Conlang Mailing List – October 2002, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

•       "Abilitative" aspect?
•       Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (2 messages)
•       Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (2 messages)
• !Ui phonemes (6 messages)
• "Abilitative" aspect? (21 messages)
• Accent Terminology Question
• And wrote:
• Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (10 messages)
• CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (32 messages)
• CHAT: Composer names (Was: Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)))
• CHAT: minimal pair of English Interdentals (2 messages)
• CHAT: The Big Storm [was: Re: conlang servey] (2 messages)
• Cleverness in vocab #2.2
• Clusters (was: conlang survey ( Géarthnuns ))
• composer names (Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (2 messages)
• conlang servey (39 messages)
• conlang servey & Ebisedian (8 messages)
• conlang servey & Kerno (2 messages)
• conlang servey & Rhean
• conlang servey (fwd)
• conlang servey (Hattic & Askaic)
• conlang servey (Maggel)
• conlang survey (2 messages)
• conlang survey ( Géarthnuns )
• conlang survey ( Géarthnuns )
• Conlang survey: Choba
• Funny site
• Going nomail for a few days ...
• Gzarondan phonology review (3 messages)
• hello again (4 messages)
• Help for a new conlang (8 messages)
• Just Found a Website That's Priceless (6 messages)
• Lindiga numerals
• linguistics humor (2 messages)
• Male and female animals (6 messages)
• mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (4 messages)
• minimal pair of English Interdentals (28 messages)
• mutation, &c FAQ
• Mutations in General (4 messages)
• Mutations in general (9 messages)
• Mutations in general was Re: Taalen mutations (2 messages)
• My visit with Thomas
• Naming customs (was Re: punctuated abbreviations)
• Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the
• Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution
• Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (6 messages)
• Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evoluution thereof
• pigeonholed pidgins (wasRe: conlang servey)
• Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean (5 messages)
• Should I do the survey?
• Subject: Re: conlang servey
• THEORY: RE: And wrote: (3 messages)
• USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (14 messages)
• vocab #2.2 (4 messages)
• vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (8 messages)
• Who was talking about Khazaria? (14 messages)

1.       "Abilitative" aspect?
   • Re:       "Abilitative" aspect? (64 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

2.       Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.
   • Re:       Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (72 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re:       Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (51 lines)
     From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>

3.       Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.
   • Re:       Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (158 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re:       Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (58 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

4. !Ui phonemes
   • !Ui phonemes (38 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: !Ui phonemes (47 lines)
     From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: !Ui phonemes (46 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: !Ui phonemes (64 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: !Ui phonemes (73 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: !Ui phonemes (72 lines)
     From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>

5. "Abilitative" aspect?
   • "Abilitative" aspect? (44 lines)
     From: Ian Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (64 lines)
     From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (48 lines)
     From: Mau Rauszer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (50 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (77 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (56 lines)
     From: JS Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (59 lines)
     From: Robert B Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (73 lines)
     From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (53 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (91 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (72 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (54 lines)
     From: Ian Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (39 lines)
     From: Ian Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (44 lines)
     From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (63 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (43 lines)
     From: Ian Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (149 lines)
     From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (67 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (61 lines)
     From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (50 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
   • "Abilitative" aspect? (51 lines)
     From: Thomas Leigh <[log in to unmask]>

6. Accent Terminology Question
   • Re: Accent Terminology Question (41 lines)
     From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>

7. And wrote:
   • And wrote: (62 lines)
     From: Rob Nierse <[log in to unmask]>

8. Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General
   • Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (69 lines)
     From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (106 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (37 lines)
     From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (76 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (43 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (55 lines)
     From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (56 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (49 lines)
     From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (61 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (48 lines)
     From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>

9. CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (66 lines)
     From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (50 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (67 lines)
     From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (37 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (47 lines)
     From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (66 lines)
     From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (59 lines)
     From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (52 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (42 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (47 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (64 lines)
     From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (45 lines)
     From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (59 lines)
     From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (47 lines)
     From: Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (58 lines)
     From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (58 lines)
     From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (37 lines)
     From: Nathaniel G. Lew <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (53 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (48 lines)
     From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (64 lines)
     From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (47 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (65 lines)
     From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (45 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (62 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (45 lines)
     From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (44 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (40 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (56 lines)
     From: Isaac A. Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (47 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (39 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (57 lines)
     From: M. Astrand <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (37 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

10. CHAT: Composer names (Was: Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)))
    • CHAT: Composer names (Was: Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))) (48 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>

11. CHAT: minimal pair of English Interdentals
    • Re: CHAT: minimal pair of English Interdentals (41 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: minimal pair of English Interdentals (51 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>

12. CHAT: The Big Storm [was: Re: conlang servey]
    • CHAT: The Big Storm [was: Re: conlang servey] (52 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: The Big Storm [was: Re: conlang servey] (75 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>

13. Cleverness in vocab #2.2
    • Re: Cleverness in vocab #2.2 (47 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

14. Clusters (was: conlang survey ( Géarthnuns ))
    • Re: Clusters (was: conlang survey ( Géarthnuns )) (64 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>

15. composer names (Re: CHAT: A flat minor)
    • composer names (Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (47 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: composer names (Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (67 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>

16. conlang servey
    • conlang servey (102 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (245 lines)
      From: Gracie M. Groove <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (51 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (333 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (366 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (231 lines)
      From: Nihil Sum <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (137 lines)
      From: Lawrie TD <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (393 lines)
      From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (184 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (183 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (94 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (500 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (133 lines)
      From: wayne chevrier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (94 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (308 lines)
      From: Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (35 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (306 lines)
      From: Robert B Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (48 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (186 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (65 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (178 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (43 lines)
      From: Nihil Sum <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (70 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (78 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (407 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (86 lines)
      From: HCLE Quernheim <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (55 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (272 lines)
      From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (389 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (54 lines)
      From: Robert B Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (271 lines)
      From: Nathaniel G. Lew <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (45 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (212 lines)
      From: Rik <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (93 lines)
      From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (85 lines)
      From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (60 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (80 lines)
      From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (63 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey (37 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

17. conlang servey & Ebisedian
    • Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian (49 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian (48 lines)
      From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian (78 lines)
      From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian (85 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian (120 lines)
      From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian (75 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian (46 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian (45 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>

18. conlang servey & Kerno
    • Re: conlang servey & Kerno (53 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang servey & Kerno (200 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>

19. conlang servey & Rhean
    • Re: conlang servey & Rhean (53 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>

20. conlang servey (fwd)
    • Re: conlang servey (fwd) (246 lines)
      From: Mau Rauszer <[log in to unmask]>

21. conlang servey (Hattic & Askaic)
    • Re: conlang servey (Hattic & Askaic) (357 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>

22. conlang servey (Maggel)
    • Re: conlang servey (Maggel) (665 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

23. conlang survey
    • Re: conlang survey (214 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: conlang survey (294 lines)
      From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>

24. conlang survey ( Géarthnuns )
    • Re: conlang survey ( Géarthnuns ) (341 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>

25. conlang survey ( Géarthnuns )
    • Re: conlang survey ( Géarthnuns ) (40 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

26. Conlang survey: Choba
    • Conlang survey: Choba (401 lines)
      From: Thomas Leigh <[log in to unmask]>

27. Funny site
    • Re: Funny site (43 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

28. Going nomail for a few days ...
    • Going nomail for a few days ... (31 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

29. Gzarondan phonology review
    • Gzarondan phonology review (166 lines)
      From: Adrian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gzarondan phonology review (167 lines)
      From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gzarondan phonology review (50 lines)
      From: Adrian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

30. hello again
    • hello again (55 lines)
      From: Heather Rice <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: hello again (60 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: hello again (42 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: hello again (47 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

31. Help for a new conlang
    • Help for a new conlang (49 lines)
      From: Roberto Suarez Soto <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Help for a new conlang (47 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Help for a new conlang (72 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Help for a new conlang (56 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Help for a new conlang (131 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Help for a new conlang (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Help for a new conlang (48 lines)
      From: Roberto Suarez Soto <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Help for a new conlang (73 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>

32. Just Found a Website That's Priceless
    • Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless (45 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless (39 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless (46 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless (45 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless (44 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless (70 lines)
      From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

33. Lindiga numerals
    • Lindiga numerals (60 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

34. linguistics humor
    • linguistics humor (36 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: linguistics humor (54 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

35. Male and female animals
    • Male and female animals (107 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Male and female animals (59 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Male and female animals (83 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Male and female animals (48 lines)
      From: Mau Rauszer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Male and female animals (183 lines)
      From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Male and female animals (60 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

36. mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals
    • mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (50 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (42 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (42 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (37 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

37. minimal pair of English Interdentals
    • minimal pair of English Interdentals (35 lines)
      From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (70 lines)
      From: Karapcik, Mike <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (53 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (62 lines)
      From: Robert B Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (60 lines)
      From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (61 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (50 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (69 lines)
      From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (47 lines)
      From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (49 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (64 lines)
      From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (56 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (40 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (40 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (32 lines)
      From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (46 lines)
      From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (39 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (40 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (41 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (38 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (45 lines)
      From: Robert B Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (39 lines)
      From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (42 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (50 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (49 lines)
      From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (58 lines)
      From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (48 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (41 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

38. mutation, &c FAQ
    • mutation, &c FAQ (111 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>

39. Mutations in General
    • Re: Mutations in General (44 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mutations in General (85 lines)
      From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mutations in General (46 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mutations in General (36 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

40. Mutations in general
    • Re: Mutations in general (130 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mutations in general (66 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mutations in general (40 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mutations in general (167 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mutations in general (39 lines)
      From: Adrian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mutations in general (46 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mutations in general (57 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mutations in general (73 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mutations in general (59 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>

41. Mutations in general was Re: Taalen mutations
    • Re: Mutations in general was Re: Taalen mutations (150 lines)
      From: Yoon Ha Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mutations in general was Re: Taalen mutations (79 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

42. My visit with Thomas
    • My visit with Thomas (42 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>

43. Naming customs (was Re: punctuated abbreviations)
    • Re: Naming customs (was Re: punctuated abbreviations) (56 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>

44. Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the
    • Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the (46 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

45. Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution
    • Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution (42 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

46. Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.
    • Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (37 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (51 lines)
      From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (75 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (63 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (67 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (45 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

47. Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evoluution thereof
    • Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evoluution thereof (53 lines)
      From: Mau Rauszer <[log in to unmask]>

48. pigeonholed pidgins (wasRe: conlang servey)
    • pigeonholed pidgins (wasRe: conlang servey) (44 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>

49. Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean
    • Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean (50 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean (55 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean (48 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean (53 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean (66 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>

50. Should I do the survey?
    • Should I do the survey? (36 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>

51. Subject: Re: conlang servey
    • Subject: Re: conlang servey (231 lines)
      From: Nihil Sum <[log in to unmask]>

52. THEORY: RE: And wrote:
    • THEORY: RE: And wrote: (69 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • THEORY: RE: And wrote: (59 lines)
      From: Rob Nierse <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: RE: And wrote: (88 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

53. USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)
    • USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (68 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (100 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (131 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (87 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (46 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (38 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (119 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (45 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (50 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (39 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (57 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (53 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (68 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (45 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

54. vocab #2.2
    • vocab #2.2 (71 lines)
      From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vocab #2.2 (115 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vocab #2.2 (202 lines)
      From: Nihil Sum <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vocab #2.2 (105 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>

55. vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor)
    • vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (28 lines)
      From: Isaac A. Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (103 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (102 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (50 lines)
      From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (58 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (44 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (73 lines)
      From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (47 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

56. Who was talking about Khazaria?
    • Who was talking about Khazaria? (62 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (67 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (94 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (47 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (63 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (49 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (97 lines)
      From: Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (52 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (142 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (61 lines)
      From: Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (44 lines)
      From: Roberto Suarez Soto <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (48 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (78 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (48 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>