Conlang
Mailing List January 2003, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
¿Naro cel ei nau cepoa sia? ['naru,gil enQ,gibua'Za]
(6 messages)
üüüüüüü or yyyyyyyyyyyy (was: Re: French)
"stupid auxlang shit" (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical languages
(paucal) Re: Introductions and a question about consonant s
(Tiny) Eretas fragment for Sally
2d case system
(6 messages)
501 Verbs
(9 messages)
?Naro cel ei nau cepoa sia? ['naru,gil enQ,gibua'Za]
(4 messages)
Accidental Conlanging
Ampersands
Analyzing Phonology
(2 messages)
Another new project and trigger languages
Antipassive
(4 messages)
Arthaey: Laadan (was Survey)
Attn. Jeffrey Henning
Biwa site updated, & bongo-bongo sentences.
Books on Translation
(5 messages)
Brass accompaniment was Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(7 messages)
Capitalizations (Was: Re: Capitals in Greek (was: Re: Workshops Review #4))
(7 messages)
Capitals in Greek (was: Re: Workshops Review #4)
(6 messages)
Catawba
CHAT Re: Brass accompaniment was Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(3 messages)
CHAT Re: evolving languages
CHAT: Orthography and maggelity
(3 messages)
CHAT: Our Phil Lang "Debate" & Us
CHAT: Totalitarian attitude towards ethnic diversity (was: Comparison of philosophical languages)
comparing languages on their merits (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical languages
Comparison of philosophical languages
(116 messages)
Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(25 messages)
Conlang Poetry (was: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits))
Cued Speech [was: Re: Sign Language?]
Danish (the language, that is) (was Re: French)
Eihdan (an explanation)
(3 messages)
Eihdan and Maggelity
(9 messages)
Emegali Verb Review
(4 messages)
Emegali Verb Review (2nd Go-Round)
English-esque Vocabulary Range
(14 messages)
Enterprise
(4 messages)
Etabnannery
(3 messages)
evolving languages
(31 messages)
First known example of political correctness was Re:
First known example of political correctness was Re: Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my
First OurTongue Verb
Fisherman and his wife links
French
(10 messages)
Funny words
Future English
(3 messages)
Future English (was Re: CHAT Re: evolving languages)
(2 messages)
Glastenon Trade Pidgin
Glide (was Re: Sign Language?)
(2 messages)
GomiLego (was/still is Re: evolving languages)
(6 messages)
Hyperambiguity
(2 messages)
I like Chinese...
I'm back, and Tairezazh update ...
(4 messages)
IALs was Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison of ph
(2 messages)
In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical
(4 messages)
In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical languages
(3 messages)
In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison ofphilosophical languages
In Its Own Script (was: Workshops Review #4)
(3 messages)
Introduction
(3 messages)
Introductions and a question about consonants
(10 messages)
Invaluable conlang links: new site
(28 messages)
IPA / SAMPA question
(5 messages)
Is "ma" Proto-World? (Re: Re: Comparison of philosophical languages)
(3 messages)
Is the listserv having a stammer?
Jedi Language
(7 messages)
Just two questions
(2 messages)
Kélen writing (jara: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs)
(2 messages)
Kasunagi's essay (jara: Jedi Language)
Kill this thread was Re: Ygyde and philosophical languages
Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my
(6 messages)
Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my Introduction)
(5 messages)
LeGuin was Re: Introduction
(2 messages)
LeGuin: Songs and Poetry of the Kesh
(2 messages)
Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't
(2 messages)
Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't Bleed)
(8 messages)
Long Wer Poetry ( Was Re: New survey... )
(3 messages)
Mandarin, anyone?
(5 messages)
Mayan Calendar (was Re: The New Year)
Mood names ...
(6 messages)
more blabbing about Tech, the eternally unfinished conlang
More on Eihdan
(2 messages)
my proposals for a philosophical language
(11 messages)
Naming mp3 players and Yakuza was Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
Naming mp3 players and Yakuza was Re: Comparison of philosophicallanguages
Native alphabets
Never too late to change
(2 messages)
New bac Font
(2 messages)
New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits)
(3 messages)
New Survey: Celtic conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits) (fwd)
(2 messages)
New To List
(15 messages)
notelangs
(20 messages)
oblique
(7 messages)
OFFLIST/PRIVATE Workshops Review #5
(2 messages)
on getting the hell out of here (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical langua
(2 messages)
on getting the hell out of here (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical languages
Oro Mpaa Verbs
OT (Somewhat) Conculture Was: Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
OT Prices (was Re: Books on Translation
(2 messages)
OT Prices (was Re: Books on Translation)
OT: Calendaring
OT: calling Berkeley conlangers
(3 messages)
OT: Myseterious landmasses Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(3 messages)
OT: Outlook -> Eudora was Re: TECH: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
OT: Proto-languages as national/international languages
(4 messages)
OT: To lie (jara: Trigger language?)
