Conlang
Mailing List May 2002, week 5
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
(chat) Yoda's word order
abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary
Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off
Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of
Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of non-indo-european l
Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of non-indo-european languages?
(7 messages)
Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off ofnon-indo-european l
Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off ofnon-indo-european languages?
(6 messages)
chat: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing)
(12 messages)
CHAT: Coming out of the conlang closet
(10 messages)
CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals
(4 messages)
Concalendrical reference point
(2 messages)
Corrections. Apologies. was Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of non-indo-european languages?
Epicene & neuter (Was: Re: The meaning of "ilicom" (perhaps hungarian?))
(2 messages)
Going nomail for a few days.
Haitian Creole was Re: Spelling ....
Head going in spirals (Was: Re: chat: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing))
How big
(12 messages)
Køpsa - New conlang
Kash dictionary
Lake, underwater version
(2 messages)
Lake: was Re: Are any of you working on a
(2 messages)
Language Replacement (Re: French and US high school language instruction)
Loglan/Lojban (was: Rick Morneau's Katanda)
(2 messages)
mandatory veracity & pygectomy
mandatory veracity & pygectomy (was: RE: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE:
(2 messages)
mandatory veracity & pygectomy (was: RE: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number
(3 messages)
Neuter girls (was Re: French)
(5 messages)
New Katanda list
(3 messages)
Please cut!
Relay list closed
(3 messages)
Reminder: deadline for submission of articles for the Conlang Journal: June 23.
Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(18 messages)
Script
(5 messages)
Script sample
(8 messages)
Some or any
(3 messages)
Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols,
(2 messages)
Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now
(5 messages)
Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now
(5 messages)
Sporting vocabulary in conlangs
(2 messages)
Sumerian
T-shirts are now available
(8 messages)
The meaning of "ilicom" (perhaps hungarian?)
(5 messages)
THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum
(4 messages)
unsubscribing
USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number
(4 messages)
Vocab #10
(3 messages)
Vocab #9
(2 messages)
was Re: Are any of you working on a
(2 messages)
What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols
(15 messages)
[QUESTION] Interlinear translations
(2 messages)
[relay] Re: Relay list closed
(4 messages)
[relay] Spoken/Written Versions?
(chat) Yoda's word order
Re: (chat) Yoda's word order
(43 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary
Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary
(55 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off
Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off
(50 lines)
From:
a. koch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of
Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of non-indo-european l
Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of non-indo-european l
(40 lines)
From:
Nihil Sum <
[log in to unmask]
>
Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of non-indo-european languages?
Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of non-indo-european languages?
(31 lines)
From:
a. koch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of non-indo-european languages?
(45 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of non-indo-european languages?
(31 lines)
From:
Balazs Sudar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of non-indo-european languages?
(33 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of non-indo-european languages?
(41 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of non-indo-european languages?
(36 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of non-indo-european languages?
(48 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off ofnon-indo-european l
Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off ofnon-indo-european l
(47 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off ofnon-indo-european languages?
Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off ofnon-indo-european languages?
(39 lines)
From:
a. koch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off ofnon-indo-european languages?
(43 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off ofnon-indo-european languages?
(45 lines)
From:
Balazs Sudar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off ofnon-indo-european languages?
(81 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off ofnon-indo-european languages?
(56 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off ofnon-indo-european languages?
(37 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
chat: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing)
chat: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing)
(196 lines)
From:
Stephen DeGrace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: chat: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing)
(254 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: chat: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing)
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: chat: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing)
(44 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: chat: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing)
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: chat: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing)
(53 lines)
From:
Kendra <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: chat: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing)
(135 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: chat: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing)
(73 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: chat: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing)
(60 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: chat: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing)
(46 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: chat: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing)
(77 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: chat: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing)
(39 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Coming out of the conlang closet
CHAT: Coming out of the conlang closet
(58 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Coming out of the conlang closet
(38 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Coming out of the conlang closet
(32 lines)
From:
Ian Maxwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Coming out of the conlang closet
(50 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Coming out of the conlang closet
(50 lines)
From:
Maarten van Beek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Coming out of the conlang closet
(64 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Coming out of the conlang closet
(42 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Coming out of the conlang closet
(64 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Coming out of the conlang closet
(81 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Coming out of the conlang closet
(74 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals
Re: CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals
(34 lines)
From:
Andrew Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals
(60 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals
(98 lines)
From:
Andrew Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals
(87 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Concalendrical reference point
Re: Concalendrical reference point
(48 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concalendrical reference point
(47 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Corrections. Apologies. was Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of non-indo-european languages?
Corrections. Apologies. was Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of non-indo-european languages?
(56 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Epicene & neuter (Was: Re: The meaning of "ilicom" (perhaps hungarian?))
Epicene & neuter (Was: Re: The meaning of "ilicom" (perhaps hungarian?))
(49 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Epicene & neuter (Was: Re: The meaning of "ilicom" (perhaps hungarian?))
(65 lines)
From:
Le cavallero <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going nomail for a few days.
Going nomail for a few days.
(34 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Haitian Creole was Re: Spelling ....
Haitian Creole was Re: Spelling ....
(94 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Head going in spirals (Was: Re: chat: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing))
Head going in spirals (Was: Re: chat: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing))
(58 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
How big
How big
(63 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How big
(51 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How big
(49 lines)
From:
Neo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How big
(72 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How big
(48 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How big
(47 lines)
From:
Nihil Sum <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How big
(48 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How big
(59 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How big
(123 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How big
(36 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How big
(65 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How big
(54 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Køpsa - New conlang
Køpsa - New conlang
(555 lines)
From:
Neo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kash dictionary
Re: Kash dictionary
(65 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lake, underwater version
Lake, underwater version
(34 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lake, underwater version
(39 lines)
From:
Ian Maxwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lake: was Re: Are any of you working on a
Lake: was Re: Are any of you working on a
(63 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lake: was Re: Are any of you working on a
(45 lines)
From:
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language Replacement (Re: French and US high school language instruction)
Re: Language Replacement (Re: French and US high school language instruction)
(49 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Loglan/Lojban (was: Rick Morneau's Katanda)
Loglan/Lojban (was: Rick Morneau's Katanda)
(49 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Loglan/Lojban (was: Rick Morneau's Katanda)
(49 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
mandatory veracity & pygectomy
Re: mandatory veracity & pygectomy
(44 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
mandatory veracity & pygectomy (was: RE: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE:
Re: mandatory veracity & pygectomy (was: RE: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE:
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mandatory veracity & pygectomy (was: RE: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE:
(62 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
mandatory veracity & pygectomy (was: RE: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number
mandatory veracity & pygectomy (was: RE: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number
(83 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mandatory veracity & pygectomy (was: RE: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number
(30 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
mandatory veracity & pygectomy (was: RE: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number
(100 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Neuter girls (was Re: French)
Re: Neuter girls (was Re: French)
(53 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Neuter girls (was Re: French)
(45 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Neuter girls (was Re: French)
(67 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Neuter girls (was Re: French)
(55 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Neuter girls (was Re: French)
(60 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Katanda list
New Katanda list
(32 lines)
From:
Jeremy Louzao <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Katanda list
(42 lines)
From:
GrayWizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Katanda list
(36 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Please cut!
Please cut!
(27 lines)
From:
Balazs Sudar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Relay list closed
Re: Relay list closed
(39 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay list closed
(40 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay list closed
(44 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Reminder: deadline for submission of articles for the Conlang Journal: June 23.
Reminder: deadline for submission of articles for the Conlang Journal: June 23.
(62 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rick Morneau's Katanda?
Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(33 lines)
From:
Jeremy Louzao <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(70 lines)
From:
Garrett Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(59 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(55 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(71 lines)
From:
Jeremy Louzao <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(66 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(66 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(69 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(35 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(52 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(38 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(65 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(45 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(71 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(44 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rick Morneau's Katanda?
(35 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Script
Re: Script
(73 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Script
(101 lines)
From:
a. koch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Script
(52 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Script
(95 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Script
(44 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Script sample
Script sample
(44 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Script sample
(44 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Script sample
(32 lines)
From:
Neo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Script sample
(39 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Script sample
(35 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Script sample
(34 lines)
From:
Neo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Script sample
(40 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Script sample
(37 lines)
From:
Neo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Some or any
Re: Some or any
(66 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some or any
(54 lines)
From:
Maarten van Beek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some or any
(65 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols,
Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols,
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols,
(42 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now
Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now
(65 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now
(76 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now
(60 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now
(60 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now
Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now
(55 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now
(47 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sporting vocabulary in conlangs
Sporting vocabulary in conlangs
(31 lines)
From:
Andrew Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sporting vocabulary in conlangs
(43 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sumerian
Sumerian
(46 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
T-shirts are now available
Re: T-shirts are now available
(20 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: T-shirts are now available
(59 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: T-shirts are now available
(79 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: T-shirts are now available
(55 lines)
From:
The Gray Wizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: T-shirts are now available
(52 lines)
From:
Mario Bonassin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: T-shirts are now available
(50 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: T-shirts are now available
(59 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: T-shirts are now available
(41 lines)
From:
Neo <
[log in to unmask]
>
The meaning of "ilicom" (perhaps hungarian?)
The meaning of "ilicom" (perhaps hungarian?)
(50 lines)
From:
Le cavallero <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The meaning of "ilicom" (perhaps hungarian?)
(31 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The meaning of "ilicom" (perhaps hungarian?)
(55 lines)
From:
Walter Tsuyoshi Sano <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The meaning of "ilicom" (perhaps hungarian?)
(55 lines)
From:
Le cavallero <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The meaning of "ilicom" (perhaps hungarian?)
(63 lines)
From:
Walter Tsuyoshi Sano <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum
Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum
(97 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum
(95 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum
(46 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum
(44 lines)
From:
Mike S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
unsubscribing
Re: unsubscribing
(56 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number
Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number
(50 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number
(52 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number
(59 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vocab #10
Vocab #10
(56 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #10
(207 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #10
(79 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vocab #9
Re: Vocab #9
(98 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab #9
(209 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
was Re: Are any of you working on a
Re: was Re: Are any of you working on a
(59 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: was Re: Are any of you working on a
(83 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols
Re: What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols
(138 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols
(52 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols
(52 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols
(82 lines)
From:
Raymond Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols
(45 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols
(43 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols
(57 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols
(35 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols
(51 lines)
From:
Y.Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols
(57 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols
(52 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
[QUESTION] Interlinear translations
[QUESTION] Interlinear translations
(41 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] Interlinear translations
(85 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
[relay] Re: Relay list closed
Re: [relay] Re: Relay list closed
(79 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
[relay] Re: Relay list closed
(37 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [relay] Re: Relay list closed
(63 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [relay] Re: Relay list closed
(42 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
[relay] Spoken/Written Versions?
Re: [relay] Spoken/Written Versions?
(76 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU