/Z/ etc. (and proto-hadwan)
Re: /Z/ etc. (and proto-hadwan)
(86 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Word Of Advice
Re: A Word Of Advice
(46 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Word Of Advice
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Almaqerin
Almaqerin
(29 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Almaqerin
(60 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Almaqerin
(57 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Almaqerin
(67 lines)
From:
The Gray Wizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Almaqerin
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Almaqerin
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Am I missing something?
Am I missing something?
(86 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Am I missing something?
(67 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Am I missing something?
(80 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Am I missing something?
(66 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Am I missing something?
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Am I missing something?
(184 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
applications
applications
(35 lines)
From:
Mario Bonassin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: applications
(39 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: applications
(38 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: applications
(56 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: applications
(56 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: applications
(61 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: applications
(48 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: applications
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: applications
(49 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: applications
(51 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
barbarisms
Re: barbarisms
(44 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: barbarisms
(56 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: barbarisms
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: barbarisms
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: barbarisms
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and
Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and
(68 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and
(56 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and
(39 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and
(55 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and properly modern)
Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and properly modern)
(46 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and properly modern)
(57 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and properly modern)
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and properly modern)
(50 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and properly modern)
(56 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc
Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc
(68 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc
(49 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc
(51 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: barbarisms
CHAT: barbarisms
(94 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc
Re: CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc
(44 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc
(45 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc
(53 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc
(49 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc
(31 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc
(34 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc
(51 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h
Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h
(120 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h
(39 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h
(63 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h
(39 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h
(37 lines)
From:
David Starner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h
(51 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang book: any interest?
Re: Conlang book: any interest?
(71 lines)
From:
Tom Tadfor Little <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang book: Read this if you want your conlang(s) included
Re: Conlang book: Read this if you want your conlang(s) included
(48 lines)
From:
Jim Hopkins <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang fluency
Re: Conlang fluency
(78 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Essential Explanations
Re: Essential Explanations
(32 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essential Explanations
(33 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essential Explanations
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essential Explanations
(33 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essential Explanations
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
genre (was: Woody or tinny?)
genre (was: Woody or tinny?)
(49 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genre (was: Woody or tinny?)
(60 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genre (was: Woody or tinny?)
(41 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genre (was: Woody or tinny?)
(40 lines)
From:
Tom Tadfor Little <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genre (was: Woody or tinny?)
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genre (was: Woody or tinny?)
(44 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genre (was: Woody or tinny?)
(35 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genre (was: Woody or tinny?)
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hawaii (was: Tekem)
Hawaii (was: Tekem)
(55 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ill Bethisad obituary
Ill Bethisad obituary
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Iltârer Verbs
Iltârer Verbs
(96 lines)
From:
Tom Tadfor Little <
[log in to unmask]
>
Iltârer website debut
Iltârer website debut
(44 lines)
From:
Tom Tadfor Little <
[log in to unmask]
>
japanese
Re: japanese
(54 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: japanese
(53 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: japanese
(49 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: japanese
(36 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: japanese
(50 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: japanese
(66 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: japanese
(62 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: japanese
(74 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Jelbäzech nouns
Re: Jelbäzech nouns
(41 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Le schwa français (was: barbarisms)
Le schwa français (was: barbarisms)
(74 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Message for Andreas Johansson and Matthew Swadener
Message for Andreas Johansson and Matthew Swadener
(32 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Message for Andreas Johansson and Matthew Swadener
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
More vocabulary building
More vocabulary building
(83 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More vocabulary building
(66 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Name barbarisms
Re: Name barbarisms
(50 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name barbarisms
(51 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name barbarisms
(47 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name barbarisms
(35 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name barbarisms
(63 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name barbarisms
(39 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name barbarisms
(45 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name barbarisms
(35 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name barbarisms
(38 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name barbarisms
(44 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name barbarisms
(34 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name barbarisms
(52 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name barbarisms
(33 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name barbarisms
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name barbarisms
(40 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name barbarisms
(54 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Oops
Oops
(25 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Perhaps a new topic of discussion
Re: Perhaps a new topic of discussion
(50 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Perhaps a new topic of discussion
(50 lines)
From:
B E Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Perhaps a new topic of discussion
(48 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Question about German
Question about German
(41 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about German
(60 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about German
(37 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about German
(41 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about German
(55 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about German
(34 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about German
(39 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about German
(35 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about German
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about German
(38 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about German
(44 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about German
(44 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
R: Re: Question about German
R: Re: Question about German
(42 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
R: Re: Question about German
(53 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
R: Re: Some questions about Romance langs
R: Re: Some questions about Romance langs
(86 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
R: Re: Some questions about Romance langs
(40 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
R: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
R: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
(49 lines)
From:
Mangiat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
(39 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
(68 lines)
From:
The Gray Wizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
(54 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
(39 lines)
From:
Mark Hutchinson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
(30 lines)
From:
Jim Hopkins <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
(46 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
(45 lines)
From:
Wade, Guy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
(33 lines)
From:
Tom Pullman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
(39 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
(34 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available/elenyo
Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available/elenyo
(70 lines)
From:
O'Connell James <
[log in to unmask]
>
rhotic retroflexion (was: CHAT: iron worlds (etc..
rhotic retroflexion (was: CHAT: iron worlds (etc..
(51 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: rhotic retroflexion (was: CHAT: iron worlds (etc..
(54 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: rhotic retroflexion (was: CHAT: iron worlds (etc..
(60 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: rhotic retroflexion (was: CHAT: iron worlds (etc..
(66 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: rhotic retroflexion (was: CHAT: iron worlds (etc..
(66 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Roman Syllabary
Roman Syllabary
(92 lines)
From:
Oskar Gudlaugsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roman Syllabary
(169 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roman Syllabary
(73 lines)
From:
Oskar Gudlaugsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roman Syllabary
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roman Syllabary
(72 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Roman syllabary goes alphanumerical ...
Roman syllabary goes alphanumerical ...
(35 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
self designations
self designations
(49 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: self designations
(49 lines)
From:
Tom Tadfor Little <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: self designations
(64 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: self designations
(50 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: self designations
(52 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: self designations
(42 lines)
From:
Dan Seriff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: self designations
(52 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: self designations
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: self designations
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: self designations
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: self designations
(43 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: self designations
(44 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: self designations
(52 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: self designations
(49 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: self designations
(39 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: self designations
(42 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: self designations
(57 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: self designations
(49 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
self designations - Druni
Re: self designations - Druni
(64 lines)
From:
Jim Hopkins <
[log in to unmask]
>
Some new Brithenig words? Narbonosc help?
Some new Brithenig words? Narbonosc help?
(34 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Some questions about Romance langs
Some questions about Romance langs
(38 lines)
From:
Oskar Gudlaugsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some questions about Romance langs
(36 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some questions about Romance langs
(63 lines)
From:
Oskar Gudlaugsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some questions about Romance langs
(84 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some questions about Romance langs
(54 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some questions about Romance langs
(36 lines)
From:
Oskar Gudlaugsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some questions about Romance langs
(80 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some questions about Romance langs
(172 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Charset encodings (was Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h)
TECH: Charset encodings (was Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h)
(48 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Charset encodings (was Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h)
(59 lines)
From:
David Starner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tekem, the language (aka deriving verbs from nouns)
Re: Tekem, the language (aka deriving verbs from nouns)
(49 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tekem, the language (aka deriving verbs from nouns)
(31 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tekem, the language (aka deriving verbs from nouns)
(74 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tekem, the language (aka deriving verbs from nouns)
(77 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tekem, the language (aka deriving verbs from nouns)
(38 lines)
From:
Oskar Gudlaugsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
The joys of (re-)discovery
The joys of (re-)discovery
(87 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tshirt Refunds
Tshirt Refunds
(39 lines)
From:
nicole perrin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tshirt Refunds
(73 lines)
From:
The Gray Wizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tshirt Refunds
(51 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tshirt Refunds
(49 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tshirt Refunds
(67 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Underspecified verbs?
Underspecified verbs?
(93 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Underspecified verbs?
(50 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Underspecified verbs?
(120 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Underspecified verbs?
(74 lines)
From:
Tom Tadfor Little <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Underspecified verbs?
(122 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Unilang report
Unilang report
(158 lines)
From:
Oskar Gudlaugsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unilang report
(145 lines)
From:
Oskar Gudlaugsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unilang report
(46 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unilang report
(55 lines)
From:
Weiben Wang <
[log in to unmask]
>
valency question
Re: valency question
(77 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
What have I done???!!!!
What have I done???!!!!
(106 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What have I done???!!!!
(56 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What have I done???!!!!
(34 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What have I done???!!!!
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What have I done???!!!!
(46 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What have I done???!!!!
(48 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What have I done???!!!!
(38 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What have I done???!!!!
(48 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What have I done???!!!!
(63 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Woody or tinny?
Woody or tinny?
(53 lines)
From:
Bjorn Kristinsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(43 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(53 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(81 lines)
From:
Patrick Jarrett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(47 lines)
From:
J Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(46 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(62 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(49 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(46 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(53 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(65 lines)
From:
Oskar Gudlaugsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(44 lines)
From:
Oskar Gudlaugsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(41 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(45 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(39 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(46 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(31 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(43 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(38 lines)
From:
Tom Pullman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(58 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(53 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(74 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(42 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(34 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(75 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Woody or tinny?
(38 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yivríndil (for the book)
Yivríndil (for the book)
(77 lines)
From:
jesse stephen bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yoon Ha Lee's engagement
Yoon Ha Lee's engagement
(55 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – May 2001, week 3
Conlang Mailing List – May 2001, week 3
