Conlang
Mailing List December 2001, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"Dutch English"; language death on Phalera [was Re: Active and Passive please help]
(5 messages)
"Dutch English"; language death on Phalera [was Re: Active andPassive please help]
"Zhang"(wasRe: English Beast, etc. (was Re: English syllable structure)
(3 messages)
* Calling Gray Wizard or Irina - pls reply asap
/r/ - /l/ - /n/ [was Re: OT: Rant about degres Celsius]
(2 messages)
=?iso-8859-1?Q?E=E4rendil?=, Isengard etc...
about the Chinese word 'aunt'
Active and Passive please help.
(42 messages)
active, passive, homo, heet.....eeek
(3 messages)
advice needed: making a dictionary
(5 messages)
Arabic 'sura' (?)-- a question
(5 messages)
Back to MAIL! :))
Big Dipper (was: Irregularities)
(3 messages)
Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch
(8 messages)
Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch (was RE: Grammatical Summary of Kemata)
Boolean Christ
CHAT Re: my meat isn't fresh enough?
CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(5 messages)
CHAT: Dwarfs/dwarves (was Re: The pitfall of Chinese/Mandarin)
(10 messages)
CHAT: East St. Louis (was Re: Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril])
(3 messages)
CHAT: East St. Louis (was Re: Re: CHAT: geographicalnomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril])
(2 messages)
CHAT: East St. Louis (was Re: Re: CHAT:geographicalnomenclature [was Re: La
CHAT: English succession (was: kinship terms (Henaudute))
CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(38 messages)
CHAT: Hawaiian Money (was Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02)
CHAT: reduced vowels in English (was: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England)
(2 messages)
CHAT: renaming oneself (was: Active and Passive please help.)
(8 messages)
CHAT: Tacos et al.
(17 messages)
CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02
(2 messages)
Chris, Chris and Chris
(45 messages)
Christmas carol
(4 messages)
classroom horrors (was: conlanging during class)
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
> having trouble with getting emails
conlanging during class (Re: Grammatical Summary of Kemata)
(6 messages)
Degaspregos
Detested sounds, was: Work in progress - Phonology
(6 messages)
disfluencies (was Re: English syllable structure)
Eärendil, Isengard etc...
(7 messages)
English syllable structure
(3 messages)
English syllable structure (was, for some reason: Re: Llirine: How to creat a language)
(2 messages)
Esp to Mathias: Geocities page
(2 messages)
FAQ?
(3 messages)
film dubbing (was: "Dutch English"; language death on Phalera)
For My Conlang Class
(4 messages)
fresh meat <-------
geographical nomenclature
Gevey: new Babel text (part 1)
Going Nomail
Going nomail
Going to NOMAIL
Grammatical Summary of Kemata
Hawaiian Money (was Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02)
(8 messages)
Hey, what Su problem?
Human Song
(6 messages)
Human Song/Kayasanoda
Interesting concultural ideas
Irregularities
(29 messages)
kinship terms (Henaudute)
(6 messages)
Laughing Best, was: English syllable structure (was...)
(2 messages)
Lord of the Rings movie
(52 messages)
Lothlorien
(2 messages)
mang(w)a (was: Grie Ka #2)
my meat isn't fresh enough?
(10 messages)
My new conlang
My new Conlang
Naming customs
(2 messages)
NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02
(14 messages)
Negatives (Trentish, with adjective notes too) (was: Re: narethanaal)
(5 messages)
Negatives (Vyh)
New/revised language: Phonology
(11 messages)
Nomail
(2 messages)
Number in Trentish
(5 messages)
OT naming customs
(45 messages)
OT, by now Re: UM....hello???
OT: baronies by writ
(2 messages)
OT: Nazque
OT: Rant about degres Celsius (was: introduction) [Really?]
(4 messages)
OT: San Remo 1961
(2 messages)
OT: Teleri (was: Lord of the Rings movie)
(2 messages)
OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(77 messages)
Phaleran Update: Arkhilokhos' _A Poet's Shield_
pronouns
Question on phonemes
Rant on partial understandings (was: Spoken French, coins)
(6 messages)
relative weirdness (was Re: signal and noise ...)
(6 messages)
Religious bigotry
(2 messages)
Religious bigotry [was Re: Chris, Chris and Chris]
(2 messages)
Rohirric, Westron & Co. (was Re: Sindarin Stress?)
Saloperie
scientifictional lexicography
Season's greetings
Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
(4 messages)
So
SolReSol
(2 messages)
specialized numbers
(7 messages)
Spoken French, coins
(3 messages)
Su's minimal language (was: Lord of the Rings movie)
(4 messages)
Surfeit of Chris, Chris and Chris
(3 messages)
taliboo
(8 messages)
the English Beast, etc. (was Re: English syllable structure)
(2 messages)
THEORY: English as a creole [was Re: Rant on partial understandings]
Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(2 messages)
Translation challenge: GBS
(6 messages)
UM....hello???
(2 messages)
Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology)
(8 messages)
Unclear topic-changer words (was: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch (was RE: Grammatical Summary of Kemata))
USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck, NZ too).
(14 messages)
USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck,NZ too).
(8 messages)
USAGE: German phonemic mergers [was Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.]
USAGE: Translation challenge: GBS
Vyh orthography, was: Negatives (Vyh)
What defines the case name?
(6 messages)
who speaks Quenya?
(3 messages)
Wittgenstein on conlanging [was Re: relative weirdness]
(4 messages)
Work in progress - Phonology
(10 messages)
"Dutch English"; language death on Phalera [was Re: Active and Passive please help]
"Dutch English"; language death on Phalera [was Re: Active and Passive please help]
(70 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Dutch English"; language death on Phalera [was Re: Active and Passive please help]
(65 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Dutch English"; language death on Phalera [was Re: Active and Passive please help]
(53 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Dutch English"; language death on Phalera [was Re: Active and Passive please help]
(83 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Dutch English"; language death on Phalera [was Re: Active and Passive please help]
(46 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
"Dutch English"; language death on Phalera [was Re: Active andPassive please help]
Re: "Dutch English"; language death on Phalera [was Re: Active andPassive please help]
(40 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
"Zhang"(wasRe: English Beast, etc. (was Re: English syllable structure)
Re: "Zhang"(wasRe: English Beast, etc. (was Re: English syllable structure)
(54 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Zhang"(wasRe: English Beast, etc. (was Re: English syllable structure)
(51 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Zhang"(wasRe: English Beast, etc. (was Re: English syllable structure)
(43 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
* Calling Gray Wizard or Irina - pls reply asap
* Calling Gray Wizard or Irina - pls reply asap
(39 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
/r/ - /l/ - /n/ [was Re: OT: Rant about degres Celsius]
/r/ - /l/ - /n/ [was Re: OT: Rant about degres Celsius]
(97 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /r/ - /l/ - /n/ [was Re: OT: Rant about degres Celsius]
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
=?iso-8859-1?Q?E=E4rendil?=, Isengard etc...
Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?E=E4rendil?=, Isengard etc...
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
about the Chinese word 'aunt'
about the Chinese word 'aunt'
(72 lines)
From:
Cheng Zhong Su <
[log in to unmask]
>
Active and Passive please help.
Active and Passive please help.
(63 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(39 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(47 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(56 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(40 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(34 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(32 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(60 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(36 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(41 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(57 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(60 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(36 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(59 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(48 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(41 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(47 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(68 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(88 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(50 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(51 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(59 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(34 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(50 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(58 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(47 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(65 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(32 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(44 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(41 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(40 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(83 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(31 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(58 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
active, passive, homo, heet.....eeek
active, passive, homo, heet.....eeek
(81 lines)
From:
christopher carter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: active, passive, homo, heet.....eeek
(45 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: active, passive, homo, heet.....eeek
(36 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
advice needed: making a dictionary
advice needed: making a dictionary
(55 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: advice needed: making a dictionary
(61 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: advice needed: making a dictionary
(92 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: advice needed: making a dictionary
(40 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: advice needed: making a dictionary
(46 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Arabic 'sura' (?)-- a question
Arabic 'sura' (?)-- a question
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic 'sura' (?)-- a question
(51 lines)
From:
William Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic 'sura' (?)-- a question
(39 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic 'sura' (?)-- a question
(57 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic 'sura' (?)-- a question
(41 lines)
From:
William Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to MAIL! :))
Back to MAIL! :))
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Big Dipper (was: Irregularities)
Big Dipper (was: Irregularities)
(57 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Big Dipper (was: Irregularities)
(52 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Big Dipper (was: Irregularities)
(41 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch
Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch
(40 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch
(52 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch
(50 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch
(45 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch
(37 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch
(42 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch (was RE: Grammatical Summary of Kemata)
Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch (was RE: Grammatical Summary of Kemata)
(77 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Boolean Christ
Boolean Christ
(51 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT Re: my meat isn't fresh enough?
Re: CHAT Re: my meat isn't fresh enough?
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(65 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(94 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(42 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(43 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Dwarfs/dwarves (was Re: The pitfall of Chinese/Mandarin)
Re: CHAT: Dwarfs/dwarves (was Re: The pitfall of Chinese/Mandarin)
(35 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dwarfs/dwarves (was Re: The pitfall of Chinese/Mandarin)
(53 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dwarfs/dwarves (was Re: The pitfall of Chinese/Mandarin)
(33 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dwarfs/dwarves (was Re: The pitfall of Chinese/Mandarin)
(44 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dwarfs/dwarves (was Re: The pitfall of Chinese/Mandarin)
(42 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dwarfs/dwarves (was Re: The pitfall of Chinese/Mandarin)
(53 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dwarfs/dwarves (was Re: The pitfall of Chinese/Mandarin)
(48 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dwarfs/dwarves (was Re: The pitfall of Chinese/Mandarin)
(37 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dwarfs/dwarves (was Re: The pitfall of Chinese/Mandarin)
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dwarfs/dwarves (was Re: The pitfall of Chinese/Mandarin)
(28 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
CHAT: East St. Louis (was Re: Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril])
CHAT: East St. Louis (was Re: Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril])
(46 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: East St. Louis (was Re: Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril])
(63 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: East St. Louis (was Re: Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril])
(58 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: East St. Louis (was Re: Re: CHAT: geographicalnomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril])
Re: CHAT: East St. Louis (was Re: Re: CHAT: geographicalnomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril])
(48 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: East St. Louis (was Re: Re: CHAT: geographicalnomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril])
(45 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: East St. Louis (was Re: Re: CHAT:geographicalnomenclature [was Re: La
Re: CHAT: East St. Louis (was Re: Re: CHAT:geographicalnomenclature [was Re: La
(63 lines)
From:
Alfred Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: English succession (was: kinship terms (Henaudute))
CHAT: English succession (was: kinship terms (Henaudute))
(81 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(40 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(58 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(50 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(43 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(48 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(56 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(77 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(37 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(57 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(44 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(54 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(46 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(38 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(63 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(57 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(53 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(50 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(40 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(70 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(31 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(48 lines)
From:
Tony Hogard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(54 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(45 lines)
From:
Tony Hogard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(41 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(47 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: geographical nomenclature [was Re: Language of Tetril]
(49 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Hawaiian Money (was Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02)
CHAT: Hawaiian Money (was Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02)
(34 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: reduced vowels in English (was: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England)
CHAT: reduced vowels in English (was: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England)
(49 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: reduced vowels in English (was: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England)
(67 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: renaming oneself (was: Active and Passive please help.)
CHAT: renaming oneself (was: Active and Passive please help.)
(57 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: renaming oneself (was: Active and Passive please help.)
(42 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: renaming oneself (was: Active and Passive please help.)
(58 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: renaming oneself (was: Active and Passive please help.)
(35 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: renaming oneself (was: Active and Passive please help.)
(45 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: renaming oneself (was: Active and Passive please help.)
(53 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: renaming oneself (was: Active and Passive please help.)
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: renaming oneself (was: Active and Passive please help.)
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Tacos et al.
Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.
(45 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.
(45 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.
(38 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.
(50 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.
(47 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.
(67 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.
(47 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.
(48 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.
(42 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.
(43 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.
(39 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.
(54 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.
(28 lines)
From:
Paul Sherrill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.
(40 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.
(62 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02
CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02
(54 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02
(71 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chris, Chris and Chris
Chris, Chris and Chris
(38 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(51 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(66 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(43 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(39 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(52 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(55 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(61 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(40 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(80 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(56 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(43 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(39 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(42 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(57 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(67 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(49 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(54 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(39 lines)
From:
William Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(75 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(65 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(51 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(50 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(40 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(90 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(52 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(33 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(76 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(46 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(52 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(37 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(75 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(41 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(39 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(42 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(56 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(39 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(63 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(63 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chris, Chris and Chris
(47 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Christmas carol
Christmas carol
(67 lines)
From:
Heather Rice <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Christmas carol
(50 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Christmas carol
(31 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Christmas carol
(48 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
classroom horrors (was: conlanging during class)
classroom horrors (was: conlanging during class)
(44 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
> having trouble with getting emails
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
> having trouble with getting emails
(40 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
conlanging during class (Re: Grammatical Summary of Kemata)
Re: conlanging during class (Re: Grammatical Summary of Kemata)
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlanging during class (Re: Grammatical Summary of Kemata)
(52 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlanging during class (Re: Grammatical Summary of Kemata)
(84 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlanging during class (Re: Grammatical Summary of Kemata)
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlanging during class (Re: Grammatical Summary of Kemata)
(68 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlanging during class (Re: Grammatical Summary of Kemata)
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Degaspregos
Re: Degaspregos
(56 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Detested sounds, was: Work in progress - Phonology
Detested sounds, was: Work in progress - Phonology
(64 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Detested sounds, was: Work in progress - Phonology
(42 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Detested sounds, was: Work in progress - Phonology
(111 lines)
From:
John-Emmanuel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Detested sounds, was: Work in progress - Phonology
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Detested sounds, was: Work in progress - Phonology
(56 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Detested sounds, was: Work in progress - Phonology
(43 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
disfluencies (was Re: English syllable structure)
Re: disfluencies (was Re: English syllable structure)
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Eärendil, Isengard etc...
Eärendil, Isengard etc...
(46 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eärendil, Isengard etc...
(45 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eärendil, Isengard etc...
(40 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eärendil, Isengard etc...
(63 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eärendil, Isengard etc...
(41 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eärendil, Isengard etc...
(50 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eärendil, Isengard etc...
(60 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
English syllable structure
Re: English syllable structure
(68 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English syllable structure
(63 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English syllable structure
(53 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
English syllable structure (was, for some reason: Re: Llirine: How to creat a language)
Re: English syllable structure (was, for some reason: Re: Llirine: How to creat a language)
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English syllable structure (was, for some reason: Re: Llirine: How to creat a language)
(46 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Esp to Mathias: Geocities page
Esp to Mathias: Geocities page
(40 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Esp to Mathias: Geocities page
(46 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
FAQ?
FAQ?
(40 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FAQ?
(88 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FAQ?
(34 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
film dubbing (was: "Dutch English"; language death on Phalera)
film dubbing (was: "Dutch English"; language death on Phalera)
(34 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
For My Conlang Class
Re: For My Conlang Class
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: For My Conlang Class
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: For My Conlang Class
(63 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: For My Conlang Class
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
fresh meat <-------
Re: fresh meat <-------
(36 lines)
From:
christopher carter <
[log in to unmask]
>
geographical nomenclature
geographical nomenclature
(38 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gevey: new Babel text (part 1)
Gevey: new Babel text (part 1)
(183 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going Nomail
Going Nomail
(31 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going nomail
Going nomail
(32 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going to NOMAIL
Going to NOMAIL
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Grammatical Summary of Kemata
Re: Grammatical Summary of Kemata
(67 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hawaiian Money (was Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02)
Re: Hawaiian Money (was Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02)
(56 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hawaiian Money (was Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02)
(39 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hawaiian Money (was Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02)
(44 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hawaiian Money (was Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02)
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hawaiian Money (was Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02)
(59 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hawaiian Money (was Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02)
(46 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hawaiian Money (was Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02)
(57 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hawaiian Money (was Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02)
(43 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hey, what Su problem?
Re: Hey, what Su problem?
(36 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Human Song
Re: Human Song
(77 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Human Song
(60 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Human Song
(55 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Human Song
(84 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Human Song
(56 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Human Song
(70 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Human Song/Kayasanoda
Human Song/Kayasanoda
(40 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Interesting concultural ideas
Re: Interesting concultural ideas
(43 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Irregularities
Irregularities
(69 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(43 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(55 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(82 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(116 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(53 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(60 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(46 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(40 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(44 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(44 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(35 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(46 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(76 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(167 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(218 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(44 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(45 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(254 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(49 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(60 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(54 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(50 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(45 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(67 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(51 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(50 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregularities
(82 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
kinship terms (Henaudute)
Re: kinship terms (Henaudute)
(50 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: kinship terms (Henaudute)
(37 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: kinship terms (Henaudute)
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: kinship terms (Henaudute)
(47 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: kinship terms (Henaudute)
(42 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: kinship terms (Henaudute)
(37 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Laughing Best, was: English syllable structure (was...)
Laughing Best, was: English syllable structure (was...)
(52 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Laughing Best, was: English syllable structure (was...)
(39 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lord of the Rings movie
Lord of the Rings movie
(56 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(41 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(37 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(55 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(29 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(39 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(73 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(40 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(47 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(48 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(57 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(68 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(39 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(45 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(38 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(46 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(36 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(56 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(52 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(34 lines)
From:
Cian Ross <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(43 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(40 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(50 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(34 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(41 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(39 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(37 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(47 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(41 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(37 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(51 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(53 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(47 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(37 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(47 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(47 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(79 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(46 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(34 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(45 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(53 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(64 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(63 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(41 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(48 lines)
From:
Damon M. Lord <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(61 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lord of the Rings movie
(50 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lothlorien
Lothlorien
(36 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lothlorien
(36 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
mang(w)a (was: Grie Ka #2)
Re: mang(w)a (was: Grie Ka #2)
(41 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
my meat isn't fresh enough?
my meat isn't fresh enough?
(62 lines)
From:
christopher carter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my meat isn't fresh enough?
(116 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my meat isn't fresh enough?
(35 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my meat isn't fresh enough?
(47 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my meat isn't fresh enough?
(55 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my meat isn't fresh enough?
(47 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my meat isn't fresh enough?
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my meat isn't fresh enough?
(41 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my meat isn't fresh enough?
(62 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my meat isn't fresh enough?
(39 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
My new conlang
Re: My new conlang
(74 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
My new Conlang
Re: My new Conlang
(34 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Naming customs
Naming customs
(91 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming customs
(109 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02
Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02
(44 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02
(41 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02
(32 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02
(47 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02
(42 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02
(67 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02
(47 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02
(39 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02
(38 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02
(37 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG/FONT: the euro & 01.01.02
(41 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Negatives (Trentish, with adjective notes too) (was: Re: narethanaal)
Negatives (Trentish, with adjective notes too) (was: Re: narethanaal)
(119 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Negatives (Trentish, with adjective notes too) (was: Re: narethanaal)
(153 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Negatives (Trentish, with adjective notes too) (was: Re: narethanaal)
(42 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Negatives (Trentish, with adjective notes too) (was: Re: narethanaal)
(57 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Negatives (Trentish, with adjective notes too) (was: Re: narethanaal)
(51 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Negatives (Vyh)
Re: Negatives (Vyh)
(92 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
New/revised language: Phonology
New/revised language: Phonology
(68 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New/revised language: Phonology
(65 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New/revised language: Phonology
(93 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New/revised language: Phonology
(68 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New/revised language: Phonology
(41 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New/revised language: Phonology
(98 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New/revised language: Phonology
(40 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New/revised language: Phonology
(40 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New/revised language: Phonology
(39 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New/revised language: Phonology
(46 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New/revised language: Phonology
(81 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nomail
Nomail
(41 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nomail
(34 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Number in Trentish
Re: Number in Trentish
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Number in Trentish
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Number in Trentish
(36 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Number in Trentish
(51 lines)
From:
Talpas Tim <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Number in Trentish
(62 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT naming customs
OT naming customs
(49 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(74 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(36 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(42 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(45 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(49 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(40 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(34 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(38 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(46 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(57 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(35 lines)
From:
Cian Ross <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(74 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(44 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(42 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(53 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(48 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(43 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(54 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(79 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(45 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(33 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(37 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT naming customs
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(46 lines)
From:
Tony Hogard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(46 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(52 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(40 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(49 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(47 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(40 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(47 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT naming customs
(45 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT, by now Re: UM....hello???
Re: OT, by now Re: UM....hello???
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: baronies by writ
OT: baronies by writ
(79 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: baronies by writ
(41 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Nazque
OT: Nazque
(35 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Rant about degres Celsius (was: introduction) [Really?]
Re: OT: Rant about degres Celsius (was: introduction) [Really?]
(39 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Rant about degres Celsius (was: introduction) [Really?]
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Rant about degres Celsius (was: introduction) [Really?]
(39 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Rant about degres Celsius (was: introduction) [Really?]
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: San Remo 1961
OT: San Remo 1961
(35 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: San Remo 1961
(42 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Teleri (was: Lord of the Rings movie)
OT: Teleri (was: Lord of the Rings movie)
(36 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Teleri (was: Lord of the Rings movie)
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(41 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(52 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(66 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(47 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(56 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(44 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(42 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(39 lines)
From:
Damon M. Lord <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(56 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(51 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(51 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(47 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(54 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(41 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(56 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(36 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(69 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(37 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(71 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(48 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(34 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(45 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(66 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(40 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(60 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(41 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(40 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(31 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(29 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(39 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(41 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(41 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(34 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(36 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(46 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(64 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(57 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(31 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(34 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(56 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(72 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(64 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(37 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(76 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(68 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(94 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(43 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(40 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(61 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(35 lines)
From:
Talpas Tim <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(73 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(50 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(86 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(52 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(37 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(94 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(52 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(49 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(48 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(35 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(55 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(42 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(44 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(48 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(51 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(41 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phaleran Update: Arkhilokhos' _A Poet's Shield_
Re: Phaleran Update: Arkhilokhos' _A Poet's Shield_
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
pronouns
pronouns
(41 lines)
From:
christopher carter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Question on phonemes
Question on phonemes
(36 lines)
From:
Steve Kramer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rant on partial understandings (was: Spoken French, coins)
Rant on partial understandings (was: Spoken French, coins)
(122 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rant on partial understandings (was: Spoken French, coins)
(91 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rant on partial understandings (was: Spoken French, coins)
(56 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rant on partial understandings (was: Spoken French, coins)
(64 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rant on partial understandings (was: Spoken French, coins)
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rant on partial understandings (was: Spoken French, coins)
(69 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
relative weirdness (was Re: signal and noise ...)
Re: relative weirdness (was Re: signal and noise ...)
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative weirdness (was Re: signal and noise ...)
(45 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative weirdness (was Re: signal and noise ...)
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative weirdness (was Re: signal and noise ...)
(93 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative weirdness (was Re: signal and noise ...)
(55 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative weirdness (was Re: signal and noise ...)
(67 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Religious bigotry
Re: Religious bigotry
(62 lines)
From:
christopher carter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religious bigotry
(54 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Religious bigotry [was Re: Chris, Chris and Chris]
Religious bigotry [was Re: Chris, Chris and Chris]
(84 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Religious bigotry [was Re: Chris, Chris and Chris]
(115 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rohirric, Westron & Co. (was Re: Sindarin Stress?)
Re: Rohirric, Westron & Co. (was Re: Sindarin Stress?)
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Saloperie
Saloperie
(51 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
scientifictional lexicography
scientifictional lexicography
(26 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Season's greetings
Season's greetings
(34 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
(71 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
(65 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
So
Re: So
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
SolReSol
SolReSol
(38 lines)
From:
John Schilke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SolReSol
(42 lines)
From:
Tony Hogard <
[log in to unmask]
>
specialized numbers
specialized numbers
(30 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: specialized numbers
(52 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: specialized numbers
(44 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: specialized numbers
(85 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: specialized numbers
(48 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: specialized numbers
(55 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: specialized numbers
(45 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Spoken French, coins
Spoken French, coins
(52 lines)
From:
Matt M. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spoken French, coins
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spoken French, coins
(59 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Su's minimal language (was: Lord of the Rings movie)
Su's minimal language (was: Lord of the Rings movie)
(43 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Su's minimal language (was: Lord of the Rings movie)
(32 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Su's minimal language (was: Lord of the Rings movie)
(43 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Su's minimal language (was: Lord of the Rings movie)
(47 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Surfeit of Chris, Chris and Chris
Surfeit of Chris, Chris and Chris
(38 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Surfeit of Chris, Chris and Chris
(52 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Surfeit of Chris, Chris and Chris
(52 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
taliboo
taliboo
(29 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: taliboo
(46 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: taliboo
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: taliboo
(46 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: taliboo
(45 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: taliboo
(56 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: taliboo
(72 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: taliboo
(62 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
the English Beast, etc. (was Re: English syllable structure)
Re: the English Beast, etc. (was Re: English syllable structure)
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the English Beast, etc. (was Re: English syllable structure)
(51 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: English as a creole [was Re: Rant on partial understandings]
THEORY: English as a creole [was Re: Rant on partial understandings]
(73 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(52 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation challenge: GBS
Translation challenge: GBS
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: GBS
(62 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: GBS
(64 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: GBS
(46 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: GBS
(36 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: GBS
(40 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
UM....hello???
UM....hello???
(27 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: UM....hello???
(31 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology)
Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology)
(33 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology)
(64 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology)
(53 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology)
(63 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology)
(46 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology)
(49 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology)
(49 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology)
(37 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Unclear topic-changer words (was: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch (was RE: Grammatical Summary of Kemata))
Unclear topic-changer words (was: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch (was RE: Grammatical Summary of Kemata))
(56 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck, NZ too).
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck, NZ too).
(59 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck, NZ too).
(49 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck, NZ too).
(48 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck, NZ too).
(54 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck, NZ too).
(45 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck, NZ too).
(65 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck, NZ too).
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck, NZ too).
(46 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck, NZ too).
(57 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck, NZ too).
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck, NZ too).
(39 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck, NZ too).
(82 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck, NZ too).
(39 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck, NZ too).
(62 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck,NZ too).
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck,NZ too).
(60 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck,NZ too).
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck,NZ too).
(55 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck,NZ too).
(35 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck,NZ too).
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck,NZ too).
(50 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck,NZ too).
(35 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck,NZ too).
(49 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: German phonemic mergers [was Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.]
USAGE: German phonemic mergers [was Re: CHAT: Tacos et al.]
(71 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Translation challenge: GBS
USAGE: Translation challenge: GBS
(83 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vyh orthography, was: Negatives (Vyh)
Vyh orthography, was: Negatives (Vyh)
(47 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
What defines the case name?
What defines the case name?
(54 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What defines the case name?
(64 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What defines the case name?
(37 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What defines the case name?
(46 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What defines the case name?
(45 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What defines the case name?
(47 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
who speaks Quenya?
who speaks Quenya?
(63 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: who speaks Quenya?
(37 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: who speaks Quenya?
(52 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Wittgenstein on conlanging [was Re: relative weirdness]
Wittgenstein on conlanging [was Re: relative weirdness]
(126 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wittgenstein on conlanging [was Re: relative weirdness]
(189 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wittgenstein on conlanging [was Re: relative weirdness]
(108 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wittgenstein on conlanging [was Re: relative weirdness]
(54 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Work in progress - Phonology
Work in progress - Phonology
(115 lines)
From:
John-Emmanuel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Work in progress - Phonology
(92 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Work in progress - Phonology
(71 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Work in progress - Phonology
(68 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Work in progress - Phonology
(126 lines)
From:
John-Emmanuel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Work in progress - Phonology
(60 lines)
From:
John-Emmanuel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Work in progress - Phonology
(140 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Work in progress - Phonology
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Work in progress - Phonology
(42 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Work in progress - Phonology
(50 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU