Conlang
Mailing List October 2001, week 2
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"Invent a language" page
(David) Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(2 messages)
<No subject>
A Re-Introduction and An Announcement
(2 messages)
Any Estonians in Tokyo?
Athenaeus and Alexarchus, the quondam conlanger
(3 messages)
Babel text in Tolwd
Base 8 counting in Gevey
beautiful scripts
(7 messages)
beautiful scripts (to Christophe/Amber)
(2 messages)
Call for help - Babel text
Chaotophile
CHAT: mosquitoes [was: Re: CHAT: Texas weirdness [was Re: CHAT: Californian secessionists] [was Re: Likin...]
(2 messages)
CONLANG Digest - 7 Oct 2001 to 8 Oct 2001 (#2001-282)
(3 messages)
Description question
(8 messages)
Diphthongs
(3 messages)
Durana Genesis text
elmenni (was: Questions about Schwa and Stress)
(6 messages)
Ergative Construction?
(7 messages)
Exceptions to the -tion rule in French
(4 messages)
Expletive (was: Odd construct)
Für Native German Speakers
French gender
(12 messages)
French Grammar
(5 messages)
Fun with orthography
(4 messages)
Fwd: Re: French gender
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200117
Gender-challenging naems (was: beautiful scripts)
German orthography: long/short vowels
(6 messages)
hi
(8 messages)
Hi
(2 messages)
hi
(2 messages)
Hi
hi
(3 messages)
hi.
(12 messages)
Imac and its language capibilities
japanese (to Mario Bonassin)
Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages taken to extremes)
(2 messages)
Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages taken toextremes)
(2 messages)
Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages takentoextremes)
Leaving the list; a very brief sketch of C'|ali.
leaving, email-address
Lexification (a pun)
(3 messages)
LINGUIST List 12.2540 Universal lang (fwd)
Lizxvööse Babel text (and a submission for Pavel)
muzzies
New Conlang: S4
(2 messages)
Nice comment, Adam! (was: beautiful scripts)
(8 messages)
Odd construct
(30 messages)
Old Languages
(15 messages)
Old Languages (revision)
OT: Traveller (was: Re: Fun with orthography)
Polysynthesis (was To Doug Ball... and Thanks Ferko...)
PycckN
(10 messages)
Questions about Schwa and Stress
(32 messages)
Real language questions
(12 messages)
Rhyming Conlangs
(20 messages)
Rhyming in poetry
Rosetta Stone Online, conscript jokes
Silent E
(13 messages)
Spaß...spasso (was Re: German orthography: long/short vowels)
(3 messages)
Syllabic n in Japanese (was: Korean politeness levels)
technical German is slooooow (was Re: Ergative Construction?)
Texas (non-)accents [was: Re: Diphthongs]
Thanks Ferko (was: To Doug Ball (was: beautiful scripts (to Christophe/Amber))
To Amber (was: beautiful scripts)
(2 messages)
To Amber (wasRe: beautiful scripts
(2 messages)
To Doug Ball (was: beautiful scripts (to Christophe/Amber))
(2 messages)
To Heather & J.Rhiemeier (was: Why conlang)
Tonal Languages taken to extremes
USAGE: German phonemically long vowels [was Re: Silent E]
USAGE: Texas Dialect [was Re: Diphthongs]
Using Cyrillic for Irish, was Re: Silent E
(2 messages)
Vietnamese, was: beautiful scripts
(4 messages)
Vietnamese/to Ferko (was: beautiful scripts)
Why conlang
(6 messages)
Why Conlang
Why conlang
(2 messages)
Why Conlang
Why conlang
(14 messages)
Why Triggers?
(2 messages)
"Invent a language" page
"Invent a language" page
(36 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
(David) Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(David) Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(41 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: (David) Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(31 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
<No subject>
(44 lines)
From:
Stefan Koch <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Re-Introduction and An Announcement
A Re-Introduction and An Announcement
(48 lines)
From:
Doug Ball <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Re-Introduction and An Announcement
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Any Estonians in Tokyo?
Any Estonians in Tokyo?
(43 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Athenaeus and Alexarchus, the quondam conlanger
Athenaeus and Alexarchus, the quondam conlanger
(87 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Athenaeus and Alexarchus, the quondam conlanger
(37 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Athenaeus and Alexarchus, the quondam conlanger
(56 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Babel text in Tolwd
Babel text in Tolwd
(177 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Base 8 counting in Gevey
Base 8 counting in Gevey
(105 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
beautiful scripts
Re: beautiful scripts
(92 lines)
From:
Amber Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: beautiful scripts
(47 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: beautiful scripts
(33 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: beautiful scripts
(61 lines)
From:
Amber Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: beautiful scripts
(42 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: beautiful scripts
(61 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: beautiful scripts
(95 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
beautiful scripts (to Christophe/Amber)
Re: beautiful scripts (to Christophe/Amber)
(88 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: beautiful scripts (to Christophe/Amber)
(67 lines)
From:
Doug Ball <
[log in to unmask]
>
Call for help - Babel text
Call for help - Babel text
(74 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chaotophile
Re: Chaotophile
(35 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: mosquitoes [was: Re: CHAT: Texas weirdness [was Re: CHAT: Californian secessionists] [was Re: Likin...]
Re: CHAT: mosquitoes [was: Re: CHAT: Texas weirdness [was Re: CHAT: Californian secessionists] [was Re: Likin...]
(56 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: mosquitoes [was: Re: CHAT: Texas weirdness [was Re: CHAT: Californian secessionists] [was Re: Likin...]
(37 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 7 Oct 2001 to 8 Oct 2001 (#2001-282)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 7 Oct 2001 to 8 Oct 2001 (#2001-282)
(98 lines)
From:
Lukasz Korczewski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 7 Oct 2001 to 8 Oct 2001 (#2001-282)
(95 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 7 Oct 2001 to 8 Oct 2001 (#2001-282)
(80 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Description question
Re: Description question
(61 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Description question
(38 lines)
From:
David Stokes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Description question
(76 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Description question
(47 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Description question
(37 lines)
From:
Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Description question
(56 lines)
From:
Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Description question
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Description question
(48 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Diphthongs
Re: Diphthongs
(34 lines)
From:
Tony Hogard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Diphthongs
(45 lines)
From:
David Stokes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Diphthongs
(56 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Durana Genesis text
Durana Genesis text
(101 lines)
From:
Patrick Jarrett <
[log in to unmask]
>
elmenni (was: Questions about Schwa and Stress)
Re: elmenni (was: Questions about Schwa and Stress)
(40 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: elmenni (was: Questions about Schwa and Stress)
(42 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: elmenni (was: Questions about Schwa and Stress)
(35 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: elmenni (was: Questions about Schwa and Stress)
(39 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: elmenni (was: Questions about Schwa and Stress)
(38 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: elmenni (was: Questions about Schwa and Stress)
(84 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ergative Construction?
Ergative Construction?
(48 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative Construction?
(74 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative Construction?
(39 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative Construction?
(59 lines)
From:
William Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative Construction?
(95 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative Construction?
(72 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative Construction?
(93 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Exceptions to the -tion rule in French
Re: Exceptions to the -tion rule in French
(58 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exceptions to the -tion rule in French
(44 lines)
From:
Steve Kramer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exceptions to the -tion rule in French
(37 lines)
From:
Alfred Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exceptions to the -tion rule in French
(51 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Expletive (was: Odd construct)
Expletive (was: Odd construct)
(62 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Für Native German Speakers
Für Native German Speakers
(28 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
French gender
Re: French gender
(43 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French gender
(88 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French gender
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French gender
(53 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French gender
(39 lines)
From:
James <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French gender
(50 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French gender
(54 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French gender
(45 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French gender
(57 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French gender
(94 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French gender
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French gender
(36 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
French Grammar
Re: French Grammar
(42 lines)
From:
Samuel Rivier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French Grammar
(28 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French Grammar
(31 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French Grammar
(42 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French Grammar
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fun with orthography
Fun with orthography
(106 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fun with orthography
(129 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fun with orthography
(75 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fun with orthography
(135 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: Re: French gender
Re: Fwd: Re: French gender
(113 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200117
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200117
(42 lines)
From:
Kvasir - Vaijskä <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gender-challenging naems (was: beautiful scripts)
Gender-challenging naems (was: beautiful scripts)
(44 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
German orthography: long/short vowels
German orthography: long/short vowels
(102 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: German orthography: long/short vowels
(29 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: German orthography: long/short vowels
(43 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: German orthography: long/short vowels
(54 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: German orthography: long/short vowels
(52 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: German orthography: long/short vowels
(49 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
hi
Re: hi
(63 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi
(43 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi
(55 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi
(48 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi
(58 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi
(35 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi
(41 lines)
From:
The RipperDoc <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi
(63 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hi
Re: Hi
(38 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hi
(48 lines)
From:
The RipperDoc <
[log in to unmask]
>
hi
Re: hi
(64 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi
(44 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hi
Re: Hi
(34 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
hi
Re: hi
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi
(70 lines)
From:
The RipperDoc <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi
(41 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
hi.
hi.
(38 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi.
(39 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi.
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi.
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi.
(50 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi.
(53 lines)
From:
Heather Rice <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi.
(53 lines)
From:
Marcel Bollmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi.
(63 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi.
(61 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi.
(49 lines)
From:
Marcel Bollmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi.
(45 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hi.
(63 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Imac and its language capibilities
Imac and its language capibilities
(33 lines)
From:
David Crowell <
[log in to unmask]
>
japanese (to Mario Bonassin)
Re: japanese (to Mario Bonassin)
(36 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages taken to extremes)
Re: Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages taken to extremes)
(47 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages taken to extremes)
(43 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages taken toextremes)
Re: Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages taken toextremes)
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages taken toextremes)
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages takentoextremes)
Re: Korean politeness levels ( wasRe: Tonal Languages takentoextremes)
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Leaving the list; a very brief sketch of C'|ali.
Leaving the list; a very brief sketch of C'|ali.
(72 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
leaving, email-address
leaving, email-address
(35 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lexification (a pun)
Re: Lexification (a pun)
(48 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexification (a pun)
(48 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexification (a pun)
(35 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
LINGUIST List 12.2540 Universal lang (fwd)
LINGUIST List 12.2540 Universal lang (fwd)
(90 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lizxvööse Babel text (and a submission for Pavel)
Lizxvööse Babel text (and a submission for Pavel)
(69 lines)
From:
Dan Seriff <
[log in to unmask]
>
muzzies
Re: muzzies
(63 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Conlang: S4
Re: New Conlang: S4
(63 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Conlang: S4
(41 lines)
From:
Joseph Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nice comment, Adam! (was: beautiful scripts)
Nice comment, Adam! (was: beautiful scripts)
(58 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nice comment, Adam! (was: beautiful scripts)
(68 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nice comment, Adam! (was: beautiful scripts)
(115 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nice comment, Adam! (was: beautiful scripts)
(28 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nice comment, Adam! (was: beautiful scripts)
(69 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nice comment, Adam! (was: beautiful scripts)
(39 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nice comment, Adam! (was: beautiful scripts)
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nice comment, Adam! (was: beautiful scripts)
(59 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Odd construct
Odd construct
(33 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(41 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(45 lines)
From:
Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(57 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(60 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(36 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(48 lines)
From:
Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(49 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(44 lines)
From:
Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(45 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(59 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(72 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(51 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(54 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(36 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(41 lines)
From:
Matthew Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(47 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(47 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(61 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(44 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(44 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(64 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(46 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Odd construct
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Old Languages
Re: Old Languages
(95 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Languages
(64 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Languages
(41 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Languages
(28 lines)
From:
Amber Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Languages
(38 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Languages
(47 lines)
From:
Amber Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Languages
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Languages
(48 lines)
From:
Amber Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Languages
(46 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Languages
(36 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Languages
(40 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Languages
(55 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Languages
(62 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Languages
(81 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Languages
(54 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Old Languages (revision)
Re: Old Languages (revision)
(72 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Traveller (was: Re: Fun with orthography)
OT: Traveller (was: Re: Fun with orthography)
(51 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Polysynthesis (was To Doug Ball... and Thanks Ferko...)
Polysynthesis (was To Doug Ball... and Thanks Ferko...)
(147 lines)
From:
Doug Ball <
[log in to unmask]
>
PycckN
PycckN
(26 lines)
From:
Colin Halverson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PycckN
(50 lines)
From:
Dan Seriff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PycckN
(34 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PycckN
(51 lines)
From:
Dan Seriff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PycckN
(39 lines)
From:
Colin Halverson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PycckN
(44 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PycckN
(56 lines)
From:
Dan Seriff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PycckN
(29 lines)
From:
Colin Halverson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PycckN
(51 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PycckN
(29 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Questions about Schwa and Stress
Questions about Schwa and Stress
(35 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(37 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(46 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(57 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(37 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(48 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(44 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(34 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(35 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(46 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(48 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(53 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(40 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(33 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(75 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(43 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(36 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(46 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(63 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(32 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(54 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(61 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(36 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(32 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(48 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(42 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(36 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(48 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(47 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(42 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions about Schwa and Stress
(51 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Real language questions
Re: Real language questions
(58 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Real language questions
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Real language questions
(36 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Real language questions
(56 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Real language questions
(48 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Real language questions
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Real language questions
(54 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Real language questions
(41 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Real language questions
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Real language questions
(58 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Real language questions
(40 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Real language questions
(63 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rhyming Conlangs
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(59 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(31 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(49 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(74 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(53 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(52 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(53 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(74 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(47 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(77 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(73 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(102 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(36 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(51 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(54 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(33 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhyming Conlangs
(40 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rhyming in poetry
Rhyming in poetry
(56 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rosetta Stone Online, conscript jokes
Re: Rosetta Stone Online, conscript jokes
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Silent E
Re: Silent E
(105 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Silent E
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Silent E
(53 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Silent E
(36 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Silent E
(46 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Silent E
(40 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Silent E
(46 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Silent E
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Silent E
(55 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Silent E
(52 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Silent E
(65 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Silent E
(36 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Silent E
(55 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Spaß...spasso (was Re: German orthography: long/short vowels)
Spaß...spasso (was Re: German orthography: long/short vowels)
(35 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Spaß...spasso (was Re: German orthography: long/short vowels)
(48 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spaß...spasso (was Re: German orthography: long/short vowels)
(63 lines)
From:
Martin Hinsch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Syllabic n in Japanese (was: Korean politeness levels)
Syllabic n in Japanese (was: Korean politeness levels)
(31 lines)
From:
Amber Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
technical German is slooooow (was Re: Ergative Construction?)
technical German is slooooow (was Re: Ergative Construction?)
(41 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Texas (non-)accents [was: Re: Diphthongs]
Re: Texas (non-)accents [was: Re: Diphthongs]
(90 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Thanks Ferko (was: To Doug Ball (was: beautiful scripts (to Christophe/Amber))
Thanks Ferko (was: To Doug Ball (was: beautiful scripts (to Christophe/Amber))
(49 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
To Amber (was: beautiful scripts)
To Amber (was: beautiful scripts)
(66 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To Amber (was: beautiful scripts)
(48 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
To Amber (wasRe: beautiful scripts
To Amber (wasRe: beautiful scripts
(145 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
To Amber (wasRe: beautiful scripts
(148 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
To Doug Ball (was: beautiful scripts (to Christophe/Amber))
To Doug Ball (was: beautiful scripts (to Christophe/Amber))
(116 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To Doug Ball (was: beautiful scripts (to Christophe/Amber))
(38 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
To Heather & J.Rhiemeier (was: Why conlang)
To Heather & J.Rhiemeier (was: Why conlang)
(47 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tonal Languages taken to extremes
Re: Tonal Languages taken to extremes
(37 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: German phonemically long vowels [was Re: Silent E]
Re: USAGE: German phonemically long vowels [was Re: Silent E]
(51 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Texas Dialect [was Re: Diphthongs]
USAGE: Texas Dialect [was Re: Diphthongs]
(50 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Using Cyrillic for Irish, was Re: Silent E
Using Cyrillic for Irish, was Re: Silent E
(51 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Using Cyrillic for Irish, was Re: Silent E
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vietnamese, was: beautiful scripts
Vietnamese, was: beautiful scripts
(42 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vietnamese, was: beautiful scripts
(29 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vietnamese, was: beautiful scripts
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vietnamese, was: beautiful scripts
(61 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vietnamese/to Ferko (was: beautiful scripts)
Vietnamese/to Ferko (was: beautiful scripts)
(35 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Why conlang
Why conlang
(35 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(36 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(48 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(37 lines)
From:
Amber Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(27 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(51 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Why Conlang
Re: Why Conlang
(64 lines)
From:
Doug Ball <
[log in to unmask]
>
Why conlang
Re: Why conlang
(60 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(31 lines)
From:
Mario Bonassin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Why Conlang
Re: Why Conlang
(69 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Why conlang
Re: Why conlang
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(36 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(40 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(60 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(46 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(54 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(36 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(31 lines)
From:
Colin Halverson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(46 lines)
From:
The Keenans <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(57 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(47 lines)
From:
D Tse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(53 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(50 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why conlang
(40 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Why Triggers?
Re: Why Triggers?
(57 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why Triggers?
(94 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU