Conlang
Mailing List – April 2002, week 5
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(39 messages)
A BrSc a?
(10 messages)
a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)
(2 messages)
Alphabet soup
Beating the Dutch
(14 messages)
BrSc & ancient Egyptian
CHAT: Pharyngeal vs. Epiglottal
CHAT: Proto-Language (Re: Re: Kentum/satem (was: The fut ure of Sturnan))
CHAT: Proto-Language (Re: Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan))
Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(5 messages)
Coatlalopeuh Phonology/Orthography
Culinary Techification (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(2 messages)
Danny Wier's PIE (was Re: Vocab #5)
(2 messages)
E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(6 messages)
E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or,Sturnan is beautiful))
Englisc (was: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?)
Essentialist Explanations
(2 messages)
Finger-Counting: More Than Just "This Little Piggy..."
(3 messages)
French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(3 messages)
Fruitcakes Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(5 messages)
Futurese
(22 messages)
genitive
(5 messages)
genitive (was: isolation vs inflection & other features)
(2 messages)
German noun genderization
help with hebrew/aramaic
(2 messages)
I get the list again
Initial Glottal Stops and Not (was: Futurese)
Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(32 messages)
List owner
Macrospeak and Microspeak
(2 messages)
Mmmm... Meatx (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
new parts of speech/cases
(10 messages)
OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager (Was Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)
(2 messages)
Poll by Email No. 9
Pro-verbs (was: new parts of speech/cases)
Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
(7 messages)
Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
(2 messages)
REAL newb question
(6 messages)
testing: please ignore
udhr in 331 languages
Vocab #4
Vocab #5
(6 messages)
Where is Sturnan?
[CHAT] genitive
[COMMENT] Coatlalopeuh Phonology/Orthography
(2 messages)
[OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(3 messages)
[QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
(14 messages)
A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(37 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(59 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(61 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(39 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(51 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(91 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(39 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(55 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(79 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(50 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(57 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(44 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(68 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(35 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(136 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(39 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(42 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(29 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(37 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(39 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(48 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(28 lines)
From:
Balazs Sudar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(49 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(39 lines)
From:
Balazs Sudar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
(41 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
A BrSc a?
Re: A BrSc a?
(69 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A BrSc a?
(53 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A BrSc a?
(158 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A BrSc a?
(64 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A BrSc a?
(69 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A BrSc a?
(71 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A BrSc a?
(48 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A BrSc a?
(71 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A BrSc a?
(44 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A BrSc a?
(67 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)
a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)
(63 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Alphabet soup
Alphabet soup
(37 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Beating the Dutch
Re: Beating the Dutch
(46 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beating the Dutch
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beating the Dutch
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beating the Dutch
(39 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beating the Dutch
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beating the Dutch
(46 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beating the Dutch
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beating the Dutch
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beating the Dutch
(48 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beating the Dutch
(51 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beating the Dutch
(45 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beating the Dutch
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beating the Dutch
(53 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beating the Dutch
(43 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
BrSc & ancient Egyptian
Re: BrSc & ancient Egyptian
(48 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Pharyngeal vs. Epiglottal
Re: CHAT: Pharyngeal vs. Epiglottal
(39 lines)
From:
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Proto-Language (Re: Re: Kentum/satem (was: The fut ure of Sturnan))
Re: CHAT: Proto-Language (Re: Re: Kentum/satem (was: The fut ure of Sturnan))
(34 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Proto-Language (Re: Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan))
CHAT: Proto-Language (Re: Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan))
(37 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(52 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(84 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(100 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(85 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(63 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Coatlalopeuh Phonology/Orthography
Re: Coatlalopeuh Phonology/Orthography
(77 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Culinary Techification (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
Culinary Techification (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(56 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Culinary Techification (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Danny Wier's PIE (was Re: Vocab #5)
Re: Danny Wier's PIE (was Re: Vocab #5)
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Danny Wier's PIE (was Re: Vocab #5)
(49 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(70 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(84 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(54 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(48 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(60 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(41 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or,Sturnan is beautiful))
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or,Sturnan is beautiful))
(48 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Englisc (was: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?)
Englisc (was: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?)
(44 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Essentialist Explanations
Essentialist Explanations
(33 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explanations
(46 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Finger-Counting: More Than Just "This Little Piggy..."
Finger-Counting: More Than Just "This Little Piggy..."
(103 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Finger-Counting: More Than Just "This Little Piggy..."
(51 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Finger-Counting: More Than Just "This Little Piggy..."
(42 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(39 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fruitcakes Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
Re: Fruitcakes Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(58 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(46 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(47 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(52 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(60 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Futurese
Re: Futurese
(53 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(98 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(182 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(106 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(217 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(36 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(25 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(44 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(66 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(142 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(85 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Futurese
(234 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(49 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(148 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(53 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(208 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(49 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(113 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(41 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(56 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
genitive
Re: genitive
(179 lines)
From:
ebera <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(97 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(394 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(45 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(46 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
genitive (was: isolation vs inflection & other features)
genitive (was: isolation vs inflection & other features)
(149 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive (was: isolation vs inflection & other features)
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
German noun genderization
German noun genderization
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
help with hebrew/aramaic
Re: help with hebrew/aramaic
(62 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: help with hebrew/aramaic
(101 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
I get the list again
I get the list again
(41 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Initial Glottal Stops and Not (was: Futurese)
Initial Glottal Stops and Not (was: Futurese)
(62 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(77 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(39 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(31 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(37 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(44 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(56 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(43 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(33 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(30 lines)
From:
William Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(70 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(30 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(53 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(38 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(57 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(37 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(35 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(48 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(31 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(61 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(50 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(55 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(34 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(39 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(69 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(45 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(47 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(33 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(30 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kentum/satem (was: The future of Sturnan)
(45 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
List owner
Re: List owner
(36 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Macrospeak and Microspeak
Macrospeak and Microspeak
(56 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Macrospeak and Microspeak
(76 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mmmm... Meatx (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
Mmmm... Meatx (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(102 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
new parts of speech/cases
new parts of speech/cases
(70 lines)
From:
Garrett Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new parts of speech/cases
(40 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new parts of speech/cases
(45 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new parts of speech/cases
(69 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new parts of speech/cases
(57 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new parts of speech/cases
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new parts of speech/cases
(31 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new parts of speech/cases
(43 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new parts of speech/cases
(46 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new parts of speech/cases
(50 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager (Was Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager (Was Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(63 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)
peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)
(117 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)
(68 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poll by Email No. 9
Re: Poll by Email No. 9
(55 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pro-verbs (was: new parts of speech/cases)
Pro-verbs (was: new parts of speech/cases)
(87 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
(55 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
(38 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
(44 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
(49 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
(43 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
(42 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
(39 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
(57 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
REAL newb question
REAL newb question
(29 lines)
From:
Neo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: REAL newb question
(40 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: REAL newb question
(37 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: REAL newb question
(48 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: REAL newb question
(49 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: REAL newb question
(66 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
testing: please ignore
testing: please ignore
(33 lines)
From:
Kvasir - Vaijskä <
[log in to unmask]
>
udhr in 331 languages
udhr in 331 languages
(143 lines)
From:
ebera <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vocab #4
Re: Vocab #4
(144 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vocab #5
Re: Vocab #5
(72 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #5
(56 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #5
(38 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #5
(34 lines)
From:
Tony Hogard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #5
(230 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #5
(28 lines)
From:
Balazs Sudar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Where is Sturnan?
Where is Sturnan?
(48 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
[CHAT] genitive
Re: [CHAT] genitive
(56 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
[COMMENT] Coatlalopeuh Phonology/Orthography
Re: [COMMENT] Coatlalopeuh Phonology/Orthography
(91 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [COMMENT] Coatlalopeuh Phonology/Orthography
(123 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
[OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(40 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(36 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(46 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
[QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
[QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
(37 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
(39 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
(51 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
(51 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
(52 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
(34 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
(71 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
(40 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
(50 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
(44 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
(49 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – April 2002, week 5
Conlang Mailing List – April 2002, week 5
