Conlang
Mailing List May 2002, week 1
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
'Magnimonious' was Re: Futurese
(3 messages)
'Yemls page update
(7 messages)
(Phonemics) was Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
A BrSc a?
(2 messages)
A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
(4 messages)
A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(2 messages)
A quick question
(11 messages)
a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)
(8 messages)
Back on the Nones of May
Celtic Consonant Mutation
(4 messages)
Celtic [was: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)]
(4 messages)
CHAT Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(2 messages)
CHAT: Not in Kansas anymore (Re: Re: Fruitcakes was Re:
CHAT: Not in Kansas anymore (Re: Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem)
CHAT: Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
CHAT: RE: [CONLANG] [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
CHAT: the N-word (Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem)
Chicago was Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(2 messages)
Chinese/japanese Pronounciation
(10 messages)
Chinese/Japanese Pronunciation
Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(7 messages)
Coatlalopeuh Evidentials
Con-Orthography - PIE
(5 messages)
conlangs and finishedness (was: RE: [CONLANG] Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry
Discuss the features?
Discussion about historic folks was Re: Fruitcakes
E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(22 messages)
Englisc (was: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?)
(2 messages)
Essentialist Explanations
(3 messages)
French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(3 messages)
Fruitcakes
Fruitcakes Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(3 messages)
Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(44 messages)
Fururese
(5 messages)
Futurese
(91 messages)
FWIW: Danny is fully Unicode!
(3 messages)
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200218
genitive
(15 messages)
Happy belated Easter
Hattic on line!
Hello I just joined the list
Hello I just joined the list...
(2 messages)
Histapamti ~ "I (somehow) spammed myself"
I'm back
If Tech was written in Arabic script... (long post)
(4 messages)
Kernewek
(5 messages)
Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(25 messages)
Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(24 messages)
Language Creation: The International Language ConstructionBulletin (working title :)) )
LOTR (in RP?) on the BBC
Macrospeak and Microspeak
(2 messages)
minority IALs (was: A BrSc a?)
new parts of speech/cases
(7 messages)
New parts of speech/cases
(5 messages)
nomail?
Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)
(7 messages)
of/for ( Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager
(3 messages)
OT: Dutch pronunciation questions
(2 messages)
peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)
(7 messages)
Persian |ezafeh| (Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery)
Pike's _Phonemics (was: E and e)
Poll by Email No. 10
Pro-verbs (was: new parts of speech/cases)
(2 messages)
Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
(8 messages)
Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
(2 messages)
Quenya expert needed
QUERY: Virus??
(2 messages)
Request for information: distributivity
Results of Poll by Email No. 9
seriously OT CHAT: makin' it seem old (was: Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(3 messages)
Spanish (was: Futurese)
Swedish pronunciation [was: Futurese]
(2 messages)
testing... hello?
THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
(6 messages)
Traduttore traditore (was: genitive)
TRANS Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager
(2 messages)
Transcript of C3P0's speech to the Ewoks from Return of the Jedi
(4 messages)
TTFN
USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:
(9 messages)
USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and
(6 messages)
USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
Vocab #4
Vocab #5
(7 messages)
Vocab #6
(14 messages)
White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)
(8 messages)
WordPerfect
(9 messages)
XPICTOC ANECTH
(11 messages)
[Chat] Douglas Adams, was RE: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(3 messages)
[CHAT] genitive
[OT, Only Semi-Serious,
[OT, Only Semi-Serious, If That] English as an IAL? (Was Futurese)
(3 messages)
[OT] blocked list (was: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes
(4 messages)
[OT] English Only Understood by Female English Speakers?
(2 messages)
[OT] Re: Fruitcakes
(7 messages)
[OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(7 messages)
[QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
[SILLY CHAT] Futurese
'Magnimonious' was Re: Futurese
'Magnimonious' was Re: Futurese
(42 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'Magnimonious' was Re: Futurese
(56 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'Magnimonious' was Re: Futurese
(52 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
'Yemls page update
Re: 'Yemls page update
(47 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'Yemls page update
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'Yemls page update
(48 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'Yemls page update
(46 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'Yemls page update
(48 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'Yemls page update
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'Yemls page update
(49 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
(Phonemics) was Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
Re: (Phonemics) was Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(35 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
A BrSc a?
Re: A BrSc a?
(67 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A BrSc a?
(137 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
(61 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(181 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(214 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
A quick question
A quick question
(33 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A quick question
(68 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A quick question
(52 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A quick question
(45 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A quick question
(38 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A quick question
(58 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A quick question
(85 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A quick question
(74 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A quick question
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A quick question
(119 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A quick question
(45 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)
Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)
(67 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)
(119 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)
(86 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)
(143 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)
(67 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back on the Nones of May
Back on the Nones of May
(40 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Celtic Consonant Mutation
Celtic Consonant Mutation
(36 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Celtic Consonant Mutation
(56 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Celtic Consonant Mutation
(66 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Celtic Consonant Mutation
(147 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Celtic [was: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)]
Celtic [was: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)]
(64 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Celtic [was: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)]
(88 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Celtic [was: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)]
(100 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Celtic [was: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)]
(64 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
Re: CHAT Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(64 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(49 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Not in Kansas anymore (Re: Re: Fruitcakes was Re:
Re: CHAT: Not in Kansas anymore (Re: Re: Fruitcakes was Re:
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Not in Kansas anymore (Re: Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem)
CHAT: Not in Kansas anymore (Re: Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem)
(57 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
CHAT: Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(66 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: RE: [CONLANG] [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
CHAT: RE: [CONLANG] [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(55 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: the N-word (Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem)
CHAT: the N-word (Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem)
(52 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chicago was Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
Re: Chicago was Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(52 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chicago was Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chinese/japanese Pronounciation
Chinese/japanese Pronounciation
(44 lines)
From:
Stefan "1of3" Koch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation
(51 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation
(92 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation
(34 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation
(33 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation
(52 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation
(54 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation
(64 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chinese/Japanese Pronunciation
Re: Chinese/Japanese Pronunciation
(65 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(74 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(45 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(42 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(58 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(28 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(62 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))
(70 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Coatlalopeuh Evidentials
Coatlalopeuh Evidentials
(118 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Con-Orthography - PIE
Con-Orthography - PIE
(53 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-Orthography - PIE
(51 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-Orthography - PIE
(59 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-Orthography - PIE
(46 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-Orthography - PIE
(52 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
conlangs and finishedness (was: RE: [CONLANG] Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry
conlangs and finishedness (was: RE: [CONLANG] Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry
(62 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Discuss the features?
Discuss the features?
(62 lines)
From:
Walter Tsuyoshi Sano <
[log in to unmask]
>
Discussion about historic folks was Re: Fruitcakes
Discussion about historic folks was Re: Fruitcakes
(36 lines)
From:
Balazs Sudar <
[log in to unmask]
>
E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(113 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(110 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(50 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(91 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(44 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(232 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(113 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(44 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(57 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(120 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(62 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(153 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(60 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(42 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(67 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(69 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(53 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(49 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Englisc (was: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?)
Re: Englisc (was: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?)
(77 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Englisc (was: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?)
(79 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Essentialist Explanations
Re: Essentialist Explanations
(44 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explanations
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explanations
(29 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
Re: French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(53 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(42 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(44 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fruitcakes
Fruitcakes
(35 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fruitcakes Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
Re: Fruitcakes Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(52 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(79 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(63 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(56 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(42 lines)
From:
Maarten van Beek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(44 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(45 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(27 lines)
From:
Balazs Sudar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(35 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(45 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(47 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(42 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(48 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(54 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(53 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(40 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(41 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(46 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(34 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(58 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(31 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(53 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(72 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(46 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(51 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(30 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(32 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(51 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(44 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(43 lines)
From:
Maarten van Beek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(39 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(45 lines)
From:
Maarten van Beek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(59 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(55 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(49 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(80 lines)
From:
Maarten van Beek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(71 lines)
From:
Maarten van Beek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(40 lines)
From:
Maarten van Beek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fururese
Fururese
(41 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fururese
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fururese
(37 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fururese
(31 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fururese
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Futurese
Re: Futurese
(36 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(35 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(34 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(62 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(135 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(37 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(253 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(65 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(198 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(74 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(253 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(98 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(48 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(43 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(105 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(115 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(194 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(26 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(37 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(49 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(146 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(153 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(111 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(98 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(61 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(131 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(47 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(58 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(52 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(61 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(55 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(107 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(45 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(113 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(158 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Futurese
(116 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(85 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(136 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(107 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(44 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(75 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(39 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(53 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(66 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(40 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(48 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(52 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(84 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(178 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(21 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(56 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(41 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(103 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(136 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(228 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(83 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(40 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(50 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(55 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(39 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(54 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(40 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(44 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(43 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(38 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(53 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(65 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(45 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(199 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(52 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(65 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(144 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(141 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(62 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(94 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(32 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(63 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(63 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(268 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(248 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(41 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
FWIW: Danny is fully Unicode!
FWIW: Danny is fully Unicode!
(43 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FWIW: Danny is fully Unicode!
(58 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FWIW: Danny is fully Unicode!
(76 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200218
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200218
(44 lines)
From:
Kvasir - Vaijskä <
[log in to unmask]
>
genitive
Re: genitive
(264 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(61 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(72 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(38 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(112 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(59 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(39 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(81 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(45 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(41 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: genitive
(69 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Happy belated Easter
Happy belated Easter
(30 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hattic on line!
Hattic on line!
(35 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hello I just joined the list
Re: Hello I just joined the list
(67 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hello I just joined the list...
Hello I just joined the list...
(62 lines)
From:
a. koch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello I just joined the list...
(69 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Histapamti ~ "I (somehow) spammed myself"
Histapamti ~ "I (somehow) spammed myself"
(78 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
I'm back
I'm back
(54 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
If Tech was written in Arabic script... (long post)
If Tech was written in Arabic script... (long post)
(177 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If Tech was written in Arabic script... (long post)
(46 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If Tech was written in Arabic script... (long post)
(96 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If Tech was written in Arabic script... (long post)
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kernewek
Kernewek
(85 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kernewek
(54 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kernewek
(85 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kernewek
(52 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kernewek
(54 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(150 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(102 lines)
From:
Maarten van Beek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(82 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(102 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(100 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(88 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(102 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(73 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(56 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(55 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(73 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(100 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(82 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(209 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(87 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(71 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(37 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(44 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(63 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(42 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(43 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(90 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )
(41 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(91 lines)
From:
Davis, Iain E. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(49 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(42 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(64 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(70 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(74 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(46 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(56 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(44 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(43 lines)
From:
Maarten van Beek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(80 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(36 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(57 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(52 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(46 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(45 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(67 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(60 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(45 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language Creation: The International Language ConstructionBulletin (working title :)) )
Re: Language Creation: The International Language ConstructionBulletin (working title :)) )
(35 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
LOTR (in RP?) on the BBC
Re: LOTR (in RP?) on the BBC
(42 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Macrospeak and Microspeak
Re: Macrospeak and Microspeak
(71 lines)
From:
The Keenans <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Macrospeak and Microspeak
(78 lines)
From:
The Keenans <
[log in to unmask]
>
minority IALs (was: A BrSc a?)
minority IALs (was: A BrSc a?)
(57 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
new parts of speech/cases
new parts of speech/cases
(64 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new parts of speech/cases
(87 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new parts of speech/cases
(136 lines)
From:
Garrett Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new parts of speech/cases
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new parts of speech/cases
(58 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new parts of speech/cases
(47 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new parts of speech/cases
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
New parts of speech/cases
Re: New parts of speech/cases
(191 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New parts of speech/cases
(102 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New parts of speech/cases
(121 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
New parts of speech/cases
(196 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New parts of speech/cases
(102 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
nomail?
nomail?
(28 lines)
From:
Walter Tsuyoshi Sano <
[log in to unmask]
>
Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)
Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)
(45 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)
(47 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)
(41 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)
(54 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)
(37 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)
(43 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
of/for ( Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
Re: of/for ( Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(57 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager
Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager
(47 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager
(76 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager
(85 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Dutch pronunciation questions
OT: Dutch pronunciation questions
(70 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Dutch pronunciation questions
(105 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)
Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)
(75 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)
(80 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)
(32 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)
(91 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)
(51 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)
(123 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)
(39 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Persian |ezafeh| (Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery)
Persian |ezafeh| (Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery)
(56 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pike's _Phonemics (was: E and e)
Pike's _Phonemics (was: E and e)
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poll by Email No. 10
Poll by Email No. 10
(61 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pro-verbs (was: new parts of speech/cases)
Re: Pro-verbs (was: new parts of speech/cases)
(57 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pro-verbs (was: new parts of speech/cases)
(47 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
(42 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
(49 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
(41 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
(39 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
(30 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
(43 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
(52 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
(44 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Quenya expert needed
Quenya expert needed
(36 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
QUERY: Virus??
QUERY: Virus??
(32 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: QUERY: Virus??
(44 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Request for information: distributivity
Request for information: distributivity
(53 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Results of Poll by Email No. 9
Results of Poll by Email No. 9
(84 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
seriously OT CHAT: makin' it seem old (was: Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
seriously OT CHAT: makin' it seem old (was: Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(94 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: seriously OT CHAT: makin' it seem old (was: Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(145 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: seriously OT CHAT: makin' it seem old (was: Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
(36 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Spanish (was: Futurese)
Spanish (was: Futurese)
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Swedish pronunciation [was: Futurese]
Swedish pronunciation [was: Futurese]
(48 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Swedish pronunciation [was: Futurese]
(70 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
testing... hello?
testing... hello?
(35 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
(54 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
(35 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
(46 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
(69 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Traduttore traditore (was: genitive)
Traduttore traditore (was: genitive)
(122 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
TRANS Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager
TRANS Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager
(57 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
TRANS Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager
(64 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Transcript of C3P0's speech to the Ewoks from Return of the Jedi
Transcript of C3P0's speech to the Ewoks from Return of the Jedi
(29 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Transcript of C3P0's speech to the Ewoks from Return of the Jedi
(33 lines)
From:
Elliott Belser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Transcript of C3P0's speech to the Ewoks from Return of the Jedi
(42 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Transcript of C3P0's speech to the Ewoks from Return of the Jedi
(48 lines)
From:
Garrett Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
TTFN
TTFN
(36 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:
(58 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:
(58 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:
(60 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:
(49 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:
(50 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:
(48 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and
(47 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and
(47 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and
(55 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and
(55 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and
(64 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
(41 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vocab #4
Re: Vocab #4
(201 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vocab #5
Re: Vocab #5
(105 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #5
(129 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #5
(44 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #5
(70 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #5
(68 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #5
(225 lines)
From:
Garrett Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #5
(250 lines)
From:
Anthony M. Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vocab #6
Vocab #6
(58 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #6
(89 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #6
(110 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #6
(126 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vocab #6
(89 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #6
(135 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #6
(185 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #6
(162 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #6
(36 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #6
(51 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #6
(47 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #6
(41 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #6
(55 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #6
(63 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)
White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)
(73 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)
(47 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)
(38 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)
(48 lines)
From:
William Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)
(57 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)
(47 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
WordPerfect
WordPerfect
(47 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WordPerfect
(41 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WordPerfect
(52 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WordPerfect
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WordPerfect
(40 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WordPerfect
(52 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WordPerfect
(52 lines)
From:
Maarten van Beek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WordPerfect
(49 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WordPerfect
(36 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
XPICTOC ANECTH
Re: XPICTOC ANECTH
(49 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XPICTOC ANECTH
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XPICTOC ANECTH
(71 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XPICTOC ANECTH
(41 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XPICTOC ANECTH
(39 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XPICTOC ANECTH
(30 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XPICTOC ANECTH
(48 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XPICTOC ANECTH
(36 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XPICTOC ANECTH
(52 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XPICTOC ANECTH
(35 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XPICTOC ANECTH
(43 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Chat] Douglas Adams, was RE: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
[Chat] Douglas Adams, was RE: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(46 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Chat] Douglas Adams, was RE: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(77 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Chat] Douglas Adams, was RE: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(78 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
[CHAT] genitive
Re: [CHAT] genitive
(65 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT, Only Semi-Serious,
Re: [OT, Only Semi-Serious,
(35 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT, Only Semi-Serious, If That] English as an IAL? (Was Futurese)
Re: [OT, Only Semi-Serious, If That] English as an IAL? (Was Futurese)
(48 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT, Only Semi-Serious, If That] English as an IAL? (Was Futurese)
(78 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT, Only Semi-Serious, If That] English as an IAL? (Was Futurese)
(43 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT] blocked list (was: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes
Re: [OT] blocked list (was: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] blocked list (was: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes
(45 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] blocked list (was: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes
(53 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] blocked list (was: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT] English Only Understood by Female English Speakers?
[OT] English Only Understood by Female English Speakers?
(35 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] English Only Understood by Female English Speakers?
(45 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT] Re: Fruitcakes
Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes
(33 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes
(45 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes
(90 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes
(105 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes
(46 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes
(51 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes
(86 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(49 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(55 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(38 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(50 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(33 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(40 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem
(42 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
[QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
Re: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?
(58 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
[SILLY CHAT] Futurese
Re: [SILLY CHAT] Futurese
(153 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU