Conlang
Mailing List June 2002, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"Kill" vs. "cause to die" (was: "Transferral" verb form...)
(6 messages)
"Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(20 messages)
# of possible verb declensions
(2 messages)
# of possible verb declensions (was gotten, boughten)
(9 messages)
'And' and 'and' (Was: Re: Logic in Languages)
(2 messages)
Allophones used only when singing // was I *almost* understand the IPA!
An Ill Bethisad thought
(12 messages)
Case mismatches (was: Re: Viko Notes)
(6 messages)
case/adposition matrix
(2 messages)
CHAT: conferences (Was: Re: THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols])
CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition)
(12 messages)
CHAT: Obscenity in British comedy,
(4 messages)
CHAT: Obscenity in British comedy, was Re: USAGE: number concord in AmE, again
CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re:
(9 messages)
CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re: Sound changes in literate societies]
(2 messages)
CHAT: To the Aussies on the list
Conlang FAQ rediscovered!
(2 messages)
Correction: Gzarondan vowels
Deixis (was: An Ill Bethisad thought)
Dzu''Fa''Ri Sudtub! Happy Rokbeigalmki New Year!
(2 messages)
Ebisedian anatomy
elanagauo verb system
(3 messages)
FAQ article on cases
(3 messages)
For God's sake, I use participles!
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200225
Going nomail
GOING NOMAIL
(3 messages)
Going nomail again
Gzarondan vowels
(3 messages)
Hear Me! Hear Me!
(3 messages)
Hear me! Hear me!
Hear Me! Hear Me!
(2 messages)
Hear me! Hear me!
(3 messages)
Hear Me! Hear Me!
(4 messages)
Hear me! Hear me!
Hear Me! Hear Me!
(2 messages)
Hebrew in all its Allophonic Majesty (was: IPA question)
Here, *Here*, and There, *There*
(11 messages)
I *almost* understand the IPA!
(4 messages)
Inspiration for new words!
IPA question
Is language cyclic?
(2 messages)
khaghan (WAS Re: Words for "boredom")
Le Guin on "the English generic singular pronoun"
(2 messages)
Lenition
(28 messages)
Logic in Languages
(4 messages)
Mandarin aspirated and unaspirated initials
(4 messages)
Miscellaneous Derivatives of "Hear Me!"
(7 messages)
Missing parts
(2 messages)
Non-HTML:Re: FAQ article on cases
Out of the ancient past-- Vocab #5
Please!!! Help me save my computer!!!
Poll by Email No. 16
QUESTION: types of plurals, few/many
(3 messages)
Request for information: Semantics of body parts
Results of Poll by Email No. 15
Saalangal affixes (it's been a while)
So how do you...
Sound changes in literate societies
(15 messages)
THEORY: accusativity marking [was Re: Viko Notes Question]
(4 messages)
THEORY: case systems [was Viko Notes]
(5 messages)
THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of
THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols]
THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols
THEORY: RE: [CONLANG] Case mismatches (was: Re: Viko Notes)
(2 messages)
THEORY: Sound changes in literate societies
(2 messages)
translation exercise(s)
(3 messages)
Upstate (was: USAGE: gotten, boughten)
(2 messages)
USAGE voicing and aspiration (was: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01)
USAGE: <o> in spoke; gotten [was: Re: Hear Me! Hear Me!]
(2 messages)
USAGE: gotten
(20 messages)
USAGE: gotten, boughten
(32 messages)
USAGE: number concord in AmE, again
(5 messages)
USAGE: Voicing and aspiration (was: "Transferral" verb form ...)
(3 messages)
Viko Notes
(19 messages)
Viko Notes Question
Voicing and Aspiration (was Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01)
[CHAT] Belgium in H2G2 (was Re: USAGE: number concord in AmE,
(3 messages)
[CHAT] Belgium in H2G2 (was Re: USAGE: number concord in AmE, again)
(2 messages)
[QUESTION] How to make a font?
(7 messages)
"Kill" vs. "cause to die" (was: "Transferral" verb form...)
"Kill" vs. "cause to die" (was: "Transferral" verb form...)
(73 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Kill" vs. "cause to die" (was: "Transferral" verb form...)
(57 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
"Kill" vs. "cause to die" (was: "Transferral" verb form...)
(63 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Kill" vs. "cause to die" (was: "Transferral" verb form...)
(55 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Kill" vs. "cause to die" (was: "Transferral" verb form...)
(75 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Kill" vs. "cause to die" (was: "Transferral" verb form...)
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
"Transferral" verb form in LC-01
"Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(190 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(42 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(97 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(48 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(88 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(142 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(42 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(49 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(83 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(62 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(41 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(53 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(45 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(54 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(69 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(51 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(62 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01
(44 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
# of possible verb declensions
Re: # of possible verb declensions
(48 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: # of possible verb declensions
(59 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
# of possible verb declensions (was gotten, boughten)
# of possible verb declensions (was gotten, boughten)
(90 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: # of possible verb declensions (was gotten, boughten)
(81 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: # of possible verb declensions (was gotten, boughten)
(94 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: # of possible verb declensions (was gotten, boughten)
(117 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: # of possible verb declensions (was gotten, boughten)
(64 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: # of possible verb declensions (was gotten, boughten)
(85 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: # of possible verb declensions (was gotten, boughten)
(70 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: # of possible verb declensions (was gotten, boughten)
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: # of possible verb declensions (was gotten, boughten)
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
'And' and 'and' (Was: Re: Logic in Languages)
'And' and 'and' (Was: Re: Logic in Languages)
(63 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'And' and 'and' (Was: Re: Logic in Languages)
(54 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Allophones used only when singing // was I *almost* understand the IPA!
Re: Allophones used only when singing // was I *almost* understand the IPA!
(47 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
An Ill Bethisad thought
An Ill Bethisad thought
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An Ill Bethisad thought
(66 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An Ill Bethisad thought
(40 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An Ill Bethisad thought
(46 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An Ill Bethisad thought
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An Ill Bethisad thought
(48 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An Ill Bethisad thought
(43 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An Ill Bethisad thought
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An Ill Bethisad thought
(48 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An Ill Bethisad thought
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An Ill Bethisad thought
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An Ill Bethisad thought
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Case mismatches (was: Re: Viko Notes)
Case mismatches (was: Re: Viko Notes)
(86 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case mismatches (was: Re: Viko Notes)
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case mismatches (was: Re: Viko Notes)
(72 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case mismatches (was: Re: Viko Notes)
(88 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case mismatches (was: Re: Viko Notes)
(81 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case mismatches (was: Re: Viko Notes)
(97 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
case/adposition matrix
case/adposition matrix
(51 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: case/adposition matrix
(47 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: conferences (Was: Re: THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols])
CHAT: conferences (Was: Re: THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols])
(82 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition)
Re: CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition)
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition)
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition)
(44 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition)
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition)
(72 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition)
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition)
(44 lines)
From:
GrayWizard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition)
(50 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition)
(59 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition)
(32 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition)
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition)
(58 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Obscenity in British comedy,
Re: CHAT: Obscenity in British comedy,
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Obscenity in British comedy,
(50 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Obscenity in British comedy,
(55 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Obscenity in British comedy,
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Obscenity in British comedy, was Re: USAGE: number concord in AmE, again
CHAT: Obscenity in British comedy, was Re: USAGE: number concord in AmE, again
(91 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re:
Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re:
(52 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re:
(40 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re:
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re:
(54 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re:
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re:
(41 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re:
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re:
(66 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re:
(51 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re: Sound changes in literate societies]
CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re: Sound changes in literate societies]
(70 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re: Sound changes in literate societies]
(83 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: To the Aussies on the list
CHAT: To the Aussies on the list
(28 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang FAQ rediscovered!
Conlang FAQ rediscovered!
(45 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang FAQ rediscovered!
(70 lines)
From:
Eli Ewing <
[log in to unmask]
>
Correction: Gzarondan vowels
Correction: Gzarondan vowels
(33 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Deixis (was: An Ill Bethisad thought)
Deixis (was: An Ill Bethisad thought)
(43 lines)
From:
Pablo David Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dzu''Fa''Ri Sudtub! Happy Rokbeigalmki New Year!
Re: Dzu''Fa''Ri Sudtub! Happy Rokbeigalmki New Year!
(45 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dzu''Fa''Ri Sudtub! Happy Rokbeigalmki New Year!
(34 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ebisedian anatomy
Ebisedian anatomy
(63 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
elanagauo verb system
elanagauo verb system
(42 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: elanagauo verb system
(52 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: elanagauo verb system
(66 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
FAQ article on cases
FAQ article on cases
(59 lines)
From:
Eli Ewing <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FAQ article on cases
(66 lines)
From:
Joel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FAQ article on cases
(43 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
For God's sake, I use participles!
For God's sake, I use participles!
(33 lines)
From:
Eli Ewing <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200225
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200225
(67 lines)
From:
Kvasir - Vaijskä <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going nomail
Going nomail
(32 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
GOING NOMAIL
GOING NOMAIL
(81 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GOING NOMAIL
(35 lines)
From:
agricola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GOING NOMAIL
(44 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going nomail again
Going nomail again
(33 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gzarondan vowels
Gzarondan vowels
(55 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gzarondan vowels
(88 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gzarondan vowels
(92 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hear Me! Hear Me!
Re: Hear Me! Hear Me!
(46 lines)
From:
a. koch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hear Me! Hear Me!
(65 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hear Me! Hear Me!
(94 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hear me! Hear me!
