Conlang
Mailing List July 2002, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"Describing Morphosyntax" questions and English example was Re: Help: Syntax
active vs. semantic marking languages (was: Re: Noun tense)
(10 messages)
affective pronouns
Another Relay, Already!
Any Oxfordian conlangers out there?
(5 messages)
Any Oxonian conlangers out there?
AW: Translation request
(2 messages)
Basque (was RE: Conlanging guide)
(2 messages)
CHAT: Chompsky's name [sic]
CHAT: Chomskyite
(6 messages)
CHAT: John Cowan's Spare Brain (was: Ferochromon)
(2 messages)
Chompsky's name [sic]
Conlang Travellers' Guide (was Re: I have a dream)
(3 messages)
Conlanging guide
(3 messages)
CreoLego in Re: Singular Pluralities
Digraphic letters (was: Dutch "ij")
(5 messages)
Dragon's Egg (was Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(2 messages)
Dying languages(OT)
Ebisedian numbers: an epilogue
Endangered Languages
(2 messages)
Eotemporal (was Re: Noun tense)
Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(16 messages)
Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld (fwd)
(2 messages)
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200229
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200230
Googol-Granddaddy
Googol-Granddaddy (Plaintext)
HELP: Font Creation Critique site
Help: Syntax
(25 messages)
I have a dream
(2 messages)
I'm back!
Imperatives... does this work?
(7 messages)
In Short
Languages on line.
(2 messages)
N(a/o)m(i) (was: X-Bar Theory)
Nawan a Praleyo - Praleyo is dead.
(5 messages)
Non-Alphabetic English
(2 messages)
Norman French (was: Thorn vs Eth)
Noun tense
(25 messages)
Noun tense + pater noster
Noun tense was Re: bac . . . some info
(6 messages)
Off on holiday
OT: music from the inner light (was Re: Ferochromon)
(4 messages)
OT: phat/vet/fat
Relative clauses (Was: Re: Help: Syntax)
(4 messages)
Rubaga Orthog. Part 1
(2 messages)
Singular Pluralities
(13 messages)
TECH? HELP? Font Creator Program
The Declaration of Independence in [spoken] American
(4 messages)
THEORY: Re: active vs. semantic marking languages
(2 messages)
TRANS: The useless dawn...
Translation request
(2 messages)
World Lexicon of Grammaticalization
X-Bar Theory
(19 messages)
Yokels (was Re: Singular Pluralities)
(6 messages)
[OT] Inuit Movie
[Totally OT] Chomsky the Speaker
"Describing Morphosyntax" questions and English example was Re: Help: Syntax
"Describing Morphosyntax" questions and English example was Re: Help: Syntax
(58 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
active vs. semantic marking languages (was: Re: Noun tense)
active vs. semantic marking languages (was: Re: Noun tense)
(75 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: active vs. semantic marking languages (was: Re: Noun tense)
(60 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: active vs. semantic marking languages (was: Re: Noun tense)
(68 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: active vs. semantic marking languages (was: Re: Noun tense)
(60 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: active vs. semantic marking languages (was: Re: Noun tense)
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: active vs. semantic marking languages (was: Re: Noun tense)
(76 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: active vs. semantic marking languages (was: Re: Noun tense)
(38 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: active vs. semantic marking languages (was: Re: Noun tense)
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: active vs. semantic marking languages (was: Re: Noun tense)
(54 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: active vs. semantic marking languages (was: Re: Noun tense)
(31 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc <
[log in to unmask]
>
affective pronouns
affective pronouns
(80 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Another Relay, Already!
Another Relay, Already!
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Any Oxfordian conlangers out there?
Any Oxfordian conlangers out there?
(37 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Any Oxfordian conlangers out there?
(43 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Any Oxfordian conlangers out there?
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Any Oxfordian conlangers out there?
(24 lines)
From:
Nathaniel G. Lew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Any Oxfordian conlangers out there?
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Any Oxonian conlangers out there?
Re: Any Oxonian conlangers out there?
(44 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
AW: Translation request
AW: Translation request
(64 lines)
From:
HCLE Quernheim <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: AW: Translation request
(50 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Basque (was RE: Conlanging guide)
Re: Basque (was RE: Conlanging guide)
(47 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basque (was RE: Conlanging guide)
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Chompsky's name [sic]
CHAT: Chompsky's name [sic]
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Chomskyite
CHAT: Chomskyite
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Chomskyite
(44 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Chomskyite
(53 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Chomskyite
(37 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Chomskyite
(38 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Chomskyite
(48 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: John Cowan's Spare Brain (was: Ferochromon)
CHAT: John Cowan's Spare Brain (was: Ferochromon)
(69 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: John Cowan's Spare Brain (was: Ferochromon)
(51 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chompsky's name [sic]
Re: Chompsky's name [sic]
(48 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Travellers' Guide (was Re: I have a dream)
Re: Conlang Travellers' Guide (was Re: I have a dream)
(117 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Travellers' Guide (was Re: I have a dream)
(34 lines)
From:
Nihil Sum <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Travellers' Guide (was Re: I have a dream)
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlanging guide
Conlanging guide
(43 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlanging guide
(50 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlanging guide
(33 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
CreoLego in Re: Singular Pluralities
CreoLego in Re: Singular Pluralities
(72 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Digraphic letters (was: Dutch "ij")
Re: Digraphic letters (was: Dutch "ij")
(142 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Digraphic letters (was: Dutch "ij")
(81 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Digraphic letters (was: Dutch "ij")
(65 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Digraphic letters (was: Dutch "ij")
(50 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Digraphic letters (was: Dutch "ij")
(109 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dragon's Egg (was Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
Re: Dragon's Egg (was Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(59 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dragon's Egg (was Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(71 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dying languages(OT)
Dying languages(OT)
(35 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ebisedian numbers: an epilogue
Ebisedian numbers: an epilogue
(66 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Endangered Languages
Endangered Languages
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Endangered Languages
(36 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Eotemporal (was Re: Noun tense)
Re: Eotemporal (was Re: Noun tense)
(81 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(120 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(31 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(44 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(43 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(47 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(51 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(42 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(45 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(54 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(52 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(62 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(49 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(60 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld (fwd)
Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld (fwd)
(168 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ferochromon: the Ebisedian conworld (fwd)
(82 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200229
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200229
(68 lines)
From:
Kvasir <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200230
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200230
(71 lines)
From:
Kvasir <
[log in to unmask]
>
Googol-Granddaddy
Re: Googol-Granddaddy
(178 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Googol-Granddaddy (Plaintext)
Re: Googol-Granddaddy (Plaintext)
(93 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
HELP: Font Creation Critique site
Re: HELP: Font Creation Critique site
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Help: Syntax
Help: Syntax
(42 lines)
From:
Robert "Neo" Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(79 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(97 lines)
From:
HCLE Quernheim <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(53 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(47 lines)
From:
Robert "Neo" Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(43 lines)
From:
Robert "Neo" Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(69 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(37 lines)
From:
Robert "Neo" Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(80 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(163 lines)
From:
Robert "Neo" Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(29 lines)
From:
Robert "Neo" Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(64 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(55 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(53 lines)
From:
Robert "Neo" Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(78 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(35 lines)
From:
Robert "Neo" Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(146 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(37 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(46 lines)
From:
Marcus Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(32 lines)
From:
Robert "Neo" Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(67 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(76 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(51 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(65 lines)
From:
Pablo David Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help: Syntax
(47 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
I have a dream
Re: I have a dream
(71 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I have a dream
(78 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
I'm back!
I'm back!
(74 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Imperatives... does this work?
Imperatives... does this work?
(111 lines)
From:
Nihil Sum <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Imperatives... does this work?
(42 lines)
From:
Nihil Sum <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Imperatives... does this work?
(123 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Imperatives... does this work?
(132 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Imperatives... does this work?
(45 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Imperatives... does this work?
(72 lines)
From:
Pablo David Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Imperatives... does this work?
(77 lines)
From:
Nihil Sum <
[log in to unmask]
>
In Short
In Short
(45 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Languages on line.
Re: Languages on line.
(67 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages on line.
(29 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
N(a/o)m(i) (was: X-Bar Theory)
N(a/o)m(i) (was: X-Bar Theory)
(90 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nawan a Praleyo - Praleyo is dead.
Nawan a Praleyo - Praleyo is dead.
(71 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nawan a Praleyo - Praleyo is dead.
(52 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nawan a Praleyo - Praleyo is dead.
(120 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nawan a Praleyo - Praleyo is dead.
(151 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nawan a Praleyo - Praleyo is dead.
(220 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Non-Alphabetic English
Re: Non-Alphabetic English
(53 lines)
From:
hcle..::..elch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Alphabetic English
(43 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Norman French (was: Thorn vs Eth)
Re: Norman French (was: Thorn vs Eth)
(35 lines)
From:
julien eychenne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Noun tense
Re: Noun tense
(82 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(48 lines)
From:
julien eychenne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(60 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(60 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(77 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(48 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(66 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(54 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(98 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(47 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(52 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(45 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(82 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(104 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(62 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(81 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(80 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(133 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(41 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(41 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(67 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(65 lines)
From:
julien eychenne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(69 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(58 lines)
From:
Nathaniel G. Lew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense
(34 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Noun tense + pater noster
Re: Noun tense + pater noster
(113 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Noun tense was Re: bac . . . some info
Re: Noun tense was Re: bac . . . some info
(55 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense was Re: bac . . . some info
(68 lines)
From:
julien eychenne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense was Re: bac . . . some info
(53 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense was Re: bac . . . some info
(52 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense was Re: bac . . . some info
(68 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun tense was Re: bac . . . some info
(52 lines)
From:
julien eychenne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Off on holiday
Off on holiday
(36 lines)
From:
Ray Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: music from the inner light (was Re: Ferochromon)
OT: music from the inner light (was Re: Ferochromon)
(49 lines)
From:
nicole dobrowolski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: music from the inner light (was Re: Ferochromon)
(20 lines)
From:
Bart Coppens <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: music from the inner light (was Re: Ferochromon)
(93 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: music from the inner light (was Re: Ferochromon)
(55 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: phat/vet/fat
Re: OT: phat/vet/fat
(59 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Relative clauses (Was: Re: Help: Syntax)
Relative clauses (Was: Re: Help: Syntax)
(74 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses (Was: Re: Help: Syntax)
(84 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses (Was: Re: Help: Syntax)
(82 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses (Was: Re: Help: Syntax)
(50 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rubaga Orthog. Part 1
Re: Rubaga Orthog. Part 1
(48 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rubaga Orthog. Part 1
(83 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Singular Pluralities
Singular Pluralities
(42 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Singular Pluralities
(96 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Singular Pluralities
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Singular Pluralities
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Singular Pluralities
(44 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Singular Pluralities
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Singular Pluralities
(63 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Singular Pluralities
(62 lines)
From:
Pablo David Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Singular Pluralities
(58 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Singular Pluralities
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Singular Pluralities
(47 lines)
From:
Jeff Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Singular Pluralities
(75 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Singular Pluralities
(59 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH? HELP? Font Creator Program
TECH? HELP? Font Creator Program
(30 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Declaration of Independence in [spoken] American
The Declaration of Independence in [spoken] American
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Declaration of Independence in [spoken] American
(45 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Declaration of Independence in [spoken] American
(59 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Declaration of Independence in [spoken] American
(47 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Re: active vs. semantic marking languages
THEORY: Re: active vs. semantic marking languages
(60 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Re: active vs. semantic marking languages
(75 lines)
From:
SMITH,MARCUS ANTHONY <
[log in to unmask]
>
TRANS: The useless dawn...
TRANS: The useless dawn...
(86 lines)
From:
Pablo David Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation request
Translation request
(28 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation request
(32 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
World Lexicon of Grammaticalization
World Lexicon of Grammaticalization
(79 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
X-Bar Theory
X-Bar Theory
(41 lines)
From:
Robert "Neo" Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(66 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(36 lines)
From:
Robert "Neo" Hill <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(47 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(51 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(60 lines)
From:
julien eychenne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(88 lines)
From:
julien eychenne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(46 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(46 lines)
From:
SMITH,MARCUS ANTHONY <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(64 lines)
From:
SMITH,MARCUS ANTHONY <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(52 lines)
From:
SMITH,MARCUS ANTHONY <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(59 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(40 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(65 lines)
From:
SMITH,MARCUS ANTHONY <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(50 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(42 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: X-Bar Theory
(36 lines)
From:
julien eychenne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yokels (was Re: Singular Pluralities)
Yokels (was Re: Singular Pluralities)
(43 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yokels (was Re: Singular Pluralities)
(42 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yokels (was Re: Singular Pluralities)
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yokels (was Re: Singular Pluralities)
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yokels (was Re: Singular Pluralities)
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yokels (was Re: Singular Pluralities)
(59 lines)
From:
Thomas R. Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT] Inuit Movie
[OT] Inuit Movie
(33 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Totally OT] Chomsky the Speaker
[Totally OT] Chomsky the Speaker
(39 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU