Conlang Mailing List – March 2002, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "Essiness, Ishiness, Veeiness, Aitchiness & /X/"
• "Essiness, Ishiness, Veeiness, Aitchiness & /X/" (was: none) (10 messages)
• /y/ WASRe: David P's "month" (was: Poll by Email No. 3)
• /zIx/, not /zix/!
• <No subject given>
• a core grammar based on 20 questions (2 messages)
• A question about language-naming (4 messages)
• A unique opportunity
• Accusative? The saga continues ... (7 messages)
• Alas, poor Telona (was: Lighting Some Flames)
• All Praise the Fount of All Knowledge! was Re: Lighting Some
• All Praise the Fount of All Knowledge! was Re: Lighting Some Flames (3 messages)
• An interesting link that I happened across
• An interesting link that I heppened across (2 messages)
• Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!) (16 messages)
• Art and hobby--Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry
• Arvorec (WAS: Translation Exercise) (6 messages)
• Babel Text in Obrenje (9 messages)
• bamboobird
• BBC TV series (2 messages)
• Better or Worse (was: Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry ) (2 messages)
• Brittonic dragons.
• Changing again... (3 messages)
• CHAT: bonfire ;) (was Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry)
• CHAT: Must Needs? (WAS: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry)
• CHAT: nuclear Re: "Usefull languages"
• chi
• Class and case (5 messages)
• conlang no longer? (6 messages)
• Conlangs in Movies: Time Machine
• Correction
• Cyrillic in email WASRe: Translation Exercise: Vozgian
• Data compression, was RE: Spanish education (2 messages)
• David P's "month" (was: Poll by Email No. 3) (11 messages)
• Dirk's Signature (WAS:Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry) (2 messages)
• DISC: phonological system of Adain (10 messages)
• Exotic? [Non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active]
• Fire Hydrant for the Flames (10 messages)
• Further comments on Kawakami
• Fwd: BBC TV series
• Fwd: Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan)
• Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200210
• Harry was Re: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan)
• Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (21 messages)
• Hello to you all! (12 messages)
• Help from a Russian speaker, please? (4 messages)
• Help with Greek
• Help with Greek was Re: Babel Text in Obrenje (8 messages)
• Help with US SW langs + new lang (5 messages)
• Idoru (13 messages)
• Inchoactive in Jpn? (was: "Anticipatory" Tense) (9 messages)
• Introduction and a few novice questions (10 messages)
• Introduction to Jovian (Comments, anyone?) (6 messages)
• Irish Pronunciation - Sligo's Connamara/Ulster mix (Was: RE: Viru s Translation Exercise) (2 messages)
• Irish Pronunciation - Sligo's Connamara/Ulster mix (Was: RE: Virus Translation Exercise)
• JINSEI WA GEIJUTSU DE ARU (was: Getting started with a newborn lang) (2 messages)
• JPN final "ga" (was: Getting started with a newborn lang) (5 messages)
• korean
• Language resource for french speakers (2 messages)
• Lashkos lexicon opened
• Latin question: "titillandus" (6 messages)
• Lighting Some Flames towards conlang artistry (2 messages)
• Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (50 messages)
• linguistic schools (2 messages)
• Missing the sky (11 messages)
• Missing Words (9 messages)
• My New Project: Chromic
• My personal project (6 messages)
• Non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active (4 messages)
• non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active ... (12 messages)
• One very dead computer (2 messages)
• Original language naming and Kayasanoda progress
• OT (partly): root vs. limma, GeoSh!tties and IE written in Hangul?
• OT: Japanese spirit writing (4 messages)
• OT: Still alive
• OT: The KJV Bible (was: Help with Greek was Re: Babel Text in
• OT: The KJV Bible (was: Help with Greek was Re: Babel Text in Obrenje)
• OT: Tolkien
• P.S.: Yivrindil (4 messages)
• Poll by Email No. 4 (4 messages)
• proposed conlang database (7 messages)
• Punctuation (was Re: Lighting Some Flames....) (3 messages)
• Results of Poll by Email No. 3
• Rubbers (was: Spanish education)
• RWG url?
• Shadoks (WAS Re: A quick new projec) (4 messages)
• Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan)
• some stewpid questions (9 messages)
• something new from me (Mogora)
• Spanish education (10 messages)
• Subject headers are the solution (and: be careful with quotes!)
• Subject headers are the solution (or are they?)
• Subject headers are the solution [was: Fire Hydrant for the Flames] (2 messages)
• Teach Yours Elf Kamakawi 5
• test
• Thanks! -- also, Classes and Cases.
• Translation Exercise: (9 messages)
• Translation Exercise: (*Muke!'s rendition)
• Translation Exercise: Vozgian (11 messages)
• Translation Exercises: Sturnan and Lashkos
• Uk-Ugh (was: A quick new project) (5 messages)
• Verb Mood questions.
• Virus Translation Exercise
• Web page updated
• What is ergative? (3 messages)
• Where's the conlang ethnologue? (2 messages)
• WOT (Way Off Topic)/HUMOUR: Oolong the Rabbit (3 messages)
• WWWOT [DISC] Is Language Creation Art?
• yet another new conlang (2 messages)
• yet another new conlang; a terminology question (kinda long) (2 messages)
• [CHAT] Bay Area Conlangers
• [conlang] Digest Number 1395
• [DISC] Is Language Creation Art? (7 messages)
• [Medially OT] Architecture and conlanging (was Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry)
• [OffTopic] All Praise the Fount of All Knowledge!
• [SEARCH] PIE roots anywhere?
• [y] in English (was: David P's "month") (2 messages)

1. "Essiness, Ishiness, Veeiness, Aitchiness & /X/"
   • Re: "Essiness, Ishiness, Veeiness, Aitchiness & /X/" (46 lines)
     From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 08:33:09 -0000