Re: Hear me! Hear me!
(118 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hear Me! Hear Me!
Re: Hear Me! Hear Me!
(44 lines)
From:
a. koch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hear Me! Hear Me!
(70 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hear me! Hear me!
Re: Hear me! Hear me!
(183 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hear me! Hear me!
(136 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hear me! Hear me!
(143 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hear Me! Hear Me!
Re: Hear Me! Hear Me!
(99 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hear Me! Hear Me!
(98 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hear Me! Hear Me!
(101 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hear Me! Hear Me!
(104 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hear me! Hear me!
Re: Hear me! Hear me!
(42 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hear Me! Hear Me!
Re: Hear Me! Hear Me!
(63 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hear Me! Hear Me!
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hebrew in all its Allophonic Majesty (was: IPA question)
Re: Hebrew in all its Allophonic Majesty (was: IPA question)
(67 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Here, *Here*, and There, *There*
Here, *Here*, and There, *There*
(43 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*
(61 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*
(84 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*
(59 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*
(41 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*
(49 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*
(82 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*
(80 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*
(84 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*
(62 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*
(75 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
I *almost* understand the IPA!
I *almost* understand the IPA!
(86 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I *almost* understand the IPA!
(52 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I *almost* understand the IPA!
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I *almost* understand the IPA!
(45 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Inspiration for new words!
Inspiration for new words!
(50 lines)
From:
agricola <
[log in to unmask]
>
IPA question
Re: IPA question
(62 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is language cyclic?
Re: Is language cyclic?
(52 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is language cyclic?
(82 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
khaghan (WAS Re: Words for "boredom")
Re: khaghan (WAS Re: Words for "boredom")
(54 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Le Guin on "the English generic singular pronoun"
Le Guin on "the English generic singular pronoun"
(37 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Le Guin on "the English generic singular pronoun"
(55 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lenition
Lenition
(63 lines)
From:
Christopher Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(30 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(23 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(21 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(82 lines)
From:
Eli Ewing <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(103 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(56 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(52 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(40 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(35 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(76 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(50 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(39 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(52 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(46 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(31 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(49 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(93 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(74 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(45 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lenition
(52 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Logic in Languages
Logic in Languages
(61 lines)
From:
Christopher Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Logic in Languages
(89 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Logic in Languages
(40 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Logic in Languages
(85 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mandarin aspirated and unaspirated initials
Mandarin aspirated and unaspirated initials
(57 lines)
From:
Freedberg, Bruce <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandarin aspirated and unaspirated initials
(69 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandarin aspirated and unaspirated initials
(89 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandarin aspirated and unaspirated initials
(62 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Miscellaneous Derivatives of "Hear Me!"
Miscellaneous Derivatives of "Hear Me!"
(48 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Miscellaneous Derivatives of "Hear Me!"
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Miscellaneous Derivatives of "Hear Me!"
(71 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Miscellaneous Derivatives of "Hear Me!"
(51 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Miscellaneous Derivatives of "Hear Me!"
(69 lines)
From:
Adrian Morgan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Miscellaneous Derivatives of "Hear Me!"
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Miscellaneous Derivatives of "Hear Me!"
(91 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Missing parts
Missing parts
(42 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Missing parts
(34 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Non-HTML:Re: FAQ article on cases
Non-HTML:Re: FAQ article on cases
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Out of the ancient past-- Vocab #5
Out of the ancient past-- Vocab #5
(161 lines)
From:
M.S. Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Please!!! Help me save my computer!!!
Please!!! Help me save my computer!!!
(76 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poll by Email No. 16
Poll by Email No. 16
(62 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
QUESTION: types of plurals, few/many
Re: QUESTION: types of plurals, few/many
(61 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: QUESTION: types of plurals, few/many
(61 lines)
From:
Eli Ewing <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: QUESTION: types of plurals, few/many
(60 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Request for information: Semantics of body parts
Re: Request for information: Semantics of body parts
(67 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Results of Poll by Email No. 15
Results of Poll by Email No. 15
(106 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Saalangal affixes (it's been a while)
Re: Saalangal affixes (it's been a while)
(51 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
So how do you...
So how do you...
(37 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sound changes in literate societies
Sound changes in literate societies
(64 lines)
From:
Eli Ewing <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound changes in literate societies
(32 lines)
From:
a. koch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound changes in literate societies
(66 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound changes in literate societies
(73 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound changes in literate societies
(56 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound changes in literate societies
(90 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound changes in literate societies
(60 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound changes in literate societies
(78 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound changes in literate societies
(65 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound changes in literate societies
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound changes in literate societies
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound changes in literate societies
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound changes in literate societies
(49 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound changes in literate societies
(38 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound changes in literate societies
(63 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: accusativity marking [was Re: Viko Notes Question]
THEORY: accusativity marking [was Re: Viko Notes Question]
(51 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: accusativity marking [was Re: Viko Notes Question]
(45 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: accusativity marking [was Re: Viko Notes Question]
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: accusativity marking [was Re: Viko Notes Question]
(44 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: case systems [was Viko Notes]
THEORY: case systems [was Viko Notes]
(65 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: case systems [was Viko Notes]
(50 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: case systems [was Viko Notes]
(79 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: case systems [was Viko Notes]
(160 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: case systems [was Viko Notes]
(105 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of
Re: THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols]
Re: THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols]
(102 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols
Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols
(67 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: RE: [CONLANG] Case mismatches (was: Re: Viko Notes)
THEORY: RE: [CONLANG] Case mismatches (was: Re: Viko Notes)
(68 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: RE: [CONLANG] Case mismatches (was: Re: Viko Notes)
(81 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Sound changes in literate societies
THEORY: Sound changes in literate societies
(57 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Sound changes in literate societies
(58 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
translation exercise(s)
translation exercise(s)
(78 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: translation exercise(s)
(105 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: translation exercise(s)
(152 lines)
From:
Pablo David Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Upstate (was: USAGE: gotten, boughten)
Upstate (was: USAGE: gotten, boughten)
(41 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Upstate (was: USAGE: gotten, boughten)
(52 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE voicing and aspiration (was: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01)
USAGE voicing and aspiration (was: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01)
(56 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: <o> in spoke; gotten [was: Re: Hear Me! Hear Me!]
USAGE: <o> in spoke; gotten [was: Re: Hear Me! Hear Me!]
(106 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: <o> in spoke; gotten [was: Re: Hear Me! Hear Me!]
(97 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: gotten
USAGE: gotten
(41 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(36 lines)
From:
jogloran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(100 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(89 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(128 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(66 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(32 lines)
From:
agricola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(58 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(36 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(128 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(46 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(44 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(46 lines)
From:
Eli Ewing <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(43 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(69 lines)
From:
Clint Jackson Baker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(54 lines)
From:
Eli Ewing <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(57 lines)
From:
Eli Ewing <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(52 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(62 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten
(68 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: gotten, boughten
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(43 lines)
From:
Tony Hogard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(39 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(83 lines)
From:
Eli Ewing <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(53 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(68 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(99 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(62 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(47 lines)
From:
Kendra <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(41 lines)
From:
Nihil Sum <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(70 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(64 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(54 lines)
From:
Eli Ewing <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(35 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(41 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(60 lines)
From:
Eli Ewing <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(42 lines)
From:
a. koch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(79 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(45 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(30 lines)
From:
agricola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(31 lines)
From:
agricola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(39 lines)
From:
Tony Hogard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(48 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(40 lines)
From:
agricola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(37 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(45 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(27 lines)
From:
Eli Ewing <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(70 lines)
From:
Eli Ewing <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(50 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(62 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: gotten, boughten
(44 lines)
From:
Eli Ewing <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: number concord in AmE, again
Re: USAGE: number concord in AmE, again
(39 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: number concord in AmE, again
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: number concord in AmE, again
(48 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: number concord in AmE, again
(42 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: number concord in AmE, again
(58 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Voicing and aspiration (was: "Transferral" verb form ...)
USAGE: Voicing and aspiration (was: "Transferral" verb form ...)
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Voicing and aspiration (was: "Transferral" verb form ...)
(52 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Voicing and aspiration (was: "Transferral" verb form ...)
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Viko Notes
Viko Notes
(98 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(47 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(53 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(49 lines)
From:
Eli Ewing <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(53 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(46 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(47 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(41 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(61 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(67 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(38 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(53 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(45 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(57 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(51 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(40 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Viko Notes
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Viko Notes Question
Viko Notes Question
(32 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Voicing and Aspiration (was Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01)
Voicing and Aspiration (was Re: "Transferral" verb form in LC-01)
(57 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
[CHAT] Belgium in H2G2 (was Re: USAGE: number concord in AmE,
Re: [CHAT] Belgium in H2G2 (was Re: USAGE: number concord in AmE,
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [CHAT] Belgium in H2G2 (was Re: USAGE: number concord in AmE,
(35 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [CHAT] Belgium in H2G2 (was Re: USAGE: number concord in AmE,
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
[CHAT] Belgium in H2G2 (was Re: USAGE: number concord in AmE, again)
[CHAT] Belgium in H2G2 (was Re: USAGE: number concord in AmE, again)
(62 lines)
From:
Matthew Bladen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [CHAT] Belgium in H2G2 (was Re: USAGE: number concord in AmE, again)
(65 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
[QUESTION] How to make a font?
[QUESTION] How to make a font?
(42 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] How to make a font?
(68 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] How to make a font?
(57 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] How to make a font?
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] How to make a font?
(45 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] How to make a font?
(67 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] How to make a font?
(99 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU