Conlang Mailing List -- July 2002, week 5

Conlang Mailing List – July 2002, week 5

Sort by

Author | Date | Topic
Chronologically | Most recent first

Options

Show author | Hide author
Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation

Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives

Table of contents:

affective pronouns (9 messages)
All-important phrases (5 messages)
CHAT: Chomskyite
CHAT: OE (3 messages)
CHAT: Re: Temperature (was: I'm back!) (3 messages)
Cyrillic IPA (4 messages)
Going nomail
I'm back! (9 messages)
introduction (44 messages)
Kayasanoda 1.1
Letter stats
Mail filters (was Re: affective pronouns) (4 messages)
names, was: introduction
Need link for 6th Relay! (10 messages)
Negation raising (was: introduction) (16 messages)
Singular Pluralities
Slovanik, my new romlang (15 messages)
Temperature (was: I'm back!) (4 messages)
THEORY: active vs. semantic marking languages (2 messages)
Too late to join 7th? (2 messages)
Welsh (was: Re: introduction)
Welsh - Verb-Nouns (5 messages)
X-Bar Theory
Yokels (was Re: Singular Pluralities) (5 messages)

affective pronouns
- Re: affective pronouns (142 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: affective pronouns (123 lines)
  From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: affective pronouns (37 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: affective pronouns (40 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: affective pronouns (38 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: affective pronouns (46 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: affective pronouns (46 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: affective pronouns (34 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: affective pronouns (45 lines)
  From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
All-important phrases
- All-important phrases (76 lines)
  From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: All-important phrases (110 lines)
  From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: All-important phrases (52 lines)
  From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: All-important phrases (46 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: All-important phrases (90 lines)
  From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
CHAT: Chomskyite
- Re: CHAT: Chomskyite (43 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
CHAT: OE
- CHAT: OE (57 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CHAT: OE (45 lines)
  From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CHAT: OE (57 lines)
  From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
CHAT: Re: Temperature (was: I'm back!)
- CHAT: Re: Temperature (was: I'm back!) (57 lines)
  From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CHAT: Re: Temperature (was: I'm back!) (45 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CHAT: Re: Temperature (was: I'm back!) (65 lines)
  From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
Cyrillic IPA
- Cyrillic IPA (43 lines)
  From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Cyrillic IPA (86 lines)
  From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Cyrillic IPA (41 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Cyrillic IPA (37 lines)
  From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Going nomail
- Going nomail (37 lines)
  From: Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>
I'm back!
- Re: I'm back! (39 lines)
  From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: I'm back! (51 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
- I'm back! (30 lines)
  From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: I'm back! (41 lines)
  From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: I'm back! (59 lines)
  From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: I'm back! (50 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: I'm back! (52 lines)
  From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: I'm back! (46 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: I'm back! (38 lines)
  From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
introduction
- introduction (37 lines)
  From: Majken M <[log in to unmask]>
- introduction (52 lines)
  From: Thomas Leigh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (47 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (63 lines)
  From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (47 lines)
  From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (45 lines)
  From: Daniel Andreasson Vpc <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (46 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (78 lines)
  From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (74 lines)
  From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (60 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (51 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (77 lines)
  From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (45 lines)
  From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (45 lines)
  From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (62 lines)
  From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (48 lines)
  From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (53 lines)
  From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (55 lines)
  From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (39 lines)
  From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (48 lines)
  From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (51 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (46 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (45 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (47 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (66 lines)
  From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (58 lines)
  From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (46 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (72 lines)
  From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (58 lines)
  From: Majken M <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (81 lines)
  From: Majken M <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (52 lines)
  From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (44 lines)
  From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (43 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (46 lines)
  From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (42 lines)
  From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (38 lines)
  From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (69 lines)
  From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (67 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (58 lines)
  From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (52 lines)
  From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (68 lines)
  From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (61 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (54 lines)
  From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: introduction (77 lines)
  From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
Kayasanoda 1.1
- Kayasanoda 1.1 (36 lines)
  From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
Letter stats
- Letter stats (86 lines)
  From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
Mail filters (was Re: affective pronouns)
- Re: Mail filters (was Re: affective pronouns) (71 lines)
  From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Mail filters (was Re: affective pronouns) (70 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Mail filters (was Re: affective pronouns) (80 lines)
  From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Mail filters (was Re: affective pronouns) (62 lines)
  From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
names, was: introduction
- names, was: introduction (47 lines)
  From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
Need link for 6th Relay!
- Need link for 6th Relay! (30 lines)
  From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Need link for 6th Relay! (43 lines)
  From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Need link for 6th Relay! (60 lines)
  From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Need link for 6th Relay! (46 lines)
  From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Need link for 6th Relay! (36 lines)
  From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Need link for 6th Relay! (49 lines)
  From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Need link for 6th Relay! (41 lines)
  From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Need link for 6th Relay! (56 lines)
  From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Need link for 6th Relay! (40 lines)
  From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Need link for 6th Relay! (62 lines)
  From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
Negation raising (was: introduction)
- Negation raising (was: introduction) (60 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Negation raising (was: introduction) (85 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Negation raising (was: introduction) (54 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Negation raising (was: introduction) (43 lines)
  From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Negation raising (was: introduction) (50 lines)
  From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Negation raising (was: introduction) (55 lines)
  From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Negation raising (was: introduction) (45 lines)
  From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Negation raising (was: introduction) (73 lines)
  From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Negation raising (was: introduction) (45 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Negation raising (was: introduction) (47 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Negation raising (was: introduction) (60 lines)
  From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Negation raising (was: introduction) (55 lines)
  From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Negation raising (was: introduction) (75 lines)
  From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Negation raising (was: introduction) (55 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Negation raising (was: introduction) (40 lines)
  From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Negation raising (was: introduction) (48 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Singular Pluralities
- Re: Singular Pluralities (41 lines)
  From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
Slovanik, my new romlang
- Slovanik, my new romlang (155 lines)
  From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Slovanik, my new romlang (174 lines)
  From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Slovanik, my new romlang (85 lines)
  From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
- Slovanik, my new romlang (75 lines)
  From: Thomas Leigh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Slovanik, my new romlang (113 lines)
  From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Slovanik, my new romlang (75 lines)
  From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Slovanik, my new romlang (47 lines)
  From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Slovanik, my new romlang (65 lines)
  From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Slovanik, my new romlang (42 lines)
  From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Slovanik, my new romlang (138 lines)
  From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Slovanik, my new romlang (51 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Slovanik, my new romlang (88 lines)
  From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Slovanik, my new romlang (39 lines)
  From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Slovanik, my new romlang (43 lines)
  From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Slovanik, my new romlang (69 lines)
  From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Temperature (was: I'm back!)
- Re: Temperature (was: I'm back!) (35 lines)
  From: Andrew Chaney <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Temperature (was: I'm back!) (43 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Temperature (was: I'm back!) (50 lines)
  From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Temperature (was: I'm back!) (61 lines)
  From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
THEORY: active vs. semantic marking languages
- Re: THEORY: active vs. semantic marking languages (175 lines)
  From: Thomas R. Wier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: THEORY: active vs. semantic marking languages (63 lines)
  From: Marcus Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Too late to join 7th?
- Too late to join 7th? (30 lines)
  From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Too late to join 7th? (69 lines)
  From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
Welsh (was: Re: introduction)
- Welsh (was: Re: introduction) (31 lines)
  From: Thomas Leigh <[log in to unmask]>
Welsh - Verb-Nouns
- Welsh - Verb-Nouns (50 lines)
  From: Christopher Bates <[log in to unmask]>
- Welsh - Verb-Nouns (66 lines)
  From: Thomas Leigh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Welsh - Verb-Nouns (95 lines)
  From: Christopher Bates <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Welsh - Verb-Nouns (95 lines)
  From: Thomas Leigh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Welsh - Verb-Nouns (80 lines)
  From: Christopher Bates <[log in to unmask]>
X-Bar Theory
- Re: X-Bar Theory (49 lines)
  From: julien eychenne <[log in to unmask]>
Yokels (was Re: Singular Pluralities)
- Re: Yokels (was Re: Singular Pluralities) (43 lines)
  From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Yokels (was Re: Singular Pluralities) (55 lines)
  From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Yokels (was Re: Singular Pluralities) (50 lines)
  From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Yokels (was Re: Singular Pluralities) (90 lines)
  From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Yokels (was Re: Singular Pluralities) (47 lines)
  From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

Back to the main CONLANG page

LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU