Conlang Mailing List – June 2001, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (16 messages)
• Another Indo-European question (2 messages)
• boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II)
• English notation (45 messages)
• English notation (conclusion?) (4 messages)
• English notation/conlang scripts (5 messages)
• Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (2 messages)
• FW: English notation (20 messages)
• Good grief! Digest anyone?
• Kélen website now up! (2 messages)
• Kélen website now up! (3 messages)
• lessons for conlang orthography Re: English notation (3 messages)
• LSA Summer Institute
• My Final Thoughts on English (3 messages)
• Reflexive Pronouns
• Resumptive pronoun?
• Rue the day: Of onions (was: of snails and slugs) (2 messages)
• Signing off for a while
• spatial-workout ( premature ) (2 messages)
• TECH: HTML
• The one already done (14 messages)
• theme/rheme markers
• Torch Stuff (2 messages)
• Tr: Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II)
• USAGE: ei and ej (was: Front vowel tensing) (2 messages)
• USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (17 messages)
• Yahoogroups has started sending mail again??
• Yahoogroups problem?

1. /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation)
   • Re: /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (43 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (38 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (46 lines)
     From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (47 lines)
     From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (52 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (35 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (32 lines)
     From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (35 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (41 lines)
     From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (59 lines)
     From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (30 lines)
     From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (39 lines)
     From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (31 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (45 lines)
     From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (45 lines)
     From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ vs /Ng/ (was: Re: English notation) (41 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

2. Another Indo-European question
   • Another Indo-European question (31 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Indo-European question (43 lines)
     From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>

3. boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II)
   • Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (73 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

4. English notation
   • Re: English notation (39 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (29 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (63 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (52 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (37 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (65 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (55 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (54 lines)
     From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (43 lines)
     From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (161 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (54 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (71 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (111 lines)
     From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (152 lines)
     From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (65 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (108 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (44 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (65 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (168 lines)
     From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (55 lines)
     From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (40 lines)
     From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (48 lines)
     From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (53 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (64 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (51 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (40 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (46 lines)
     From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (65 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (30 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (60 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (188 lines)
     From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (95 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (47 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (49 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (52 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (51 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (62 lines)
     From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (60 lines)
     From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (32 lines)
     From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (31 lines)
     From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (61 lines)
     From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (56 lines)
     From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (41 lines)
     From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (42 lines)
     From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (45 lines)
     From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>

5. English notation (conclusion?)
   • Re: English notation (conclusion?) (58 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (conclusion?) (52 lines)
     From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (conclusion?) (81 lines)
     From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation (conclusion?) (59 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>

6. English notation/conlang scripts
   • English notation/conlang scripts (41 lines)
     From: O'Connell James <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation/conlang scripts (64 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation/conlang scripts (28 lines)
     From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation/conlang scripts (35 lines)
     From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English notation/conlang scripts (91 lines)
     From: O'Connell James <[log in to unmask]>

7. Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition
   • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (58 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Essentialist Explanations, 8.0 edition (45 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

8. FW: English notation
   • FW: English notation (64 lines)
     From: t <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (61 lines)
     From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (100 lines)
     From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (47 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (141 lines)
     From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (52 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (44 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (50 lines)
     From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (51 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (163 lines)
     From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (71 lines)
     From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (48 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (57 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (135 lines)
     From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (89 lines)
     From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (60 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (37 lines)
     From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (75 lines)
     From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (46 lines)
     From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FW: English notation (112 lines)
     From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>

9. Good grief! Digest anyone?
   • Good grief! Digest anyone? (32 lines)
     From: cfohl <[log in to unmask]>

10. Kélen website now up!
    • Re: Kélen website now up! (55 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kélen website now up! (34 lines)
      From: Jim Hopkins <[log in to unmask]>

11. Kélen website now up!
    • Kélen website now up! (39 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kélen website now up! (58 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kélen website now up! (48 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>

12. lessons for conlang orthography Re: English notation
    • lessons for conlang orthography Re: English notation (82 lines)
      From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: lessons for conlang orthography Re: English notation (42 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: lessons for conlang orthography Re: English notation (53 lines)
      From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>

13. LSA Summer Institute
    • LSA Summer Institute (38 lines)
      From: dirk elzinga <[log in to unmask]>

14. My Final Thoughts on English
    • My Final Thoughts on English (50 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: My Final Thoughts on English (59 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: My Final Thoughts on English (50 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>

15. Reflexive Pronouns
    • Reflexive Pronouns (49 lines)
      From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>

16. Resumptive pronoun?
    • Re: Resumptive pronoun? (52 lines)
      From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>

17. Rue the day: Of onions (was: of snails and slugs)
    • Re: Rue the day: Of onions (was: of snails and slugs) (50 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rue the day: Of onions (was: of snails and slugs) (38 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>

18. Signing off for a while
    • Signing off for a while (30 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

19. spatial-workout ( premature )
    • Re: spatial-workout ( premature ) (50 lines)
      From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: spatial-workout ( premature ) (91 lines)
      From: claudio <[log in to unmask]>

20. TECH: HTML
    • TECH: HTML (38 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>

21. The one already done
    • The one already done (40 lines)
      From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The one already done (52 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The one already done (56 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The one already done (73 lines)
      From: O'Connell James <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The one already done (47 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The one already done (33 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The one already done (65 lines)
      From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The one already done (31 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The one already done (42 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The one already done (33 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The one already done (42 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The one already done (63 lines)
      From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The one already done (40 lines)
      From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The one already done (36 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

22. theme/rheme markers
    • Re: theme/rheme markers (78 lines)
      From: O'Connell James <[log in to unmask]>

23. Torch Stuff
    • Torch Stuff (42 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Torch Stuff (36 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>

24. Tr: Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II)
    • Re: Tr: Re: boustrophedon (was: Atlantis II) (37 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>

25. USAGE: ei and ej (was: Front vowel tensing)
    • Re: USAGE: ei and ej (was: Front vowel tensing) (59 lines)
      From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: ei and ej (was: Front vowel tensing) (80 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

26. USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation]
    • USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (47 lines)
      From: dirk elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (48 lines)
      From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (51 lines)
      From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (66 lines)
      From: dirk elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (78 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (40 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (83 lines)
      From: dirk elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (44 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (51 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (32 lines)
      From: Tommie L Powell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (30 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (66 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (44 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (46 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (45 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation] (48 lines)
      From: Tom Tadfor Little <[log in to unmask]>

27. Yahoogroups has started sending mail again??
    • Yahoogroups has started sending mail again?? (22 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>

28. Yahoogroups problem?
    • Re: Yahoogroups problem? (77 lines)
      From: David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>