Conlang
Mailing List July 2002, week 1
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"i" (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(4 messages)
About the Gaelic-L thing
(10 messages)
American English
CHAT De Bello Gaelico
(7 messages)
CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin)
(8 messages)
CHAT: idiot poets (wasRe: CHAT:"the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin)
(2 messages)
CHAT: Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG
(3 messages)
CHAT: Results of Poll by Email No. 17
CHAT: smiley faces (was Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
CHAT: UCD quasi-fascists; was Re: Essentialist Explanation
CHATter: Poll by Email No. 18
(3 messages)
Code Talkers
Concerning your libel of Conlang
Conlang FAQ rediscovered!
(3 messages)
Conlang meet July 18th
(2 messages)
Consonants and sonorant as vowels
(7 messages)
Consonants and sonorants as vowels
(5 messages)
Devanagari LTR, Question etc. (was: Scripts)
(3 messages)
Dr. Dunn
(3 messages)
Dr. Gunn
(2 messages)
English and Bostonian (was Re: Klingon Script)
Enough with the BLOODY Gaelic-L garbage.
Enterprise Scripts and Languages
Eskimo Snow words (Was:Navajo code-talkers (Was: Trolls))
Essentialist Explaination
(11 messages)
Essentialist Explanation
(11 messages)
EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(19 messages)
EXERCISE: Small grammar exercise
(4 messages)
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200226
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200227
Gaelic thing
Gaelic-L Controversy - Translations, Please? (really long)
Gwr script
(2 messages)
Handwriting (Was: Re: Klingon Script)
Here, there and more
How Much for Conversation?
(5 messages)
I'm trying to think of a word...
(2 messages)
Infered Vowels?
(2 messages)
Interesting multilingual PDF
(4 messages)
INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG
(7 messages)
Japanese
(3 messages)
Japanese (was Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!)
(2 messages)
Klingon Script
(19 messages)
Logical Lingo
Lookin' for the OED
(12 messages)
NATLANG: Sanskrit, Hinduism, Indian culture, stories, etc.
(4 messages)
Navajo codes (was: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!)
(2 messages)
Obligatives? (Was: Re: Optatives (Was: Re: Making Lots of Money (no spam!)))
Obligatives? (Was: Re: Optatives...)
Optatives (Was: Re: Making Lots of Money (no spam!))
OT Academia (was Re: Dr. Gunn)
OT: Poly was; Results of Poll by Email No. 17
Perfect/imperfect vs Past/present/future
(5 messages)
Polish L/
Politics
POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(19 messages)
Poll by Email No. 17
(2 messages)
Poll by Email No. 18
(7 messages)
Re Codetalkers
Really Intersistemal
(2 messages)
Really Intersistemal (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(11 messages)
Results of Poll by Email no. 16
Results of Poll by Email No. 17
(2 messages)
Romanico, was Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(3 messages)
Scripts
(13 messages)
scripts
Scripts
(18 messages)
Scripts/Klingon and others.
sheu~
Signing off for a while
Sound changes in literate societies
Spelling
(15 messages)
Tentative Ebisedian number system
(13 messages)
The war on gaelic-l
(4 messages)
THEORY: RE: Case mismatches (was: Re: Viko Notes)
Three letter root words, relationships to subject
(2 messages)
Took
USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *Ther
(10 messages)
USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*]
(6 messages)
Vong, Viko et al.
Writ
xor
"i" (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
"i" (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "i" (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(46 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "i" (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "i" (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(45 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
About the Gaelic-L thing
About the Gaelic-L thing
(29 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About the Gaelic-L thing
(39 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About the Gaelic-L thing
(101 lines)
From:
Stephen DeGrace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About the Gaelic-L thing
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About the Gaelic-L thing
(67 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About the Gaelic-L thing
(57 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About the Gaelic-L thing
(97 lines)
From:
Stephen DeGrace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About the Gaelic-L thing
(61 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About the Gaelic-L thing
(89 lines)
From:
Howlsedhes Services <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About the Gaelic-L thing
(47 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
American English
American English
(31 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT De Bello Gaelico
CHAT De Bello Gaelico
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT De Bello Gaelico
(77 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT De Bello Gaelico
(48 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT De Bello Gaelico
(67 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT De Bello Gaelico
(66 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT De Bello Gaelico
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT De Bello Gaelico
(40 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin)
Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin)
(60 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin)
(75 lines)
From:
Andy Canivet <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin)
(39 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin)
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin)
(38 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin)
(48 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin)
(38 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin)
(40 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: idiot poets (wasRe: CHAT:"the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin)
CHAT: idiot poets (wasRe: CHAT:"the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin)
(62 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: idiot poets (wasRe: CHAT:"the future," sci-fi, Quecha (Le Guin)
(53 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG
CHAT: Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG
(63 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG
(93 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG
(68 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Results of Poll by Email No. 17
Re: CHAT: Results of Poll by Email No. 17
(51 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: smiley faces (was Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
CHAT: smiley faces (was Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(55 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: UCD quasi-fascists; was Re: Essentialist Explanation
CHAT: UCD quasi-fascists; was Re: Essentialist Explanation
(43 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHATter: Poll by Email No. 18
CHATter: Poll by Email No. 18
(52 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHATter: Poll by Email No. 18
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHATter: Poll by Email No. 18
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Code Talkers
Code Talkers
(28 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Concerning your libel of Conlang
Concerning your libel of Conlang
(66 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang FAQ rediscovered!
Re: Conlang FAQ rediscovered!
(74 lines)
From:
Davis, Iain E. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang FAQ rediscovered!
(39 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang FAQ rediscovered!
(87 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang meet July 18th
Conlang meet July 18th
(42 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang meet July 18th
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Consonants and sonorant as vowels
Re: Consonants and sonorant as vowels
(56 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Consonants and sonorant as vowels
(43 lines)
From:
julien eychenne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Consonants and sonorant as vowels
(42 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Consonants and sonorant as vowels
(51 lines)
From:
tim talpas <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Consonants and sonorant as vowels
(48 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Consonants and sonorant as vowels
(54 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Consonants and sonorant as vowels
(57 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Consonants and sonorants as vowels
Consonants and sonorants as vowels
(32 lines)
From:
julien eychenne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Consonants and sonorants as vowels
(61 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Consonants and sonorants as vowels
(51 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Consonants and sonorants as vowels
(44 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Consonants and sonorants as vowels
(48 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Devanagari LTR, Question etc. (was: Scripts)
Devanagari LTR, Question etc. (was: Scripts)
(54 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Devanagari LTR, Question etc. (was: Scripts)
(57 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Devanagari LTR, Question etc. (was: Scripts)
(50 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dr. Dunn
Re: Dr. Dunn
(79 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dr. Dunn
(34 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dr. Dunn
(42 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dr. Gunn
Re: Dr. Gunn
(62 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dr. Gunn
(80 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
English and Bostonian (was Re: Klingon Script)
English and Bostonian (was Re: Klingon Script)
(49 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Enough with the BLOODY Gaelic-L garbage.
Enough with the BLOODY Gaelic-L garbage.
(29 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Enterprise Scripts and Languages
Enterprise Scripts and Languages
(32 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Eskimo Snow words (Was:Navajo code-talkers (Was: Trolls))
Re: Eskimo Snow words (Was:Navajo code-talkers (Was: Trolls))
(56 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Essentialist Explaination
Essentialist Explaination
(31 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explaination
(40 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explaination
(43 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explaination
(37 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explaination
(45 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explaination
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explaination
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explaination
(59 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explaination
(49 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explaination
(44 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Essentialist Explaination
(31 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Essentialist Explanation
Re: Essentialist Explanation
(51 lines)
From:
Howlsedhes Services <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explanation
(57 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explanation
(39 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explanation
(145 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explanation
(47 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explanation
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explanation
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explanation
(61 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explanation
(37 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explanation
(48 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Essentialist Explanation
(57 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(55 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(86 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(57 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(116 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(50 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(52 lines)
From:
agricola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(58 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(58 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(70 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(42 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(73 lines)
From:
Kala Tunu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(175 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(80 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(60 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(44 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(70 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(103 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Meanings of to be
(45 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
EXERCISE: Small grammar exercise
Re: EXERCISE: Small grammar exercise
(121 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Small grammar exercise
(80 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Small grammar exercise
(159 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EXERCISE: Small grammar exercise
(186 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200226
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200226
(67 lines)
From:
Kvasir - Vaijskä <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200227
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200227
(67 lines)
From:
Kvasir - Vaijskä <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gaelic thing
Gaelic thing
(41 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gaelic-L Controversy - Translations, Please? (really long)
Gaelic-L Controversy - Translations, Please? (really long)
(281 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gwr script
Gwr script
(34 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gwr script
(74 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Handwriting (Was: Re: Klingon Script)
Handwriting (Was: Re: Klingon Script)
(50 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Here, there and more
Here, there and more
(42 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
How Much for Conversation?
How Much for Conversation?
(41 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How Much for Conversation?
(78 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How Much for Conversation?
(100 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How Much for Conversation?
(46 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
How Much for Conversation?
(56 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
I'm trying to think of a word...
I'm trying to think of a word...
(41 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I'm trying to think of a word...
(56 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Infered Vowels?
Infered Vowels?
(32 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Infered Vowels?
(44 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Interesting multilingual PDF
Interesting multilingual PDF
(29 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting multilingual PDF
(32 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting multilingual PDF
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting multilingual PDF
(41 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG
Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG
(55 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG
(57 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG
(36 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG
(58 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG
(45 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG
(33 lines)
From:
agricola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG
(52 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Japanese
Re: Japanese
(45 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese
(30 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese
(74 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Japanese (was Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!)
Japanese (was Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!)
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Japanese (was Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!)
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Klingon Script
Klingon Script
(37 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(48 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(36 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(41 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(37 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(43 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(35 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(47 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(60 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(56 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(54 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(63 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(44 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon Script
(53 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Logical Lingo
Logical Lingo
(70 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lookin' for the OED
Lookin' for the OED
(46 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lookin' for the OED
(38 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lookin' for the OED
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lookin' for the OED
(51 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lookin' for the OED
(52 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lookin' for the OED
(93 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lookin' for the OED
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lookin' for the OED
(54 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lookin' for the OED
(58 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lookin' for the OED
(55 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lookin' for the OED
(50 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lookin' for the OED
(65 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG: Sanskrit, Hinduism, Indian culture, stories, etc.
NATLANG: Sanskrit, Hinduism, Indian culture, stories, etc.
(36 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Sanskrit, Hinduism, Indian culture, stories, etc.
(41 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Sanskrit, Hinduism, Indian culture, stories, etc.
(56 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Sanskrit, Hinduism, Indian culture, stories, etc.
(53 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Navajo codes (was: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!)
Re: Navajo codes (was: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!)
(75 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Navajo codes (was: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!)
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Obligatives? (Was: Re: Optatives (Was: Re: Making Lots of Money (no spam!)))
Obligatives? (Was: Re: Optatives (Was: Re: Making Lots of Money (no spam!)))
(55 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Obligatives? (Was: Re: Optatives...)
Re: Obligatives? (Was: Re: Optatives...)
(61 lines)
From:
Pablo David Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Optatives (Was: Re: Making Lots of Money (no spam!))
Re: Optatives (Was: Re: Making Lots of Money (no spam!))
(54 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Academia (was Re: Dr. Gunn)
OT Academia (was Re: Dr. Gunn)
(58 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Poly was; Results of Poll by Email No. 17
Re: OT: Poly was; Results of Poll by Email No. 17
(102 lines)
From:
The Keenans <
[log in to unmask]
>
Perfect/imperfect vs Past/present/future
Perfect/imperfect vs Past/present/future
(43 lines)
From:
Nihil Sum <
[log in to unmask]
>
Perfect/imperfect vs Past/present/future
(55 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Perfect/imperfect vs Past/present/future
(54 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Perfect/imperfect vs Past/present/future
(41 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Perfect/imperfect vs Past/present/future
(56 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Polish L/
Re: Polish L/
(52 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Politics
Politics
(32 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(83 lines)
From:
Stephen DeGrace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(98 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(53 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(57 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(54 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(39 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(167 lines)
From:
Stephen DeGrace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(64 lines)
From:
Stephen DeGrace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(53 lines)
From:
Stephen DeGrace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(51 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(53 lines)
From:
Stephen DeGrace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(39 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(62 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(40 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(31 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(46 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(42 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poll by Email No. 17
Re: Poll by Email No. 17
(37 lines)
From:
Gustavo Eulalio <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 17
(43 lines)
From:
Gustavo Eulalio <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poll by Email No. 18
Poll by Email No. 18
(78 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 18
(37 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 18
(41 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 18
(59 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 18
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 18
(41 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 18
(41 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re Codetalkers
Re Codetalkers
(40 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Really Intersistemal
Re: Really Intersistemal
(72 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Really Intersistemal
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Really Intersistemal (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
Really Intersistemal (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(72 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Really Intersistemal (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(60 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Really Intersistemal (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(61 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Really Intersistemal (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(94 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Really Intersistemal (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(51 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Really Intersistemal (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Really Intersistemal (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(71 lines)
From:
Ted E. Saratoga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Really Intersistemal (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(55 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Really Intersistemal (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(75 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Really Intersistemal (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(61 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Really Intersistemal (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
(58 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Results of Poll by Email no. 16
Results of Poll by Email no. 16
(32 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Results of Poll by Email No. 17
Results of Poll by Email No. 17
(92 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 17
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Romanico, was Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
Romanico, was Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(87 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Romanico, was Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(68 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Romanico, was Re: POLITICS <G>: Trolls!
(70 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Scripts
Scripts
(37 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(40 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(41 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(52 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(44 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(50 lines)
From:
Jeremy Louzao <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(61 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(55 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(92 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(63 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(35 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(53 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
scripts
Re: scripts
(33 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Scripts
Re: Scripts
(48 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(61 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(81 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(44 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(52 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(59 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(66 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(54 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(52 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(38 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(48 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(50 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(78 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(43 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts
(46 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Scripts/Klingon and others.
Re: Scripts/Klingon and others.
(54 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
sheu~
sheu~
(63 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Signing off for a while
Signing off for a while
(40 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sound changes in literate societies
Re: Sound changes in literate societies
(55 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Spelling
Spelling
(37 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling
(51 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling
(75 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling
(81 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling
(51 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling
(40 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling
(28 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling
(53 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling
(56 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling
(64 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling
(39 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling
(57 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tentative Ebisedian number system
Tentative Ebisedian number system
(46 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tentative Ebisedian number system
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tentative Ebisedian number system
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tentative Ebisedian number system
(34 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tentative Ebisedian number system
(78 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tentative Ebisedian number system
(132 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tentative Ebisedian number system
(47 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tentative Ebisedian number system
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tentative Ebisedian number system
(37 lines)
From:
Christopher B Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tentative Ebisedian number system
(52 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tentative Ebisedian number system
(39 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tentative Ebisedian number system
(43 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tentative Ebisedian number system
(45 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
The war on gaelic-l
The war on gaelic-l
(24 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The war on gaelic-l
(49 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The war on gaelic-l
(50 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The war on gaelic-l
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: RE: Case mismatches (was: Re: Viko Notes)
Re: THEORY: RE: Case mismatches (was: Re: Viko Notes)
(41 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Three letter root words, relationships to subject
Three letter root words, relationships to subject
(62 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Three letter root words, relationships to subject
(47 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Took
Took
(35 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *Ther
Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *Ther
(55 lines)
From:
agricola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *Ther
(38 lines)
From:
agricola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *Ther
(32 lines)
From:
agricola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *Ther
(33 lines)
From:
agricola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *Ther
(69 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *Ther
(57 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *Ther
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *Ther
(49 lines)
From:
agricola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *Ther
(34 lines)
From:
agricola <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *Ther
(77 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*]
Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*]
(47 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*]
(109 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*]
(44 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*]
(40 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*]
(36 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: writ [was Re: Here, *Here*, and There, *There*]
(36 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vong, Viko et al.
Re: Vong, Viko et al.
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Writ
Writ
(30 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
xor
Re: xor
(44 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU