Conlang Mailing List – October 2002, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

•       "Abilitative" aspect?
•       Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (2 messages)
•       Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (2 messages)
• !Ui phonemes (6 messages)
• "Abilitative" aspect? (21 messages)
• Accent Terminology Question
• And wrote:
• Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (10 messages)
• CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (32 messages)
• CHAT: Composer names (Was: Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)))
• CHAT: minimal pair of English Interdentals (2 messages)
• CHAT: The Big Storm [was: Re: conlang servey] (2 messages)
• Cleverness in vocab #2.2
• Clusters (was: conlang survey ( Géarthnuns ))
• composer names (Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (2 messages)
• conlang servey (39 messages)
• conlang servey & Ebisedian (8 messages)
• conlang servey & Kerno (2 messages)
• conlang servey & Rhean
• conlang servey (fwd)
• conlang servey (Hattic & Askaic)
• conlang servey (Maggel)
• conlang survey (2 messages)
• conlang survey ( Géarthnuns )
• conlang survey ( Géarthnuns )
• Conlang survey: Choba
• Funny site
• Going nomail for a few days ...
• Gzarondan phonology review (3 messages)
• hello again (4 messages)
• Help for a new conlang (8 messages)
• Just Found a Website That's Priceless (6 messages)
• Lindiga numerals
• linguistics humor (2 messages)
• Male and female animals (6 messages)
• mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (4 messages)
• minimal pair of English Interdentals (28 messages)
• mutation, &c FAQ
• Mutations in General (4 messages)
• Mutations in general (9 messages)
• Mutations in general was Re: Taalen mutations (2 messages)
• My visit with Thomas
• Naming customs (was Re: punctuated abbreviations)
• Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the
• Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution
• Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (6 messages)
• Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evoluution thereof
• pigeonholed pidgins (wasRe: conlang servey)
• Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean (5 messages)
• Should I do the survey?
• Subject: Re: conlang servey
• THEORY: RE: And wrote: (3 messages)
• USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (14 messages)
• vocab #2.2 (4 messages)
• vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (8 messages)
• Who was talking about Khazaria? (14 messages)

1.       "Abilitative" aspect?
   • Re:       "Abilitative" aspect? (64 lines)
     Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:18:51 EDT

2.       Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.
   • Re:       Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (72 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:33:34 EDT
   • Re:       Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (51 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:51:59 -0700

3.       Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.
   • Re:       Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (158 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 19:30:10 EDT
   • Re:       Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (58 lines)
     Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 05:55:10 EDT

4. !Ui phonemes
   • !Ui phonemes (38 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:16:08 +0000
   • Re: !Ui phonemes (47 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:05:19 -0400
   • Re: !Ui phonemes (46 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:13:58 -0500
   • Re: !Ui phonemes (64 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:07:56 +0000
   • Re: !Ui phonemes (73 lines)
     Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:22:22 +0100
   • Re: !Ui phonemes (72 lines)
     Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:34:25 +0100

5. "Abilitative" aspect?
   • "Abilitative" aspect? (44 lines)
     Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:24:43 -0400
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (64 lines)
     Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:59:11 +0100
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (48 lines)
     Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:27:36 +0200
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (50 lines)
     Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:16:51 +0000
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (77 lines)
     Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:24:26 -0400
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (56 lines)
     Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:25:48 -0700
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (59 lines)
     Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:44:31 -0400
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (73 lines)
     Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:00:32 +0200
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (53 lines)
     Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:11:49 -0400
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (91 lines)
     Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:06:45 -0500
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (72 lines)
     Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:53:59 -0700
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (54 lines)
     Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:31:35 -0400
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (39 lines)
     Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:40:18 -0400
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (44 lines)
     Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 02:37:10 +0100
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (63 lines)
     Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:39:51 -0400
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (43 lines)
     Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:48:41 -0400
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (149 lines)
     Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:44:51 +0100
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (67 lines)
     Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:42:35 -0400
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (61 lines)
     Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:16:05 +0100
   • Re: "Abilitative" aspect? (50 lines)
     Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 02:25:47 -0400
   • "Abilitative" aspect? (51 lines)
     Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 12:45:05 -0800

6. Accent Terminology Question
   • Re: Accent Terminology Question (41 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:41:37 -0400

7. And wrote:
   • And wrote: (62 lines)
     Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:06:12 +0200

8. Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General
   • Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (69 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:22:05 -0500
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (106 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:07:33 +0200
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (37 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 19:37:56 +0100
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (76 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:41:24 -0600
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (43 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:01:29 -0600
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (55 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 22:59:15 +0100
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (56 lines)
     Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:32:42 +0200
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (49 lines)
     Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:05:23 +0200
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (61 lines)
     Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:25:30 -0600
   • Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (48 lines)
     Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:24:06 +0100

9. CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (66 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:23:36 +0100
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (50 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 06:27:00 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (67 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:37:16 +0100
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (37 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 06:44:13 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (47 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:42:35 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (66 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:55:49 +0100
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (59 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:05:02 +0100
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (52 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:10:28 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (42 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:20:07 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (47 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:24:11 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (64 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:40:23 +0100
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (45 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:41:57 +0100
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (59 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:51:29 +0100
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (47 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:08:22 +0400
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (58 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:24:30 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (58 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:52:15 +0100
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (37 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:28:10 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (53 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:52:10 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (48 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:12:02 +0100
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (64 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:21:34 +0100
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (47 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:22:27 +0000
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (65 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:25:06 +0100
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (45 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:31:37 +0000
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (62 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:42:15 +0000
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (45 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:02:27 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (44 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 20:49:08 +0000
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (40 lines)
     Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:34:47 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (56 lines)
     Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:46:16 +0300
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (47 lines)
     Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:58:15 +0000
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (39 lines)
     Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:50:28 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (57 lines)
     Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:52:19 +0300
   • Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (37 lines)
     Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:41:02 +0000

10. CHAT: Composer names (Was: Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)))
    • CHAT: Composer names (Was: Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))) (48 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:59:02 -0400

11. CHAT: minimal pair of English Interdentals
    • Re: CHAT: minimal pair of English Interdentals (41 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 18:17:18 +0200
    • Re: CHAT: minimal pair of English Interdentals (51 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:37:01 -0700

12. CHAT: The Big Storm [was: Re: conlang servey]
    • CHAT: The Big Storm [was: Re: conlang servey] (52 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:58:45 -0700
    • Re: CHAT: The Big Storm [was: Re: conlang servey] (75 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 19:02:01 +0000

13. Cleverness in vocab #2.2
    • Re: Cleverness in vocab #2.2 (47 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:44:33 -0500

14. Clusters (was: conlang survey ( Géarthnuns ))
    • Re: Clusters (was: conlang survey ( Géarthnuns )) (64 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:00:50 -0500

15. composer names (Re: CHAT: A flat minor)
    • composer names (Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (47 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:21:17 -0400
    • Re: composer names (Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (67 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:41:56 -0400

16. conlang servey
    • conlang servey (102 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:16:11 -0700
    • Re: conlang servey (245 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:07:02 -0700
    • Re: conlang servey (51 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 06:24:22 +0100
    • Re: conlang servey (333 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 01:08:31 -0500
    • Re: conlang servey (366 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 06:57:21 +0000
    • Re: conlang servey (231 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:13:56 -0700
    • Re: conlang servey (137 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:03:31 +0200
    • Re: conlang servey (393 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:01:53 +0100
    • Re: conlang servey (184 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:59:53 +0200
    • Re: conlang servey (183 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:43:28 +0100
    • Re: conlang servey (94 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:20:59 -0700
    • Re: conlang servey (500 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:39:17 -0400
    • Re: conlang servey (133 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:40:25 +0000
    • Re: conlang servey (94 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:53:17 -0400
    • Re: conlang servey (308 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:13:36 +0400
    • Re: conlang servey (35 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:40:22 +0000
    • Re: conlang servey (306 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:49:09 -0400
    • Re: conlang servey (48 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:23:54 -0400
    • Re: conlang servey (186 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:44:00 -0700
    • Re: conlang servey (65 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:26:30 -0400
    • Re: conlang servey (178 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 23:43:50 -0400
    • Re: conlang servey (43 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:48:54 -0700
    • Re: conlang servey (70 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:29:54 +0000
    • Re: conlang servey (78 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 05:45:28 -0700
    • Re: conlang servey (407 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:47:41 +0200
    • Re: conlang servey (86 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:34:17 +0200
    • Re: conlang servey (55 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:26:23 +0200
    • Re: conlang servey (272 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:41:26 -0400
    • Re: conlang servey (389 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:20:15 -0700
    • Re: conlang servey (54 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:50:54 -0400
    • Re: conlang servey (271 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 01:03:32 -0500
    • Re: conlang servey (45 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 18:27:26 +0100
    • Re: conlang servey (212 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 18:58:16 +0000
    • Re: conlang servey (93 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:42:37 +0000
    • Re: conlang servey (85 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:43:53 +0000
    • Re: conlang servey (60 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:51:12 +0100
    • Re: conlang servey (80 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:02:20 +0000
    • Re: conlang servey (63 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:17:12 +0100
    • Re: conlang servey (37 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:51:28 -0600

17. conlang servey & Ebisedian
    • Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian (49 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 08:00:45 +0100
    • Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian (48 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:41:28 -0400
    • Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian (78 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:27:56 +0000
    • Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian (85 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:09:31 +0100
    • Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian (120 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:27:30 +0000
    • Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian (75 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:24:36 +0000
    • Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian (46 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:19:16 +0100
    • Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian (45 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 19:35:40 +0000

18. conlang servey & Kerno
    • Re: conlang servey & Kerno (53 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 07:32:28 +0000
    • Re: conlang servey & Kerno (200 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:17:01 -0800

19. conlang servey & Rhean
    • Re: conlang servey & Rhean (53 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 07:48:24 +0100

20. conlang servey (fwd)
    • Re: conlang servey (fwd) (246 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 06:21:20 +0200

21. conlang servey (Hattic & Askaic)
    • Re: conlang servey (Hattic & Askaic) (357 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 12:44:05 +0100

22. conlang servey (Maggel)
    • Re: conlang servey (Maggel) (665 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:08:51 +0100

23. conlang survey
    • Re: conlang survey (214 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:30:49 -0400
    • Re: conlang survey (294 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:46:50 -0400

24. conlang survey ( Géarthnuns )
    • Re: conlang survey ( Géarthnuns ) (341 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:09:34 -0400

25. conlang survey ( Géarthnuns )
    • Re: conlang survey ( Géarthnuns ) (40 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:00:55 +0000

26. Conlang survey: Choba
    • Conlang survey: Choba (401 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:42:11 -0800

27. Funny site
    • Re: Funny site (43 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:45:17 +0200

28. Going nomail for a few days ...
    • Going nomail for a few days ... (31 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 12:32:51 +0000

29. Gzarondan phonology review
    • Gzarondan phonology review (166 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 23:12:56 +1000
    • Re: Gzarondan phonology review (167 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:15:04 -0400
    • Re: Gzarondan phonology review (50 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:30:00 +1000

30. hello again
    • hello again (55 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:54:40 -0700
    • Re: hello again (60 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:34:42 +0200
    • Re: hello again (42 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:04:26 -0700
    • Re: hello again (47 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:45:03 +0200

31. Help for a new conlang
    • Help for a new conlang (49 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:30:37 +0200
    • Re: Help for a new conlang (47 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:03:59 -0400
    • Re: Help for a new conlang (72 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:21:34 +0000
    • Re: Help for a new conlang (56 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:02:03 +0100
    • Re: Help for a new conlang (131 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:02:21 EDT
    • Re: Help for a new conlang (40 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:13:15 -0400
    • Re: Help for a new conlang (48 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:22:41 +0200
    • Re: Help for a new conlang (73 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:30:55 +1300

32. Just Found a Website That's Priceless
    • Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless (45 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:47:36 +0200
    • Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless (39 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 01:54:51 -0500
    • Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless (46 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:45:53 +0200
    • Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless (45 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:14:43 +0100
    • Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless (44 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:04:15 +0000
    • Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless (70 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:56:31 -0500

33. Lindiga numerals
    • Lindiga numerals (60 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:19:41 -0500

34. linguistics humor
    • linguistics humor (36 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:50:45 -0500
    • Re: linguistics humor (54 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:27:35 +0100

35. Male and female animals
    • Male and female animals (107 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 20:42:33 -0500
    • Re: Male and female animals (59 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 22:15:20 -0500
    • Re: Male and female animals (83 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:48:57 +0100
    • Re: Male and female animals (48 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:39:59 +0100
    • Re: Male and female animals (183 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:12:00 +0000
    • Re: Male and female animals (60 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 01:09:33 -0500

36. mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals
    • mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (50 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:20:22 -0700
    • Re: mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (42 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 01:57:51 -0400
    • Re: mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (42 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:52:06 -0800
    • Re: mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (37 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:08:32 -0500

37. minimal pair of English Interdentals
    • minimal pair of English Interdentals (35 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:02:06 -0400
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (70 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:17:18 -0400
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (53 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:39:38 -0500
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (62 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:30:17 -0400
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (60 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:51:56 +0100
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (61 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:31:03 -0400
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (50 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:33:23 -0400
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (69 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:41:03 +0100
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (47 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:47:03 +0100
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (49 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:39:09 -0400
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (64 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:21:21 +0100
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (56 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:22:54 +0000
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (40 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:24:58 +0000
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (40 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:09:26 -0700
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (32 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:13:17 -0400
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (46 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:15:46 -0400
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (39 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:58:33 -0400
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (40 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:31:36 -0500
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (41 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:33:45 -0500
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (38 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:39:51 -0500
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (45 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 23:23:35 -0400
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (39 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:23:52 -0400
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (42 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:44:46 -0400
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (50 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 00:22:21 +1000
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (49 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:16:33 +0000
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (58 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:19:15 +0000
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (48 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 06:46:21 -0500
    • Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (41 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:45:35 -0600

38. mutation, &c FAQ
    • mutation, &c FAQ (111 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:13:48 -0600

39. Mutations in General
    • Re: Mutations in General (44 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 02:38:19 -0500
    • Re: Mutations in General (85 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:18:53 +0100
    • Re: Mutations in General (46 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:08:13 -0600
    • Re: Mutations in General (36 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:31:51 +0000

40. Mutations in general
    • Re: Mutations in general (130 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:31:01 -0400
    • Re: Mutations in general (66 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:45:35 +0000
    • Re: Mutations in general (40 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:33:33 -0400
    • Re: Mutations in general (167 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:04:45 +0200
    • Re: Mutations in general (39 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:07:43 +1000
    • Re: Mutations in general (46 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:53:14 -0400
    • Re: Mutations in general (57 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:41:55 +0000
    • Re: Mutations in general (73 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:56:43 +0000
    • Re: Mutations in general (59 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:33:37 -0400

41. Mutations in general was Re: Taalen mutations
    • Re: Mutations in general was Re: Taalen mutations (150 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:53:47 -0400
    • Re: Mutations in general was Re: Taalen mutations (79 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:33:14 +0200

42. My visit with Thomas
    • My visit with Thomas (42 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:05:37 -0700

43. Naming customs (was Re: punctuated abbreviations)
    • Re: Naming customs (was Re: punctuated abbreviations) (56 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:56:06 +0100

44. Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the
    • Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the (46 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 22:55:45 -0400

45. Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution
    • Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution (42 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:21:20 -0400

46. Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.
    • Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (37 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:34:47 -0700
    • Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (51 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:52:22 -0400
    • Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (75 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:00:57 -0600
    • Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (63 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:48:12 +0200
    • Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (67 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:21:34 -0600
    • Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (45 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:09:10 +0200

47. Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evoluution thereof
    • Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evoluution thereof (53 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 07:36:17 +0200

48. pigeonholed pidgins (wasRe: conlang servey)
    • pigeonholed pidgins (wasRe: conlang servey) (44 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 20:46:27 EDT

49. Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean
    • Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean (50 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:26:11 -0700
    • Re: Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean (55 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:56:55 +0100
    • Re: Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean (48 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:01:29 -0700
    • Re: Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean (53 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 18:33:38 +0100
    • Re: Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean (66 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:50:55 -0700

50. Should I do the survey?
    • Should I do the survey? (36 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:55:24 -0700

51. Subject: Re: conlang servey
    • Subject: Re: conlang servey (231 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:10:05 -0700

52. THEORY: RE: And wrote:
    • THEORY: RE: And wrote: (69 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:45:11 +0100
    • THEORY: RE: And wrote: (59 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:41:29 +0200
    • Re: THEORY: RE: And wrote: (88 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:55:57 +0100

53. USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)
    • USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (68 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 12:31:21 -0400
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (100 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:45:07 -0700
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (131 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 12:58:06 +1100
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (87 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:33:08 -0700
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (46 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:13:32 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (38 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:23:09 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (119 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:36:16 +1100
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (45 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:07:11 +0000
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (50 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 15:45:55 +1000
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (39 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 15:42:09 +0000
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (57 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 12:07:59 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (53 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:42:34 -0800
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (68 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:49:04 -0800
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (45 lines)
      Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 06:57:03 -0500

54. vocab #2.2
    • vocab #2.2 (71 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:21:42 -0400
    • Re: vocab #2.2 (115 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:17:50 -0400
    • Re: vocab #2.2 (202 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:19:44 -0700
    • Re: vocab #2.2 (105 lines)
      Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 20:05:48 -0700

55. vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor)
    • vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (28 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:02:22 +0300
    • Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (103 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:08:24 +0200
    • Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (102 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 07:54:43 -0400
    • Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (50 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:12:26 -0400
    • vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (58 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:27:30 +0200
    • Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (44 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:25:42 -0400
    • Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (73 lines)
      Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:01:08 -0400
    • Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (47 lines)
      Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:53:14 -0500

56. Who was talking about Khazaria?
    • Who was talking about Khazaria? (62 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:43:07 +1300
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (67 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:45:07 +0200
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (94 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:06:22 -0500
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (47 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:02:18 -0400
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (63 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:09:03 -0400
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (49 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:21:55 -0500
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (97 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:25:56 +0400
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (52 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:26:00 -0500
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (142 lines)
      Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:55:53 -0400
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (61 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:11:17 +0400
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (44 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:28:44 +0200
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (48 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 12:22:22 +0100
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (78 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:42:47 -0400
    • Re: Who was talking about Khazaria? (48 lines)
      Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:54:07 -0400