Conlang
Mailing List December 2001, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"two be"
(10 messages)
<No subject>
A grammar of Friulian
(6 messages)
A Tip: Don't Play the Horses (was:CHAT: currency [was Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02])
(2 messages)
Active and Passive please help.
advice needed: making a dictionary
Arabic 'sura' (?)-- a question
As Is (was: Re: Concurrency)
(15 messages)
Basic lexicon
(8 messages)
CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(38 messages)
CHAT: conculture's value systems [was Re: Sexual terminology ]
CHAT: Creativity (was: Re: Phaleran homosexuality)
(3 messages)
CHAT: currency [was Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02]
(7 messages)
CHAT: Housinge (was: Translation challenge: GBS)
CHAT: prefecture, etc. [was Re: As Is]
CHAT: renaming oneself (was: Active and Passive please help.)
CHAT: Sexual proselytism
CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02
(10 messages)
CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(3 messages)
CHAT: totalitarianism [was Re: Sexual terminology]
(9 messages)
Christmas wishes
(3 messages)
Concurrency
(5 messages)
CONLANG Digest - 23 Dec 2001 to 24 Dec 2001 (#2001-357)
Eärendil, Isengard etc...
(3 messages)
English has 4 cases, not 3!
(8 messages)
English `as of' (was: Rant on partial understandings)
Esp to Mathias: Geocities page
(5 messages)
Excel for word generation
(2 messages)
finnish and japanese thru GMC
Going NOMAIL
Hi, I'm a new guy... not in the face!
(11 messages)
Ill Bethisad
(2 messages)
Merian H-4: Grammar and Phonology.
(10 messages)
more gay creativity
(2 messages)
Negatives (Trentish, with adjective notes too) (was: Re: narethanaal)
NGL: alt.language.artificial.ngl archives
NGL: was: Re: FAQ?
(6 messages)
NOMAIL
nomail
oalia
Oh well... (LoTR)
OT: Joe Hill
(7 messages)
OT: MAXEME'S-- the Linguist's Restaurant
(3 messages)
OT: Proto-Centum?
(3 messages)
OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:
(5 messages)
OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(33 messages)
OT:Dollars and Cents(was the euro & 01.01.02)
(2 messages)
Periodic Table in conlang
(14 messages)
Phaleran homosexuality
(14 messages)
Pronunciation of "Kayasanoda"
Proto-Germanic: Question
(3 messages)
Rant on partial understandings (was: Spoken French, coins)
(2 messages)
Season's greetings
Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
(11 messages)
Signing off
small feather in my cap
solstice (was Re: Translation challenge: GBS)
(2 messages)
specialized numbers
taliboo
THEORY: English as a creole [was Re: Rant on partial understandings]
(2 messages)
THEORY: English as a creole [was Re: Rant on partialunderstandings]
Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(5 messages)
Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(10 messages)
Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re:CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
Translation challenge: GBS
(3 messages)
two 'be's
(2 messages)
Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology)
Unaccusative...Unergative...Ergative...neep?
(2 messages)
USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck,NZ too).
(2 messages)
USAGE: Translation challenge: GBS
Vyh orthography, was: Negatives (Vyh)
Website For Silindion
whimsical conreligion? (was Re: Chris, Chris and Chris)
(3 messages)
X-X-SAMPA (Keeping the Standard)
(11 messages)
[CHAT] I need a favour...
"two be"
Re: "two be"
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "two be"
(67 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "two be"
(73 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "two be"
(81 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "two be"
(82 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "two be"
(33 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "two be"
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "two be"
(43 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "two be"
(58 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "two be"
(66 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
<No subject>
(57 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
A grammar of Friulian
A grammar of Friulian
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A grammar of Friulian
(57 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A grammar of Friulian
(51 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A grammar of Friulian
(57 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A grammar of Friulian
(38 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A grammar of Friulian
(59 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Tip: Don't Play the Horses (was:CHAT: currency [was Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02])
Re: A Tip: Don't Play the Horses (was:CHAT: currency [was Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02])
(102 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Tip: Don't Play the Horses (was:CHAT: currency [was Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02])
(126 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Active and Passive please help.
Re: Active and Passive please help.
(74 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
advice needed: making a dictionary
Re: advice needed: making a dictionary
(35 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Arabic 'sura' (?)-- a question
Re: Arabic 'sura' (?)-- a question
(46 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
As Is (was: Re: Concurrency)
As Is (was: Re: Concurrency)
(103 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: As Is (was: Re: Concurrency)
(44 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: As Is (was: Re: Concurrency)
(52 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: As Is (was: Re: Concurrency)
(46 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: As Is (was: Re: Concurrency)
(76 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: As Is (was: Re: Concurrency)
(42 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: As Is (was: Re: Concurrency)
(67 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: As Is (was: Re: Concurrency)
(42 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: As Is (was: Re: Concurrency)
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: As Is (was: Re: Concurrency)
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: As Is (was: Re: Concurrency)
(49 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: As Is (was: Re: Concurrency)
(37 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: As Is (was: Re: Concurrency)
(50 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: As Is (was: Re: Concurrency)
(38 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: As Is (was: Re: Concurrency)
(37 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Basic lexicon
Basic lexicon
(34 lines)
From:
The RipperDoc <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basic lexicon
(64 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basic lexicon
(38 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basic lexicon
(83 lines)
From:
Ciege Engine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basic lexicon
(65 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basic lexicon
(36 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basic lexicon
(30 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basic lexicon
(62 lines)
From:
The Gray Wizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(37 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(40 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(43 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(51 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(48 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(36 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(44 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(45 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(62 lines)
From:
Ciege Engine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(52 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(40 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(36 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(36 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(44 lines)
From:
Andrew Chaney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(50 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(132 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(33 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(47 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(54 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(47 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(36 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(42 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(43 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(46 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(45 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(47 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(99 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(47 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(45 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(33 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(37 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(40 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(45 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(37 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(52 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
(37 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: conculture's value systems [was Re: Sexual terminology ]
CHAT: conculture's value systems [was Re: Sexual terminology ]
(65 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Creativity (was: Re: Phaleran homosexuality)
CHAT: Creativity (was: Re: Phaleran homosexuality)
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Creativity (was: Re: Phaleran homosexuality)
(36 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Creativity (was: Re: Phaleran homosexuality)
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: currency [was Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02]
CHAT: currency [was Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02]
(67 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: currency [was Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02]
(68 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: currency [was Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02]
(76 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: currency [was Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02]
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: currency [was Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02]
(39 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: currency [was Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02]
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: currency [was Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02]
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Housinge (was: Translation challenge: GBS)
CHAT: Housinge (was: Translation challenge: GBS)
(36 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: prefecture, etc. [was Re: As Is]
CHAT: prefecture, etc. [was Re: As Is]
(51 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: renaming oneself (was: Active and Passive please help.)
Re: CHAT: renaming oneself (was: Active and Passive please help.)
(45 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Sexual proselytism
CHAT: Sexual proselytism
(37 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02
Re: CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02
(39 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02
(54 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02
(78 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02
(38 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02
(44 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02
(32 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02
(38 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02
(46 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(49 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(44 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(54 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: totalitarianism [was Re: Sexual terminology]
CHAT: totalitarianism [was Re: Sexual terminology]
(113 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: totalitarianism [was Re: Sexual terminology]
(38 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: totalitarianism [was Re: Sexual terminology]
(62 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: totalitarianism [was Re: Sexual terminology]
(39 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: CHAT: totalitarianism [was Re: Sexual terminology]
(88 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: totalitarianism [was Re: Sexual terminology]
(52 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: totalitarianism [was Re: Sexual terminology]
(60 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: totalitarianism [was Re: Sexual terminology]
(52 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: totalitarianism [was Re: Sexual terminology]
(85 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Christmas wishes
Christmas wishes
(35 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Christmas wishes
(75 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Christmas wishes
(55 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Concurrency
Concurrency
(46 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concurrency
(69 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concurrency
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concurrency
(69 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concurrency
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 23 Dec 2001 to 24 Dec 2001 (#2001-357)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 23 Dec 2001 to 24 Dec 2001 (#2001-357)
(48 lines)
From:
Matt McLauchlin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Eärendil, Isengard etc...
Re: Eärendil, Isengard etc...
(37 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eärendil, Isengard etc...
(35 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eärendil, Isengard etc...
(57 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
English has 4 cases, not 3!
English has 4 cases, not 3!
(68 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English has 4 cases, not 3!
(42 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English has 4 cases, not 3!
(68 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English has 4 cases, not 3!
(55 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English has 4 cases, not 3!
(47 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English has 4 cases, not 3!
(46 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English has 4 cases, not 3!
(48 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English has 4 cases, not 3!
(57 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
English `as of' (was: Rant on partial understandings)
English `as of' (was: Rant on partial understandings)
(55 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Esp to Mathias: Geocities page
Re: Esp to Mathias: Geocities page
(48 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Esp to Mathias: Geocities page
(50 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Esp to Mathias: Geocities page
(40 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Esp to Mathias: Geocities page
(46 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Esp to Mathias: Geocities page
(46 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Excel for word generation
Excel for word generation
(43 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Excel for word generation
(55 lines)
From:
John-Emmanuel <
[log in to unmask]
>
finnish and japanese thru GMC
finnish and japanese thru GMC
(77 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going NOMAIL
Going NOMAIL
(30 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hi, I'm a new guy... not in the face!
Hi, I'm a new guy... not in the face!
(72 lines)
From:
Hiro M. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hi, I'm a new guy... not in the face!
(86 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hi, I'm a new guy... not in the face!
(94 lines)
From:
Heather Rice <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hi, I'm a new guy... not in the face!
(82 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hi, I'm a new guy... not in the face!
(73 lines)
From:
Hiro M. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hi, I'm a new guy... not in the face!
(85 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hi, I'm a new guy... not in the face!
(39 lines)
From:
Cheng Zhong Su <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hi, I'm a new guy... not in the face!
(34 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hi, I'm a new guy... not in the face!
(40 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hi, I'm a new guy... not in the face!
(95 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hi, I'm a new guy... not in the face!
(41 lines)
From:
Hiro M. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ill Bethisad
Ill Bethisad
(27 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ill Bethisad
(45 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Merian H-4: Grammar and Phonology.
Merian H-4: Grammar and Phonology.
(123 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Merian H-4: Grammar and Phonology.
(226 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Merian H-4: Grammar and Phonology.
(57 lines)
From:
Talpas Tim <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Merian H-4: Grammar and Phonology.
(71 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Merian H-4: Grammar and Phonology.
(238 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Merian H-4: Grammar and Phonology.
(68 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Merian H-4: Grammar and Phonology.
(61 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Merian H-4: Grammar and Phonology.
(106 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Merian H-4: Grammar and Phonology.
(96 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Merian H-4: Grammar and Phonology.
(148 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
more gay creativity
more gay creativity
(37 lines)
From:
Matt M. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: more gay creativity
(34 lines)
From:
Ciege Engine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Negatives (Trentish, with adjective notes too) (was: Re: narethanaal)
Re: Negatives (Trentish, with adjective notes too) (was: Re: narethanaal)
(87 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
NGL: alt.language.artificial.ngl archives
NGL: alt.language.artificial.ngl archives
(32 lines)
From:
Mia Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
NGL: was: Re: FAQ?
NGL: was: Re: FAQ?
(35 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NGL: was: Re: FAQ?
(68 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NGL: was: Re: FAQ?
(55 lines)
From:
The Keenans <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NGL: was: Re: FAQ?
(52 lines)
From:
Mia Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NGL: was: Re: FAQ?
(68 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NGL: was: Re: FAQ?
(48 lines)
From:
Mia Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
NOMAIL
NOMAIL
(35 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
nomail
nomail
(27 lines)
From:
Yoon Ha Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
oalia
oalia
(55 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Oh well... (LoTR)
Oh well... (LoTR)
(50 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Joe Hill
OT: Joe Hill
(50 lines)
From:
The Gray Wizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Joe Hill
(49 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Joe Hill
(80 lines)
From:
The Gray Wizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Joe Hill
(33 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Joe Hill
(71 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Joe Hill
(69 lines)
From:
The Gray Wizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Joe Hill
(43 lines)
From:
Tony Hogard <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: MAXEME'S-- the Linguist's Restaurant
OT: MAXEME'S-- the Linguist's Restaurant
(76 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: MAXEME'S-- the Linguist's Restaurant
(38 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: MAXEME'S-- the Linguist's Restaurant
(47 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Proto-Centum?
OT: Proto-Centum?
(55 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Proto-Centum?
(34 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Proto-Centum?
(104 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:
(104 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:
(40 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:
(36 lines)
From:
David Starner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(53 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(51 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(50 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(37 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(45 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(40 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(37 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(61 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(68 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(36 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(39 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(61 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(42 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(54 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(60 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(46 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(52 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(61 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(39 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(35 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(46 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(48 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(29 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(44 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(39 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(50 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(34 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(34 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(38 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(38 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:)
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT:Dollars and Cents(was the euro & 01.01.02)
Re: OT:Dollars and Cents(was the euro & 01.01.02)
(116 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT:Dollars and Cents(was the euro & 01.01.02)
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Periodic Table in conlang
Periodic Table in conlang
(94 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Periodic Table in conlang
(52 lines)
From:
laokou <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Periodic Table in conlang
(36 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Periodic Table in conlang
(49 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Periodic Table in conlang
(96 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Periodic Table in conlang
(43 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Periodic Table in conlang
(36 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Periodic Table in conlang
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Periodic Table in conlang
(54 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Periodic Table in conlang
(45 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Periodic Table in conlang
(54 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Periodic Table in conlang
(46 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Periodic Table in conlang
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Periodic Table in conlang
(83 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phaleran homosexuality
Phaleran homosexuality
(53 lines)
From:
christopher carter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phaleran homosexuality
(62 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phaleran homosexuality
(42 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phaleran homosexuality
(47 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phaleran homosexuality
(42 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phaleran homosexuality
(47 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phaleran homosexuality
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phaleran homosexuality
(63 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phaleran homosexuality
(46 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phaleran homosexuality
(33 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phaleran homosexuality
(52 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phaleran homosexuality
(35 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phaleran homosexuality
(32 lines)
From:
Ciege Engine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phaleran homosexuality
(34 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Pronunciation of "Kayasanoda"
Pronunciation of "Kayasanoda"
(38 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Proto-Germanic: Question
Proto-Germanic: Question
(55 lines)
From:
Joe Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proto-Germanic: Question
(89 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proto-Germanic: Question
(41 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rant on partial understandings (was: Spoken French, coins)
Rant on partial understandings (was: Spoken French, coins)
(99 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rant on partial understandings (was: Spoken French, coins)
(56 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Season's greetings
Season's greetings
(53 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
(88 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
(51 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
(65 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
(101 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
(54 lines)
From:
Steve Kramer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
(81 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
(52 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
(63 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
(34 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Signing off
Signing off
(30 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
small feather in my cap
small feather in my cap
(52 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
solstice (was Re: Translation challenge: GBS)
solstice (was Re: Translation challenge: GBS)
(51 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: solstice (was Re: Translation challenge: GBS)
(34 lines)
From:
Jim Hopkins <
[log in to unmask]
>
specialized numbers
Re: specialized numbers
(43 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
taliboo
Re: taliboo
(67 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: English as a creole [was Re: Rant on partial understandings]
Re: THEORY: English as a creole [was Re: Rant on partial understandings]
(63 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: English as a creole [was Re: Rant on partial understandings]
(50 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: English as a creole [was Re: Rant on partialunderstandings]
Re: THEORY: English as a creole [was Re: Rant on partialunderstandings]
(39 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(68 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(47 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(59 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(61 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(59 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(46 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(46 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(40 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(41 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(64 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(55 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(55 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(70 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(51 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re:CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re:CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
(45 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation challenge: GBS
Re: Translation challenge: GBS
(57 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: GBS
(60 lines)
From:
Almaran Dungeonmaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: GBS
(86 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
two 'be's
Re: two 'be's
(47 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: two 'be's
(69 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology)
Re: Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology)
(43 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Unaccusative...Unergative...Ergative...neep?
Unaccusative...Unergative...Ergative...neep?
(29 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unaccusative...Unergative...Ergative...neep?
(40 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck,NZ too).
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck,NZ too).
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -i/yse vs -i/yze in England (and what the heck,NZ too).
(39 lines)
From:
Aquamarine Demon <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Translation challenge: GBS
Re: USAGE: Translation challenge: GBS
(79 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vyh orthography, was: Negatives (Vyh)
Re: Vyh orthography, was: Negatives (Vyh)
(200 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Website For Silindion
Website For Silindion
(27 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
whimsical conreligion? (was Re: Chris, Chris and Chris)
whimsical conreligion? (was Re: Chris, Chris and Chris)
(61 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: whimsical conreligion? (was Re: Chris, Chris and Chris)
(75 lines)
From:
SuomenkieliMaa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: whimsical conreligion? (was Re: Chris, Chris and Chris)
(48 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
X-X-SAMPA (Keeping the Standard)
X-X-SAMPA (Keeping the Standard)
(56 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-X-SAMPA (Keeping the Standard)
(55 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-X-SAMPA (Keeping the Standard)
(55 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-X-SAMPA (Keeping the Standard)
(67 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-X-SAMPA (Keeping the Standard)
(33 lines)
From:
Anton Sherwood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-X-SAMPA (Keeping the Standard)
(42 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-X-SAMPA (Keeping the Standard)
(53 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-X-SAMPA (Keeping the Standard)
(52 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-X-SAMPA (Keeping the Standard)
(50 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-X-SAMPA (Keeping the Standard)
(37 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-X-SAMPA (Keeping the Standard)
(52 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
[CHAT] I need a favour...
[CHAT] I need a favour...
(38 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU