Conlang Mailing List – October 2002, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• <No subject>
• A form of poetry - "octricle" (3 messages)
• another language reconstruction question (22 messages)
• Belated thanks and Mohawk question, was Re: Head-marking languages and adpositions?
• colors in kinsi rorotan
• conlang servey (2 messages)
• conlang servey (Maggel) (2 messages)
• Conlang Survey
• Email troubles
• erratum (A form of poetry - "octricle")
• Going NOMAIL for a few days
• Harmony: Dominance Patterns in Seinundjé (Comment?)
• I'm back, and an 'ow' question ... (6 messages)
• Language reconstruction question (6 messages)
• Lindiga numerals (3 messages)
• Long Wer Website
• Male and female animals (2 messages)
• mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals
• Mixed writing systems (WAS: Newbie says hi)
• Newbie says hi (16 messages)
• related features (6 messages)
• Sino-Langs (was Re: Hey, what Su problem?) (2 messages)
• Ta-da! Enamyn Mutation Systems (3 messages)
• Thoughts on an English Remorph [?]
• USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (3 messages)
• [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (18 messages)

1. <No subject>
   • <No subject> (46 lines)
     From: Robert B Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

2. A form of poetry - "octricle"
   • A form of poetry - "octricle" (97 lines)
     From: Adrian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A form of poetry - "octricle" (78 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A form of poetry - "octricle" (76 lines)
     From: Adrian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

3. another language reconstruction question
   • another language reconstruction question (23 lines)
     From: Florian Rivoal <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (94 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (32 lines)
     From: Florian Rivoal <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (74 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (77 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (50 lines)
     From: tim talpas <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (53 lines)
     From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (51 lines)
     From: daniel andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (148 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (43 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (44 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (47 lines)
     From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (31 lines)
     From: Nihil Sum <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (42 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (46 lines)
     From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (59 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (74 lines)
     From: Mat McVeagh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (85 lines)
     From: Mat McVeagh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (40 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (60 lines)
     From: Mat McVeagh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (68 lines)
     From: Mat McVeagh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another language reconstruction question (48 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

4. Belated thanks and Mohawk question, was Re: Head-marking languages and adpositions?
   • Belated thanks and Mohawk question, was Re: Head-marking languages and adpositions? (49 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>

5. colors in kinsi rorotan
   • colors in kinsi rorotan (43 lines)
     From: Robert B Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

6. conlang servey
   • Re: conlang servey (58 lines)
     From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: conlang servey (55 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

7. conlang servey (Maggel)
   • Re: conlang servey (Maggel) (142 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: conlang servey (Maggel) (92 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

8. Conlang Survey
   • Conlang Survey (205 lines)
     From: Anthony M. Miles <[log in to unmask]>

9. Email troubles
   • Email troubles (44 lines)
     From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>

10. erratum (A form of poetry - "octricle")
    • erratum (A form of poetry - "octricle") (33 lines)
      From: Adrian Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

11. Going NOMAIL for a few days
    • Going NOMAIL for a few days (52 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

12. Harmony: Dominance Patterns in Seinundjé (Comment?)
    • Harmony: Dominance Patterns in Seinundjé (Comment?) (63 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>

13. I'm back, and an 'ow' question ...
    • I'm back, and an 'ow' question ... (37 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I'm back, and an 'ow' question ... (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I'm back, and an 'ow' question ... (56 lines)
      From: Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I'm back, and an 'ow' question ... (37 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I'm back, and an 'ow' question ... (54 lines)
      From: Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I'm back, and an 'ow' question ... (43 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

14. Language reconstruction question
    • Language reconstruction question (37 lines)
      From: Ian Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language reconstruction question (53 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language reconstruction question (58 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language reconstruction question (71 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language reconstruction question (45 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language reconstruction question (77 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

15. Lindiga numerals
    • Re: Lindiga numerals (82 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Lindiga numerals (60 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Lindiga numerals (97 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>

16. Long Wer Website
    • Long Wer Website (33 lines)
      From: Mau Rauszer <[log in to unmask]>

17. Male and female animals
    • Re: Male and female animals (53 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Male and female animals (43 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>

18. mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals
    • Re: mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (48 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

19. Mixed writing systems (WAS: Newbie says hi)
    • Mixed writing systems (WAS: Newbie says hi) (49 lines)
      From: Florian Rivoal <[log in to unmask]>

20. Newbie says hi
    • Newbie says hi (169 lines)
      From: Mat McVeagh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newbie says hi (74 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newbie says hi (63 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newbie says hi (41 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newbie says hi (75 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newbie says hi (260 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newbie says hi (56 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newbie says hi (122 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newbie says hi (48 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newbie says hi (73 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newbie says hi (66 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newbie says hi (53 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newbie says hi (44 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newbie says hi (72 lines)
      From: Mat McVeagh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newbie says hi (167 lines)
      From: Mat McVeagh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newbie says hi (55 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

21. related features
    • related features (37 lines)
      From: Florian Rivoal <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: related features (57 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: related features (80 lines)
      From: Clint Jackson Baker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: related features (66 lines)
      From: wayne chevrier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: related features (60 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: related features (41 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

22. Sino-Langs (was Re: Hey, what Su problem?)
    • Re: Sino-Langs (was Re: Hey, what Su problem?) (50 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sino-Langs (was Re: Hey, what Su problem?) (60 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>

23. Ta-da! Enamyn Mutation Systems
    • Ta-da! Enamyn Mutation Systems (168 lines)
      From: Peter Clark (by way of Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>) <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ta-da! Enamyn Mutation Systems (116 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ta-da! Enamyn Mutation Systems (71 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>

24. Thoughts on an English Remorph [?]
    • Thoughts on an English Remorph [?] (123 lines)
      From: E. Naeher <[log in to unmask]>

25. USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (89 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (52 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (58 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>

26. [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish)
    • [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (155 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (340 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (55 lines)
      From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (64 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (113 lines)
      From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (86 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (120 lines)
      From: bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (271 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (44 lines)
      From: wayne chevrier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (185 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (176 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (84 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (44 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (100 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (51 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (114 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (65 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [PEER REVIEW] Mutations and sound changes (longish) (51 lines)
      From: Pavel Iosad <[log in to unmask]>