Conlang Mailing List – June 2002, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (8 messages)
• CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition) (2 messages)
• CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re: (4 messages)
• Data mining // was Swearing
• EXERCISE: Small grammar exercise (3 messages)
• Going nomail
• GOING NOMAIL
• Here, *Here*, and There, *There* (4 messages)
• INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG (6 messages)
• Logic in Languages (2 messages)
• Making Lots of Money (no spam!) (2 messages)
• Missing parts (3 messages)
• Missing Parts
• Missing parts (3 messages)
• Optatives (Was: Re: Making Lots of Money (no spam!))
• OT: Help with the Role of a Linguist (2 messages)
• Poll by Email No. 17
• Results of Poll by Email no. 16
• Sound changes in literate societies (2 messages)
• Swearing // was CHAT: Murgatroyd (5 messages)
• THEORY: accusativity marking [was Re: Viko Notes Question] (3 messages)
• THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts] (7 messages)
• USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*] (4 messages)

1. CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin)
   • Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (69 lines)
     From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 17:08:52 EDT
   • Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (66 lines)
     From: Andy Canivet <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 15:43:02 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (61 lines)
     From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 13:30:49 +0100
   • Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (51 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 04:02:56 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (71 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 18:19:45 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (55 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 19:51:58 EDT
   • Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (79 lines)
     From: Andy Canivet <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 11:06:55 -0400
   • CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin) (90 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 03:53:03 EDT

2. CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition)
   • Re: CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition) (45 lines)
     From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 20:52:30 +1200
   • Re: CHAT: Murgatroyd (was somehow Re: Lenition) (55 lines)
     From: Adrian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 18:20:01 +1000

3. CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re:
   • Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re: (46 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 17:02:23 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re: (68 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 10:06:27 +0000
   • Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re: (59 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 10:06:24 +0000
   • Re: CHAT: oldest known records of vernacular languages [was Re: (61 lines)
     From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 10:06:17 +0000

4. Data mining // was Swearing
   • Re: Data mining // was Swearing (61 lines)
     From: Adrian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 11:04:01 +1000

5. EXERCISE: Small grammar exercise
   • Re: EXERCISE: Small grammar exercise (162 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 19:11:34 -0400
   • Re: EXERCISE: Small grammar exercise (114 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 23:19:33 +0200
   • EXERCISE: Small grammar exercise (83 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 19:57:49 +0200

6. Going nomail
   • Going nomail (31 lines)
     From: Mia Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 11:34:40 -0700

7. GOING NOMAIL
   • GOING NOMAIL (31 lines)
     From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 22:33:33 +1000

8. Here, *Here*, and There, *There*
   • Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There* (39 lines)
     From: agricola <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 01:03:45 -0400
   • Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There* (38 lines)
     From: wayne chevrier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 17:22:21 +0000
   • Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There* (52 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 08:04:54 -0400
   • Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There* (37 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 00:50:00 -0400

9. INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG
   • Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG (68 lines)
     From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 20:32:05 -0400
   • Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG (40 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 17:28:31 -0400
   • Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG (38 lines)
     From: agricola <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 14:20:59 -0400
   • Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG (35 lines)
     From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 02:04:20 -0400
   • Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG (26 lines)
     From: agricola <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 01:03:49 -0400
   • INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG (41 lines)
     From: Ted E. Saratoga <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 14:42:49 -0400

10. Logic in Languages
    • Re: Logic in Languages (101 lines)
      From: Ray Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 07:24:45 +0000
    • Re: Logic in Languages (66 lines)
      From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 15:46:03 -0400

11. Making Lots of Money (no spam!)
    • Re: Making Lots of Money (no spam!) (40 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 19:24:28 -0400
    • Making Lots of Money (no spam!) (144 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 00:02:19 +0200

12. Missing parts
    • Re: Missing parts (75 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 01:40:29 -0400
    • Re: Missing parts (48 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 17:52:23 -0400
    • Re: Missing parts (44 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 23:07:09 +0200

13. Missing Parts
    • Re: Missing Parts (31 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 13:40:03 -0400

14. Missing parts
    • Re: Missing parts (66 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 09:52:52 -0500
    • Re: Missing parts (48 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 07:22:08 -0400
    • Re: Missing parts (44 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 10:06:34 +0200

15. Optatives (Was: Re: Making Lots of Money (no spam!))
    • Optatives (Was: Re: Making Lots of Money (no spam!)) (58 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 19:40:51 -0400

16. OT: Help with the Role of a Linguist
    • Re: OT: Help with the Role of a Linguist (41 lines)
      From: Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 17:58:27 -0700
    • OT: Help with the Role of a Linguist (28 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 20:12:16 EDT

17. Poll by Email No. 17
    • Poll by Email No. 17 (70 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 16:49:07 -0500

18. Results of Poll by Email no. 16
    • Results of Poll by Email no. 16 (86 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 16:35:23 -0500

19. Sound changes in literate societies
    • Re: Sound changes in literate societies (41 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 02:21:06 -0400
    • Re: Sound changes in literate societies (52 lines)
      From: Adrian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 16:10:39 +1000

20. Swearing // was CHAT: Murgatroyd
    • Re: Swearing // was CHAT: Murgatroyd (66 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 23:20:08 EDT
    • Re: Swearing // was CHAT: Murgatroyd (43 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 17:25:17 -0400
    • Re: Swearing // was CHAT: Murgatroyd (37 lines)
      From: Christopher B Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 22:18:28 -0400
    • Re: Swearing // was CHAT: Murgatroyd (53 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 18:47:41 -0700
    • Re: Swearing // was CHAT: Murgatroyd (53 lines)
      From: Adrian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 11:28:08 +1000

21. THEORY: accusativity marking [was Re: Viko Notes Question]
    • Re: THEORY: accusativity marking [was Re: Viko Notes Question] (41 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 16:58:50 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: accusativity marking [was Re: Viko Notes Question] (98 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 04:46:24 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: accusativity marking [was Re: Viko Notes Question] (82 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 10:06:34 +0200

22. THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts]
    • Re: THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts] (56 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 17:47:48 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts] (40 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 17:36:13 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts] (49 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 17:23:34 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts] (37 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 17:16:13 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts] (38 lines)
      From: Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 13:55:48 -0700
    • Re: THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts] (43 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 16:17:58 -0400
    • THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts] (53 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 13:37:46 -0500

23. USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*]
    • Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*] (103 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 18:13:27 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*] (53 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 20:42:25 -0700
    • Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*] (33 lines)
      From: agricola <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 14:21:06 -0400
    • USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*] (50 lines)
      From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 01:47:12 -0500