Conlang Mailing List – June 2002, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (8 messages)
• CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition) (2 messages)
• CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re: (4 messages)
• Data mining // was Swearing
• EXERCISE: Small grammar exercise (3 messages)
• GOING NOMAIL
• Going nomail
• Here, *Here*, and There, *There* (4 messages)
• INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG (6 messages)
• Logic in Languages (2 messages)
• Making Lots of Money (no spam!) (2 messages)
• Missing parts (3 messages)
• Missing Parts
• Missing parts (3 messages)
• Optatives (Was: Re: Making Lots of Money (no spam!))
• OT: Help with the Role of a Linguist (2 messages)
• Poll by Email No. 17
• Results of Poll by Email no. 16
• Sound changes in literate societies (2 messages)
• Swearing // was CHAT: Murgatroyd (5 messages)
• THEORY: accusativity marking [was Re: Viko Notes Question] (3 messages)
• THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts] (7 messages)
• USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*] (4 messages)

1. CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin)
   • CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (90 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (79 lines)
     From: Andy Canivet <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (55 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (71 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (51 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (61 lines)
     From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (66 lines)
     From: Andy Canivet <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (69 lines)
     From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>

2. CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition)
   • Re: CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition) (55 lines)
     From: Adrian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition) (45 lines)
     From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>

3. CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re:
   • Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re: (61 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re: (59 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re: (68 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re: (46 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

4. Data mining // was Swearing
   • Re: Data mining // was Swearing (61 lines)
     From: Adrian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

5. EXERCISE: Small grammar exercise
   • EXERCISE: Small grammar exercise (83 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: EXERCISE: Small grammar exercise (114 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: EXERCISE: Small grammar exercise (162 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

6. GOING NOMAIL
   • GOING NOMAIL (31 lines)
     From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>

7. Going nomail
   • Going nomail (31 lines)
     From: Mia Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>

8. Here, *Here*, and There, *There*
   • Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There* (37 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There* (52 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There* (38 lines)
     From: wayne chevrier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There* (39 lines)
     From: agricola <[log in to unmask]>

9. INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG
   • INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG (41 lines)
     From: Ted E. Saratoga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG (26 lines)
     From: agricola <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG (35 lines)
     From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG (38 lines)
     From: agricola <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG (40 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG (68 lines)
     From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>

10. Logic in Languages
    • Re: Logic in Languages (66 lines)
      From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Logic in Languages (101 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>

11. Making Lots of Money (no spam!)
    • Making Lots of Money (no spam!) (144 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Making Lots of Money (no spam!) (40 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

12. Missing parts
    • Re: Missing parts (44 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Missing parts (48 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Missing parts (66 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>

13. Missing Parts
    • Re: Missing Parts (31 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>

14. Missing parts
    • Re: Missing parts (44 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Missing parts (48 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Missing parts (75 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>

15. Optatives (Was: Re: Making Lots of Money (no spam!))
    • Optatives (Was: Re: Making Lots of Money (no spam!)) (58 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>

16. OT: Help with the Role of a Linguist
    • OT: Help with the Role of a Linguist (28 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Help with the Role of a Linguist (41 lines)
      From: Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]>

17. Poll by Email No. 17
    • Poll by Email No. 17 (70 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>

18. Results of Poll by Email no. 16
    • Results of Poll by Email no. 16 (86 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>

19. Sound changes in literate societies
    • Re: Sound changes in literate societies (52 lines)
      From: Adrian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound changes in literate societies (41 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

20. Swearing // was CHAT: Murgatroyd
    • Re: Swearing // was CHAT: Murgatroyd (53 lines)
      From: Adrian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Swearing // was CHAT: Murgatroyd (53 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Swearing // was CHAT: Murgatroyd (37 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Swearing // was CHAT: Murgatroyd (43 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Swearing // was CHAT: Murgatroyd (66 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>

21. THEORY: accusativity marking [was Re: Viko Notes Question]
    • Re: THEORY: accusativity marking [was Re: Viko Notes Question] (82 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: accusativity marking [was Re: Viko Notes Question] (98 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: accusativity marking [was Re: Viko Notes Question] (41 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

22. THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts]
    • THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts] (53 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts] (43 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts] (38 lines)
      From: Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts] (37 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts] (49 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts] (40 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts] (56 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

23. USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*]
    • USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*] (50 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*] (33 lines)
      From: agricola <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*] (53 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*] (103 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>