Conlang
Mailing List May 2002, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
A late introduction
(3 messages)
A New Accent, Political Boundaries and Accents,
(4 messages)
A New Accent, Political Boundaries and Accents, Languages and Dialects
A question on vowel orthography
(11 messages)
Call for articles. Deadline: 23 June 2002
(7 messages)
CHAT: Newfs (was: Getting into the intro game)
(6 messages)
CHAT: On the term 'engelang'
CHAT: Pater Noster in Skuodian
CHAT: The Elven (or Techian) calendar
(3 messages)
Cherokee and--Re: Optimum number of symbols
Classifying my languages.
(3 messages)
Conlang labels (wasR: Futurese, Chinese, Hz of NatLangs, etc.)
Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)
(2 messages)
Dublex
Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese,
(5 messages)
Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(20 messages)
Dublex/Katanda hybrid
(10 messages)
Futurese
Futurese, Chinese, Hz of NatLangs, etc.
(12 messages)
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200220
Getting into the intro game
(6 messages)
Going nomail
Greetings
(2 messages)
head-initial structure
(11 messages)
Houston, we have a problem
Houston, we have a problem WAS:Re: When you want one odd character....
(2 messages)
Hungarian and Slavonic (was: Codename "de")
(2 messages)
Ibran (was: Dublex
(4 messages)
Is this the motherlode? WAS:Re: When you want one odd character....
lablang or engelang
(8 messages)
Language Creation: The International Language Construction
(7 messages)
Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(11 messages)
Language Creation: The International Language ConstructionBulletin (working title)
(6 messages)
Late again! (was Re: A late introduction)
LaTeX diacritics (Was: Re: Orthography typesetter!)
Logophonetics (was: Optimum number of symbols)
(2 messages)
me again
(6 messages)
Montrei History (a little) (was Re: Semitic languages & Cultures)
More on number bases
(17 messages)
My syllabry
Name of my conlang
(3 messages)
NATLANG: Velar nasals in Japanese, and coda moras.
(3 messages)
new to the list
(5 messages)
NF accent WAS:Re: CHAT: Newfs
(2 messages)
NGL: Naming
Numeral systems was:Re: Getting into the intro game
(4 messages)
On the term 'engelang'
(5 messages)
Optimum number of symbols
(104 messages)
Optimum number of symbols (repost)
Orthography typesetter!
(5 messages)
OT: Hieroglyphs was RE: Optimum number of symbols
Phaleran Update: Language game; Alienable and inalienable possession
(3 messages)
Phaleran Update: Language game; Alienable and inalienablepossession
(2 messages)
Poll by Email No. 11
(10 messages)
POLL: lablang/engelang
(2 messages)
POLL: lablang/engelang (clarification)
Principles and causation (was: Language Creation etc.)
(3 messages)
Re: me again
requests for the Conlang Journal (was: Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title))
Results of Poll by Email No. 10
(3 messages)
Self-Segregating Morphologies
(3 messages)
Semi-OT: A proposed unified Quechua-Aymara orthography
(2 messages)
Semitic languages & Cultures
(13 messages)
Syllabemes, and Underspecification
(3 messages)
The Conlang-L FAQ
(3 messages)
THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]
(11 messages)
THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols
(3 messages)
THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols
(3 messages)
Turkish Dialogue (Midnight Express)
Unicode
unicode fonts
(2 messages)
Universal Language Dictionary
(2 messages)
Vlachs
(5 messages)
Vocab #7
(3 messages)
Vocab #8
(3 messages)
When you want one odd character....
(11 messages)
Yet another Aramaic-based script
(2 messages)
[Chat] C-64; was RE: Hungarian and Slavonic (was: Codename "de")
(2 messages)
A late introduction
Re: A late introduction
(38 lines)
From:
Łukasz Korczewski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A late introduction
(47 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A late introduction
(47 lines)
From:
Gustavo Eulalio <
[log in to unmask]
>
A New Accent, Political Boundaries and Accents,
Re: A New Accent, Political Boundaries and Accents,
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Accent, Political Boundaries and Accents,
(38 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Accent, Political Boundaries and Accents,
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A New Accent, Political Boundaries and Accents,
(47 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
A New Accent, Political Boundaries and Accents, Languages and Dialects
A New Accent, Political Boundaries and Accents, Languages and Dialects
(83 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
A question on vowel orthography
A question on vowel orthography
(60 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question on vowel orthography
(40 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question on vowel orthography
(35 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question on vowel orthography
(44 lines)
From:
Arnt Richard Johansen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question on vowel orthography
(42 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question on vowel orthography
(58 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question on vowel orthography
(83 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question on vowel orthography
(70 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question on vowel orthography
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question on vowel orthography
(93 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question on vowel orthography
(58 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Call for articles. Deadline: 23 June 2002
Call for articles. Deadline: 23 June 2002
(62 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Call for articles. Deadline: 23 June 2002
(45 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Call for articles. Deadline: 23 June 2002
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Call for articles. Deadline: 23 June 2002
(28 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Call for articles. Deadline: 23 June 2002
(42 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Call for articles. Deadline: 23 June 2002
(49 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Call for articles. Deadline: 23 June 2002
(37 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Newfs (was: Getting into the intro game)
Re: CHAT: Newfs (was: Getting into the intro game)
(128 lines)
From:
Stephen DeGrace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Newfs (was: Getting into the intro game)
(39 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Newfs (was: Getting into the intro game)
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Newfs (was: Getting into the intro game)
(37 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Newfs (was: Getting into the intro game)
(49 lines)
From:
Stephen DeGrace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Newfs (was: Getting into the intro game)
(42 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: On the term 'engelang'
Re: CHAT: On the term 'engelang'
(53 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Pater Noster in Skuodian
Re: CHAT: Pater Noster in Skuodian
(65 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: The Elven (or Techian) calendar
Re: CHAT: The Elven (or Techian) calendar
(67 lines)
From:
Maarten van Beek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: The Elven (or Techian) calendar
(71 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: The Elven (or Techian) calendar
(89 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cherokee and--Re: Optimum number of symbols
Cherokee and--Re: Optimum number of symbols
(161 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Classifying my languages.
Classifying my languages.
(107 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Classifying my languages.
(242 lines)
From:
Stephen DeGrace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Classifying my languages.
(43 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang labels (wasR: Futurese, Chinese, Hz of NatLangs, etc.)
Re: Conlang labels (wasR: Futurese, Chinese, Hz of NatLangs, etc.)
(64 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)
Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)
(77 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)
(49 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dublex
Re: Dublex
(57 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese,
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese,
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese,
(64 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese,
(36 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese,
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese,
(86 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(56 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(139 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(59 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(142 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(44 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(90 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(140 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(64 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(190 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(198 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(59 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(121 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(55 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(55 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(61 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(81 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(157 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(66 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(44 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,
(48 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dublex/Katanda hybrid
Dublex/Katanda hybrid
(111 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex/Katanda hybrid
(63 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex/Katanda hybrid
(68 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex/Katanda hybrid
(54 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex/Katanda hybrid
(113 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex/Katanda hybrid
(159 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex/Katanda hybrid
(100 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex/Katanda hybrid
(228 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex/Katanda hybrid
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dublex/Katanda hybrid
(109 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Futurese
Re: Futurese
(86 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Futurese, Chinese, Hz of NatLangs, etc.
Re: Futurese, Chinese, Hz of NatLangs, etc.
(99 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese, Chinese, Hz of NatLangs, etc.
(127 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese, Chinese, Hz of NatLangs, etc.
(126 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese, Chinese, Hz of NatLangs, etc.
(111 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese, Chinese, Hz of NatLangs, etc.
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese, Chinese, Hz of NatLangs, etc.
(94 lines)
From:
Javier BF <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese, Chinese, Hz of NatLangs, etc.
(158 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese, Chinese, Hz of NatLangs, etc.
(129 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese, Chinese, Hz of NatLangs, etc.
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese, Chinese, Hz of NatLangs, etc.
(126 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese, Chinese, Hz of NatLangs, etc.
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Futurese, Chinese, Hz of NatLangs, etc.
(100 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200220
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200220
(44 lines)
From:
Kvasir - Vaijsk <
[log in to unmask]
>
Getting into the intro game
Re: Getting into the intro game
(66 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Getting into the intro game
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Getting into the intro game
(62 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Getting into the intro game
(53 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Getting into the intro game
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Getting into the intro game
(54 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going nomail
Going nomail
(35 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Greetings
Greetings
(66 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Greetings
(46 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
head-initial structure
head-initial structure
(60 lines)
From:
Garrett Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: head-initial structure
(63 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: head-initial structure
(107 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: head-initial structure
(85 lines)
From:
Garrett Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: head-initial structure
(90 lines)
From:
Garrett Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: head-initial structure
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: head-initial structure
(40 lines)
From:
Garrett Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: head-initial structure
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: head-initial structure
(48 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: head-initial structure
(49 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: head-initial structure
(54 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Houston, we have a problem
Re: Houston, we have a problem
(59 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Houston, we have a problem WAS:Re: When you want one odd character....
Houston, we have a problem WAS:Re: When you want one odd character....
(48 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Houston, we have a problem WAS:Re: When you want one odd character....
(42 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hungarian and Slavonic (was: Codename "de")
Hungarian and Slavonic (was: Codename "de")
(73 lines)
From:
P. M. Arktayg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hungarian and Slavonic (was: Codename "de")
(65 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ibran (was: Dublex
Re: Ibran (was: Dublex
(144 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ibran (was: Dublex
(146 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ibran (was: Dublex
(131 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ibran (was: Dublex
(99 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is this the motherlode? WAS:Re: When you want one odd character....
Is this the motherlode? WAS:Re: When you want one odd character....
(54 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
lablang or engelang
Re: lablang or engelang
(80 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: lablang or engelang
(49 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: lablang or engelang
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: lablang or engelang
(67 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: lablang or engelang
(53 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: lablang or engelang
(36 lines)
From:
Walter Tsuyoshi Sano <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: lablang or engelang
(53 lines)
From:
P. M. Arktayg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: lablang or engelang
(57 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language Creation: The International Language Construction
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction
(68 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction
(51 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction
(51 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(74 lines)
From:
Maarten van Beek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(66 lines)
From:
Maarten van Beek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(92 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(95 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(93 lines)
From:
Maarten van Beek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(83 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(81 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(41 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(61 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(63 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)
(34 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language Creation: The International Language ConstructionBulletin (working title)
Re: Language Creation: The International Language ConstructionBulletin (working title)
(41 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language ConstructionBulletin (working title)
(53 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language ConstructionBulletin (working title)
(39 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language ConstructionBulletin (working title)
(62 lines)
From:
Davis, Iain E. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language ConstructionBulletin (working title)
(69 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language Creation: The International Language ConstructionBulletin (working title)
(44 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Late again! (was Re: A late introduction)
Late again! (was Re: A late introduction)
(42 lines)
From:
Walter Tsuyoshi Sano <
[log in to unmask]
>
LaTeX diacritics (Was: Re: Orthography typesetter!)
LaTeX diacritics (Was: Re: Orthography typesetter!)
(71 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Logophonetics (was: Optimum number of symbols)
Logophonetics (was: Optimum number of symbols)
(56 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Logophonetics (was: Optimum number of symbols)
(69 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
me again
me again
(47 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: me again
(66 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: me again
(33 lines)
From:
a. koch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: me again
(62 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: me again
(64 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: me again
(64 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Montrei History (a little) (was Re: Semitic languages & Cultures)
Montrei History (a little) (was Re: Semitic languages & Cultures)
(98 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
More on number bases
More on number bases
(37 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
More on number bases
(52 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More on number bases
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More on number bases
(46 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More on number bases
(31 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More on number bases
(37 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More on number bases
(40 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More on number bases
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More on number bases
(74 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More on number bases
(116 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More on number bases
(69 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More on number bases
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More on number bases
(38 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More on number bases
(58 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More on number bases
(82 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More on number bases
(80 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More on number bases
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
My syllabry
My syllabry
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Name of my conlang
Name of my conlang
(56 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name of my conlang
(33 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name of my conlang
(49 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG: Velar nasals in Japanese, and coda moras.
NATLANG: Velar nasals in Japanese, and coda moras.
(49 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Velar nasals in Japanese, and coda moras.
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Velar nasals in Japanese, and coda moras.
(47 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
new to the list
new to the list
(32 lines)
From:
Julien Eychenne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(77 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(120 lines)
From:
julien eychenne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(59 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new to the list
(40 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
NF accent WAS:Re: CHAT: Newfs
NF accent WAS:Re: CHAT: Newfs
(81 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NF accent WAS:Re: CHAT: Newfs
(53 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
NGL: Naming
NGL: Naming
(341 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Numeral systems was:Re: Getting into the intro game
Numeral systems was:Re: Getting into the intro game
(61 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeral systems was:Re: Getting into the intro game
(125 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeral systems was:Re: Getting into the intro game
(80 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeral systems was:Re: Getting into the intro game
(181 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
On the term 'engelang'
Re: On the term 'engelang'
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On the term 'engelang'
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On the term 'engelang'
(60 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On the term 'engelang'
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On the term 'engelang'
(51 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Optimum number of symbols
Optimum number of symbols
(99 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(136 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(70 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(63 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(52 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(40 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(59 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(41 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(53 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(71 lines)
From:
Kendra <
[log in to unmask]
>
Optimum number of symbols
(92 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(104 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(75 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(88 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(90 lines)
From:
Kendra <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(48 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(71 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(66 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(73 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(55 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(117 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(79 lines)
From:
Kendra <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(69 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(182 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(52 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(46 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(133 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(71 lines)
From:
julien eychenne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(50 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(42 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(125 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(71 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(59 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(61 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(50 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(66 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(57 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(77 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(40 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(297 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(57 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(59 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(53 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(59 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(48 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(89 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(54 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(59 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(67 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(63 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(68 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(47 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Optimum number of symbols
(57 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(49 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(73 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(59 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(59 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(53 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(54 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(53 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(66 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(29 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(33 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(64 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(71 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(40 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(82 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(64 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(75 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(47 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(41 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(36 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(45 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(108 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(44 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(37 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(212 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(53 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(72 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(35 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(65 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(66 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(65 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(34 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(346 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(35 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(61 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Optimum number of symbols
(55 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(53 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(63 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(89 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optimum number of symbols
(85 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Optimum number of symbols (repost)
Re: Optimum number of symbols (repost)
(101 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Orthography typesetter!
Orthography typesetter!
(87 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthography typesetter!
(134 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthography typesetter!
(36 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthography typesetter!
(52 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthography typesetter!
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Hieroglyphs was RE: Optimum number of symbols
OT: Hieroglyphs was RE: Optimum number of symbols
(60 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phaleran Update: Language game; Alienable and inalienable possession
Phaleran Update: Language game; Alienable and inalienable possession
(134 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phaleran Update: Language game; Alienable and inalienable possession
(58 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phaleran Update: Language game; Alienable and inalienable possession
(67 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phaleran Update: Language game; Alienable and inalienablepossession
Re: Phaleran Update: Language game; Alienable and inalienablepossession
(97 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phaleran Update: Language game; Alienable and inalienablepossession
(90 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poll by Email No. 11
Poll by Email No. 11
(73 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 11
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 11
(47 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 11
(44 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 11
(45 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 11
(50 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 11
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 11
(40 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 11
(73 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 11
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
POLL: lablang/engelang
Re: POLL: lablang/engelang
(70 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLL: lablang/engelang
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
POLL: lablang/engelang (clarification)
Re: POLL: lablang/engelang (clarification)
(128 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Principles and causation (was: Language Creation etc.)
Principles and causation (was: Language Creation etc.)
(71 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Principles and causation (was: Language Creation etc.)
(71 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Principles and causation (was: Language Creation etc.)
(62 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: me again
Re: Re: me again
(81 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
requests for the Conlang Journal (was: Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title))
requests for the Conlang Journal (was: Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title))
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Results of Poll by Email No. 10
Results of Poll by Email No. 10
(100 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 10
(40 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 10
(37 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Self-Segregating Morphologies
Re: Self-Segregating Morphologies
(92 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Self-Segregating Morphologies
(100 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Self-Segregating Morphologies
(57 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Semi-OT: A proposed unified Quechua-Aymara orthography
Re: Semi-OT: A proposed unified Quechua-Aymara orthography
(64 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semi-OT: A proposed unified Quechua-Aymara orthography
(57 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Semitic languages & Cultures
Semitic languages & Cultures
(35 lines)
From:
Balazs Sudar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semitic languages & Cultures
(81 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semitic languages & Cultures
(47 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semitic languages & Cultures
(54 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semitic languages & Cultures
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semitic languages & Cultures
(84 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semitic languages & Cultures
(42 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semitic languages & Cultures
(57 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semitic languages & Cultures
(43 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semitic languages & Cultures
(96 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semitic languages & Cultures
(88 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semitic languages & Cultures
(57 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semitic languages & Cultures
(71 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Syllabemes, and Underspecification
Syllabemes, and Underspecification
(60 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabemes, and Underspecification
(43 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabemes, and Underspecification
(72 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Conlang-L FAQ
The Conlang-L FAQ
(228 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Conlang-L FAQ
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Conlang-L FAQ
(66 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]
Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]
(69 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]
(49 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]
(60 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]
(68 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]
(50 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]
(56 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]
(67 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]
(54 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols
THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols
(65 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols
(38 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols
(41 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols
THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols
(111 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols
(93 lines)
From:
julien eychenne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols
(149 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Turkish Dialogue (Midnight Express)
Turkish Dialogue (Midnight Express)
(40 lines)
From:
Kvasir - Vaijsk <
[log in to unmask]
>
Unicode
Unicode
(70 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
unicode fonts
unicode fonts
(35 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: unicode fonts
(55 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Universal Language Dictionary
Universal Language Dictionary
(43 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Universal Language Dictionary
(73 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vlachs
Vlachs
(36 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vlachs
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vlachs
(32 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vlachs
(44 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vlachs
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vocab #7
Re: Vocab #7
(160 lines)
From:
Garrett Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #7
(38 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #7
(56 lines)
From:
Garrett Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vocab #8
Vocab #8
(62 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #8
(163 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #8
(98 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
When you want one odd character....
When you want one odd character....
(37 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: When you want one odd character....
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: When you want one odd character....
(60 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: When you want one odd character....
(55 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: When you want one odd character....
(77 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: When you want one odd character....
(41 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: When you want one odd character....
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: When you want one odd character....
(63 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: When you want one odd character....
(45 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: When you want one odd character....
(48 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: When you want one odd character....
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yet another Aramaic-based script
Yet another Aramaic-based script
(48 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yet another Aramaic-based script
(44 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Chat] C-64; was RE: Hungarian and Slavonic (was: Codename "de")
[Chat] C-64; was RE: Hungarian and Slavonic (was: Codename "de")
(45 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Chat] C-64; was RE: Hungarian and Slavonic (was: Codename "de")
(50 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU