Conlang Mailing List – December 2001, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "two be" (22 messages)
• Basic lexicon (4 messages)
• C'est Chic (was: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages) (2 messages)
• CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR (2 messages)
• Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (31 messages)
• English has 4 cases, not 3! (10 messages)
• Fwd: Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
• Fwd: Re: Translation challenge: GBS
• Fwd: Re: Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology)
• German "ch" (was: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages)
• German aus- etc. (2 messages)
• Going nomail
• Intro and other (12 messages)
• Is "The Secret Vice" Online? (2 messages)
• Merian H-4: Grammar and Phonology. (2 messages)
• OT: MAXEME'S-- the Linguist's Restaurant
• OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:
• Periodic Table in conlang
• Phaleran homosexuality
• PIE (5 messages)
• Proto-Germanic: Question
• Roots of English (Was: Intro and other) (6 messages)
• Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch] (6 messages)
• Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
• Translation challenge: GBS
• Virus Alert???
• Virus alert???
• Virus Alert???
• Voice in German, was: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages

1. "two be"
   • Re: "two be" (69 lines)
     From: nicole dobrowolski <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (121 lines)
     From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (51 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (60 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (39 lines)
     From: nicole dobrowolski <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (40 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (48 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (30 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (45 lines)
     From: Steven W. Lytle <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (42 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (41 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (32 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (38 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (46 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (48 lines)
     From: Joe Hill <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (44 lines)
     From: Joe Hill <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (50 lines)
     From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (43 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (43 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (61 lines)
     From: Joe Hill <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (65 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "two be" (32 lines)
     From: jogloran <[log in to unmask]>

2. Basic lexicon
   • Re: Basic lexicon (82 lines)
     From: Kala Tunu <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Basic lexicon (60 lines)
     From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Basic lexicon (59 lines)
     From: The Gray Wizard <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Basic lexicon (49 lines)
     From: Anton Sherwood <[log in to unmask]>

3. C'est Chic (was: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages)
   • Re: C'est Chic (was: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages) (51 lines)
     From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: C'est Chic (was: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages) (51 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>

4. CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR
   • Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR (53 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR (75 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

5. Con-Alphabets & Real Languages
   • Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (52 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (36 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (50 lines)
     From: nicole dobrowolski <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (56 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (54 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (39 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (44 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (45 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (37 lines)
     From: jogloran <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (51 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (88 lines)
     From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
   • Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (46 lines)
     From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (69 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (43 lines)
     From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (48 lines)
     From: Anton Sherwood <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (77 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (50 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (66 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (48 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (42 lines)
     From: nicole dobrowolski <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (52 lines)
     From: Steven W. Lytle <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (58 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (49 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (55 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (59 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (169 lines)
     From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (63 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (37 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (63 lines)
     From: nicole dobrowolski <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (75 lines)
     From: nicole dobrowolski <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (55 lines)
     From: Matthew Kehrt <[log in to unmask]>

6. English has 4 cases, not 3!
   • Re: English has 4 cases, not 3! (42 lines)
     From: Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English has 4 cases, not 3! (35 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English has 4 cases, not 3! (49 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English has 4 cases, not 3! (81 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English has 4 cases, not 3! (37 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English has 4 cases, not 3! (47 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English has 4 cases, not 3! (61 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English has 4 cases, not 3! (68 lines)
     From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English has 4 cases, not 3! (64 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English has 4 cases, not 3! (66 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

7. Fwd: Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
   • Fwd: Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch] (156 lines)
     From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>

8. Fwd: Re: Translation challenge: GBS
   • Fwd: Re: Translation challenge: GBS (110 lines)
     From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>

9. Fwd: Re: Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology)
   • Fwd: Re: Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology) (186 lines)
     From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>

10. German "ch" (was: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages)
    • Re: German "ch" (was: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages) (60 lines)
      From: laokou <[log in to unmask]>

11. German aus- etc.
    • German aus- etc. (60 lines)
      From: Steven W. Lytle <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: German aus- etc. (59 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

12. Going nomail
    • Going nomail (37 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>

13. Intro and other
    • Intro and other (51 lines)
      From: Gregory Gadow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Intro and other (50 lines)
      From: Almaran Dungeonmaster <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Intro and other (48 lines)
      From: Gregory Gadow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Intro and other (41 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Intro and other (46 lines)
      From: Joe Hill <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Intro and other (59 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Intro and other (44 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Intro and other (53 lines)
      From: Joe Hill <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Intro and other (77 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Intro and other (43 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Intro and other (58 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Intro and other (41 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>

14. Is "The Secret Vice" Online?
    • Is "The Secret Vice" Online? (32 lines)
      From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is "The Secret Vice" Online? (33 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

15. Merian H-4: Grammar and Phonology.
    • Re: Merian H-4: Grammar and Phonology. (145 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Merian H-4: Grammar and Phonology. (146 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

16. OT: MAXEME'S-- the Linguist's Restaurant
    • Re: OT: MAXEME'S-- the Linguist's Restaurant (54 lines)
      From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>

17. OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT:
    • Re: OT: the euro & 01.01.02 (was NATLANG/FONT: (49 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>

18. Periodic Table in conlang
    • Re: Periodic Table in conlang (97 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>

19. Phaleran homosexuality
    • Re: Phaleran homosexuality (40 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

20. PIE
    • PIE (54 lines)
      From: Joe Hill <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: PIE (37 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: PIE (42 lines)
      From: Joe Hill <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: PIE (54 lines)
      From: Joe Hill <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: PIE (37 lines)
      From: jogloran <[log in to unmask]>

21. Proto-Germanic: Question
    • Re: Proto-Germanic: Question (94 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>

22. Roots of English (Was: Intro and other)
    • Roots of English (Was: Intro and other) (63 lines)
      From: Gregory Gadow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Roots of English (Was: Intro and other) (48 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Roots of English (Was: Intro and other) (84 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Roots of English (Was: Intro and other) (100 lines)
      From: Joe Hill <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Roots of English (Was: Intro and other) (34 lines)
      From: Anton Sherwood <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Roots of English (Was: Intro and other) (46 lines)
      From: Gregory Gadow <[log in to unmask]>

23. Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]
    • Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch] (108 lines)
      From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch] (52 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch] (67 lines)
      From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch] (39 lines)
      From: jogloran <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch] (54 lines)
      From: SuomenkieliMaa <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch] (33 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>

24. Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR]
    • Re: Tolkienian conlangs in the movie [was Re: CHAT:Best/Worst/Missing Scenes in LotR] (59 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

25. Translation challenge: GBS
    • Re: Translation challenge: GBS (37 lines)
      From: jogloran <[log in to unmask]>

26. Virus Alert???
    • Virus Alert??? (28 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

27. Virus alert???
    • Re: Virus alert??? (26 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

28. Virus Alert???
    • Re: Virus Alert??? (39 lines)
      From: Fabian <[log in to unmask]>

29. Voice in German, was: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages
    • Voice in German, was: Con-Alphabets & Real Languages (45 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>