Conlang Mailing List – June 2001, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation)
• Aelya GMS phase 1
• Aelya stuff - or is it Elheiren? (3 messages)
• agglutination or inflexion ?
• Another Person Re: Going Nomail.
• Antipassive (17 messages)
• boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (26 messages)
• CHAT: Dutch treats (was: It sucks!) (2 messages)
• Con-scripts (2 messages)
• Conlang Dinner in NYC (2 messages)
• Emergency! Shoebox not working! (4 messages)
• English notation (16 messages)
• Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (31 messages)
• fallire (was: a King's proverb)
• favorite aspects of conlanging (16 messages)
• Fiat Lux (25 messages)
• glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (26 messages)
• Going nomail ...
• Going Nomail.
• Indo-European question (5 messages)
• Languages we like the sound of [was: favorite aspects of conlanging]
• Languages we like the sound of [was: favorite aspects ofconlanging]
• Let us lettuce (was Re: Fiat Lux) (4 messages)
• Morphems (18 messages)
• morphems ? (2 messages)
• Most Beautiful Langs (was: favorite aspects of conlanging)
• numerals (7 messages)
• Obrenje and Schwiizertüütsch (4 messages)
• Obrenje and Schwiizertüütsch
• Offa-da-topic Re: warez (2 messages)
• Oops-silon (was: Rare Phonetics) (3 messages)
• opinion and statements (11 messages)
• OT: Anyone speak Norwegian? (3 messages)
• OT: Broiling (2 messages)
• OT: vowel in 'kerb', 'bird' (3 messages)
• Phonetic and phonematic (7 messages)
• present subj. of 'to be' (was: Fiat Lux) (2 messages)
• Rare Phonetics (2 messages)
• rare phonetics
• Rare Phonetics
• rare phonetics
• Rare Phonetics (8 messages)
• realistic conlang orthography
• relay page update (7 messages)
• Resumptive pronoun? (12 messages)
• Salve Iustine! (was: Fiat Lux) (4 messages)
• Script & Conlang Update (7 messages)
• Shameless website advertisement
• spatial-workout ( premature ) (3 messages)
• Suggestive nonsense (was: K-Rad) (8 messages)
• The (Other) Other Grand Master Plan (6 messages)
• theme/rheme markers (3 messages)
• Tr: Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (5 messages)
• Tr: Re: Resumptive pronoun?
• Unresolved problems in Lyanjen morphosyntactic nomenclature (4 messages)
• Vocab Lists? (Was: Emergency! Shoebox not working!) (3 messages)
• YANC and YANCC, Ecoi and the saKoni (8 messages)
• YI (was: Rare Phonetics)
• [Fwd: D'ni font] (2 messages)

1. /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation)
   • Re: /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (49 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 18:14:12 -0400

2. Aelya GMS phase 1
   • Re: Aelya GMS phase 1 (193 lines)
     From: Daniel Andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:13:05 -0000

3. Aelya stuff - or is it Elheiren?
   • Re: Aelya stuff - or is it Elheiren? (63 lines)
     From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:39:09 -0700
   • Re: Aelya stuff - or is it Elheiren? (88 lines)
     From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:58:54 +0100
   • Re: Aelya stuff - or is it Elheiren? (234 lines)
     From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:15:34 -0700

4. agglutination or inflexion ?
   • agglutination or inflexion ? (72 lines)
     From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:03:58 +0200

5. Another Person Re: Going Nomail.
   • Another Person Re: Going Nomail. (52 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 03:46:07 -0400

6. Antipassive
   • Re: Antipassive (57 lines)
     From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:47:07 -0400
   • Re: Antipassive (49 lines)
     From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:22:52 -0400
   • Re: Antipassive (113 lines)
     From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:06:40 -0400
   • Re: Antipassive (94 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:40:20 +0200
   • Re: Antipassive (60 lines)
     From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 06:41:04 -0400
   • Re: Antipassive (45 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 01:25:53 -0500
   • Re: Antipassive (48 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:49:01 -0400
   • Re: Antipassive (49 lines)
     From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:20:30 -0700
   • Re: Antipassive (38 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:01:13 -0400
   • Re: Antipassive (86 lines)
     From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:44:19 -0400
   • Re: Antipassive (70 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:28:55 +0200
   • Re: Antipassive (71 lines)
     From: O'Connell James <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:56:31 +0100
   • Re: Antipassive (52 lines)
     From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 23:23:48 -0700
   • Re: Antipassive (45 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 17:36:47 -0400
   • Re: Antipassive (52 lines)
     From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 17:30:41 -0400
   • Re: Antipassive (56 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 17:23:12 -0400
   • Antipassive (40 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 23:05:02 +0200

7. boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II)
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (42 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:47:24 -0400
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (40 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:23:41 -0400
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (47 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:17:24 -0400
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (60 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:11:08 -0400
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (58 lines)
     From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:52:43 +0100
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (33 lines)
     From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:24:32 +0200
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (48 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 08:33:22 -0400
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (47 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 08:29:36 -0400
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (108 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:31:57 +0200
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (84 lines)
     From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:15:24 +0200
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (51 lines)
     From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 18:54:26 +1000
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (63 lines)
     From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 18:54:02 +1000
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (53 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 02:12:31 -0500
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (50 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:54:42 -0400
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (32 lines)
     From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:13:46 -0500
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (45 lines)
     From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:14:08 -0400
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (44 lines)
     From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:58:24 -0400
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (61 lines)
     From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:12:43 -0700
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (39 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:58:50 -0400
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (52 lines)
     From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 22:58:56 +0100
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (44 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:46:23 -0400
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (39 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:44:40 -0400
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (60 lines)
     From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:06:14 +0200
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (42 lines)
     From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:03:41 -0400
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (37 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:51:29 -0400
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (40 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:22:51 +0200

8. CHAT: Dutch treats (was: It sucks!)
   • Re: CHAT: Dutch treats (was: It sucks!) (54 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:13:23 +0200
   • Re: CHAT: Dutch treats (was: It sucks!) (46 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 01:03:55 -0400

9. Con-scripts
   • Re: Con-scripts (65 lines)
     From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:04:16 +0200
   • Re: Con-scripts (40 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:39:02 +0200

10. Conlang Dinner in NYC
    • Re: Conlang Dinner in NYC (35 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:07:56 -0400
    • Re: Conlang Dinner in NYC (50 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:58:31 -0500

11. Emergency! Shoebox not working!
    • Re: Emergency! Shoebox not working! (47 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:07:41 +0100
    • Re: Emergency! Shoebox not working! (35 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 19:35:35 +1000
    • Re: Emergency! Shoebox not working! (61 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 01:09:11 -0400
    • Re: Emergency! Shoebox not working! (35 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:49:02 +0200

12. English notation
    • Re: English notation (76 lines)
      From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 23:33:35 -0400
    • Re: English notation (43 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 22:49:12 -0400
    • Re: English notation (38 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:35:27 -0500
    • Re: English notation (48 lines)
      From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 19:28:25 -0600
    • Re: English notation (103 lines)
      From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 18:59:05 -0600
    • Re: English notation (33 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 18:38:57 -0400
    • Re: English notation (77 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 00:17:56 +0200
    • Re: English notation (40 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 00:05:30 +0200
    • Re: English notation (43 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:40:07 -0400
    • Re: English notation (34 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:23:05 EDT
    • Re: English notation (43 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:55:43 -0400
    • Re: English notation (37 lines)
      From: Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:54:41 -0700
    • Re: English notation (50 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:32:22 -0400
    • Re: English notation (75 lines)
      From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:21:28 -0600
    • Re: English notation (46 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:47:08 -0400
    • English notation (80 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:29:29 +0200

13. Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (34 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 01:21:25 +0200
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (36 lines)
      From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:57:24 +1000
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (31 lines)
      From: Amber Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:01:51 -0400
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (33 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:56:41 -0400
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (43 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 03:58:43 EDT
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (45 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:16:27 +0200
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (29 lines)
      From: Amber Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:46:49 -0400
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (31 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 07:37:26 +0200
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (42 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 21:12:10 EDT
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (45 lines)
      From: Matthew Kehrt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:28:14 -0400
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (36 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:57:43 -0400
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (28 lines)
      From: Matthew Kehrt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:30:57 -0400
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (35 lines)
      From: Daniel Andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:55:04 -0000
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (42 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 03:58:11 -0500
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (56 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 03:43:38 -0500
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (30 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:42:01 -0400
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (56 lines)
      From: Justin Mansfield <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:33:15 -0400
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:20:11 -0400
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (37 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:36:46 -0400
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (47 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:51:30 -0400
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (32 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:35:58 -0400
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (50 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 18:07:29 -0500
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (56 lines)
      From: Dan Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 11:58:52 -0500
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (40 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:22:19 +0200
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (44 lines)
      From: t. alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 19:37:55 +1000
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (35 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:30:50 +0200
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (51 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 14:54:51 -0400
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (69 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 00:42:12 -0500
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (31 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 21:09:13 -0400
    • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (49 lines)
      From: Dan Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:54:28 -0500
    • Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (34 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:14:11 -0400

14. fallire (was: a King's proverb)
    • Re: fallire (was: a King's proverb) (63 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:05:18 +1200

15. favorite aspects of conlanging
    • Re: favorite aspects of conlanging (83 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:55:46 +0100
    • Re: favorite aspects of conlanging (33 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 04:01:46 EDT
    • Re: favorite aspects of conlanging (53 lines)
      From: Amber Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:15:29 -0400
    • Re: favorite aspects of conlanging (43 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 22:07:02 +0200
    • Re: favorite aspects of conlanging (64 lines)
      From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:45:10 -0700
    • Re: favorite aspects of conlanging (54 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:44:26 +0200
    • Re: favorite aspects of conlanging (51 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:39:02 +0200
    • Re: favorite aspects of conlanging (41 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 04:06:37 -0400
    • Re: favorite aspects of conlanging (36 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 03:06:02 -0500
    • Re: favorite aspects of conlanging (73 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 03:00:11 -0500
    • Re: favorite aspects of conlanging (54 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 03:54:04 EDT
    • Re: favorite aspects of conlanging (55 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:22:58 +0200
    • Re: favorite aspects of conlanging (49 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 23:30:11 -0700
    • Re: favorite aspects of conlanging (56 lines)
      From: Dan Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:25:44 -0500
    • Re: favorite aspects of conlanging (39 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:35:16 -0400
    • favorite aspects of conlanging (54 lines)
      From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 22:08:50 -0600

16. Fiat Lux
    • Re: Fiat Lux (31 lines)
      From: Justin Mansfield <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 21:33:13 -0400
    • Re: Fiat Lux (37 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 20:19:49 -0400
    • Re: Fiat Lux (40 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:48:21 +1200
    • Re: Fiat Lux (31 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 20:04:00 -0400
    • Re: Fiat Lux (37 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:38:55 -0400
    • Re: Fiat Lux (104 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:35:48 -0400
    • Re: Fiat Lux (67 lines)
      From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 05:15:04 +0200
    • Re: Fiat Lux (36 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 19:28:58 -0400
    • Re: Fiat Lux (39 lines)
      From: Justin Mansfield <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:13:38 -0400
    • Re: Fiat Lux (53 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 18:05:37 +0200
    • Re: Fiat Lux (38 lines)
      From: Justin Mansfield <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 11:07:59 -0400
    • Re: Fiat Lux (191 lines)
      From: Justin Mansfield <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:40:43 EDT
    • Re: Fiat Lux (52 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 09:06:03 -0400
    • Re: Fiat Lux (45 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 00:42:38 -0400
    • Re: Fiat Lux (35 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:31:29 -0400
    • Re: Fiat Lux (45 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:25:46 -0400
    • Re: Fiat Lux (40 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:22:12 -0400
    • Re: Fiat Lux (45 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:53:57 -0500
    • Re: Fiat Lux (48 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:49:27 -0500
    • Re: Fiat Lux (44 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:50:32 -0400
    • Re: Fiat Lux (52 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:10:30 -0400
    • Re: Fiat Lux (245 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:47:00 +0000
    • Re: Fiat Lux (29 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:54:00 -0400
    • Re: Fiat Lux (51 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 02:01:06 -0500
    • Re: Fiat Lux (44 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:32:56 -0400

17. glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question)
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (187 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:36:18 -0400
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (39 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 02:23:08 -0400
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (57 lines)
      From: Weiben Wang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 02:08:06 -0500
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (45 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:27:57 -0400
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (36 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 20:45:17 -0400
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (58 lines)
      From: Sven Sommerfeld <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 02:09:41 +0200
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (46 lines)
      From: Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:37:18 -0700
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (43 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:04:09 -0000
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (148 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 19:39:20 +0000
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (33 lines)
      From: Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:57:18 -0700
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (52 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:41:01 -0000
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (53 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:24:40 -0000
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (56 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 08:47:19 -0400
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (74 lines)
      From: Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 01:56:11 -0700
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (43 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 01:14:11 -0400
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (47 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 01:10:25 -0400
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (83 lines)
      From: Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 15:40:03 -0700
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (54 lines)
      From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:19:44 -0700
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (50 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 16:11:22 -0400
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (63 lines)
      From: Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:55:33 -0700
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (34 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 15:24:30 -0400
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (33 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 14:52:25 -0400
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (86 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 14:22:11 -0400
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (49 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:48:33 -0400
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (239 lines)
      From: Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 23:32:33 -0700
    • Re: glossogenesis (was: Indo-European question) (59 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:23:51 -0400

18. Going nomail ...
    • Going nomail ... (31 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 09:35:29 -0400

19. Going Nomail.
    • Going Nomail. (31 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 23:35:44 -0400

20. Indo-European question
    • Re: Indo-European question (150 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 09:31:03 -0400
    • Re: Indo-European question (125 lines)
      From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:11:38 +0000
    • Re: Indo-European question (61 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 15:18:51 -0400
    • Re: Indo-European question (39 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:42:46 -0400
    • Re: Indo-European question (50 lines)
      From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:20:37 +0000

21. Languages we like the sound of [was: favorite aspects of conlanging]
    • Languages we like the sound of [was: favorite aspects of conlanging] (57 lines)
      From: T. Leigh/M. Carchrie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 08:27:27 -0400

22. Languages we like the sound of [was: favorite aspects ofconlanging]
    • Re: Languages we like the sound of [was: favorite aspects ofconlanging] (55 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:43:13 -0400

23. Let us lettuce (was Re: Fiat Lux)
    • Re: Let us lettuce (was Re: Fiat Lux) (48 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:43:42 -0400
    • Re: Let us lettuce (was Re: Fiat Lux) (50 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:37:33 -0400
    • Re: Let us lettuce (was Re: Fiat Lux) (84 lines)
      From: Wade, Guy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:23:02 -0500
    • Re: Let us lettuce (was Re: Fiat Lux) (64 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 01:41:42 -0400

24. Morphems
    • Re: Morphems (47 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:52:13 +0200
    • Re: Morphems (31 lines)
      From: Justin Mansfield <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 20:23:54 -0400
    • Re: Morphems (83 lines)
      From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 21:34:42 +0200
    • Re: Morphems (66 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:22:17 -0400
    • Re: Morphems (51 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 01:55:26 -0500
    • Re: Morphems (33 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 02:43:00 -0400
    • Re: Morphems (58 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 02:21:44 -0400
    • Re: Morphems (63 lines)
      From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:10:05 +0200
    • Re: Morphems (47 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:22:58 +0300
    • Re: Morphems (35 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:25:35 -0400
    • Re: Morphems (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 20:42:06 -0400
    • Re: Morphems (42 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 19:31:19 -0400
    • Re: Morphems (51 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:02:06 +0300
    • Re: Morphems (36 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:11:50 +0200
    • Re: Morphems (42 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 05:49:22 EDT
    • Re: Morphems (56 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 12:20:29 +0300
    • Re: Morphems (50 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:25:17 -0400
    • Re: Morphems (47 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:42:26 EDT

25. morphems ?
    • Re: morphems ? (52 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:46:01 -0400
    • morphems ? (39 lines)
      From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:31:47 +0200

26. Most Beautiful Langs (was: favorite aspects of conlanging)
    • Most Beautiful Langs (was: favorite aspects of conlanging) (79 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 01:18:50 +0200

27. numerals
    • Re: numerals (46 lines)
      From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 04:29:59 +0200
    • Re: numerals (55 lines)
      From: Justin Mansfield <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:09:57 -0400
    • Re: numerals (42 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 19:35:45 -0400
    • Re: numerals (44 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 18:13:09 -0500
    • Re: numerals (46 lines)
      From: Dan Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 17:28:17 -0500
    • Re: numerals (44 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 18:19:18 -0400
    • numerals (32 lines)
      From: O'Connell James <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:54:36 +0100

28. Obrenje and Schwiizertüütsch
    • Re: Obrenje and Schwiizertüütsch (97 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:38:57 +0200
    • Re: Obrenje and Schwiizertüütsch (43 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:05:14 +0200
    • Re: Obrenje and Schwiizertüütsch (35 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:31:11 -0400
    • Re: Obrenje and Schwiizertüütsch (85 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:16:26 +0200

29. Obrenje and Schwiizertüütsch
    • Re: Obrenje and Schwiizertüütsch (45 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:30:25 -0400

30. Offa-da-topic Re: warez
    • Re: Offa-da-topic Re: warez (46 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:06:44 -0500
    • Offa-da-topic Re: warez (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:09:55 -0400

31. Oops-silon (was: Rare Phonetics)
    • Re: Oops-silon (was: Rare Phonetics) (89 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 05:57:20 +0000
    • Re: Oops-silon (was: Rare Phonetics) (41 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:16:26 -0500
    • Re: Oops-silon (was: Rare Phonetics) (71 lines)
      From: Justin Mansfield <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:07:05 -0500

32. opinion and statements
    • Re: opinion and statements (62 lines)
      From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 12:51:46 +0200
    • Re: opinion and statements (31 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 05:45:35 EDT
    • Re: opinion and statements (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 01:18:20 -0400
    • Re: opinion and statements (117 lines)
      From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 06:48:45 +0200
    • Re: opinion and statements (33 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 23:47:18 EDT
    • Re: opinion and statements (37 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:08:23 -0400
    • Re: opinion and statements (40 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:34:16 -0700
    • Re: opinion and statements (38 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:04:24 EDT
    • Re: opinion and statements (34 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:53:48 -0400
    • Re: opinion and statements (73 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 03:35:33 EDT
    • opinion and statements (55 lines)
      From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 04:15:09 +0200

33. OT: Anyone speak Norwegian?
    • Re: OT: Anyone speak Norwegian? (55 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:07:07 -0500
    • Re: OT: Anyone speak Norwegian? (46 lines)
      From: Daniel Andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:51:52 -0000
    • OT: Anyone speak Norwegian? (31 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 03:08:04 -0500

34. OT: Broiling
    • Re: OT: Broiling (35 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:35:20 -0400
    • Re: OT: Broiling (32 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:04:22 -0400

35. OT: vowel in 'kerb', 'bird'
    • Re: OT: vowel in 'kerb', 'bird' (49 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:01:50 +0000
    • Re: OT: vowel in 'kerb', 'bird' (39 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 09:28:02 -0400
    • OT: vowel in 'kerb', 'bird' (34 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:56:05 +1000

36. Phonetic and phonematic
    • Re: Phonetic and phonematic (75 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 20:11:13 +0000
    • Re: Phonetic and phonematic (53 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 06:08:34 +0000
    • Re: Phonetic and phonematic (32 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:31:43 -0400
    • Re: Phonetic and phonematic (35 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:01:22 -0400
    • Re: Phonetic and phonematic (33 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:32:10 -0400
    • Re: Phonetic and phonematic (41 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:40:12 +0200
    • Phonetic and phonematic (31 lines)
      From: Mangiat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:18:22 +0200

37. present subj. of 'to be' (was: Fiat Lux)
    • Re: present subj. of 'to be' (was: Fiat Lux) (57 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 16:44:52 -0400
    • present subj. of 'to be' (was: Fiat Lux) (86 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 06:50:07 +0000

38. Rare Phonetics
    • Re: Rare Phonetics (71 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 00:45:22 -0500
    • Re: Rare Phonetics (69 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:26:50 +0200

39. rare phonetics
    • Re: rare phonetics (43 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 21:31:56 -0700

40. Rare Phonetics
    • Re: Rare Phonetics (45 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:24:13 -0500

41. rare phonetics
    • Re: rare phonetics (50 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:59:17 -0400

42. Rare Phonetics
    • Re: Rare Phonetics (38 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:03:54 EDT
    • Re: Rare Phonetics (77 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:21:18 -0500
    • Re: Rare Phonetics (65 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:22:49 +0200
    • Re: Rare Phonetics (55 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:38:20 -0500
    • Re: Rare Phonetics (72 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:06:36 -0400
    • Re: Rare Phonetics (46 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 11:39:04 -0700
    • Re: Rare Phonetics (76 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:22:01 -0400
    • Re: Rare Phonetics (52 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:51:59 -0500

43. realistic conlang orthography
    • Re: realistic conlang orthography (48 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 22:49:15 -0400

44. relay page update
    • Re: relay page update (61 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:15:05 +0100
    • Re: relay page update (52 lines)
      From: Daniel Andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:44:21 -0000
    • Re: relay page update (41 lines)
      From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:44:13 -0700
    • Re: relay page update (32 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 12:40:30 -0400
    • Re: relay page update (45 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 12:30:22 -0400
    • Re: relay page update (37 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 18:08:06 +0200
    • relay page update (38 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 09:07:46 -0400

45. Resumptive pronoun?
    • Re: Resumptive pronoun? (44 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:04:08 -0400
    • Re: Resumptive pronoun? (66 lines)
      From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:43:12 +0200
    • Re: Resumptive pronoun? (50 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 03:45:34 EDT
    • Re: Resumptive pronoun? (56 lines)
      From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 21:04:01 -0600
    • Re: Resumptive pronoun? (49 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:57:18 -0400
    • Re: Resumptive pronoun? (60 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:27:41 -0400
    • Re: Resumptive pronoun? (26 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 17:50:38 -0400
    • Re: Resumptive pronoun? (48 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:49:07 EDT
    • Re: Resumptive pronoun? (62 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:53:01 +0200
    • Re: Resumptive pronoun? (58 lines)
      From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:30:41 +0200
    • Re: Resumptive pronoun? (37 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:10:39 -0000
    • Resumptive pronoun? (22 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 05:42:02 -0400

46. Salve Iustine! (was: Fiat Lux)
    • Re: Salve Iustine! (was: Fiat Lux) (46 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 06:08:34 +0000
    • Re: Salve Iustine! (was: Fiat Lux) (33 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:48:08 +0200
    • Re: Salve Iustine! (was: Fiat Lux) (35 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 02:14:57 EDT
    • Salve Iustine! (was: Fiat Lux) (47 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 06:15:05 +0000

47. Script & Conlang Update
    • Re: Script & Conlang Update (37 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:29:21 -0400
    • Re: Script & Conlang Update (44 lines)
      From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:57:03 -0600
    • Re: Script & Conlang Update (51 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:10:21 +0200
    • Re: Script & Conlang Update (53 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:05:44 +0200
    • Re: Script & Conlang Update (36 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:26:52 -0400
    • Re: Script & Conlang Update (40 lines)
      From: Amber Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:24:29 -0400
    • Script & Conlang Update (58 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 01:41:54 +0200

48. Shameless website advertisement
    • Shameless website advertisement (25 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 08:11:26 -0400

49. spatial-workout ( premature )
    • Re: spatial-workout ( premature ) (83 lines)
      From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 22:49:09 +0200
    • Re: spatial-workout ( premature ) (64 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:29:18 -0400
    • spatial-workout ( premature ) (154 lines)
      From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:07:59 +0200

50. Suggestive nonsense (was: K-Rad)
    • Re: Suggestive nonsense (was: K-Rad) (47 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 21:39:08 -0700
    • Re: Suggestive nonsense (was: K-Rad) (48 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:34:02 -0400
    • Re: Suggestive nonsense (was: K-Rad) (49 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 19:38:55 -0500
    • Re: Suggestive nonsense (was: K-Rad) (66 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 01:10:12 +0100
    • Re: Suggestive nonsense (was: K-Rad) (44 lines)
      From: J Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 11:31:43 -0700
    • Re: Suggestive nonsense (was: K-Rad) (28 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 06:15:26 -0400
    • Re: Suggestive nonsense (was: K-Rad) (46 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 01:55:15 -0500
    • Re: Suggestive nonsense (was: K-Rad) (39 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:28:20 -0400

51. The (Other) Other Grand Master Plan
    • Re: The (Other) Other Grand Master Plan (45 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:10:57 -0400
    • Re: The (Other) Other Grand Master Plan (68 lines)
      From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 05:49:26 +1000
    • Re: The (Other) Other Grand Master Plan (41 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:25:04 -0400
    • Re: The (Other) Other Grand Master Plan (50 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:59:54 -0400
    • Re: The (Other) Other Grand Master Plan (34 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:50:54 +0200
    • The (Other) Other Grand Master Plan (35 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 22:51:43 +1000

52. theme/rheme markers
    • Re: theme/rheme markers (57 lines)
      From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:21:36 -0400
    • Re: theme/rheme markers (93 lines)
      From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 23:17:06 +0200
    • theme/rheme markers (58 lines)
      From: O'Connell James <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 21:48:20 +0100

53. Tr: Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II)
    • Re: Tr: Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (48 lines)
      From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 23:33:33 -0400
    • Re: Tr: Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (80 lines)
      From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 04:55:05 +0200
    • Re: Tr: Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:52:39 -0400
    • Re: Tr: Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (46 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:34:13 -0400
    • Tr: Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (93 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:39:50 +0200

54. Tr: Re: Resumptive pronoun?
    • Tr: Re: Resumptive pronoun? (72 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:41:05 +0200

55. Unresolved problems in Lyanjen morphosyntactic nomenclature
    • Re: Unresolved problems in Lyanjen morphosyntactic nomenclature (49 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:09:45 -0400
    • Re: Unresolved problems in Lyanjen morphosyntactic nomenclature (59 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:39:50 -0400
    • Re: Unresolved problems in Lyanjen morphosyntactic nomenclature (112 lines)
      From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:26:33 -0400
    • Unresolved problems in Lyanjen morphosyntactic nomenclature (117 lines)
      From: Matt M. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 02:13:56 -0400

56. Vocab Lists? (Was: Emergency! Shoebox not working!)
    • Re: Vocab Lists? (Was: Emergency! Shoebox not working!) (61 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 02:16:26 -0500
    • Re: Vocab Lists? (Was: Emergency! Shoebox not working!) (47 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:31:03 +0200
    • Re: Vocab Lists? (Was: Emergency! Shoebox not working!) (50 lines)
      From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:08:58 +0000

57. YANC and YANCC, Ecoi and the saKoni
    • Re: YANC and YANCC, Ecoi and the saKoni (44 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 19:44:56 -0400
    • Re: YANC and YANCC, Ecoi and the saKoni (49 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:50:10 +0200
    • Re: YANC and YANCC, Ecoi and the saKoni (40 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:24:28 +1200
    • Re: YANC and YANCC, Ecoi and the saKoni (63 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:04:41 +0100
    • Re: YANC and YANCC, Ecoi and the saKoni (38 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:32:09 +0200
    • Re: YANC and YANCC, Ecoi and the saKoni (26 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 06:19:05 -0400
    • Re: YANC and YANCC, Ecoi and the saKoni (44 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:11:47 +0200
    • YANC and YANCC, Ecoi and the saKoni (185 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:30:40 +0100

58. YI (was: Rare Phonetics)
    • YI (was: Rare Phonetics) (75 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:05:19 +0000

59. [Fwd: D'ni font]
    • Re: [Fwd: D'ni font] (42 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 21:13:56 EDT
    • [Fwd: D'ni font] (115 lines)
      From: Matthew Kehrt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:29:04 -0400