Conlang Mailing List – May 2001, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• /Z/ etc. (and proto-hadwan)
• A Word Of Advice (2 messages)
• Almaqerin (6 messages)
• Am I missing something? (6 messages)
• applications (10 messages)
• barbarisms (5 messages)
• barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and (4 messages)
• barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and properly modern) (5 messages)
• barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc (3 messages)
• CHAT: barbarisms
• CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc (7 messages)
• Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h (6 messages)
• Conlang book: any interest?
• Conlang book: Read this if you want your conlang(s) included
• Conlang fluency
• Essential Explanations (5 messages)
• genre (was: Woody or tinny?) (8 messages)
• Hawaii (was: Tekem)
• Ill Bethisad obituary
• Iltârer Verbs
• Iltârer website debut
• japanese (8 messages)
• Jelbäzech nouns
• Le schwa français (was: barbarisms)
• Message for Andreas Johansson and Matthew Swadener (2 messages)
• More vocabulary building (2 messages)
• Name barbarisms (16 messages)
• Oops
• Perhaps a new topic of discussion (3 messages)
• Question about German (12 messages)
• R: Re: Question about German (2 messages)
• R: Re: Some questions about Romance langs (2 messages)
• R: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
• Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available (13 messages)
• Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available/elenyo
• rhotic retroflexion (was: CHAT: iron worlds (etc.. (5 messages)
• Roman Syllabary (5 messages)
• Roman syllabary goes alphanumerical ...
• self designations (18 messages)
• self designations - Druni
• Some new Brithenig words? Narbonosc help?
• Some questions about Romance langs (8 messages)
• TECH: Charset encodings (was Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h) (2 messages)
• Tekem, the language (aka deriving verbs from nouns) (5 messages)
• The joys of (re-)discovery
• Tshirt Refunds (5 messages)
• Underspecified verbs? (5 messages)
• Unilang report (4 messages)
• valency question
• What have I done???!!!! (9 messages)
• Woody or tinny? (32 messages)
• Yivríndil (for the book)
• Yoon Ha Lee's engagement

1. /Z/ etc. (and proto-hadwan)
   • Re: /Z/ etc. (and proto-hadwan) (86 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 21:14:38 -0400

2. A Word Of Advice
   • Re: A Word Of Advice (40 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 13:13:33 -0400
   • Re: A Word Of Advice (46 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 09:43:37 +0200

3. Almaqerin
   • Re: Almaqerin (45 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 00:39:27 +0200
   • Re: Almaqerin (43 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 00:36:22 +0200
   • Re: Almaqerin (67 lines)
     From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 18:03:07 -0400
   • Re: Almaqerin (57 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 17:25:59 EDT
   • Re: Almaqerin (60 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 09:43:29 +0200
   • Almaqerin (29 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 17:10:29 EDT

4. Am I missing something?
   • Re: Am I missing something? (184 lines)
     From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 20:36:29 +0000
   • Re: Am I missing something? (40 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 12:15:07 -0400
   • Re: Am I missing something? (66 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 00:24:40 EDT
   • Re: Am I missing something? (80 lines)
     From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 21:27:09 -0400
   • Re: Am I missing something? (67 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 15:31:01 -0400
   • Am I missing something? (86 lines)
     From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 20:01:23 +0000

5. applications
   • Re: applications (51 lines)
     From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 19:19:54 +1000
   • Re: applications (49 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 19:44:37 -0500
   • Re: applications (40 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 18:02:09 -0400
   • Re: applications (48 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 16:40:35 -0500
   • Re: applications (61 lines)
     From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 16:16:30 -0400
   • Re: applications (56 lines)
     From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 20:23:31 +0200
   • Re: applications (56 lines)
     From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 22:40:34 -0700
   • Re: applications (38 lines)
     From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 07:16:34 +0200
   • Re: applications (39 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 21:17:09 EDT
   • applications (35 lines)
     From: Mario Bonassin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 16:23:05 -0500

6. barbarisms
   • Re: barbarisms (38 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 18:15:47 -0400
   • Re: barbarisms (52 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 13:03:00 -0400
   • Re: barbarisms (38 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 07:07:40 -0400
   • Re: barbarisms (56 lines)
     From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 10:32:47 -0000
   • Re: barbarisms (44 lines)
     From: dirk elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 15:30:36 -0600

7. barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and
   • Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and (55 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 12:15:07 +0200
   • Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and (39 lines)
     From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 10:25:59 -0700
   • Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and (56 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 01:01:36 -0500
   • Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and (68 lines)
     From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 05:37:11 +0000

8. barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and properly modern)
   • Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and properly modern) (56 lines)
     From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 10:35:51 -0700
   • Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and properly modern) (50 lines)
     From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 10:28:53 -0700
   • Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and properly modern) (43 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 07:09:42 -0400
   • Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and properly modern) (57 lines)
     From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 09:32:53 -0000
   • Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct and properly modern) (46 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 01:02:45 -0500

9. barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc
   • Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc (51 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 11:56:55 +0200
   • Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc (49 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 20:20:10 -0400
   • Re: barbarisms (was: CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc (68 lines)
     From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 05:37:11 +0000

10. CHAT: barbarisms
    • CHAT: barbarisms (94 lines)
      From: dirk elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 10:06:25 -0600

11. CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc
    • Re: CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc (51 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 20:36:29 +0000
    • Re: CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc (34 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 17:48:17 -0400
    • Re: CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc (31 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 00:49:54 EDT
    • Re: CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc (49 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 05:45:15 +0000
    • Re: CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc (53 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 16:51:38 -0500
    • Re: CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc (45 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 19:22:03 +0000
    • Re: CHAT: iron worlds (CHAT: Being both theologically correct etc (44 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 01:14:22 -0500

12. Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h
    • Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h (51 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 07:28:16 -0000
    • Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h (37 lines)
      From: David Starner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 00:48:36 -0500
    • Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h (39 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 11:54:43 -0000
    • Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h (63 lines)
      From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 03:30:34 -0700
    • Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h (39 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 11:36:24 -0400
    • Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h (120 lines)
      From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 07:01:10 -0700

13. Conlang book: any interest?
    • Re: Conlang book: any interest? (71 lines)
      From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 11:52:53 -0600

14. Conlang book: Read this if you want your conlang(s) included
    • Re: Conlang book: Read this if you want your conlang(s) included (48 lines)
      From: Jim Hopkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 08:03:25 EDT

15. Conlang fluency
    • Re: Conlang fluency (78 lines)
      From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 06:23:03 -0700

16. Essential Explanations
    • Re: Essential Explanations (44 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 16:07:37 -0400
    • Re: Essential Explanations (33 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 15:57:51 -0400
    • Re: Essential Explanations (37 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 09:42:39 -0400
    • Re: Essential Explanations (33 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 01:31:03 -0400
    • Re: Essential Explanations (32 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 07:20:05 +0200

17. genre (was: Woody or tinny?)
    • Re: genre (was: Woody or tinny?) (40 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 19:22:00 -0400
    • Re: genre (was: Woody or tinny?) (35 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 19:15:51 -0400
    • Re: genre (was: Woody or tinny?) (44 lines)
      From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 14:46:46 -0700
    • Re: genre (was: Woody or tinny?) (46 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 12:47:28 -0400
    • Re: genre (was: Woody or tinny?) (40 lines)
      From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 10:31:26 -0600
    • Re: genre (was: Woody or tinny?) (41 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 12:13:33 -0400
    • Re: genre (was: Woody or tinny?) (60 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:16:51 -0400
    • genre (was: Woody or tinny?) (49 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 06:34:44 +0000

18. Hawaii (was: Tekem)
    • Hawaii (was: Tekem) (55 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 06:51:24 -0400

19. Ill Bethisad obituary
    • Ill Bethisad obituary (47 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 11:59:50 -0400

20. Iltârer Verbs
    • Iltârer Verbs (96 lines)
      From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 14:04:57 -0600

21. Iltârer website debut
    • Iltârer website debut (44 lines)
      From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 11:55:21 -0600

22. japanese
    • Re: japanese (74 lines)
      From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 06:46:08 -0700
    • Re: japanese (62 lines)
      From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 06:50:06 -0700
    • Re: japanese (66 lines)
      From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 06:47:23 -0700
    • Re: japanese (50 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 09:39:43 -0400
    • Re: japanese (36 lines)
      From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 05:44:45 -0700
    • Re: japanese (49 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 14:45:42 +0200
    • Re: japanese (53 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 14:45:37 +0200
    • Re: japanese (54 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 16:17:33 +1000

23. Jelbäzech nouns
    • Re: Jelbäzech nouns (41 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 15:17:40 +0100

24. Le schwa français (was: barbarisms)
    • Le schwa français (was: barbarisms) (74 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 06:40:08 +0000

25. Message for Andreas Johansson and Matthew Swadener
    • Re: Message for Andreas Johansson and Matthew Swadener (38 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 16:23:58 -0400
    • Message for Andreas Johansson and Matthew Swadener (32 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 12:00:12 -0700

26. More vocabulary building
    • Re: More vocabulary building (66 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 10:09:53 +1000
    • More vocabulary building (83 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 19:37:09 -0400

27. Name barbarisms
    • Re: Name barbarisms (54 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 23:51:39 -0400
    • Re: Name barbarisms (40 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 23:50:29 -0400
    • Re: Name barbarisms (50 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 12:38:37 -0400
    • Re: Name barbarisms (33 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 23:25:20 -0400
    • Re: Name barbarisms (52 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 22:52:26 -0400
    • Re: Name barbarisms (34 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 22:04:46 -0400
    • Re: Name barbarisms (44 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 20:58:19 -0400
    • Re: Name barbarisms (38 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 19:32:29 -0400
    • Re: Name barbarisms (35 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 17:52:14 -0400
    • Re: Name barbarisms (45 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 16:50:01 -0400
    • Re: Name barbarisms (39 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 12:23:03 -0700
    • Re: Name barbarisms (63 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 15:03:15 -0400
    • Re: Name barbarisms (35 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 10:11:20 +0200
    • Re: Name barbarisms (47 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 01:35:26 -0400
    • Re: Name barbarisms (51 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 15:00:09 +0200
    • Re: Name barbarisms (50 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 01:13:46 -0500

28. Oops
    • Oops (25 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 10:43:45 -0400

29. Perhaps a new topic of discussion
    • Re: Perhaps a new topic of discussion (48 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 17:27:16 +0200
    • Re: Perhaps a new topic of discussion (50 lines)
      From: B E Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 15:27:46 -0700
    • Re: Perhaps a new topic of discussion (50 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 14:47:58 +0200

30. Question about German
    • Re: Question about German (44 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 00:24:23 +0200
    • Re: Question about German (44 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 19:24:37 +1000
    • Re: Question about German (38 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 10:46:46 -0700
    • Re: Question about German (34 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 06:53:29 -0400
    • Re: Question about German (35 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 12:50:08 +0200
    • Re: Question about German (39 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 10:15:44 -0000
    • Re: Question about German (34 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 01:30:02 -0400
    • Re: Question about German (55 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 07:17:23 +0200
    • Re: Question about German (41 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 00:15:59 +0200
    • Re: Question about German (37 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 23:04:34 +0200
    • Re: Question about German (60 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 21:50:59 +0200
    • Question about German (41 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 10:38:40 -0400

31. R: Re: Question about German
    • R: Re: Question about German (53 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 16:40:33 +0200
    • R: Re: Question about German (42 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 17:07:31 +0200

32. R: Re: Some questions about Romance langs
    • R: Re: Some questions about Romance langs (40 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 15:06:34 +0200
    • R: Re: Some questions about Romance langs (86 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 15:05:03 +0200

33. R: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
    • R: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available (49 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 16:42:18 +0200

34. Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available
    • Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available (50 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 23:41:51 +0200
    • Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available (34 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:49:34 -0700
    • Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available (39 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:29:20 -0700
    • Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available (33 lines)
      From: Tom Pullman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 09:13:42 -0700
    • Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available (56 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 15:27:35 +0200
    • Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available (45 lines)
      From: Wade, Guy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 07:27:30 -0500
    • Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available (46 lines)
      From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 03:23:33 -0700
    • Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available (44 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 13:08:43 -0400
    • Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available (30 lines)
      From: Jim Hopkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 08:40:29 EDT
    • Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available (39 lines)
      From: Mark Hutchinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 07:10:59 +0000
    • Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available (54 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 00:49:16 +0100
    • Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available (68 lines)
      From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 06:30:10 -0400
    • Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available (39 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 17:23:46 -0700

35. Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available/elenyo
    • Re: Revised Tokana Reference Grammar available/elenyo (70 lines)
      From: O'Connell James <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 21:58:17 +0100

36. rhotic retroflexion (was: CHAT: iron worlds (etc..
    • Re: rhotic retroflexion (was: CHAT: iron worlds (etc.. (66 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 21:00:25 -0400
    • Re: rhotic retroflexion (was: CHAT: iron worlds (etc.. (66 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 17:00:53 -0500
    • Re: rhotic retroflexion (was: CHAT: iron worlds (etc.. (60 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 16:58:45 -0500
    • Re: rhotic retroflexion (was: CHAT: iron worlds (etc.. (54 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 16:12:30 -0400
    • rhotic retroflexion (was: CHAT: iron worlds (etc.. (51 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 06:38:00 +0000

37. Roman Syllabary
    • Re: Roman Syllabary (72 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 11:44:03 +0000
    • Re: Roman Syllabary (41 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 15:01:49 -0400
    • Re: Roman Syllabary (73 lines)
      From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 14:43:25 -0400
    • Re: Roman Syllabary (169 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 19:13:55 +0000
    • Roman Syllabary (92 lines)
      From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 23:47:39 -0400

38. Roman syllabary goes alphanumerical ...
    • Roman syllabary goes alphanumerical ... (35 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 12:28:25 -0400

39. self designations
    • Re: self designations (49 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 12:00:42 +1200
    • Re: self designations (57 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 23:28:23 +0200
    • Re: self designations (42 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 15:53:18 -0400
    • Re: self designations (39 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:29:19 -0400
    • Re: self designations (49 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 23:50:46 -0500
    • Re: self designations (52 lines)
      From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 14:08:13 -0700
    • Re: self designations (44 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 19:15:11 +1200
    • Re: self designations (43 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 20:06:51 -0700
    • Re: self designations (57 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 13:19:34 -0400
    • Re: self designations (44 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 01:05:25 -0400
    • Re: self designations (43 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 08:35:12 -0400
    • Re: self designations (52 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 20:12:00 -0400
    • Re: self designations (42 lines)
      From: Dan Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 19:01:37 -0500
    • Re: self designations (52 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 00:59:01 +0100
    • Re: self designations (50 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 01:11:27 +0200
    • Re: self designations (64 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 01:05:54 +0200
    • Re: self designations (49 lines)
      From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 16:22:49 -0600
    • self designations (49 lines)
      From: dirk elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 15:53:42 -0600

40. self designations - Druni
    • Re: self designations - Druni (64 lines)
      From: Jim Hopkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 08:32:04 EDT

41. Some new Brithenig words? Narbonosc help?
    • Some new Brithenig words? Narbonosc help? (34 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 22:52:42 -0400

42. Some questions about Romance langs
    • Re: Some questions about Romance langs (172 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 18:44:25 +0000
    • Re: Some questions about Romance langs (80 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:30:18 -0400
    • Re: Some questions about Romance langs (36 lines)
      From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 07:16:17 -0400
    • Re: Some questions about Romance langs (54 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 16:50:45 +1000
    • Re: Some questions about Romance langs (84 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 00:17:55 -0500
    • Re: Some questions about Romance langs (63 lines)
      From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 00:27:49 -0400
    • Re: Some questions about Romance langs (36 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 20:56:55 -0400
    • Some questions about Romance langs (38 lines)
      From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 19:41:20 -0400

43. TECH: Charset encodings (was Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h)
    • Re: TECH: Charset encodings (was Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h) (59 lines)
      From: David Starner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 02:47:23 -0500
    • TECH: Charset encodings (was Re: Conlang book - please include Vya:a:h) (48 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 23:20:27 -0500

44. Tekem, the language (aka deriving verbs from nouns)
    • Re: Tekem, the language (aka deriving verbs from nouns) (38 lines)
      From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 14:35:33 -0400
    • Re: Tekem, the language (aka deriving verbs from nouns) (77 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 00:32:51 EDT
    • Re: Tekem, the language (aka deriving verbs from nouns) (74 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 23:28:19 -0400
    • Re: Tekem, the language (aka deriving verbs from nouns) (31 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 19:42:50 -0700
    • Re: Tekem, the language (aka deriving verbs from nouns) (49 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 21:31:46 -0500

45. The joys of (re-)discovery
    • The joys of (re-)discovery (87 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 23:13:00 +0200

46. Tshirt Refunds
    • Re: Tshirt Refunds (67 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 07:24:40 +0300
    • Re: Tshirt Refunds (49 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 13:03:06 +1200
    • Re: Tshirt Refunds (51 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 18:08:47 -0400
    • Re: Tshirt Refunds (73 lines)
      From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 17:55:41 -0400
    • Tshirt Refunds (39 lines)
      From: nicole perrin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 16:50:38 -0400

47. Underspecified verbs?
    • Re: Underspecified verbs? (122 lines)
      From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 23:01:36 -0700
    • Re: Underspecified verbs? (74 lines)
      From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 16:49:21 -0600
    • Re: Underspecified verbs? (120 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 11:47:01 +0200
    • Re: Underspecified verbs? (50 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 18:49:04 -0700
    • Underspecified verbs? (93 lines)
      From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 14:54:38 -0700

48. Unilang report
    • Re: Unilang report (55 lines)
      From: Weiben Wang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:52:28 -0700
    • Re: Unilang report (46 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 18:44:25 +0000
    • Re: Unilang report (145 lines)
      From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 21:01:45 -0400
    • Unilang report (158 lines)
      From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 18:12:38 -0400

49. valency question
    • Re: valency question (77 lines)
      From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 05:00:56 -0700

50. What have I done???!!!!
    • Re: What have I done???!!!! (63 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 12:03:51 -0400
    • Re: What have I done???!!!! (48 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 20:43:30 +1000
    • Re: What have I done???!!!! (38 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 00:55:28 -0500
    • Re: What have I done???!!!! (48 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 22:48:36 -0400
    • Re: What have I done???!!!! (46 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 22:03:02 -0400
    • Re: What have I done???!!!! (37 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 18:37:22 -0400
    • Re: What have I done???!!!! (34 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 23:23:08 +0200
    • Re: What have I done???!!!! (56 lines)
      From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 14:12:36 -0700
    • What have I done???!!!! (106 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 20:07:51 +0100

51. Woody or tinny?
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (38 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 19:46:18 -0400
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (75 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 19:01:44 -0400
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (34 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 18:49:07 -0400
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (42 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 16:58:57 -0500
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (74 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 23:37:39 +0200
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (53 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 23:26:56 +0200
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (49 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 16:01:25 -0400
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (58 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 13:14:40 -0400
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (38 lines)
      From: Tom Pullman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 04:49:34 -0700
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (43 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 20:30:09 +1000
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (31 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 04:41:19 EDT
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (46 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 01:06:29 -0500
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (39 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 01:08:36 -0400
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (45 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 23:54:56 -0500
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (41 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 15:53:22 -0400
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (44 lines)
      From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 14:21:34 -0400
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (46 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 15:38:39 +1000
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (65 lines)
      From: Oskar Gudlaugsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 18:20:03 -0400
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (53 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 02:38:52 -0500
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (46 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 20:54:42 -0400
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (40 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 20:45:32 -0400
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (60 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 15:52:30 -0400
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (49 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 20:14:58 +0200
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (39 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 13:44:09 -0400
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (62 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 10:45:59 -0700
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (46 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 19:13:33 +0200
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (40 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 12:59:55 -0400
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (47 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 09:00:15 -0700
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (81 lines)
      From: Patrick Jarrett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 10:43:54 -0400
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (53 lines)
      From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 06:55:06 -0700
    • Re: Woody or tinny? (43 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 09:43:35 EDT
    • Woody or tinny? (53 lines)
      From: Bjorn Kristinsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 10:19:26 -0000

52. Yivríndil (for the book)
    • Yivríndil (for the book) (77 lines)
      From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 22:32:08 -0700

53. Yoon Ha Lee's engagement
    • Yoon Ha Lee's engagement (55 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 00:45:04 +0100