(2 messages)
Piata (was: Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site)
(4 messages)
Piata tidbit (was: Re: Translation thingy)
Pidgin Languages
(2 messages)
Plurals in Maggel (jara: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs)
(2 messages)
Poll by Email No. 21
preoccupation with word boundaries (was: RE: my proposals for a philosophical language
Quaroeth
(3 messages)
Questions on Proto-Indo-European
(4 messages)
re : colour terms ( was Re: IALs was Re: Comparison . . .
Replies to my Introduction
Reply to Sarah's condensed message
Request for Shoebox Data
Return to the game.
(2 messages)
Rhoticity (Was: Several phonetic questions)
Schoenberg
Schoenberg ( was Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other
Schoenberg ( was Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits)
Several phonetic questions
(6 messages)
Sign Language?
(12 messages)
Singing in foreign langs. was Re: Greetings
(4 messages)
Slightly OT: Language Census Info
(3 messages)
Spanish /rr/ (was Re: IPA / SAMPA question)
(2 messages)
SV's, [despammed]'s, and other Thread-Killers
(5 messages)
SV: Re: Enterprise
(10 messages)
SV: Re: Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my Introduction)
Taboo jadoo
(2 messages)
Taxonomic languages and igididity
(3 messages)
TECH: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(3 messages)
TECH: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't Bleed)
(3 messages)
The "owned" noun case is called...?
(5 messages)
The Netherlands (jara: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs)
(3 messages)
The New Year
(3 messages)
tonal languages
(6 messages)
Translation Exercise
Translation thingy (was Re: Antipassive)
(10 messages)
Trigger language?
(37 messages)
Trigger language? (CORRECTION)
Trigger languages (was Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits)
(4 messages)
Trigger languages-- exs.
Tripartite (was Re: Trigger language?)
(2 messages)
Typographie (was: Re: Comparison of philosophical languages)
(3 messages)
USAGE: compounds (was: I'm back ...)
verb question
(2 messages)
verbal system
(2 messages)
Verbless language
(5 messages)
Vocabulary Creation
(2 messages)
Welcome to vaksje (was: Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits))
(9 messages)
Word Creation
Wordplay
(2 messages)
Workshops Review #4
(6 messages)
Workshops Review #5
Yahoo listserv's cup overfloweth
Yes, I'm back
(17 messages)
Ygyde and philosophical languages
(7 messages)
Ygyde Ykidu
[despammed] Re: Antipassive
[despammed] Re: Brass accompaniment was Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
[despammed] Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(4 messages)
[despammed] Re: Sarah's language.
(13 messages)
[Fwd: evolving languages]
¿Naro cel ei nau cepoa sia? ['naru,gil enQ,gibua'Za]
Re: ¿Naro cel ei nau cepoa sia? ['naru,gil enQ,gibua'Za]
(38 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ¿Naro cel ei nau cepoa sia? ['naru,gil enQ,gibua'Za]
(144 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ¿Naro cel ei nau cepoa sia? ['naru,gil enQ,gibua'Za]
(122 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ¿Naro cel ei nau cepoa sia? ['naru,gil enQ,gibua'Za]
(75 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ¿Naro cel ei nau cepoa sia? ['naru,gil enQ,gibua'Za]
(66 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ¿Naro cel ei nau cepoa sia? ['naru,gil enQ,gibua'Za]
(68 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
üüüüüüü or yyyyyyyyyyyy (was: Re: French)
üüüüüüü or yyyyyyyyyyyy (was: Re: French)
(51 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
"stupid auxlang shit" (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical languages
"stupid auxlang shit" (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical languages
(52 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
(paucal) Re: Introductions and a question about consonant s
Re: (paucal) Re: Introductions and a question about consonant s
(60 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
(Tiny) Eretas fragment for Sally
(Tiny) Eretas fragment for Sally
(40 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
2d case system
2d case system
(37 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 2d case system
(61 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 2d case system
(67 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 2d case system
(58 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 2d case system
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 2d case system
(82 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
501 Verbs
501 Verbs
(100 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 501 Verbs
(62 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 501 Verbs
(110 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 501 Verbs
(60 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 501 Verbs
(126 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 501 Verbs
(26 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 501 Verbs
(69 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 501 Verbs
(103 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 501 Verbs
(64 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
?Naro cel ei nau cepoa sia? ['naru,gil enQ,gibua'Za]
Re: ?Naro cel ei nau cepoa sia? ['naru,gil enQ,gibua'Za]
(53 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
RE: ?Naro cel ei nau cepoa sia? ['naru,gil enQ,gibua'Za]
(44 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ?Naro cel ei nau cepoa sia? ['naru,gil enQ,gibua'Za]
(40 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ?Naro cel ei nau cepoa sia? ['naru,gil enQ,gibua'Za]
(93 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Accidental Conlanging
Accidental Conlanging
(33 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ampersands
Ampersands
(34 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Analyzing Phonology
Analyzing Phonology
(46 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Analyzing Phonology
(51 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Another new project and trigger languages
Re: Another new project and trigger languages
(71 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Antipassive
Antipassive
(33 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Antipassive
(98 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Antipassive
(61 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Antipassive
(71 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Arthaey: Laadan (was Survey)
Re: Arthaey: Laadan (was Survey)
(47 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Attn. Jeffrey Henning
Attn. Jeffrey Henning
(26 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Biwa site updated, & bongo-bongo sentences.
Biwa site updated, & bongo-bongo sentences.
(97 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Books on Translation
Books on Translation
(76 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books on Translation
(36 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books on Translation
(46 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books on Translation
(48 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books on Translation
(43 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Brass accompaniment was Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
Brass accompaniment was Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(60 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Brass accompaniment was Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(137 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Brass accompaniment was Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(68 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Brass accompaniment was Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(84 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Brass accompaniment was Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(149 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Brass accompaniment was Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(27 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Brass accompaniment was Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(41 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Capitalizations (Was: Re: Capitals in Greek (was: Re: Workshops Review #4))
Capitalizations (Was: Re: Capitals in Greek (was: Re: Workshops Review #4))
(58 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Capitalizations (Was: Re: Capitals in Greek (was: Re: Workshops Review #4))
(46 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Capitalizations (Was: Re: Capitals in Greek (was: Re: Workshops Review #4))
(37 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Capitalizations (Was: Re: Capitals in Greek (was: Re: Workshops Review #4))
(44 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Capitalizations (Was: Re: Capitals in Greek (was: Re: Workshops Review #4))
(66 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Capitalizations (Was: Re: Capitals in Greek (was: Re: Workshops Review #4))
(27 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Capitalizations (Was: Re: Capitals in Greek (was: Re: Workshops Review #4))
(55 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Capitals in Greek (was: Re: Workshops Review #4)
Capitals in Greek (was: Re: Workshops Review #4)
(49 lines)
From:
Robert Hailman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Capitals in Greek (was: Re: Workshops Review #4)
(50 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Capitals in Greek (was: Re: Workshops Review #4)
(31 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Capitals in Greek (was: Re: Workshops Review #4)
(45 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Capitals in Greek (was: Re: Workshops Review #4)
(41 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Capitals in Greek (was: Re: Workshops Review #4)
(47 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Catawba
Catawba
(46 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT Re: Brass accompaniment was Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
Re: CHAT Re: Brass accompaniment was Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(49 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Re: Brass accompaniment was Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(62 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Re: Brass accompaniment was Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(94 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT Re: evolving languages
Re: CHAT Re: evolving languages
(43 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Orthography and maggelity
CHAT: Orthography and maggelity
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Orthography and maggelity
(51 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Orthography and maggelity
(79 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Our Phil Lang "Debate" & Us
CHAT: Our Phil Lang "Debate" & Us
(58 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Totalitarian attitude towards ethnic diversity (was: Comparison of philosophical languages)
CHAT: Totalitarian attitude towards ethnic diversity (was: Comparison of philosophical languages)
(55 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
comparing languages on their merits (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical languages
comparing languages on their merits (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical languages
(64 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Comparison of philosophical languages
Comparison of philosophical languages
(56 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(46 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(37 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(94 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(53 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(136 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(69 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(175 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(75 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(97 lines)
From:
Florian Rivoal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(73 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(210 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(54 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(132 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(142 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(49 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(157 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(38 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(77 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(61 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(57 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(99 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(37 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(72 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(101 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(81 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(41 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(44 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(51 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(96 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(47 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(46 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(40 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(66 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(25 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(63 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(54 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(98 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(88 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(74 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(181 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(108 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(157 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(82 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(140 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(46 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(204 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(70 lines)
From:
Samuel Rivier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(61 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(46 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(40 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(69 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(230 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(77 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(41 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(41 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(144 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(172 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(222 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(27 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(124 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(210 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(74 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(34 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(41 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Comparison of philosophical languages
(86 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(81 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(52 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(289 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(54 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(103 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(93 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(72 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(22 lines)
From:
Florian Rivoal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(74 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(36 lines)
From:
Florian Rivoal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(52 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(35 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(54 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(79 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(35 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(54 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(80 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(42 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(75 lines)
From:
James Landau <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(82 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(55 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(28 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(41 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(67 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(59 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(42 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(62 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(52 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(87 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(41 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(78 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(44 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(83 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(46 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(39 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(52 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(26 lines)
From:
Florian Rivoal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(77 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conculture (jara: Introduction)
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(69 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(67 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(52 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(50 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(42 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(48 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(48 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(61 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(55 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(43 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(80 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(95 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(37 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(51 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(74 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(62 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(45 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Poetry (was: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits))
Re: Conlang Poetry (was: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits))
(60 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cued Speech [was: Re: Sign Language?]
Cued Speech [was: Re: Sign Language?]
(51 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Danish (the language, that is) (was Re: French)
Danish (the language, that is) (was Re: French)
(56 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Eihdan (an explanation)
Eihdan (an explanation)
(120 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eihdan (an explanation)
(172 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eihdan (an explanation)
(67 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Eihdan and Maggelity
Eihdan and Maggelity
(47 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eihdan and Maggelity
(43 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eihdan and Maggelity
(124 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eihdan and Maggelity
(68 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eihdan and Maggelity
(49 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eihdan and Maggelity
(153 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eihdan and Maggelity
(99 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eihdan and Maggelity
(51 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eihdan and Maggelity
(62 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Emegali Verb Review
Emegali Verb Review
(117 lines)
From:
Anthony M. Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Emegali Verb Review
(265 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Emegali Verb Review
(173 lines)
From:
habarakhe4 <
[log in to unmask]
> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Emegali Verb Review
(73 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Emegali Verb Review (2nd Go-Round)
Re: Emegali Verb Review (2nd Go-Round)
(268 lines)
From:
habarakhe4 <
[log in to unmask]
> <
[log in to unmask]
>
English-esque Vocabulary Range
English-esque Vocabulary Range
(56 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English-esque Vocabulary Range
(52 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English-esque Vocabulary Range
(35 lines)
From:
Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English-esque Vocabulary Range
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English-esque Vocabulary Range
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English-esque Vocabulary Range
(44 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English-esque Vocabulary Range
(37 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English-esque Vocabulary Range
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English-esque Vocabulary Range
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English-esque Vocabulary Range
(40 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English-esque Vocabulary Range
(46 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English-esque Vocabulary Range
(53 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English-esque Vocabulary Range
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English-esque Vocabulary Range
(48 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Enterprise
Enterprise
(38 lines)
From:
Michael Fors <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Enterprise
(47 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Enterprise
(62 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Enterprise
(32 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Etabnannery
Etabnannery
(48 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etabnannery
(66 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etabnannery
(46 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
evolving languages
evolving languages
(27 lines)
From:
Florian Rivoal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(54 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(79 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(131 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(140 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(90 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(71 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(85 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(40 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(101 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(69 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(45 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(46 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(45 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(63 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(44 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(61 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(53 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(71 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(46 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(49 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(66 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(55 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(31 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(40 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(37 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: evolving languages
(30 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
First known example of political correctness was Re:
Re: First known example of political correctness was Re:
(65 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
First known example of political correctness was Re: Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my
First known example of political correctness was Re: Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my
(55 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
First OurTongue Verb
First OurTongue Verb
(28 lines)
From:
Rob H <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fisherman and his wife links
Re: Fisherman and his wife links
(21 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
French
Re: French
(67 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French
(56 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French
(53 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French
(38 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French
(39 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French
(33 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French
(49 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: French
(47 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Funny words
Re: Funny words
(44 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Future English
Future English
(35 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Future English
(59 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Future English
(56 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Future English (was Re: CHAT Re: evolving languages)
Future English (was Re: CHAT Re: evolving languages)
(51 lines)
From:
Samuel Rivier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Future English (was Re: CHAT Re: evolving languages)
(57 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Glastenon Trade Pidgin
Glastenon Trade Pidgin
(66 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Glide (was Re: Sign Language?)
Glide (was Re: Sign Language?)
(56 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Glide (was Re: Sign Language?)
(76 lines)
From:
Diana Slattery <
[log in to unmask]
>
GomiLego (was/still is Re: evolving languages)
GomiLego (was/still is Re: evolving languages)
(90 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GomiLego (was/still is Re: evolving languages)
(36 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GomiLego (was/still is Re: evolving languages)
(55 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GomiLego (was/still is Re: evolving languages)
(58 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GomiLego (was/still is Re: evolving languages)
(98 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GomiLego (was/still is Re: evolving languages)
(41 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hyperambiguity
Hyperambiguity
(71 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hyperambiguity
(71 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
I like Chinese...
I like Chinese...
(34 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
> <
[log in to unmask]
>
I'm back, and Tairezazh update ...
I'm back, and Tairezazh update ...
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I'm back, and Tairezazh update ...
(62 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I'm back, and Tairezazh update ...
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I'm back, and Tairezazh update ...
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
IALs was Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
IALs was Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(112 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison of ph
Re: In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison of ph
(53 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison of ph
(73 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical
Re: In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical
(70 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical
(103 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical
(80 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical
(39 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
> <
[log in to unmask]
>
In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical languages
In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical languages
(102 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical languages
(177 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical languages
(127 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison ofphilosophical languages
Re: In defence of philosophical languages (was: RE: Comparison ofphilosophical languages
(68 lines)
From:
Florian Rivoal <
[log in to unmask]
>
In Its Own Script (was: Workshops Review #4)
In Its Own Script (was: Workshops Review #4)
(47 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: In Its Own Script (was: Workshops Review #4)
(49 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: In Its Own Script (was: Workshops Review #4)
(43 lines)
From:
Balazs Sudar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Introduction
Re: Introduction
(56 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(63 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction
(63 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Introductions and a question about consonants
Introductions and a question about consonants
(55 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductions and a question about consonants
(85 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductions and a question about consonants
(70 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductions and a question about consonants
(100 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductions and a question about consonants
(77 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductions and a question about consonants
(83 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductions and a question about consonants
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductions and a question about consonants
(30 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductions and a question about consonants
(31 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductions and a question about consonants
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Invaluable conlang links: new site
Invaluable conlang links: new site
(79 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(100 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(38 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(70 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(46 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(96 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(48 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(45 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(27 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(43 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(46 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(35 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(34 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(34 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(125 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(45 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(49 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(76 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(37 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(123 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(81 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(38 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(64 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(45 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(45 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(46 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(60 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
IPA / SAMPA question
IPA / SAMPA question
(26 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA / SAMPA question
(38 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA / SAMPA question
(42 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA / SAMPA question
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA / SAMPA question
(46 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is "ma" Proto-World? (Re: Re: Comparison of philosophical languages)
Is "ma" Proto-World? (Re: Re: Comparison of philosophical languages)
(49 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is "ma" Proto-World? (Re: Re: Comparison of philosophical languages)
(47 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is "ma" Proto-World? (Re: Re: Comparison of philosophical languages)
(37 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is the listserv having a stammer?
Re: Is the listserv having a stammer?
(27 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Jedi Language
Jedi Language
(46 lines)
From:
Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Jedi Language
(102 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Jedi Language
(67 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Jedi Language
(48 lines)
From:
Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Jedi Language
(38 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Jedi Language
(86 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Jedi Language
(46 lines)
From:
Kasunagi Helkran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Just two questions
Just two questions
(34 lines)
From:
Balazs Sudar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Just two questions
(53 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kélen writing (jara: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs)
Kélen writing (jara: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs)
(41 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kélen writing (jara: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs)
(46 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kasunagi's essay (jara: Jedi Language)
Kasunagi's essay (jara: Jedi Language)
(40 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kill this thread was Re: Ygyde and philosophical languages
Kill this thread was Re: Ygyde and philosophical languages
(34 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my
Re: Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my
(52 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my
(52 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my
(54 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my
(68 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my Introduction)
Re: Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my Introduction)
(47 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Henning <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my Introduction)
(53 lines)
From:
LuÃs Henrique <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my Introduction)
(41 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my Introduction)
(42 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my Introduction)
(85 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
LeGuin was Re: Introduction
Re: LeGuin was Re: Introduction
(295 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin was Re: Introduction
(63 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
LeGuin: Songs and Poetry of the Kesh
LeGuin: Songs and Poetry of the Kesh
(322 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin: Songs and Poetry of the Kesh
(54 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't
Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't
(58 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't Bleed)
Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't Bleed)
(173 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't Bleed)
(59 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't Bleed)
(60 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't Bleed)
(51 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't Bleed)
(31 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't Bleed)
(27 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't Bleed)
(38 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't Bleed)
(54 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Long Wer Poetry ( Was Re: New survey... )
Re: Long Wer Poetry ( Was Re: New survey... )
(98 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Long Wer Poetry ( Was Re: New survey... )
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Long Wer Poetry ( Was Re: New survey... )
(43 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mandarin, anyone?
Mandarin, anyone?
(34 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandarin, anyone?
(35 lines)
From:
Florian Rivoal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandarin, anyone?
(51 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandarin, anyone?
(52 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandarin, anyone?
(44 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mayan Calendar (was Re: The New Year)
Mayan Calendar (was Re: The New Year)
(78 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mood names ...
Mood names ...
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mood names ...
(55 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mood names ...
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mood names ...
(27 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mood names ...
(71 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mood names ...
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
more blabbing about Tech, the eternally unfinished conlang
more blabbing about Tech, the eternally unfinished conlang
(83 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
More on Eihdan
More on Eihdan
(204 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More on Eihdan
(192 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
my proposals for a philosophical language
my proposals for a philosophical language
(371 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my proposals for a philosophical language
(53 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my proposals for a philosophical language
(287 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my proposals for a philosophical language
(66 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my proposals for a philosophical language
(150 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my proposals for a philosophical language
(122 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my proposals for a philosophical language
(41 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my proposals for a philosophical language
(115 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my proposals for a philosophical language
(251 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my proposals for a philosophical language
(88 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my proposals for a philosophical language
(213 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Naming mp3 players and Yakuza was Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
Naming mp3 players and Yakuza was Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(63 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Naming mp3 players and Yakuza was Re: Comparison of philosophicallanguages
Re: Naming mp3 players and Yakuza was Re: Comparison of philosophicallanguages
(74 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Native alphabets
Re: Native alphabets
(83 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Never too late to change
Re: Never too late to change
(43 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Never too late to change
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
New bac Font
Re: New bac Font
(42 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New bac Font
(84 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits)
Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits)
(420 lines)
From:
vaksje <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits)
(47 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits)
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Survey: Celtic conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits) (fwd)
Re: New Survey: Celtic conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits) (fwd)
(367 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Survey: Celtic conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits) (fwd)
(62 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
New To List
New To List
(47 lines)
From:
E. Notagain <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New To List
(62 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New To List
(88 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New To List
(54 lines)
From:
E. Notagain <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New To List
(82 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New To List
(52 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New To List
(47 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New To List
(69 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New To List
(65 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New To List
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New To List
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New To List
(36 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New To List
(122 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New To List
(49 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New To List
(35 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
notelangs
notelangs
(34 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(60 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(47 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(60 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(78 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(89 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(50 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(58 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(50 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(38 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(87 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(69 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(38 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(52 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(58 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(58 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(59 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(49 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: notelangs
(42 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
> <
[log in to unmask]
>
oblique
oblique
(21 lines)
From:
Florian Rivoal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: oblique
(35 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: oblique
(32 lines)
From:
Florian Rivoal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: oblique
(65 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: oblique
(71 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: oblique
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: oblique
(48 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
OFFLIST/PRIVATE Workshops Review #5
Re: OFFLIST/PRIVATE Workshops Review #5
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OFFLIST/PRIVATE Workshops Review #5
(25 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
on getting the hell out of here (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical langua
Re: on getting the hell out of here (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical langua
(32 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: on getting the hell out of here (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical langua
(44 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
on getting the hell out of here (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical languages
on getting the hell out of here (was: RE: Comparison of philosophical languages
(57 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Oro Mpaa Verbs
Oro Mpaa Verbs
(36 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT (Somewhat) Conculture Was: Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
OT (Somewhat) Conculture Was: Re: Conculture (jara: Introduction)
(83 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Prices (was Re: Books on Translation
Re: OT Prices (was Re: Books on Translation
(60 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Prices (was Re: Books on Translation
(86 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Prices (was Re: Books on Translation)
OT Prices (was Re: Books on Translation)
(62 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Calendaring
OT: Calendaring
(246 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: calling Berkeley conlangers
OT: calling Berkeley conlangers
(43 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: calling Berkeley conlangers
(29 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: calling Berkeley conlangers
(38 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Myseterious landmasses Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
OT: Myseterious landmasses Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(32 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Myseterious landmasses Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(28 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Myseterious landmasses Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site
(38 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Outlook -> Eudora was Re: TECH: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
OT: Outlook -> Eudora was Re: TECH: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(33 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Proto-languages as national/international languages
OT: Proto-languages as national/international languages
(80 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Proto-languages as national/international languages
(54 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Proto-languages as national/international languages
(86 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Proto-languages as national/international languages
(68 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: To lie (jara: Trigger language?)
OT: To lie (jara: Trigger language?)
(56 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: To lie (jara: Trigger language?)
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Piata (was: Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site)
Piata (was: Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site)
(59 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piata (was: Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site)
(56 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piata (was: Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site)
(71 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piata (was: Re: Invaluable conlang links: new site)
(40 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Piata tidbit (was: Re: Translation thingy)
Piata tidbit (was: Re: Translation thingy)
(92 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pidgin Languages
Pidgin Languages
(39 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pidgin Languages
(69 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Plurals in Maggel (jara: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs)
Plurals in Maggel (jara: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs)
(62 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Plurals in Maggel (jara: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs)
(119 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poll by Email No. 21
Poll by Email No. 21
(72 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
preoccupation with word boundaries (was: RE: my proposals for a philosophical language
preoccupation with word boundaries (was: RE: my proposals for a philosophical language
(63 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Quaroeth
Quaroeth
(129 lines)
From:
Quentin Read <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quaroeth
(49 lines)
From:
James Landau <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quaroeth
(47 lines)
From:
Quentin Read <
[log in to unmask]
>
Questions on Proto-Indo-European
Re: Questions on Proto-Indo-European
(45 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions on Proto-Indo-European
(45 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions on Proto-Indo-European
(38 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questions on Proto-Indo-European
(39 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
re : colour terms ( was Re: IALs was Re: Comparison . . .
re : colour terms ( was Re: IALs was Re: Comparison . . .
(101 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Replies to my Introduction
Re: Replies to my Introduction
(44 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Reply to Sarah's condensed message
Re: Reply to Sarah's condensed message
(44 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Request for Shoebox Data
Request for Shoebox Data
(48 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Return to the game.
Return to the game.
(41 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Return to the game.
(38 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rhoticity (Was: Several phonetic questions)
Re: Rhoticity (Was: Several phonetic questions)
(51 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Schoenberg
Re: Schoenberg
(47 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Schoenberg ( was Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other
Re: Schoenberg ( was Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Schoenberg ( was Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits)
Re: Schoenberg ( was Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits)
(62 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Several phonetic questions
Re: Several phonetic questions
(48 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Several phonetic questions
(59 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Several phonetic questions
(47 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Several phonetic questions
(51 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Several phonetic questions
(34 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Several phonetic questions
(42 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sign Language?
Sign Language?
(76 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sign Language?
(45 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sign Language?
(75 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sign Language?
(122 lines)
From:
Diana Slattery <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sign Language?
(113 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sign Language?
(57 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sign Language?
(40 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sign Language?
(91 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sign Language?
(97 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sign Language?
(56 lines)
From:
Diana Slattery <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sign Language?
(84 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sign Language?
(44 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Singing in foreign langs. was Re: Greetings
Re: Singing in foreign langs. was Re: Greetings
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Singing in foreign langs. was Re: Greetings
(56 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Singing in foreign langs. was Re: Greetings
(51 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Singing in foreign langs. was Re: Greetings
(39 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Slightly OT: Language Census Info
Slightly OT: Language Census Info
(38 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slightly OT: Language Census Info
(39 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slightly OT: Language Census Info
(48 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Spanish /rr/ (was Re: IPA / SAMPA question)
Re: Spanish /rr/ (was Re: IPA / SAMPA question)
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spanish /rr/ (was Re: IPA / SAMPA question)
(52 lines)
From:
Rob Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
SV's, [despammed]'s, and other Thread-Killers
SV's, [despammed]'s, and other Thread-Killers
(47 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SV's, [despammed]'s, and other Thread-Killers
(50 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SV's, [despammed]'s, and other Thread-Killers
(56 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SV's, [despammed]'s, and other Thread-Killers
(48 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SV's, [despammed]'s, and other Thread-Killers
(42 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
SV: Re: Enterprise
SV: Re: Enterprise
(72 lines)
From:
Michael Fors <
[log in to unmask]
>
SV: Re: Enterprise
(75 lines)
From:
Michael Fors <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SV: Re: Enterprise
(37 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SV: Re: Enterprise
(42 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SV: Re: Enterprise
(120 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SV: Re: Enterprise
(51 lines)
From:
James Landau <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SV: Re: Enterprise
(49 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SV: Re: Enterprise
(75 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SV: Re: Enterprise
(45 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
SV: Re: Enterprise
(43 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
> <
[log in to unmask]
>
SV: Re: Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my Introduction)
SV: Re: Language-generating software (was Re: Replies to my Introduction)
(58 lines)
From:
Michael Fors <
[log in to unmask]
>
Taboo jadoo
Taboo jadoo
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Taboo jadoo
(39 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Taxonomic languages and igididity
Taxonomic languages and igididity
(52 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Taxonomic languages and igididity
(31 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Taxonomic languages and igididity
(27 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
Re: TECH: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(43 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't Bleed)
TECH: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't Bleed)
(94 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't Bleed)
(43 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki! (I Promise Your Ears Won't Bleed)
(45 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
The "owned" noun case is called...?
The "owned" noun case is called...?
(75 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The "owned" noun case is called...?
(60 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The "owned" noun case is called...?
(58 lines)
From:
Karapcik, Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The "owned" noun case is called...?
(38 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The "owned" noun case is called...?
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Netherlands (jara: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs)
The Netherlands (jara: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs)
(44 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Netherlands (jara: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs)
(44 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Netherlands (jara: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs)
(37 lines)
From:
vaksje <
[log in to unmask]
>
The New Year
Re: The New Year
(128 lines)
From:
James Landau <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The New Year
(73 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The New Year
(96 lines)
From:
James Landau <
[log in to unmask]
>
tonal languages
Re: tonal languages
(73 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tonal languages
(88 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tonal languages
(46 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tonal languages
(52 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tonal languages
(48 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tonal languages
(53 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation Exercise
Re: Translation Exercise
(100 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation thingy (was Re: Antipassive)
Translation thingy (was Re: Antipassive)
(62 lines)
From:
Rik <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation thingy (was Re: Antipassive)
(94 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation thingy (was Re: Antipassive)
(77 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation thingy (was Re: Antipassive)
(101 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation thingy (was Re: Antipassive)
(98 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation thingy (was Re: Antipassive)
(79 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation thingy (was Re: Antipassive)
(51 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation thingy (was Re: Antipassive)
(80 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation thingy (was Re: Antipassive)
(68 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation thingy (was Re: Antipassive)
(48 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Trigger language?
Trigger language?
(39 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(51 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(39 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(199 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(75 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(42 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(117 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(80 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(55 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(81 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(105 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(73 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(130 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(136 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(32 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(148 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(53 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(44 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(164 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(54 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(39 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(64 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(52 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(63 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(40 lines)
From:
vaksje <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(78 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(28 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(32 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(246 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(35 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Trigger language?
(37 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(63 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(30 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(229 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(93 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger language?
(37 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Trigger language? (CORRECTION)
Re: Trigger language? (CORRECTION)
(41 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Trigger languages (was Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits)
Re: Trigger languages (was Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits)
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger languages (was Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits)
(60 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger languages (was Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits)
(45 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger languages (was Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits)
(67 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Trigger languages-- exs.
Trigger languages-- exs.
(84 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tripartite (was Re: Trigger language?)
Tripartite (was Re: Trigger language?)
(54 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tripartite (was Re: Trigger language?)
(56 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Typographie (was: Re: Comparison of philosophical languages)
Typographie (was: Re: Comparison of philosophical languages)
(66 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typographie (was: Re: Comparison of philosophical languages)
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typographie (was: Re: Comparison of philosophical languages)
(40 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: compounds (was: I'm back ...)
USAGE: compounds (was: I'm back ...)
(60 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
verb question
verb question
(32 lines)
From:
Rob H <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: verb question
(41 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
verbal system
verbal system
(41 lines)
From:
Florian Rivoal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: verbal system
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Verbless language
Verbless language
(96 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbless language
(113 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbless language
(38 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbless language
(31 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbless language
(67 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vocabulary Creation
Vocabulary Creation
(53 lines)
From:
Kua Sai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocabulary Creation
(67 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Welcome to vaksje (was: Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits))
Welcome to vaksje (was: Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits))
(167 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Welcome to vaksje (was: Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits))
(37 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Welcome to vaksje (was: Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits))
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Welcome to vaksje (was: Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits))
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Welcome to vaksje (was: Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits))
(73 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Welcome to vaksje (was: Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits))
(38 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Welcome to vaksje (was: Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits))
(137 lines)
From:
vaksje <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Welcome to vaksje (was: Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits))
(140 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Welcome to vaksje (was: Re: New Survey: Celtic Conlangs (and other lunatic pursuits))
(51 lines)
From:
vaksje <
[log in to unmask]
>
Word Creation
Word Creation
(101 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Wordplay
Re: Wordplay
(61 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wordplay
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Workshops Review #4
Re: Workshops Review #4
(49 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review #4
(61 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review #4
(44 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review #4
(86 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review #4
(54 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review #4
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Workshops Review #5
Workshops Review #5
(78 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yahoo listserv's cup overfloweth
Yahoo listserv's cup overfloweth
(29 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yes, I'm back
Yes, I'm back
(255 lines)
From:
James Landau <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes, I'm back
(51 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes, I'm back
(61 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes, I'm back
(117 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes, I'm back
(60 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes, I'm back
(50 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes, I'm back
(126 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes, I'm back
(87 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes, I'm back
(52 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes, I'm back
(107 lines)
From:
James Landau <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes, I'm back
(60 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes, I'm back
(58 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes, I'm back
(309 lines)
From:
James Landau <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes, I'm back
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes, I'm back
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes, I'm back
(124 lines)
From:
James Landau <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes, I'm back
(43 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ygyde and philosophical languages
Ygyde and philosophical languages
(291 lines)
From:
James Landau <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ygyde and philosophical languages
(52 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ygyde and philosophical languages
(52 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ygyde and philosophical languages
(58 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ygyde and philosophical languages
(58 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ygyde and philosophical languages
(62 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ygyde and philosophical languages
(131 lines)
From:
James Landau <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ygyde Ykidu
Ygyde Ykidu
(41 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
[despammed] Re: Antipassive
Re: [despammed] Re: Antipassive
(62 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
[despammed] Re: Brass accompaniment was Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
Re: [despammed] Re: Brass accompaniment was Re: Listen To Me Sing In Rokbeigalmki!
(66 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
[despammed] Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
Re: [despammed] Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(59 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [despammed] Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(62 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [despammed] Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(41 lines)
From:
Andrew Nowicki <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [despammed] Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
(120 lines)
From:
James Landau <
[log in to unmask]
>
[despammed] Re: Sarah's language.
Re: [despammed] Re: Sarah's language.
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [despammed] Re: Sarah's language.
(27 lines)
From:
Florian Rivoal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [despammed] Re: Sarah's language.
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [despammed] Re: Sarah's language.
(34 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [despammed] Re: Sarah's language.
(68 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [despammed] Re: Sarah's language.
(56 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [despammed] Re: Sarah's language.
(70 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [despammed] Re: Sarah's language.
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [despammed] Re: Sarah's language.
(43 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [despammed] Re: Sarah's language.
(53 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [despammed] Re: Sarah's language.
(44 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [despammed] Re: Sarah's language.
(75 lines)
From:
bnathyuw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [despammed] Re: Sarah's language.
(61 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Fwd: evolving languages]
[Fwd: evolving languages]
(68 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU