Conlang Mailing List – September 2001, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction) (7 messages)
• "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies (was Rating Languages) (11 messages)
• "endearin'" (was onceuponatime "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction) (4 messages)
• "the Asymmetrical SVO Middle Path" ;) (was Re: Branching typologies)
• 'Arabiiya (12 messages)
• .com/religion (13 messages)
• <No subject> (4 messages)
• A con-Creole (2 messages)
• a small discovery (3 messages)
• Agency/Instrumentality (was RE: Ergative?)
• Agreeing with possessives, was: Yet another introduction
• Anne Heche - Celebrity Conlanger? (4 messages)
• Announcement: Jameld dictionary online
• Another Russian Question
• Becoming triconsonantal, was: 'Arabiiya
• Branching typologies (10 messages)
• Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order t...
• Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (18 messages)
• Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages,SE Asian word-order typologies]
• Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German] (15 messages)
• Cantonal spelling, take 2 (2 messages)
• Cantonal spelling, take 3 (5 messages)
• Cantonese (was Re: Language Difficulty) (2 messages)
• CHAT: Speaking in paragraphs [was Re: Rating Languages]
• Chinese insults (was Re: "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction) (2 messages)
• Chinese insults (was Re: "...two Moscovites conversing in English")
• conlangs for all occasions
• Conlangs for all occasions (2 messages)
• conreligion selector (3 messages)
• Contractions (well i guess they are...)
• Czevraqis: pitch accent help?
• Ergative? (30 messages)
• Fw: Re: Montanian (3 messages)
• Fwd: Re: Rating Languages (3 messages)
• Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200114
• German favourite words (was Re: Language Difficulty) (2 messages)
• German Verb List
• greek word order (4 messages)
• Greek word order
• greek word order (4 messages)
• Green Ribbon Language Creation Campaign
• HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (34 messages)
• HUMOUR: comparative Christian theology (2 messages)
• I have returned (2 messages)
• I should know my own birthday by now.
• Introducing Heather Rice! (8 messages)
• Korean politeness levels
• Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages taken to extremes) (2 messages)
• Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages taken toextremes) (3 messages)
• Korean politeness levels (& farewells)
• la bella luna...
• Language Difficulty (44 messages)
• Language Difficulty (so OT it takes the michael)
• Liking German (4 messages)
• may a 1,000 SinoEnglishes bloom...
• me and my languages
• MeloChalaka (20 messages)
• Montanian (31 messages)
• muzzies (13 messages)
• Need Conlang Links
• New Conlanger Stuck, would you help? (3 messages)
• Obscure languages (5 messages)
• opinions (was: Re: religion quiz) (3 messages)
• OT another test
• OT Testing......
• OT: Anne Heche - Celebrity Conlanger? (2 messages)
• OT: Paris?
• OT: Philotype (TM) and religion selectors
• Personality Type / Myers Briggs (was: Philotype) (11 messages)
• Phaleran update: more valence changing operations
• Philotype
• Philotype Selector (4 messages)
• Philotype(TM) Selector was Re: conreligion selector (7 messages)
• Pirana Ksulilh
• proverbs? (9 messages)
• Question: Verb Paradigms (7 messages)
• r's (was Re: Rating Languages)
• Rating Languages (152 messages)
• Recording opinions
• religion, etc (2 messages)
• Requesting only Digest... (3 messages)
• Slava (was: Re: .com/religion) (fwd) (6 messages)
• strange distinctions (2 messages)
• Supine (was: Tense formations)
• test (2 messages)
• Tirehlat romanization (21 messages)
• Tonal Languages taken to extremes (18 messages)
• Trigger Systems (was: Rating languages)
• trilled r's (was Re: Rating Languages)
• Update on me: Elliott (LONG) (3 messages)
• USAGE: Cantonal spelling (11 messages)
• USAGE: Yet another try at Pinyin-compatible tonal spelling for Mandarin
• Verbal Valency and Tense Inflections in Finnstek
• Vices (2 messages)
• Voicing sandhi (3 messages)
• Way,way OT was Re: USAGE: Yet another try at Pinyin-compatible,etc.
• Where does it say that Anne Heche made up a language? (4 messages)
• Where to Get Characters (was:Language Difficulty) (2 messages)
• x > f sound change
• Xhosa? (15 messages)
• Yet another introduction
• Yil, tones, miscellaneous fun stuff!
• yl112's Meep, LOL... (4 messages)
• Yue/Cantonese (was Re: "...two Moscovites conversing in English" )
• _Tr:'pang_, a sample (was Re: Rating Languages)

1. "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction)
   • "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction) (34 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 22:51:49 EDT
   • Re: "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction) (37 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 22:55:41 -0400
   • Re: "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction) (48 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 06:05:14 -0400
   • Re: "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction) (43 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 16:06:33 -0400
   • Re: "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction) (58 lines)
     From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:45:24 -0400
   • Re: "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction) (63 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 06:33:39 -0400
   • Re: "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction) (71 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 07:00:08 -0400

2. "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies (was Rating Languages)
   • "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies (was Rating Languages) (65 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 22:51:53 EDT
   • Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies (was Rating Languages) (42 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 23:03:13 -0400
   • Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies (was Rating Languages) (77 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 00:11:40 -0400
   • Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies (was Rating Languages) (51 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 00:44:27 EDT
   • Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies (was Rating Languages) (46 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 03:39:59 -0400
   • Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies (was Rating Languages) (46 lines)
     From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 09:51:21 +0200
   • Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies (was Rating Languages) (39 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 05:43:22 -0400
   • Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies (was Rating Languages) (44 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 06:10:57 -0400
   • Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies (was Rating Languages) (66 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 07:00:45 -0400
   • Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies (was Rating Languages) (35 lines)
     From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:10:45 -0400
   • Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies (was Rating Languages) (30 lines)
     From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:16:42 -0400

3. "endearin'" (was onceuponatime "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction)
   • "endearin'" (was onceuponatime "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction) (49 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 20:11:59 EDT
   • Re: "endearin'" (was onceuponatime "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction) (55 lines)
     From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 10:06:38 -0500
   • Re: "endearin'" (was onceuponatime "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction) (57 lines)
     From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 23:15:09 -0400
   • Re: "endearin'" (was onceuponatime "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction) (29 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 00:13:48 EDT

4. "the Asymmetrical SVO Middle Path" ;) (was Re: Branching typologies)
   • "the Asymmetrical SVO Middle Path" ;) (was Re: Branching typologies) (74 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:42:26 EDT

5. 'Arabiiya
   • 'Arabiiya (136 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:55:57 EDT
   • Re: 'Arabiiya (32 lines)
     From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:20:30 -0700
   • Re: 'Arabiiya (88 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 01:53:45 -0400
   • Re: 'Arabiiya (51 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 02:28:10 EDT
   • Re: 'Arabiiya (66 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 09:52:23 +0200
   • Re: 'Arabiiya (209 lines)
     From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 02:48:04 -0700
   • Re: 'Arabiiya (59 lines)
     From: Fabian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 08:20:37 +0100
   • Re: 'Arabiiya (38 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:00:24 -0400
   • Re: 'Arabiiya (80 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 10:54:38 -0400
   • Re: 'Arabiiya (183 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 10:10:11 -0400
   • Re: 'Arabiiya (31 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:56:40 EDT
   • Re: 'Arabiiya (29 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 23:39:28 EDT

6. .com/religion
   • Re: .com/religion (62 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 05:27:28 -0400
   • Re: .com/religion (46 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:38:04 EDT
   • Re: .com/religion (57 lines)
     From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:47:21 +0200
   • Re: .com/religion (40 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:40:37 -0400
   • Re: .com/religion (47 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 16:49:11 -0400
   • Re: .com/religion (44 lines)
     From: Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 23:02:46 +0200
   • Re: .com/religion (59 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:09:25 -0400
   • Re: .com/religion (38 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 16:59:06 -0400
   • Re: .com/religion (29 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:00:31 -0400
   • Re: .com/religion (51 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:19:04 -0400
   • Re: .com/religion (48 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:23:55 -0400
   • Re: .com/religion (47 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:42:41 EDT
   • Re: .com/religion (46 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:42:47 -0400

7. <No subject>
   • <No subject> (41 lines)
     From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 06:17:49 -0000
   • <No subject> (52 lines)
     From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:34:40 +1100
   • <No subject> (51 lines)
     From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:40:23 +1100
   • <No subject> (71 lines)
     From: joe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 16:58:19 +0100

8. A con-Creole
   • A con-Creole (129 lines)
     From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 15:10:24 +1200
   • Re: A con-Creole (39 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 23:11:04 -0400

9. a small discovery
   • a small discovery (30 lines)
     From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:37:32 -0700
   • Re: a small discovery (39 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:42:27 -0400
   • Re: a small discovery (48 lines)
     From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:22:58 -0700

10. Agency/Instrumentality (was RE: Ergative?)
    • Agency/Instrumentality (was RE: Ergative?) (126 lines)
      From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 09:58:07 -0400

11. Agreeing with possessives, was: Yet another introduction
    • Agreeing with possessives, was: Yet another introduction (63 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:52:22 -0400

12. Anne Heche - Celebrity Conlanger?
    • Re: Anne Heche - Celebrity Conlanger? (109 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:11:23 -0400
    • Re: Anne Heche - Celebrity Conlanger? (42 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 11:32:26 -0500
    • Re: Anne Heche - Celebrity Conlanger? (45 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:50:38 -0400
    • Re: Anne Heche - Celebrity Conlanger? (55 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 00:00:34 -0400

13. Announcement: Jameld dictionary online
    • Announcement: Jameld dictionary online (47 lines)
      From: James Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 10:02:27 +0100

14. Another Russian Question
    • Re: Another Russian Question (48 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:23:53 +0100

15. Becoming triconsonantal, was: 'Arabiiya
    • Becoming triconsonantal, was: 'Arabiiya (118 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:56:29 -0400

16. Branching typologies
    • Re: Branching typologies (54 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 12:33:57 -0600
    • Re: Branching typologies (53 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 12:40:01 -0600
    • Re: Branching typologies (67 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:07:31 EDT
    • Re: Branching typologies (63 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 08:53:34 -0000
    • Re: Branching typologies (63 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 09:26:56 -0600
    • Re: Branching typologies (33 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:08:18 EDT
    • Re: Branching typologies (35 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:15:36 -0700
    • Re: Branching typologies (42 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 22:47:47 +0200
    • Re: Branching typologies (72 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:02:16 -0700
    • Re: Branching typologies (69 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:01:09 -0500

17. Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order t...
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order t... (42 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:56:53 EDT

18. Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies]
    • Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (57 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:42:35 -0500
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (60 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:52:23 -0400
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (45 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:19:27 -0400
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (49 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:43:23 -0400
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (40 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:28:01 -0400
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (86 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:04:51 -0500
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (110 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:16:46 -0400
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (47 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:25:17 EDT
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (76 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:12:48 -0400
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (40 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:31:05 EDT
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (68 lines)
      From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 10:41:15 +1000
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (37 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:54:57 -0400
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (76 lines)
      From: Josh Roth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 23:57:36 EDT
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (84 lines)
      From: Josh Roth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 00:44:51 EDT
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (65 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:08:43 +0200
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (46 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:11:27 -0500
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (37 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:42:44 EDT
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies] (68 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:52:57 -0400

19. Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages,SE Asian word-order typologies]
    • Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages,SE Asian word-order typologies] (37 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:00:02 -0400

20. Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German]
    • Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German] (56 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:47:05 -0500
    • Re: Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German] (41 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 23:42:43 -0000
    • Re: Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German] (55 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 20:11:47 EDT
    • Re: Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German] (34 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 20:19:53 EDT
    • Re: Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German] (56 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:20:00 -0500
    • Re: Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German] (66 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:55:38 -0500
    • Re: Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German] (61 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 20:05:59 -0500
    • Re: Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German] (42 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 21:29:23 -0400
    • Re: Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German] (35 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 02:16:25 -0000
    • Re: Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German] (34 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 02:19:38 -0000
    • Re: Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German] (48 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:30:29 -0700
    • Re: Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German] (44 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:32:37 -0700
    • Re: Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German] (62 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 22:50:20 -0400
    • Re: Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German] (49 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 23:33:34 -0400
    • Re: Californian vowels [was Re: Liking German] (41 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 23:50:49 -0400

21. Cantonal spelling, take 2
    • Cantonal spelling, take 2 (62 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 00:51:22 -0400
    • Re: Cantonal spelling, take 2 (63 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 04:39:25 -0400

22. Cantonal spelling, take 3
    • Cantonal spelling, take 3 (69 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 09:17:31 -0400
    • Re: Cantonal spelling, take 3 (108 lines)
      From: Jän-Køs Larsä Giirtingäär <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 07:23:59 -0700
    • Re: Cantonal spelling, take 3 (77 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:33:59 -0400
    • Re: Cantonal spelling, take 3 (44 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:19:52 EDT
    • Re: Cantonal spelling, take 3 (48 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 21:03:09 -0400

23. Cantonese (was Re: Language Difficulty)
    • Cantonese (was Re: Language Difficulty) (34 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 22:14:52 EDT
    • Re: Cantonese (was Re: Language Difficulty) (42 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 07:31:15 -0400

24. CHAT: Speaking in paragraphs [was Re: Rating Languages]
    • CHAT: Speaking in paragraphs [was Re: Rating Languages] (47 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:41:51 -0500

25. Chinese insults (was Re: "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction)
    • Re: Chinese insults (was Re: "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction) (52 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 00:44:33 EDT
    • Re: Chinese insults (was Re: "...two Moscovites conversing in English" (was Re: Yet another introduction) (40 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 23:20:23 -0400

26. Chinese insults (was Re: "...two Moscovites conversing in English")
    • Re: Chinese insults (was Re: "...two Moscovites conversing in English") (40 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 20:28:15 -0700

27. conlangs for all occasions
    • conlangs for all occasions (115 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:08:55 +0100

28. Conlangs for all occasions
    • Conlangs for all occasions (37 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:40:27 +0200
    • Re: Conlangs for all occasions (42 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:29:21 -0400

29. conreligion selector
    • Re: conreligion selector (70 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 00:09:13 -0400
    • Re: conreligion selector (52 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 05:02:27 -0400
    • Re: conreligion selector (46 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:25:01 +0200

30. Contractions (well i guess they are...)
    • Contractions (well i guess they are...) (103 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:31:23 -0700

31. Czevraqis: pitch accent help?
    • Czevraqis: pitch accent help? (61 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:23:52 -0700

32. Ergative?
    • Ergative? (50 lines)
      From: Matthew Kehrt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:21:27 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (52 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 19:21:30 -0700
    • Re: Ergative? (65 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 23:13:40 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (62 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 21:53:41 -0700
    • Re: Ergative? (80 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:02:01 -0500
    • Re: Ergative? (71 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:51:47 +0200
    • Re: Ergative? (44 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:55:00 +0200
    • Re: Ergative? (76 lines)
      From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 06:34:42 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (43 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:03:32 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (61 lines)
      From: Matthew Kehrt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:31:14 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (27 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:52:56 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (44 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 09:14:33 -0700
    • Re: Ergative? (66 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:34:57 +0100
    • Re: Ergative? (74 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 12:44:46 -0500
    • Re: Ergative? (62 lines)
      From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 14:52:12 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (84 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 09:30:15 -0000
    • Re: Ergative? (97 lines)
      From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 07:26:01 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (113 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:59:27 -0000
    • Re: Ergative? (78 lines)
      From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 10:39:27 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (61 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:08:28 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (71 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:44:31 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (58 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:40:05 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (29 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:43:06 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (118 lines)
      From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:31:29 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (63 lines)
      From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:37:07 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (69 lines)
      From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:58:28 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (76 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:32:30 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (35 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:37:55 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (115 lines)
      From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:51:27 -0400
    • Re: Ergative? (88 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:22:23 -0400

33. Fw: Re: Montanian
    • Fw: Re: Montanian (123 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 21:06:52 -0400
    • Re: Fw: Re: Montanian (49 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 21:29:20 -0400
    • Re: Fw: Re: Montanian (49 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 23:33:34 -0400

34. Fwd: Re: Rating Languages
    • Fwd: Re: Rating Languages (77 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 17:07:43 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: Re: Rating Languages (41 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 08:50:36 +0200
    • Re: Fwd: Re: Rating Languages (59 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:54:13 +0200

35. Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200114
    • Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200114 (40 lines)
      From: Kvasir - Vaijskä <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 03:15:00 -0000

36. German favourite words (was Re: Language Difficulty)
    • German favourite words (was Re: Language Difficulty) (54 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:42:28 EDT
    • Re: German favourite words (was Re: Language Difficulty) (35 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:49:45 -0400

37. German Verb List
    • German Verb List (40 lines)
      From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:15:07 -0400

38. greek word order
    • greek word order (31 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 19:09:38 -0700
    • Re: greek word order (32 lines)
      From: Cian Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 21:55:18 -0500
    • Re: greek word order (51 lines)
      From: Dan Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 03:49:13 -0500
    • Re: greek word order (31 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 08:22:53 -0400

39. Greek word order
    • Re: Greek word order (38 lines)
      From: Karapcik, Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 09:31:32 -0400

40. greek word order
    • Re: greek word order (52 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 10:54:26 -0500
    • Re: greek word order (54 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:27:15 +0000
    • Re: greek word order (46 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:02:44 -0400
    • Re: greek word order (69 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 06:45:07 +0000

41. Green Ribbon Language Creation Campaign
    • Green Ribbon Language Creation Campaign (58 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 20:00:47 -0400

42. HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion
    • HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (67 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 01:43:53 EDT
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (45 lines)
      From: Dan Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:17:53 -0500
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (37 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:50:16 EDT
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (45 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 20:59:17 +0200
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (55 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 15:37:29 -0400
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (30 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 16:00:07 EDT
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (56 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 21:27:52 +0100
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (56 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 17:03:02 -0400
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (51 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 17:10:37 -0400
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (45 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 18:55:58 EDT
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (68 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 18:42:09 -0700
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (35 lines)
      From: Luís Henrique <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 23:01:50 -0400
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (46 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 00:18:04 -0400
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (42 lines)
      From: Mia Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 01:31:32 -0400
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (57 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 16:51:11 +0200
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (32 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:42:49 -0400
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (48 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:08:15 EDT
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (44 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:51:00 -0400
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (28 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 22:15:08 EDT
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (29 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 22:15:12 EDT
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (28 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 22:15:16 EDT
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (53 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 05:58:01 -0400
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (63 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 22:17:05 +1200
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (52 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 06:11:21 -0400
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (44 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:31:13 +0200
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (44 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:12:09 EDT
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (58 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:26:14 -0400
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (46 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 17:23:29 EDT
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (35 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 20:12:17 EDT
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (54 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:07:08 -0400
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (36 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:40:44 EDT
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (69 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 15:23:54 -0400
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (56 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:46:07 -0400
    • Re: HUMOUR (lingua vulgaris) Re: .com/religion (40 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:36:48 EDT

43. HUMOUR: comparative Christian theology
    • HUMOUR: comparative Christian theology (63 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:37:59 EDT
    • Re: HUMOUR: comparative Christian theology (92 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 00:58:37 -0400

44. I have returned
    • I have returned (48 lines)
      From: The Keenans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:29:00 -0400
    • Re: I have returned (87 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 09:34:13 +0200

45. I should know my own birthday by now.
    • Re: I should know my own birthday by now. (53 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:43:49 +0200

46. Introducing Heather Rice!
    • Introducing Heather Rice! (110 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:06:13 EDT
    • Re: Introducing Heather Rice! (51 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:54:30 -0500
    • Re: Introducing Heather Rice! (48 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 17:21:19 -0400
    • Re: Introducing Heather Rice! (36 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:28:44 -0400
    • Re: Introducing Heather Rice! (43 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 14:31:48 +0200
    • Re: Introducing Heather Rice! (42 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:18:50 +0200
    • Re: Introducing Heather Rice! (49 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 02:49:19 -0700
    • Re: Introducing Heather Rice! (57 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 13:06:44 +0200

47. Korean politeness levels
    • Re: Korean politeness levels (63 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:32:12 -0700

48. Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages taken to extremes)
    • Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages taken to extremes) (88 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 15:43:05 -0700
    • Re: Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages taken to extremes) (48 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:50:20 -0400

49. Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages taken toextremes)
    • Re: Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages taken toextremes) (51 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:54:44 -0400
    • Re: Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages taken toextremes) (65 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 16:02:39 -0700
    • Re: Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages taken toextremes) (65 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:38:07 -0400

50. Korean politeness levels (& farewells)
    • Re: Korean politeness levels (& farewells) (67 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:02:23 -0700

51. la bella luna...
    • la bella luna... (140 lines)
      From: Mia Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 10:07:14 -0400

52. Language Difficulty
    • Re: Language Difficulty (28 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:58:29 EDT
    • Re: Language Difficulty (54 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 10:24:04 +1100
    • Re: Language Difficulty (47 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:31:12 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (32 lines)
      From: Amber Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:21:47 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (43 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:12:30 +1100
    • Re: Language Difficulty (49 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 01:07:19 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (35 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 08:55:09 +0200
    • Re: Language Difficulty (41 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 23:56:51 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (59 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 05:18:13 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (53 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 05:39:06 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (47 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:05:06 -0500
    • Re: Language Difficulty (37 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:56:29 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (66 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 06:24:40 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (44 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:54:02 +0200
    • Re: Language Difficulty (50 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:04:55 +0200
    • Re: Language Difficulty (39 lines)
      From: Amber Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:07:42 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (35 lines)
      From: Amber Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:14:38 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (43 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 16:23:08 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (48 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:16:44 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (37 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:33:38 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (53 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 22:54:22 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (39 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 00:14:08 EDT
    • Re: Language Difficulty (57 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 02:46:37 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (59 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 03:06:44 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (36 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:02:17 +0200
    • Re: Language Difficulty (35 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:17:00 +0200
    • Re: Language Difficulty (49 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 10:34:43 -0500
    • Re: Language Difficulty (51 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 10:38:34 -0500
    • Re: Language Difficulty (46 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 10:51:54 -0500
    • Re: Language Difficulty (58 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 18:12:22 +0200
    • Re: Language Difficulty (66 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:43:36 -0700
    • Re: Language Difficulty (36 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 20:43:56 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (41 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 20:44:37 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (32 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 12:31:07 -0000
    • Re: Language Difficulty (42 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:59:17 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (54 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 10:55:44 +0200
    • Re: Language Difficulty (54 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 05:47:20 -0700
    • Re: Language Difficulty (58 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:18:27 +0200
    • Re: Language Difficulty (47 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:53:00 +0200
    • Re: Language Difficulty (36 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:43:34 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (60 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:03:56 -0700
    • Re: Language Difficulty (44 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:43:50 -0400
    • Re: Language Difficulty (87 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:21:37 +0100
    • Re: Language Difficulty (60 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:27:23 -0700

53. Language Difficulty (so OT it takes the michael)
    • Re: Language Difficulty (so OT it takes the michael) (50 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 23:51:46 +0100

54. Liking German
    • Liking German (60 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:21:58 -0700
    • Re: Liking German (32 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 03:53:28 EDT
    • Re: Liking German (40 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:17:40 -0500
    • Re: Liking German (52 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:35:40 -0500

55. may a 1,000 SinoEnglishes bloom...
    • may a 1,000 SinoEnglishes bloom... (40 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 00:44:21 EDT

56. me and my languages
    • Re: me and my languages (41 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:43:24 +0200

57. MeloChalaka
    • MeloChalaka (93 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 04:30:02 -0000
    • Re: MeloChalaka (63 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 03:54:34 EDT
    • Re: MeloChalaka (55 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 09:30:05 -0400
    • Re: MeloChalaka (124 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 12:06:32 -0400
    • Re: MeloChalaka (83 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 15:55:32 -0500
    • Re: MeloChalaka (75 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 18:57:04 -0700
    • Re: MeloChalaka (84 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 19:07:51 -0700
    • Re: MeloChalaka (47 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 22:30:28 -0400
    • Re: MeloChalaka (53 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 01:27:04 EDT
    • Re: MeloChalaka (40 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 01:39:17 EDT
    • Re: MeloChalaka (44 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:44:32 +0200
    • Re: MeloChalaka (47 lines)
      From: Matthew Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:19:02 PDT
    • Re: MeloChalaka (75 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:01:37 -0500
    • Re: MeloChalaka (49 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 02:34:06 -0700
    • Re: MeloChalaka (73 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 02:58:26 -0700
    • Re: MeloChalaka (80 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 03:15:20 -0700
    • Re: MeloChalaka (80 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:06:29 EDT
    • Re: MeloChalaka (36 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:34:53 -0400
    • Re: MeloChalaka (58 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 19:17:28 -0700
    • Re: MeloChalaka (81 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:08:14 -0400

58. Montanian
    • Re: Montanian (42 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:50:26 -0400
    • Re: Montanian (232 lines)
      From: joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:46:01 +0100
    • Re: Montanian (35 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 17:08:16 -0400
    • Re: Montanian (110 lines)
      From: joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:40:32 +0100
    • Re: Montanian (50 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 00:48:56 -0400
    • Re: Montanian (142 lines)
      From: joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 13:12:31 +0100
    • Re: Montanian (37 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 09:14:58 -0400
    • Re: Montanian (34 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 09:32:05 -0400
    • Re: Montanian (175 lines)
      From: joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:47:30 +0100
    • Re: Montanian (52 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 12:16:44 -0400
    • Re: Montanian (94 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 12:13:54 -0400
    • Re: Montanian (109 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 12:22:59 -0400
    • Re: Montanian (82 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 12:34:33 -0400
    • Re: Montanian (53 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:51:17 -0400
    • Re: Montanian (29 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 15:56:47 EDT
    • Re: Montanian (49 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 16:01:15 -0500
    • Re: Montanian (50 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 16:06:24 -0500
    • Re: Montanian (57 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 09:50:44 +1200
    • Re: Montanian (73 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 20:01:20 -0400
    • Re: Montanian (124 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:05:55 +0100
    • Re: Montanian (106 lines)
      From: joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 16:49:42 +0100
    • Re: Montanian (52 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:20:13 -0400
    • Re: Montanian (111 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:27:15 +0000
    • Re: Montanian (39 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:30:37 -0400
    • Re: Montanian (37 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:47:03 -0700
    • Re: Montanian (49 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:12:14 -0400
    • Re: Montanian (39 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:49:23 -0400
    • Re: Montanian (60 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:36:00 EDT
    • Re: Montanian (76 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:26:35 +0200
    • Re: Montanian (106 lines)
      From: joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:25:15 +0100
    • Re: Montanian (40 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:00:43 -0400

59. muzzies
    • muzzies (45 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 19:26:38 -0700
    • Re: muzzies (50 lines)
      From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 15:06:15 +1000
    • Re: muzzies (70 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:38:20 -0500
    • Re: muzzies (55 lines)
      From: Steve Hefford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 06:56:43 +0100
    • Re: muzzies (44 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:36:54 -0400
    • Re: muzzies (64 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:37:23 +0100
    • Re: muzzies (55 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 10:15:08 +1000
    • Re: muzzies (39 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:05:26 -0700
    • Re: muzzies (79 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 21:50:34 -0700
    • Re: muzzies (44 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:24:32 +1000
    • Re: muzzies (45 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:26:09 +1000
    • Re: muzzies (40 lines)
      From: Fabian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 08:21:19 +0100
    • Re: muzzies (59 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:23:52 -0500

60. Need Conlang Links
    • Need Conlang Links (40 lines)
      From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:47:31 -0400

61. New Conlanger Stuck, would you help?
    • New Conlanger Stuck, would you help? (51 lines)
      From: cybersolutions <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:37:00 -0400
    • Re: New Conlanger Stuck, would you help? (35 lines)
      From: cybersolutions <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:41:06 -0400
    • Re: New Conlanger Stuck, would you help? (73 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:53:26 -0400

62. Obscure languages
    • Obscure languages (79 lines)
      From: joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 21:45:45 +0100
    • Re: Obscure languages (52 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 23:05:31 +0200
    • Re: Obscure languages (55 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:52:53 -0700
    • Re: Obscure languages (62 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 18:44:23 -0500
    • Re: Obscure languages (44 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 22:37:31 -0400

63. opinions (was: Re: religion quiz)
    • opinions (was: Re: religion quiz) (47 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:05:25 +0200
    • Re: opinions (was: Re: religion quiz) (58 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:15:11 -0400
    • Re: opinions (was: Re: religion quiz) (54 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:30:37 +0200

64. OT another test
    • Re: OT another test (25 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:41:14 -0400

65. OT Testing......
    • OT Testing...... (25 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:19:40 -0400

66. OT: Anne Heche - Celebrity Conlanger?
    • Re: OT: Anne Heche - Celebrity Conlanger? (67 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 02:01:44 -0400
    • Re: OT: Anne Heche - Celebrity Conlanger? (40 lines)
      From: Damon M. Lord <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 21:09:06 GMT0BST

67. OT: Paris?
    • OT: Paris? (45 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 18:21:53 -0700

68. OT: Philotype (TM) and religion selectors
    • OT: Philotype (TM) and religion selectors (75 lines)
      From: Mia Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:38:57 -0400

69. Personality Type / Myers Briggs (was: Philotype)
    • Personality Type / Myers Briggs (was: Philotype) (88 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 13:09:55 +0200
    • Re: Personality Type / Myers Briggs (was: Philotype) (87 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 15:51:58 EDT
    • Personality Type / Myers Briggs (was: Philotype) (85 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 14:25:34 +0200
    • Re: Personality Type / Myers Briggs (was: Philotype) (86 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 05:31:38 -0400
    • Re: Personality Type / Myers Briggs (was: Philotype) (42 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:48:40 +0200
    • Re: Personality Type / Myers Briggs (was: Philotype) (39 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 06:18:47 -0400
    • Re: Personality Type / Myers Briggs (was: Philotype) (61 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:07:35 -0000
    • Re: Personality Type / Myers Briggs (was: Philotype) (88 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:33:07 +0200
    • Re: Personality Type / Myers Briggs (was: Philotype) (44 lines)
      From: Steve Kramer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:00:12 -0400
    • Re: Personality Type / Myers Briggs (was: Philotype) (57 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:47:55 -0500
    • Re: Personality Type / Myers Briggs (was: Philotype) (74 lines)
      From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 23:19:52 -0400

70. Phaleran update: more valence changing operations
    • Phaleran update: more valence changing operations (106 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 17:04:30 -0500

71. Philotype
    • Philotype (37 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 06:18:57 EDT

72. Philotype Selector
    • Re: Philotype Selector (28 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:58:33 -0400
    • Re: Philotype Selector (38 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 01:47:40 -0400
    • Re: Philotype Selector (46 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 13:07:13 +0200
    • Re: Philotype Selector (57 lines)
      From: joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:23:00 +0100

73. Philotype(TM) Selector was Re: conreligion selector
    • Philotype(TM) Selector was Re: conreligion selector (39 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 07:14:25 -0400
    • Re: Philotype(TM) Selector was Re: conreligion selector (42 lines)
      From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:11:42 -0500
    • Re: Philotype(TM) Selector was Re: conreligion selector (77 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:21:13 +0100
    • Re: Philotype(TM) Selector was Re: conreligion selector (61 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 22:04:07 +0200
    • Re: Philotype(TM) Selector was Re: conreligion selector (58 lines)
      From: Robert Hailman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 16:54:20 -0400
    • Re: Philotype(TM) Selector was Re: conreligion selector (36 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:13:18 -0000
    • Re: Philotype(TM) Selector was Re: conreligion selector (54 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:15:27 +0200

74. Pirana Ksulilh
    • Pirana Ksulilh (78 lines)
      From: joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 22:03:04 +0100

75. proverbs?
    • proverbs? (56 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 20:52:44 -0700
    • Re: proverbs? (55 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:20:28 -0500
    • Re: proverbs? (53 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 06:45:07 +0000
    • Re: proverbs? (88 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 05:36:32 -0400
    • Re: proverbs? (42 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:13:44 EDT
    • Re: proverbs? (85 lines)
      From: Matthew Kehrt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:40:35 -0400
    • Re: proverbs? (47 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 16:47:15 -0400
    • Re: proverbs? (90 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 21:01:46 -0400
    • Re: proverbs? (74 lines)
      From: Josh Roth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 01:30:52 EDT

76. Question: Verb Paradigms
    • Question: Verb Paradigms (36 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:30:02 EDT
    • Re: Question: Verb Paradigms (53 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 16:23:03 -0400
    • Re: Question: Verb Paradigms (40 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 17:29:52 -0400
    • Re: Question: Verb Paradigms (54 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 16:51:23 -0500
    • Re: Question: Verb Paradigms (81 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:07:06 -0400
    • Re: Question: Verb Paradigms (67 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 07:23:47 -0400
    • Re: Question: Verb Paradigms (73 lines)
      From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:42:45 +0000

77. r's (was Re: Rating Languages)
    • r's (was Re: Rating Languages) (51 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:19:15 -0700

78. Rating Languages
    • Re: Rating Languages (50 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 21:26:10 -0700
    • Re: Rating Languages (111 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 08:46:39 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (46 lines)
      From: Amber Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 04:55:58 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (36 lines)
      From: Amber Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 04:58:01 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (63 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:32:15 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (54 lines)
      From: Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:55:24 +0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (71 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 06:03:33 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (39 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 06:58:52 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (37 lines)
      From: Weiben Wang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:53:53 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (48 lines)
      From: Peter Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:35:50 -0700
    • Re: Rating Languages (36 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:26:03 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (52 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:04:32 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (91 lines)
      From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:03:57 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (57 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 16:33:34 -0500
    • Re: Rating Languages (115 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 16:19:54 -0700
    • Re: Rating Languages (52 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:04:53 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (45 lines)
      From: Amber Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:19:44 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (72 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 00:30:14 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (37 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 01:13:43 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (46 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 01:18:05 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (40 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 00:25:45 -0700
    • Re: Rating Languages (98 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 08:25:27 +0000
    • Re: Rating Languages (42 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 06:55:22 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (37 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 09:19:04 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (56 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 23:45:43 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (48 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 00:13:18 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (40 lines)
      From: Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 11:29:45 -0700
    • Re: Rating Languages (42 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 21:57:14 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (34 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 22:27:20 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (40 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 22:06:45 -0700
    • Re: Rating Languages (46 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 06:28:28 +0000
    • Re: Rating Languages (38 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:50:04 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (62 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:15:30 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (47 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:16:56 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (128 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:26:09 +0100
    • Re: Rating Languages (42 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 07:52:50 -0700
    • Re: Rating Languages (57 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:36:54 -0500
    • Re: Rating Languages (59 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:57:38 -0500
    • Re: Rating Languages (76 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:52:39 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (49 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 21:09:08 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (44 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:37:32 -0700
    • Re: Rating Languages (71 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:01:17 -0700
    • Re: Rating Languages (30 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 22:21:24 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (41 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:35:44 -0700
    • Re: Rating Languages (53 lines)
      From: Amber Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 01:47:55 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (36 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 02:23:15 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (55 lines)
      From: Amber Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 02:43:13 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (44 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 06:54:19 -0000
    • Re: Rating Languages (30 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 02:58:50 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (53 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:38:19 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (58 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 02:22:18 -0700
    • Re: Rating Languages (69 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 10:01:40 +0100
    • Re: Rating Languages (41 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 10:06:43 +0100
    • Re: Rating Languages (105 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 10:19:54 +0100
    • Re: Rating Languages (61 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 07:17:26 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (39 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 07:33:32 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (83 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 06:54:56 -0700
    • Re: Rating Languages (42 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 06:56:29 -0700
    • Re: Rating Languages (34 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:54:02 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (29 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:55:48 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (39 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:21:26 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (60 lines)
      From: Chris Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:29:35 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (68 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:34:58 -0500
    • Re: Rating Languages (58 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:54:40 -0500
    • Re: Rating Languages (49 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 16:06:10 -0500
    • Re: Rating Languages (43 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:25:35 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (34 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:17:22 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (33 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:22:00 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (46 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:55:38 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (95 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 16:39:48 -0700
    • Re: Rating Languages (46 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:00:25 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (36 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:28:36 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (50 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:29:42 -0700
    • Re: Rating Languages (42 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 00:12:42 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (48 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 02:28:18 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (98 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 09:11:51 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (64 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:52:33 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (53 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:54:53 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (70 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:02:33 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (38 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 09:15:33 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (50 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 10:26:28 -0500
    • Re: Rating Languages (53 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 10:30:51 -0500
    • Re: Rating Languages (39 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:03:53 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (33 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:05:14 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (37 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:52:21 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (24 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:26:26 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (46 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 20:37:49 +0100
    • Re: Rating Languages (43 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 20:43:04 +0100
    • Re: Rating Languages (48 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:31:51 -0700
    • Re: Rating Languages (61 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:01:15 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (72 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:57:36 -0500
    • Re: Rating Languages (42 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 17:27:58 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (42 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 17:30:49 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (41 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 20:43:24 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (49 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:24:08 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (41 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 23:23:42 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (62 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 23:47:20 -0500
    • Re: Rating Languages (77 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 02:01:45 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (53 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 20:29:03 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (77 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 20:53:15 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (48 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:05:21 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (50 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:07:52 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (55 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:07:08 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (70 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:11:34 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (40 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 09:18:01 -0600
    • Re: Rating Languages (26 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:59:51 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (53 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 12:13:39 -0500
    • Re: Rating Languages (49 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:15:16 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (52 lines)
      From: Steve Kramer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:22:39 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (36 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:42:15 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (40 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:44:18 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (28 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:26:07 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (42 lines)
      From: tristan alexander mcleay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 09:48:35 +1000
    • Re: Rating Languages (126 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:23:03 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (94 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 21:39:53 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (46 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:35:31 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (42 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:04:18 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (67 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:01:14 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (32 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:27:19 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (67 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:29:42 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (50 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:43:25 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (64 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:58:54 -0700
    • Re: Rating Languages (116 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 01:49:53 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (36 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 03:48:13 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (54 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 03:48:20 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (90 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 04:14:50 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (60 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:00:22 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (31 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 09:31:21 -0000
    • Re: Rating Languages (40 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:59:53 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (69 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:05:14 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (39 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:37:31 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (49 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:39:53 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (66 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:58:50 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (32 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:14:27 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (30 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:23:59 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (87 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:59:48 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (48 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 20:02:50 +0200
    • Re: Rating Languages (42 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:03:10 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (41 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:57:35 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (61 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:15:41 -0500
    • Re: Rating Languages (50 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:18:09 -0500
    • Re: Rating Languages (60 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:42:34 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (36 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:49:34 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (48 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:56:55 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (47 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:49:17 -0500
    • Re: Rating Languages (39 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:23:43 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (42 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:26:39 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (38 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:41:20 EDT
    • Re: Rating Languages (48 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:58:05 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (44 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 20:11:16 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (38 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 22:19:46 -0400
    • Re: Rating Languages (46 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:19:09 -0400

79. Recording opinions
    • Re: Recording opinions (49 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:30:07 -0400

80. religion, etc
    • Re: religion, etc (67 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 05:22:36 -0400
    • Re: religion, etc (33 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:36:00 -0400

81. Requesting only Digest...
    • Requesting only Digest... (28 lines)
      From: Eruanno <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 20:29:26 -0400
    • Re: Requesting only Digest... (36 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 23:07:15 -0400
    • Re: Requesting only Digest... (32 lines)
      From: Eruanno <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 23:49:45 -0400

82. Slava (was: Re: .com/religion) (fwd)
    • Re: Slava (was: Re: .com/religion) (fwd) (55 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 19:28:05 -0400
    • Re: Slava (was: Re: .com/religion) (fwd) (55 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 22:00:12 -0700
    • Re: Slava (was: Re: .com/religion) (fwd) (29 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 08:26:07 -0400
    • Re: Slava (was: Re: .com/religion) (fwd) (41 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:10:30 -0400
    • Re: Slava (was: Re: .com/religion) (fwd) (36 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:21:14 -0700
    • Re: Slava (was: Re: .com/religion) (fwd) (40 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 16:28:08 -0400

83. strange distinctions
    • strange distinctions (106 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 22:04:56 +0100
    • Re: strange distinctions (37 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 19:45:16 -0400

84. Supine (was: Tense formations)
    • Re: Supine (was: Tense formations) (47 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:55:06 -0000

85. test
    • test (29 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 02:12:56 +0200
    • Re: test (41 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:32:31 -0400

86. Tirehlat romanization
    • Tirehlat romanization (187 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:05:09 -0400
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (34 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:59:00 EDT
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (54 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 22:05:51 -0400
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (68 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 13:07:25 +0200
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (67 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 08:13:55 -0400
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (51 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 13:12:23 -0500
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (54 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:56:11 -0400
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (41 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 23:31:54 EDT
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (45 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:42:37 -0700
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (35 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 01:01:55 EDT
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (51 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 02:04:53 -0400
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (34 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 02:09:12 EDT
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (64 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 09:22:22 +0200
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (89 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:29:54 +0200
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (54 lines)
      From: D Tse <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 12:04:30 -0000
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (66 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:33:45 +0100
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (79 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:37:07 +0100
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (90 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 23:13:50 -0400
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (38 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:26:49 -0400
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (59 lines)
      From: Karapcik, Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:02:45 -0400
    • Re: Tirehlat romanization (51 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:27:58 -0500

87. Tonal Languages taken to extremes
    • Tonal Languages taken to extremes (77 lines)
      From: joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 21:00:23 +0100
    • Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes (54 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:10:59 -0700
    • Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes (44 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:57:57 -0400
    • Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes (45 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:26:49 -0400
    • Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes (34 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:51:52 -0400
    • Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes (32 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:15:31 EDT
    • Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes (36 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:17:16 EDT
    • Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes (98 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 21:20:01 -0400
    • Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes (42 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:25:42 -0700
    • Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes (45 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:04:46 -0700
    • Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes (40 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:14:00 -0700
    • Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes (54 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 03:16:32 -0400
    • Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes (29 lines)
      From: Amber Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 03:30:08 -0400
    • Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes (55 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 04:52:36 -0400
    • Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes (55 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:18:43 +0200
    • Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes (39 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:47:28 -0400
    • Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes (39 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:02:26 -0400
    • Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes (82 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 21:59:04 -0400

88. Trigger Systems (was: Rating languages)
    • Trigger Systems (was: Rating languages) (37 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 12:43:22 +1000

89. trilled r's (was Re: Rating Languages)
    • trilled r's (was Re: Rating Languages) (54 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:16:48 -0700

90. Update on me: Elliott (LONG)
    • Update on me: Elliott (LONG) (160 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 23:00:02 EDT
    • Re: Update on me: Elliott (LONG) (61 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:30:34 +0200
    • Re: Update on me: Elliott (LONG) (29 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:13:43 -0400

91. USAGE: Cantonal spelling
    • Re: USAGE: Cantonal spelling (63 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 12:33:12 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: Cantonal spelling (65 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:18:22 -0400
    • Re: USAGE: Cantonal spelling (84 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 01:05:34 -0400
    • Re: USAGE: Cantonal spelling (106 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 00:56:56 -0400
    • Re: USAGE: Cantonal spelling (65 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 22:27:02 -0400
    • Re: USAGE: Cantonal spelling (56 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 05:48:10 -0400
    • Re: USAGE: Cantonal spelling (64 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:46:33 -0400
    • Re: USAGE: Cantonal spelling (42 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:52:14 -0400
    • Re: USAGE: Cantonal spelling (54 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 09:45:03 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: Cantonal spelling (39 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 06:18:09 -0400
    • Re: USAGE: Cantonal spelling (56 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 06:38:39 -0400

92. USAGE: Yet another try at Pinyin-compatible tonal spelling for Mandarin
    • Re: USAGE: Yet another try at Pinyin-compatible tonal spelling for Mandarin (41 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 01:44:01 EDT

93. Verbal Valency and Tense Inflections in Finnstek
    • Verbal Valency and Tense Inflections in Finnstek (85 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:39:47 +1000

94. Vices
    • Vices (40 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 17:34:02 -0400
    • Re: Vices (34 lines)
      From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 13:07:25 +0200

95. Voicing sandhi
    • Voicing sandhi (55 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 16:11:45 -0400
    • Re: Voicing sandhi (66 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 07:00:59 -0400
    • Re: Voicing sandhi (49 lines)
      From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:50:38 +0000

96. Way,way OT was Re: USAGE: Yet another try at Pinyin-compatible,etc.
    • Way,way OT was Re: USAGE: Yet another try at Pinyin-compatible,etc. (58 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 06:44:01 -0400

97. Where does it say that Anne Heche made up a language?
    • Where does it say that Anne Heche made up a language? (68 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 11:28:42 -0400
    • Re: Where does it say that Anne Heche made up a language? (86 lines)
      From: Alfred Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 11:28:43 -0500
    • Re: Where does it say that Anne Heche made up a language? (73 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:49:37 -0400
    • Re: Where does it say that Anne Heche made up a language? (47 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 16:16:31 -0500

98. Where to Get Characters (was:Language Difficulty)
    • Re: Where to Get Characters (was:Language Difficulty) (57 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 23:59:17 -0400
    • Re: Where to Get Characters (was:Language Difficulty) (85 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 05:30:18 -0400

99. x > f sound change
    • Re: x > f sound change (33 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:00:05 -0000

100. Xhosa?
     • Xhosa? (26 lines)
       From: Colin Halverson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:48:37 EDT
     • Re: Xhosa? (33 lines)
       From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:27:45 -0400
     • Re: Xhosa? (48 lines)
       From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:36:42 -0500
     • Re: Xhosa? (53 lines)
       From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:45:09 -0500
     • Re: Xhosa? (44 lines)
       From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:49:51 EDT
     • Re: Xhosa? (43 lines)
       From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 09:49:23 +1000
     • Re: Xhosa? (48 lines)
       From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:57:37 EDT
     • Re: Xhosa? (48 lines)
       From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 21:44:34 -0400
     • Re: Xhosa? (47 lines)
       From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 06:44:44 -0400
     • Re: Xhosa? (55 lines)
       From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:15:55 +0200
     • Re: Xhosa? (58 lines)
       From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 13:37:13 -0500
     • Re: Xhosa? (73 lines)
       From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 19:47:56 +0000
     • Re: Xhosa? (60 lines)
       From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:07:46 -0400
     • Re: Xhosa? (62 lines)
       From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 09:29:09 -0500
     • Re: Xhosa? (68 lines)
       From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 21:54:24 -0400

101. Yet another introduction
     • Re: Yet another introduction (69 lines)
       From: Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:51:43 +0400

102. Yil, tones, miscellaneous fun stuff!
     • Yil, tones, miscellaneous fun stuff! (83 lines)
       From: Amber Adams <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:52:52 -0400

103. yl112's Meep, LOL...
     • yl112's Meep, LOL... (53 lines)
       From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:42:54 EDT
     • Re: yl112's Meep, LOL... (34 lines)
       From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:13:29 -0700
     • Re: yl112's Meep, LOL... (48 lines)
       From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:32:27 -0400
     • Re: yl112's Meep, LOL... (51 lines)
       From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:48:05 -0400

104. Yue/Cantonese (was Re: "...two Moscovites conversing in English" )
     • Yue/Cantonese (was Re: "...two Moscovites conversing in English" ) (61 lines)
       From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 00:44:45 EDT

105. _Tr:'pang_, a sample (was Re: Rating Languages)
     • _Tr:'pang_, a sample (was Re: Rating Languages) (79 lines)
       From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 20:12:34 EDT