2. "Essiness, Ishiness, Veeiness, Aitchiness & /X/" (was: none)
   • "Essiness, Ishiness, Veeiness, Aitchiness & /X/" (was: none) (82 lines)
     From: M.E.S. <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 03:29:05 -0800
   • Re: "Essiness, Ishiness, Veeiness, Aitchiness & /X/" (was: none) (51 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:05:48 +0100
   • Re: "Essiness, Ishiness, Veeiness, Aitchiness & /X/" (was: none) (32 lines)
     From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 08:50:34 -0800
   • Re: "Essiness, Ishiness, Veeiness, Aitchiness & /X/" (was: none) (42 lines)
     From: Talpas Tim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 10:10:21 -0700
   • Re: "Essiness, Ishiness, Veeiness, Aitchiness & /X/" (was: none) (59 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:20:32 -0500
   • Re: "Essiness, Ishiness, Veeiness, Aitchiness & /X/" (was: none) (41 lines)
     From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:52:02 -0800
   • Re: "Essiness, Ishiness, Veeiness, Aitchiness & /X/" (was: none) (56 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 21:24:52 +0100
   • Re: "Essiness, Ishiness, Veeiness, Aitchiness & /X/" (was: none) (43 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 21:33:47 +0100
   • Re: "Essiness, Ishiness, Veeiness, Aitchiness & /X/" (was: none) (69 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 16:09:23 -0500
   • Re: "Essiness, Ishiness, Veeiness, Aitchiness & /X/" (was: none) (66 lines)
     From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 07:14:54 +0000

3. /y/ WASRe: David P's "month" (was: Poll by Email No. 3)
   • /y/ WASRe: David P's "month" (was: Poll by Email No. 3) (59 lines)
     From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:50:52 -0800

4. /zIx/, not /zix/!
   • /zIx/, not /zix/! (46 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 21:47:20 +0100

5. <No subject given>
   • Re: <No subject given> (38 lines)
     From: Aquamarine Demon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 13:12:17 -0800

6. a core grammar based on 20 questions
   • a core grammar based on 20 questions (55 lines)
     From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:35:07 -0800
   • Re: a core grammar based on 20 questions (37 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 06:30:00 -0500

7. A question about language-naming
   • A question about language-naming (59 lines)
     From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:15:24 +0000
   • Re: A question about language-naming (66 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 14:41:16 +0100
   • Re: A question about language-naming (53 lines)
     From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 09:12:16 -0500
   • Re: A question about language-naming (71 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:10:39 +0100

8. A unique opportunity
   • A unique opportunity (72 lines)
     From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 12:07:16 -0800

9. Accusative? The saga continues ...
   • Accusative? The saga continues ... (49 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 15:05:07 -0500
   • Re: Accusative? The saga continues ... (57 lines)
     From: Talpas Tim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 15:01:50 -0700
   • Re: Accusative? The saga continues ... (84 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 12:56:06 -0500
   • Re: Accusative? The saga continues ... (47 lines)
     From: Talpas Tim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:53:26 -0700
   • Re: Accusative? The saga continues ... (69 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:46:53 -0500
   • Re: Accusative? The saga continues ... (73 lines)
     From: Talpas Tim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 12:38:13 -0700
   • Re: Accusative? The saga continues ... (67 lines)
     From: GrayWizard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:21:04 -0500

10. Alas, poor Telona (was: Lighting Some Flames)
    • Alas, poor Telona (was: Lighting Some Flames) (49 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:41:02 -0000

11. All Praise the Fount of All Knowledge! was Re: Lighting Some
    • Re: All Praise the Fount of All Knowledge! was Re: Lighting Some (41 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:01:50 -0500

12. All Praise the Fount of All Knowledge! was Re: Lighting Some Flames
    • All Praise the Fount of All Knowledge! was Re: Lighting Some Flames (77 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:20:29 -0600
    • Re: All Praise the Fount of All Knowledge! was Re: Lighting Some Flames (53 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:48:56 -0000
    • Re: All Praise the Fount of All Knowledge! was Re: Lighting Some Flames (45 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 21:53:50 +0100

13. An interesting link that I happened across
    • Re: An interesting link that I happened across (36 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 16:09:46 -0800

14. An interesting link that I heppened across
    • An interesting link that I heppened across (46 lines)
      From: GrayWizard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 17:25:12 -0500
    • Re: An interesting link that I heppened across (44 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 23:47:38 +0100

15. Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!)
    • Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!) (86 lines)
      From: M.E.S. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 04:01:14 -0800
    • Re: Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!) (64 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:49:07 -0800
    • Re: Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!) (56 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 12:04:50 +0100
    • Re: Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!) (41 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 14:13:09 -0000
    • Re: Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!) (64 lines)
      From: Karapcik, Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:12:43 -0500
    • Re: Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!) (49 lines)
      From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:21:37 -0500
    • Re: Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!) (44 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:40:13 -0000
    • Re: Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!) (45 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:52:35 -0000
    • Re: Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!) (58 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 22:49:17 +0100
    • Re: Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!) (54 lines)
      From: Karapcik, Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:56:55 -0500
    • Re: Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!) (50 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 01:29:38 +0100
    • Re: Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!) (69 lines)
      From: Karapcik, Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 22:22:04 -0500
    • Re: Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!) (103 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 12:14:57 +0100
    • Re: Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!) (53 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 22:15:36 +0000
    • Re: Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!) (38 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:53:44 -0000
    • Re: Apologetic for accent in English?! (was: Hello to you all!) (42 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 10:34:35 -0500

16. Art and hobby--Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry
    • Art and hobby--Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (50 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 11:43:21 -0800

17. Arvorec (WAS: Translation Exercise)
    • Re: Arvorec (WAS: Translation Exercise) (58 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 02:14:52 EST
    • Re: Arvorec (WAS: Translation Exercise) (52 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:27:41 -0500
    • Re: Arvorec (WAS: Translation Exercise) (73 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 01:08:28 +0000
    • Re: Arvorec (WAS: Translation Exercise) (37 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 01:20:49 +0000
    • Re: Arvorec (WAS: Translation Exercise) (76 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 21:06:20 EST
    • Re: Arvorec (WAS: Translation Exercise) (45 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 21:16:25 -0500

18. Babel Text in Obrenje
    • Babel Text in Obrenje (194 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 22:52:31 +0100
    • Re: Babel Text in Obrenje (51 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 23:07:31 +0100
    • Re: Babel Text in Obrenje (32 lines)
      From: Jesse Raccio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 19:58:15 -0800
    • Re: Babel Text in Obrenje (40 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 23:11:01 -0500
    • Re: Babel Text in Obrenje (42 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:54:26 -0500
    • Re: Babel Text in Obrenje (68 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:56:09 -0500
    • Re: Babel Text in Obrenje (45 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 21:55:04 +0000
    • Re: Babel Text in Obrenje (37 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 22:39:18 -0500
    • Re: Babel Text in Obrenje (46 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:38:42 -0800

19. bamboobird
    • bamboobird (90 lines)
      From: Kala Tunu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:47:51 +0100

20. BBC TV series
    • BBC TV series (44 lines)
      From: Tom Collinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:31:59 -0500
    • BBC TV series (47 lines)
      From: James Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:18:14 -0000

21. Better or Worse (was: Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry )
    • Better or Worse (was: Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry ) (52 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:47:24 -0500
    • Re: Better or Worse (was: Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry ) (59 lines)
      From: William Annis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:01:06 -0600

22. Brittonic dragons.
    • Brittonic dragons. (98 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 07:14:54 +0000

23. Changing again...
    • Changing again... (44 lines)
      From: Pablo David Flores <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:29:38 -0300
    • Re: Changing again... (38 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 15:32:54 -0800
    • Re: Changing again... (56 lines)
      From: Antonio WARD <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 15:18:10 +0100

24. CHAT: bonfire ;) (was Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry)
    • CHAT: bonfire ;) (was Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry) (148 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 22:30:03 EST

25. CHAT: Must Needs? (WAS: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry)
    • CHAT: Must Needs? (WAS: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry) (55 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:40:43 EST

26. CHAT: nuclear Re: "Usefull languages"
    • Re: CHAT: nuclear Re: "Usefull languages" (45 lines)
      From: Aquamarine Demon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 10:52:48 -0800

27. chi
    • chi (33 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 15:42:28 -0500

28. Class and case
    • Class and case (28 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:22:27 -0800
    • Re: Class and case (35 lines)
      From: Talpas Tim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:59:00 -0700
    • Re: Class and case (45 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 21:47:19 +0100
    • Re: Class and case (79 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 22:02:36 -0600
    • Re: Class and case (41 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 22:29:27 -0600

29. conlang no longer?
    • conlang no longer? (21 lines)
      From: Andrew Strader <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:10:46 -0500
    • Re: conlang no longer? (72 lines)
      From: Karapcik, Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:58:27 -0500
    • Re: conlang no longer? (48 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 16:58:03 -0500
    • Re: conlang no longer? (56 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 23:33:06 +0100
    • Re: conlang no longer? (40 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 21:02:16 -0500
    • Re: conlang no longer? (52 lines)
      From: Christian Koettl <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 08:21:17 -0500

30. Conlangs in Movies: Time Machine
    • Conlangs in Movies: Time Machine (35 lines)
      From: Thomas Leigh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 14:43:36 -0500

31. Correction
    • Correction (34 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 22:09:31 EST

32. Cyrillic in email WASRe: Translation Exercise: Vozgian
    • Cyrillic in email WASRe: Translation Exercise: Vozgian (57 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:41:43 -0800

33. Data compression, was RE: Spanish education
    • Data compression, was RE: Spanish education (73 lines)
      From: Karapcik, Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 13:57:33 -0500
    • Re: Data compression, was RE: Spanish education (46 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:32:28 -0500

34. David P's "month" (was: Poll by Email No. 3)
    • Re: David P's "month" (was: Poll by Email No. 3) (55 lines)
      From: M.E.S. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 04:25:24 -0800
    • Re: David P's "month" (was: Poll by Email No. 3) (58 lines)
      From: M.E.S. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 04:30:36 -0800
    • Re: David P's "month" (was: Poll by Email No. 3) (49 lines)
      From: M.E.S. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 04:33:37 -0800
    • Re: David P's "month" (was: Poll by Email No. 3) (35 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 15:48:53 EST
    • Re: David P's "month" (was: Poll by Email No. 3) (50 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 17:09:30 -0500
    • Re: David P's "month" (was: Poll by Email No. 3) (48 lines)
      From: M.E.S. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 00:11:31 -0800
    • Re: David P's "month" (was: Poll by Email No. 3) (35 lines)
      From: Aquamarine Demon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 12:15:15 -0800
    • Re: David P's "month" (was: Poll by Email No. 3) (51 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 21:22:51 EST
    • Re: David P's "month" (was: Poll by Email No. 3) (60 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 06:23:38 +0100
    • Re: David P's "month" (was: Poll by Email No. 3) (46 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 01:07:43 -0500
    • Re: David P's "month" (was: Poll by Email No. 3) (37 lines)
      From: Matthew Bladen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 19:00:50 +0000

35. Dirk's Signature (WAS:Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry)
    • Re: Dirk's Signature (WAS:Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry) (56 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 16:41:15 EST
    • Re: Dirk's Signature (WAS:Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry) (60 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 15:04:06 -0700

36. DISC: phonological system of Adain
    • DISC: phonological system of Adain (111 lines)
      From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:50:46 -0500
    • Re: DISC: phonological system of Adain (62 lines)
      From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 16:07:05 -0500
    • Re: DISC: phonological system of Adain (131 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:09:57 -0700
    • Re: DISC: phonological system of Adain (60 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:20:10 -0700
    • Re: DISC: phonological system of Adain (39 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 17:44:15 -0500
    • Re: DISC: phonological system of Adain (36 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 17:54:20 -0500
    • Re: DISC: phonological system of Adain (65 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 16:45:43 -0700
    • Re: DISC: phonological system of Adain (222 lines)
      From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:26:18 -0500
    • Re: DISC: phonological system of Adain (54 lines)
      From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:32:18 -0500
    • Re: DISC: phonological system of Adain (41 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 23:08:08 -0500

37. Exotic? [Non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active]
    • Exotic? [Non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active] (44 lines)
      From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:09:24 -0800

38. Fire Hydrant for the Flames
    • Fire Hydrant for the Flames (103 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:59:17 -0600
    • Re: Fire Hydrant for the Flames (72 lines)
      From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:08:39 -0500
    • Re: Fire Hydrant for the Flames (50 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:58:25 EST
    • Re: Fire Hydrant for the Flames (56 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:02:25 -0600
    • Re: Fire Hydrant for the Flames (32 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 07:43:39 -0500
    • Re: Fire Hydrant for the Flames (54 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:30:29 -0600
    • Re: Fire Hydrant for the Flames (41 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 09:46:30 -0600
    • Re: Fire Hydrant for the Flames (51 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 20:38:51 -0000
    • Re: Fire Hydrant for the Flames (56 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 00:02:13 -0800
    • Re: Fire Hydrant for the Flames (61 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:01:21 -0500

39. Further comments on Kawakami
    • Further comments on Kawakami (89 lines)
      From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 17:25:44 -0800

40. Fwd: BBC TV series
    • Fwd: BBC TV series (77 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:06:57 -0600

41. Fwd: Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan)
    • Fwd: Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (44 lines)
      From: jogloran <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 06:08:17 -0000

42. Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200210
    • Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200210 (44 lines)
      From: Kvasir - Vaijskä <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 23:11:16 -0000

43. Harry was Re: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan)
    • Re: Harry was Re: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (35 lines)
      From: jogloran <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 06:09:44 -0000

44. Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan)
    • Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (45 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 18:13:15 -0800
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (46 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 21:22:14 -0500
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 21:51:29 -0500
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (58 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 11:50:26 +0000
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (49 lines)
      From: Elliott Belser <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 09:40:02 -0800
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (44 lines)
      From: wayne chevrier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 20:56:06 -0500
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (63 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 15:27:57 +0000
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (40 lines)
      From: David Starner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 20:53:00 -0600
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (73 lines)
      From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 21:29:22 -0500
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (39 lines)
      From: jogloran <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 06:20:10 -0000
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (41 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 01:20:36 -0500
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (40 lines)
      From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 03:04:01 -0500
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (39 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 06:00:04 -0500
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (54 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:30:34 -0500
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (44 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 21:04:18 +0000
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (81 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:14:24 -0500
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (47 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:32:34 -0500
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (37 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 15:41:51 -0800
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (99 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:54:54 -0500
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (50 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 22:59:18 +0000
    • Re: Harry WASRe: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (38 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 20:18:38 -0500

45. Hello to you all!
    • Re: Hello to you all! (37 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 06:38:47 +0000
    • Re: Hello to you all! (44 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 12:36:37 -0500
    • Re: Hello to you all! (40 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:03:14 -0500
    • Re: Hello to you all! (55 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 11:27:43 +0000
    • Re: Hello to you all! (56 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 11:50:29 +0100
    • Re: Hello to you all! (54 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 11:58:26 +0100
    • Re: Hello to you all! (41 lines)
      From: Matthew Bladen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 16:48:01 +0000
    • Re: Hello to you all! (39 lines)
      From: Aquamarine Demon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 11:15:40 -0800
    • Re: Hello to you all! (58 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 05:50:08 -0500
    • Re: Hello to you all! (46 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 06:03:20 -0500
    • Re: Hello to you all! (39 lines)
      From: David Starner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:00:31 -0600
    • Re: Hello to you all! (45 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:20:56 -0000

46. Help from a Russian speaker, please?
    • Help from a Russian speaker, please? (79 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 02:33:45 -0800
    • Re: Help from a Russian speaker, please? (33 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 03:06:43 -0500
    • Re: Help from a Russian speaker, please? (59 lines)
      From: Y.Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:41:22 +0200
    • Re: Help from a Russian speaker, please? (131 lines)
      From: Y.Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:18:09 +0200

47. Help with Greek
    • Re: Help with Greek (49 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:23:42 -0000

48. Help with Greek was Re: Babel Text in Obrenje
    • Help with Greek was Re: Babel Text in Obrenje (70 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:58:23 -0600
    • Re: Help with Greek was Re: Babel Text in Obrenje (59 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:25:36 -0500
    • Re: Help with Greek was Re: Babel Text in Obrenje (72 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:52:28 -0600
    • Re: Help with Greek was Re: Babel Text in Obrenje (77 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:25:19 +0000
    • Re: Help with Greek was Re: Babel Text in Obrenje (57 lines)
      From: Matthew Bladen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 23:41:25 +0000
    • Re: Help with Greek was Re: Babel Text in Obrenje (111 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 06:42:02 +0000
    • Re: Help with Greek was Re: Babel Text in Obrenje (61 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 09:38:29 -0500
    • Re: Help with Greek was Re: Babel Text in Obrenje (43 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:04:31 -0500

49. Help with US SW langs + new lang
    • Help with US SW langs + new lang (109 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:47:26 -0800
    • Re: Help with US SW langs + new lang (67 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:59:41 -0700
    • Re: Help with US SW langs + new lang (78 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:55:24 -0800
    • Re: Help with US SW langs + new lang (83 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:05:10 -0700
    • Re: Help with US SW langs + new lang (39 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:35:59 -0500

50. Idoru
    • Re: Idoru (57 lines)
      From: M.E.S. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 04:57:07 -0800
    • Re: Idoru (73 lines)
      From: M.E.S. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 05:03:22 -0800
    • Re: Idoru (57 lines)
      From: M.E.S. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 05:04:47 -0800
    • Re: Idoru (49 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:58:25 +0100
    • Re: Idoru (56 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:24:24 -0500
    • Re: Idoru (28 lines)
      From: William Annis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 12:32:03 -0600
    • Re: Idoru (40 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:43:44 -0500
    • Re: Idoru (58 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 19:16:17 +0000
    • Re: Idoru (68 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 15:47:54 -0500
    • Re: Idoru (84 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 21:25:01 +0000
    • Re: Idoru (37 lines)
      From: Jesse Raccio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 20:21:52 -0800
    • Re: Idoru (72 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 04:37:03 -0500
    • Re: Idoru (57 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:20:21 -0500

51. Inchoactive in Jpn? (was: "Anticipatory" Tense)
    • Re: Inchoactive in Jpn? (was: "Anticipatory" Tense) (86 lines)
      From: M.E.S. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 04:45:15 -0800
    • Re: Inchoactive in Jpn? (was: "Anticipatory" Tense) (53 lines)
      From: Weiben Wang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 12:08:11 -0800
    • Re: Inchoactive in Jpn? (was: "Anticipatory" Tense) (50 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 17:38:48 EST
    • Re: Inchoactive in Jpn? (was: "Anticipatory" Tense) (39 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 22:34:59 -0500
    • Re: Inchoactive in Jpn? (was: "Anticipatory" Tense) (82 lines)
      From: M.E.S. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 00:16:40 -0800
    • Re: Inchoactive in Jpn? (was: "Anticipatory" Tense) (43 lines)
      From: jogloran <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 06:26:49 -0000
    • Re: Inchoactive in Jpn? (was: "Anticipatory" Tense) (59 lines)
      From: Weiben Wang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:50:06 -0800
    • Re: Inchoactive in Jpn? (was: "Anticipatory" Tense) (57 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:08:36 -0500
    • Re: Inchoactive in Jpn? (was: "Anticipatory" Tense) (47 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:44:30 -0500

52. Introduction and a few novice questions
    • Introduction and a few novice questions (83 lines)
      From: Paul Edson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 14:03:24 -0500
    • Re: Introduction and a few novice questions (76 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 14:26:35 -0600
    • Re: Introduction and a few novice questions (89 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:55:49 +0100
    • Re: Introduction and a few novice questions (46 lines)
      From: Antonio WARD <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 12:40:07 +0100
    • Re: Introduction and a few novice questions (34 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 11:55:02 -0000
    • Re: Introduction and a few novice questions (68 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:01:08 -0500
    • Re: Introduction and a few novice questions (57 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 12:19:28 -0700
    • Re: Introduction and a few novice questions (78 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 12:00:27 -0800
    • Re: Introduction and a few novice questions (81 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 07:49:44 +0000
    • Re: Introduction and a few novice questions (51 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 17:02:47 EST

53. Introduction to Jovian (Comments, anyone?)
    • Re: Introduction to Jovian (Comments, anyone?) (42 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 02:14:13 -0500
    • Re: Introduction to Jovian (Comments, anyone?) (54 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 08:13:27 -0500
    • Re: Introduction to Jovian (Comments, anyone?) (32 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:17:26 -0500
    • Re: Introduction to Jovian (Comments, anyone?) (69 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 15:36:15 +0100
    • Re: Introduction to Jovian (Comments, anyone?) (45 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:30:32 -0500
    • Re: Introduction to Jovian (Comments, anyone?) (45 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:28:00 -0500

54. Irish Pronunciation - Sligo's Connamara/Ulster mix (Was: RE: Viru s Translation Exercise)
    • Irish Pronunciation - Sligo's Connamara/Ulster mix (Was: RE: Viru s Translation Exercise) (79 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 16:51:07 -0000
    • Re: Irish Pronunciation - Sligo's Connamara/Ulster mix (Was: RE: Viru s Translation Exercise) (95 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 20:31:52 +0000

55. Irish Pronunciation - Sligo's Connamara/Ulster mix (Was: RE: Virus Translation Exercise)
    • Re: Irish Pronunciation - Sligo's Connamara/Ulster mix (Was: RE: Virus Translation Exercise) (95 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:42:53 -0000

56. JINSEI WA GEIJUTSU DE ARU (was: Getting started with a newborn lang)
    • Re: JINSEI WA GEIJUTSU DE ARU (was: Getting started with a newborn lang) (74 lines)
      From: M.E.S. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 03:16:53 -0800
    • Re: JINSEI WA GEIJUTSU DE ARU (was: Getting started with a newborn lang) (107 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 17:38:53 EST

57. JPN final "ga" (was: Getting started with a newborn lang)
    • JPN final "ga" (was: Getting started with a newborn lang) (49 lines)
      From: M.E.S. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 05:07:40 -0800
    • JPN final "ga" (was: Getting started with a newborn lang) (46 lines)
      From: Kala Tunu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 21:47:12 +0100
    • Re: JPN final "ga" (was: Getting started with a newborn lang) (43 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 22:51:15 +0100
    • Re: JPN final "ga" (was: Getting started with a newborn lang) (61 lines)
      From: M.E.S. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 00:24:16 -0800
    • Re: JPN final "ga" (was: Getting started with a newborn lang) (52 lines)
      From: M.E.S. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 00:28:12 -0800

58. korean
    • korean (23 lines)
      From: Florian Rivoal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 22:15:43 +0100

59. Language resource for french speakers
    • Language resource for french speakers (29 lines)
      From: Antonio WARD <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:04:34 +0100
    • Re: Language resource for french speakers (56 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 21:51:45 +0100

60. Lashkos lexicon opened
    • Lashkos lexicon opened (35 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 09:32:37 -0500

61. Latin question: "titillandus"
    • Re: Latin question: "titillandus" (99 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 20:05:39 +0000
    • Re: Latin question: "titillandus" (83 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 21:40:24 +0100
    • Re: Latin question: "titillandus" (52 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 22:27:28 +0000
    • Re: Latin question: "titillandus" (128 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 07:14:54 +0000
    • Re: Latin question: "titillandus" (37 lines)
      From: Antonio WARD <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 14:12:41 +0100
    • Re: Latin question: "titillandus" (45 lines)
      From: some Cook or Himes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 23:35:54 -0500

62. Lighting Some Flames towards conlang artistry
    • Lighting Some Flames towards conlang artistry (110 lines)
      From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 22:42:59 -0800
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames towards conlang artistry (40 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:42:13 -0700

63. Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry
    • Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (119 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:16:37 -0800
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (83 lines)
      From: Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 01:20:41 -0500
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (99 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 01:24:04 -0600
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (124 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 03:48:06 EST
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (126 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 06:30:57 -0500
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (48 lines)
      From: jogloran <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 12:02:34 -0000
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (86 lines)
      From: Arnt Richard Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 13:21:13 +0100
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (51 lines)
      From: Y.Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 15:31:42 +0200
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (110 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 08:44:04 -0500
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (65 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:03:16 -0500
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (83 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 07:34:39 -0800
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (42 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:34:39 -0500
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (79 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:47:04 -0500
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (48 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 11:10:16 -0500
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (40 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:21:51 +0100
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (65 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:35:07 -0700
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (45 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:42:57 -0700
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (45 lines)
      From: David Starner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 12:06:10 -0600
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (48 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:21:20 -0000
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (51 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:38:05 +0100
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (77 lines)
      From: Jesse Raccio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:43:54 -0800
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (59 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 20:08:58 +0100
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (53 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 14:13:21 -0600
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (51 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 14:16:39 -0600
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (191 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 20:53:14 +0000
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (46 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 20:43:12 +0000
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (156 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:00:14 +0000
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (49 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 16:02:09 -0500
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (35 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 15:40:42 -0800
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (42 lines)
      From: Kala Tunu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:06:29 +0100
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (271 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:35:03 -0800
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (79 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:25:02 +0200
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (44 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 05:59:54 -0500
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (90 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:00:19 +0100
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (103 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 07:48:48 EST
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (46 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:29:59 -0500
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (56 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:47:29 -0500
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (68 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 09:44:22 -0600
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (97 lines)
      From: Paul Edson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 11:01:35 -0500
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (131 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:00:02 -0500
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (46 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:45:28 -0500
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (115 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 19:28:21 +0000
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (57 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:31:20 EST
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (81 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 22:00:00 +0100
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (43 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 22:03:52 +0100
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (109 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 21:01:33 -0000
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (44 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:49:53 -0500
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (180 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 21:19:43 +0000
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (60 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 17:02:56 EST
    • Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (77 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 22:45:27 -0500

64. linguistic schools
    • linguistic schools (39 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 07:17:23 -0800
    • Re: linguistic schools (33 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 21:28:52 EST

65. Missing the sky
    • Re: Missing the sky (70 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 08:10:08 +0100
    • Re: Missing the sky (53 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 08:14:08 +0100
    • Re: Missing the sky (57 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 06:05:48 -0500
    • Re: Missing the sky (73 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 12:40:15 -0500
    • Re: Missing the sky (56 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 12:53:15 -0500
    • Re: Missing the sky (42 lines)
      From: Joe Hill <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 19:23:58 -0000
    • Re: Missing the sky (49 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 15:50:32 -0500
    • Re: Missing the sky (61 lines)
      From: Joe Hill <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 21:20:54 -0000
    • Re: Missing the sky (73 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 05:52:36 -0000
    • Re: Missing the sky (54 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 20:09:35 -0500
    • Re: Missing the sky (51 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 06:11:46 -0500

66. Missing Words
    • Missing Words (43 lines)
      From: Matthew Bladen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 01:30:18 +0000
    • Re: Missing Words (75 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:53:29 EST
    • Re: Missing Words (85 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 22:15:17 EST
    • Re: Missing Words (69 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:11:00 +0100
    • Re: Missing Words (53 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:01:29 -0500
    • Re: Missing Words (43 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:19:11 -0000
    • Re: Missing Words (54 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:37:17 -0500
    • Re: Missing Words (68 lines)
      From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 23:14:40 -0500
    • Re: Missing Words (63 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 07:26:26 +0000

67. My New Project: Chromic
    • Re: My New Project: Chromic (32 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 02:34:36 -0500

68. My personal project
    • My personal project (177 lines)
      From: Antonio WARD <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 12:35:35 +0100
    • Re: My personal project (82 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 07:14:54 +0000
    • Re: My personal project (47 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 05:59:20 -0500
    • Re: My personal project (44 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 06:24:41 -0500
    • Re: My personal project (84 lines)
      From: Antonio WARD <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:31:49 +0100
    • Re: My personal project (103 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:25:19 +0000

69. Non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active
    • Non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active (154 lines)
      From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:30:36 -0800
    • Re: Non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active (44 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 21:41:58 -0500
    • Non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active (42 lines)
      From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 21:51:55 -0800
    • Re: Non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active (50 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 04:48:15 -0500

70. non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active ...
    • non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active ... (38 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:41:04 -0500
    • Re: non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active ... (48 lines)
      From: Joe Hill <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 19:35:45 -0000
    • Re: non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active ... (37 lines)
      From: William Annis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:40:47 -0600
    • Re: non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active ... (55 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 21:32:36 +0100
    • Re: non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active ... (65 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 15:55:52 -0500
    • Re: non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active ... (51 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 15:58:56 EST
    • Re: non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active ... (61 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 16:16:30 -0500
    • Re: non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active ... (67 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 16:29:30 -0500
    • Re: non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active ... (67 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 21:26:16 +0000
    • Re: non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active ... (30 lines)
      From: Kala Tunu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 08:30:13 +0100
    • Re: non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active ... (36 lines)
      From: Antonio WARD <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 13:46:55 +0100
    • Re: non-accusative, non-ergative, non-active ... (76 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 04:54:45 -0500

71. One very dead computer
    • One very dead computer (83 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 23:28:26 +0100
    • Re: One very dead computer (118 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 15:07:48 +0100

72. Original language naming and Kayasanoda progress
    • Original language naming and Kayasanoda progress (43 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:18:19 -0800

73. OT (partly): root vs. limma, GeoSh!tties and IE written in Hangul?
    • OT (partly): root vs. limma, GeoSh!tties and IE written in Hangul? (51 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 22:41:28 -0600

74. OT: Japanese spirit writing
    • OT: Japanese spirit writing (33 lines)
      From: William Annis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:50:09 -0600
    • Re: OT: Japanese spirit writing (57 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 20:16:20 EST
    • Re: OT: Japanese spirit writing (39 lines)
      From: jogloran <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 06:06:43 -0000
    • Re: OT: Japanese spirit writing (50 lines)
      From: William Annis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:05:29 -0600

75. OT: Still alive
    • OT: Still alive (39 lines)
      From: Almaran Dungeonmaster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 22:25:53 +0100

76. OT: The KJV Bible (was: Help with Greek was Re: Babel Text in
    • Re: OT: The KJV Bible (was: Help with Greek was Re: Babel Text in (60 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 17:23:46 -0500

77. OT: The KJV Bible (was: Help with Greek was Re: Babel Text in Obrenje)
    • OT: The KJV Bible (was: Help with Greek was Re: Babel Text in Obrenje) (139 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 19:28:21 +0000

78. OT: Tolkien
    • Re: OT: Tolkien (66 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 21:42:05 EST

79. P.S.: Yivrindil
    • P.S.: Yivrindil (43 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:01:19 EST
    • Re: P.S.: Yivrindil (117 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 23:41:51 -0800
    • Re: P.S.: Yivrindil (121 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 05:36:26 EST
    • Re: P.S.: Yivrindil (125 lines)
      From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 14:03:09 -0800

80. Poll by Email No. 4
    • Poll by Email No. 4 (77 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 16:20:52 -0600
    • Re: Poll by Email No. 4 (43 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 19:18:07 -0800
    • Re: Poll by Email No. 4 (29 lines)
      From: Ian Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 00:30:00 -0500
    • Re: Poll by Email No. 4 (27 lines)
      From: Ian Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 09:48:49 -0500

81. proposed conlang database
    • proposed conlang database (115 lines)
      From: Garrett Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:40:22 -0800
    • Re: proposed conlang database (33 lines)
      From: Antonio WARD <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 18:04:02 +0100
    • Re: proposed conlang database (38 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:15:29 -0700
    • Re: proposed conlang database (35 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 22:01:23 +0100
    • Re: proposed conlang database (63 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:29:17 +0000
    • Re: proposed conlang database (91 lines)
      From: Garrett Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:46:08 -0800
    • Re: proposed conlang database (124 lines)
      From: Garrett Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 14:35:20 -0800

82. Punctuation (was Re: Lighting Some Flames....)
    • Re: Punctuation (was Re: Lighting Some Flames....) (35 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 18:29:01 -0500
    • Re: Punctuation (was Re: Lighting Some Flames....) (63 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 20:56:32 -0500
    • Re: Punctuation (was Re: Lighting Some Flames....) (77 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:11:21 +0100

83. Results of Poll by Email No. 3
    • Results of Poll by Email No. 3 (155 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 16:05:14 -0600

84. Rubbers (was: Spanish education)
    • Rubbers (was: Spanish education) (52 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:42:11 -0000

85. RWG url?
    • RWG url? (32 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:46:53 +0000

86. Shadoks (WAS Re: A quick new projec)
    • Shadoks (WAS Re: A quick new projec) (44 lines)
      From: Kala Tunu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 16:48:32 +0100
    • Re: Shadoks (WAS Re: A quick new projec) (49 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 21:20:21 +0100
    • Re: Shadoks (WAS Re: A quick new projec) (45 lines)
      From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 11:27:43 +0000
    • Re: Shadoks (WAS Re: A quick new projec) (62 lines)
      From: Y.Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:22:01 +0200

87. Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan)
    • Re: Sleeping dragons (and Harry in Ngandan) (43 lines)
      From: Elliott Belser <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:16:54 -0800

88. some stewpid questions
    • some stewpid questions (52 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 05:26:47 -0600
    • Re: some stewpid questions (63 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:06:10 +0100
    • Re: some stewpid questions (46 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:11:40 -0500
    • Re: some stewpid questions (45 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:56:57 +0100
    • Re: some stewpid questions (74 lines)
      From: Antonio WARD <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 15:15:10 +0100
    • Re: some stewpid questions (37 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:09:01 EST
    • Re: some stewpid questions (44 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:58:27 -0500
    • Re: some stewpid questions (44 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:28:13 -0500
    • Re: some stewpid questions (44 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 22:14:04 +0100

89. something new from me (Mogora)
    • something new from me (Mogora) (167 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:48:59 -0800

90. Spanish education
    • Spanish education (39 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 15:47:05 -0800
    • Re: Spanish education (41 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 19:50:52 -0500
    • Re: Spanish education (61 lines)
      From: Antonio WARD <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 12:31:44 +0100
    • Re: Spanish education (62 lines)
      From: Karapcik, Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 09:50:17 -0500
    • Re: Spanish education (38 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:32:37 -0500
    • Re: Spanish education (87 lines)
      From: Antonio WARD <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 16:52:50 +0100
    • Re: Spanish education (58 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 11:30:22 -0800
    • Re: Spanish education (50 lines)
      From: Bob Greenwade <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 15:08:42 -0800
    • Re: Spanish education (51 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:34:38 -0000
    • Re: Spanish education (41 lines)
      From: Karapcik, Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 09:39:05 -0500

91. Subject headers are the solution (and: be careful with quotes!)
    • Re: Subject headers are the solution (and: be careful with quotes!) (60 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 10:11:56 +0000

92. Subject headers are the solution (or are they?)
    • Re: Subject headers are the solution (or are they?) (63 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:13:14 -0700

93. Subject headers are the solution [was: Fire Hydrant for the Flames]
    • Subject headers are the solution [was: Fire Hydrant for the Flames] (55 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:40:56 -0700
    • Re: Subject headers are the solution [was: Fire Hydrant for the Flames] (86 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:19:02 -0600

94. Teach Yours Elf Kamakawi 5
    • Teach Yours Elf Kamakawi 5 (27 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 04:44:53 EST

95. test
    • test (58 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 04:22:52 -0600

96. Thanks! -- also, Classes and Cases.
    • Thanks! -- also, Classes and Cases. (84 lines)
      From: Paul Edson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 10:12:38 -0500

97. Translation Exercise:
    • Re: Translation Exercise: (54 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:09:28 -0800
    • Re: Translation Exercise: (47 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:26:45 -0800
    • Re: Translation Exercise: (56 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 17:09:25 -0500
    • Re: Translation Exercise: (36 lines)
      From: Elliott Belser <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:29:07 -0800
    • Re: Translation Exercise: (53 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 18:10:41 -0800
    • Re: Translation Exercise: (57 lines)
      From: Dan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 08:43:47 +0000
    • Re: Translation Exercise: (41 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 20:12:01 -0500
    • Re: Translation Exercise: (45 lines)
      From: Jim Hopkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 20:48:53 EST
    • Re: Translation Exercise: (43 lines)
      From: Bob Greenwade <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 15:28:48 -0800

98. Translation Exercise: (*Muke!'s rendition)
    • Re: Translation Exercise: (*Muke!'s rendition) (45 lines)
      From: M.E.S. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 05:15:26 -0800

99. Translation Exercise: Vozgian
    • Re: Translation Exercise: Vozgian (41 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 03:49:47 -0500
    • Re: Translation Exercise: Vozgian (61 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 10:14:01 +0100
    • Re: Translation Exercise: Vozgian (46 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 04:46:08 -0500
    • Re: Translation Exercise: Vozgian (56 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 12:02:06 +0100
    • Re: Translation Exercise: Vozgian (43 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 06:59:54 -0500
    • Re: Translation Exercise: Vozgian (31 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 08:20:02 -0500
    • Re: Translation Exercise: Vozgian (31 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:10:40 -0500
    • Re: Translation Exercise: Vozgian (59 lines)
      From: Y.Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:31:45 +0200
    • Re: Translation Exercise: Vozgian (45 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 03:00:56 -0500
    • Re: Translation Exercise: Vozgian (27 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 03:10:30 -0500
    • Re: Translation Exercise: Vozgian (40 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:02:21 -0500

100. Translation Exercises: Sturnan and Lashkos
     • Re: Translation Exercises: Sturnan and Lashkos (74 lines)
       From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 07:53:55 -0500

101. Uk-Ugh (was: A quick new project)
     • Uk-Ugh (was: A quick new project) (73 lines)
       From: Raymond Brown <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 06:38:47 +0000
     • Re: Uk-Ugh (was: A quick new project) (69 lines)
       From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:05:48 -0500
     • Re: Uk-Ugh (was: A quick new project) (37 lines)
       From: Matthew Bladen <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 18:27:34 +0000
     • Re: Uk-Ugh (was: A quick new project) (40 lines)
       From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:45:13 -0500
     • Re: Uk-Ugh (was: A quick new project) (40 lines)
       From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 08:22:20 -0000

102. Verb Mood questions.
     • Verb Mood questions. (67 lines)
       From: Paul Edson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 10:44:46 -0500

103. Virus Translation Exercise
     • Re: Virus Translation Exercise (255 lines)
       From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 16:15:45 +0000

104. Web page updated
     • Web page updated (37 lines)
       From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 20:35:50 -0500

105. What is ergative?
     • What is ergative? (39 lines)
       From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 13:44:50 -0500
     • Re: What is ergative? (104 lines)
       From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 20:34:26 +0100
     • Re: What is ergative? (58 lines)
       From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 15:34:30 -0800

106. Where's the conlang ethnologue?
     • Where's the conlang ethnologue? (48 lines)
       From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:55:55 -0700
     • Re: Where's the conlang ethnologue? (57 lines)
       From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:10:38 +0000

107. WOT (Way Off Topic)/HUMOUR: Oolong the Rabbit
     • WOT (Way Off Topic)/HUMOUR: Oolong the Rabbit (45 lines)
       From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:32:37 EST
     • Re: WOT (Way Off Topic)/HUMOUR: Oolong the Rabbit (53 lines)
       From: Fabian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 09:12:32 -0000
     • Re: WOT (Way Off Topic)/HUMOUR: Oolong the Rabbit (35 lines)
       From: jogloran <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:38:27 -0000

108. WWWOT [DISC] Is Language Creation Art?
     • Re: WWWOT [DISC] Is Language Creation Art? (48 lines)
       From: Jesse Raccio <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:35:21 -0800

109. yet another new conlang
     • yet another new conlang (52 lines)
       From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 02:19:53 -0500
     • Re: yet another new conlang (62 lines)
       From: Christian Koettl <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 04:01:43 -0500

110. yet another new conlang; a terminology question (kinda long)
     • Re: yet another new conlang; a terminology question (kinda long) (179 lines)
       From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 14:35:33 -0500
     • Re: yet another new conlang; a terminology question (kinda long) (42 lines)
       From: jesse stephen bangs <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:44:05 -0800

111. [CHAT] Bay Area Conlangers
     • [CHAT] Bay Area Conlangers (34 lines)
       From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 23:19:29 EST

112. [conlang] Digest Number 1395
     • Re: [conlang] Digest Number 1395 (120 lines)
       From: Anthony M. Miles <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 14:42:27 -0600

113. [DISC] Is Language Creation Art?
     • Re: [DISC] Is Language Creation Art? (46 lines)
       From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:30:03 EST
     • Re: [DISC] Is Language Creation Art? (48 lines)
       From: Jesse Raccio <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:25:28 -0800
     • Re: [DISC] Is Language Creation Art? (42 lines)
       From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 21:27:47 EST
     • Re: [DISC] Is Language Creation Art? (35 lines)
       From: Jesse Raccio <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 20:16:12 -0800
     • Re: [DISC] Is Language Creation Art? (71 lines)
       From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:40:54 +0000
     • Re: [DISC] Is Language Creation Art? (49 lines)
       From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:00:28 +0000
     • Re: [DISC] Is Language Creation Art? (49 lines)
       From: Daniel Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:38:37 -0500

114. [Medially OT] Architecture and conlanging (was Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry)
     • [Medially OT] Architecture and conlanging (was Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry) (45 lines)
       From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 10:45:15 -0500

115. [OffTopic] All Praise the Fount of All Knowledge!
     • Re: [OffTopic] All Praise the Fount of All Knowledge! (39 lines)
       From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 18:24:19 -0500

116. [SEARCH] PIE roots anywhere?
     • [SEARCH] PIE roots anywhere? (39 lines)
       From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 21:11:59 -0500

117. [y] in English (was: David P's "month")
     • [y] in English (was: David P's "month") (57 lines)
       From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:31:32 -0000
     • Re: [y] in English (was: David P's "month") (54 lines)
       From: Matthew Bladen <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:25:06 +0000