Conlang Mailing List – January 2003, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• A new land/languages swim into our ken (4 messages)
• A prioi vs. A posteriori ? (16 messages)
• Announcement: Andreas's Conlanging Pages (7 messages)
• Aspect Question
• Basque and monks was Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (3 messages)
• Basque s, z
• CHAT: Dada (was'Re: my proposals for a philosophical language' & etc)
• Conlang baby-talk (8 messages)
• English diglossia (4 messages)
• English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (56 messages)
• Etabnannimizing Tsiressa Orthography
• Farewell for now, and thank you!
• Fernch consonants (was Re: Conlang baby-talk)
• Fickleness (4 messages)
• French -ois (jara: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde) (13 messages)
• Fuluffya (was: IPA question) (2 messages)
• IPA question (67 messages)
• Is "ma" Proto-World? (Re: Re: Comparison ofphilosophicallanguages)
• Jara (jara: French -ois)
• Meyadhew (8 messages)
• more "discoveries" about the Techians (2 messages)
• NAT/CONLANG: "Lone gene linked to language skills"(wasRe: Is "ma" Proto-World? ) (2 messages)
• NATLANG Q?: Dutch,etc. for "Pangaea" & "Gaia, etc. (8 messages)
• New Conlang (2 messages)
• new conlang: Farzaiyai (3 messages)
• New Writing System (5 messages)
• OT! Re: IPizzA question (3 messages)
• OT: CC (jara: Russian and Ukrainian) (2 messages)
• OT: Harry (2 messages)
• OT: Poets against the war
• Peter-Clark-repellingly OT: RE: [CONLANG] English diglossia (3 messages)
• Peter-Clark-repellingly OT: RE: [CONLANG] English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants)
• retroflex consonants (14 messages)
• Russian and Ukrainian (was: Re: semi-OT: bilingual communication)
• Russian and Ukrainian was Re: semi-OT: bilingual communication
• Site update
• SPONT: Re: Peter-Clark-repellingly OT: RE: [CONLANG] English diglossia
• Trigger language?
• Triggers and infinitives
• Vocab #10a and b (6 messages)
• Vocabs 10a and 10b (KuJomu) (2 messages)
• X-SAMPA to IPA gif translator (not chart) (2 messages)
• YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (23 messages)
• [poll] (6 messages)

1. A new land/languages swim into our ken
   • A new land/languages swim into our ken (28 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A new land/languages swim into our ken (32 lines)
     From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A new land/languages swim into our ken (37 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A new land/languages swim into our ken (41 lines)
     From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

2. A prioi vs. A posteriori ?
   • A prioi vs. A posteriori ? (83 lines)
     From: Greg Williams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A prioi vs. A posteriori ? (42 lines)
     From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A prioi vs. A posteriori ? (36 lines)
     From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A prioi vs. A posteriori ? (55 lines)
     From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A prioi vs. A posteriori ? (37 lines)
     From: Mau Rauszer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A prioi vs. A posteriori ? (45 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A prioi vs. A posteriori ? (42 lines)
     From: Isaac A. Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A prioi vs. A posteriori ? (58 lines)
     From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A prioi vs. A posteriori ? (52 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A prioi vs. A posteriori ? (65 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A prioi vs. A posteriori ? (41 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A prioi vs. A posteriori ? (35 lines)
     From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A prioi vs. A posteriori ? (49 lines)
     From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A prioi vs. A posteriori ? (40 lines)
     From: Greg Williams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A prioi vs. A posteriori ? (37 lines)
     From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A prioi vs. A posteriori ? (34 lines)
     From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>

3. Announcement: Andreas's Conlanging Pages
   • Re: Announcement: Andreas's Conlanging Pages (58 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Announcement: Andreas's Conlanging Pages (45 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Announcement: Andreas's Conlanging Pages (42 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Announcement: Andreas's Conlanging Pages (46 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Announcement: Andreas's Conlanging Pages (42 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Announcement: Andreas's Conlanging Pages (49 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Announcement: Andreas's Conlanging Pages (46 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

4. Aspect Question
   • Aspect Question (33 lines)
     From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

5. Basque and monks was Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde
   • Basque and monks was Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (45 lines)
     From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Basque and monks was Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (55 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Basque and monks was Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (50 lines)
     From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

6. Basque s, z
   • Basque s, z (35 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

7. CHAT: Dada (was'Re: my proposals for a philosophical language' & etc)
   • CHAT: Dada (was'Re: my proposals for a philosophical language' & etc) (81 lines)
     From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>

8. Conlang baby-talk
   • Re: Conlang baby-talk (99 lines)
     From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang baby-talk (73 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang baby-talk (44 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang baby-talk (54 lines)
     From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang baby-talk (51 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang baby-talk (46 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang baby-talk (41 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang baby-talk (44 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

9. English diglossia
   • Re: English diglossia (42 lines)
     From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English diglossia (46 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • English diglossia (56 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: English diglossia (44 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

10. English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants)
    • English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (61 lines)
      From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (81 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (73 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (36 lines)
      From: E. Notagain <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (76 lines)
      From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (78 lines)
      From: E. Notagain <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (49 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (54 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (72 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (31 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (60 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (106 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (99 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (34 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (72 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (71 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (56 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (40 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (37 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (49 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (47 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (45 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (48 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (81 lines)
      From: Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (37 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (49 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (85 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (75 lines)
      From: Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (38 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (46 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (66 lines)
      From: Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (76 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (52 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (62 lines)
      From: Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (40 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (77 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (56 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (125 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (72 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (105 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (47 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (55 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (39 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (60 lines)
      From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (69 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (77 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (42 lines)
      From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (64 lines)
      From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (38 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (57 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (42 lines)
      From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (72 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (50 lines)
      From: kendra <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (79 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (95 lines)
      From: kendra <[log in to unmask]>

11. Etabnannimizing Tsiressa Orthography
    • Etabnannimizing Tsiressa Orthography (89 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>

12. Farewell for now, and thank you!
    • Farewell for now, and thank you! (50 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>

13. Fernch consonants (was Re: Conlang baby-talk)
    • Fernch consonants (was Re: Conlang baby-talk) (46 lines)
      From: Isaac A. Penzev <[log in to unmask]>

14. Fickleness
    • Re: Fickleness (130 lines)
      From: James Landau <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fickleness (60 lines)
      From: James Landau <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fickleness (47 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fickleness (56 lines)
      From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>

15. French -ois (jara: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde)
    • French -ois (jara: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde) (47 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French -ois (jara: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde) (53 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French -ois (jara: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde) (46 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French -ois (jara: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde) (43 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French -ois (jara: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde) (42 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French -ois (jara: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde) (58 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French -ois (jara: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde) (48 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller, Latin & French <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French -ois (jara: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde) (45 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French -ois (jara: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde) (31 lines)
      From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French -ois (jara: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde) (43 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French -ois (jara: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde) (72 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French -ois (jara: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde) (57 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French -ois (jara: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde) (46 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

16. Fuluffya (was: IPA question)
    • Fuluffya (was: IPA question) (35 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fuluffya (was: IPA question) (42 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

17. IPA question
    • Re: IPA question (67 lines)
      From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (26 lines)
      From: E. Notagain <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (50 lines)
      From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (104 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (74 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (35 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (60 lines)
      From: E. Notagain <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (179 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (28 lines)
      From: Isaac A. Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (39 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (92 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (192 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (174 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (64 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (66 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (41 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (51 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (46 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (178 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (79 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (27 lines)
      From: Isaac A. Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (52 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (167 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (31 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (51 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (63 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (44 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (152 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (62 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (79 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (39 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (43 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (150 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (103 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (70 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (58 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (93 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (37 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (57 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (112 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (36 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (47 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (55 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (73 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (33 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (45 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (44 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (50 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (77 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (55 lines)
      From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (38 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (36 lines)
      From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (43 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (65 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (113 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (99 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (59 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (47 lines)
      From: Josh Brandt-Young <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (67 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (53 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (46 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (47 lines)
      From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (124 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (40 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (51 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (33 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA question (39 lines)
      From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>

18. Is "ma" Proto-World? (Re: Re: Comparison ofphilosophicallanguages)
    • Re: Is "ma" Proto-World? (Re: Re: Comparison ofphilosophicallanguages) (90 lines)
      From: James Landau <[log in to unmask]>

19. Jara (jara: French -ois)
    • Jara (jara: French -ois) (36 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>

20. Meyadhew
    • Meyadhew (106 lines)
      From: Mau Rauszer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Meyadhew (105 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Meyadhew (34 lines)
      From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Meyadhew (46 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Meyadhew (97 lines)
      From: Mau Rauszer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Meyadhew (35 lines)
      From: Mau Rauszer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Meyadhew (44 lines)
      From: Mau Rauszer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Meyadhew (40 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

21. more "discoveries" about the Techians
    • Re: more "discoveries" about the Techians (46 lines)
      From: Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: more "discoveries" about the Techians (48 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

22. NAT/CONLANG: "Lone gene linked to language skills"(wasRe: Is "ma" Proto-World? )
    • NAT/CONLANG: "Lone gene linked to language skills"(wasRe: Is "ma" Proto-World? ) (103 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NAT/CONLANG: "Lone gene linked to language skills"(wasRe: Is "ma" Proto-World? ) (42 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>

23. NATLANG Q?: Dutch,etc. for "Pangaea" & "Gaia, etc.
    • Re: NATLANG Q?: Dutch,etc. for "Pangaea" & "Gaia, etc. (45 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG Q?: Dutch,etc. for "Pangaea" & "Gaia, etc. (66 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG Q?: Dutch,etc. for "Pangaea" & "Gaia, etc. (53 lines)
      From: Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG Q?: Dutch,etc. for "Pangaea" & "Gaia, etc. (54 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG Q?: Dutch,etc. for "Pangaea" & "Gaia, etc. (85 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG Q?: Dutch,etc. for "Pangaea" & "Gaia, etc. (33 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG Q?: Dutch,etc. for "Pangaea" & "Gaia, etc. (33 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NATLANG Q?: Dutch,etc. for "Pangaea" & "Gaia, etc. (16 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

24. New Conlang
    • New Conlang (35 lines)
      From: Kua Sai <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Conlang (63 lines)
      From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>

25. new conlang: Farzaiyai
    • new conlang: Farzaiyai (73 lines)
      From: Robert B Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: new conlang: Farzaiyai (96 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: new conlang: Farzaiyai (76 lines)
      From: Robert B Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

26. New Writing System
    • New Writing System (50 lines)
      From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Writing System (33 lines)
      From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Writing System (41 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Writing System (40 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • New Writing System (28 lines)
      From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>

27. OT! Re: IPizzA question
    • Re: OT! Re: IPizzA question (69 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT! Re: IPizzA question (57 lines)
      From: Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT! Re: IPizzA question (40 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

28. OT: CC (jara: Russian and Ukrainian)
    • OT: CC (jara: Russian and Ukrainian) (40 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: CC (jara: Russian and Ukrainian) (43 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

29. OT: Harry
    • Re: OT: Harry (46 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Harry (54 lines)
      From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>

30. OT: Poets against the war
    • OT: Poets against the war (29 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

31. Peter-Clark-repellingly OT: RE: [CONLANG] English diglossia
    • Re: Peter-Clark-repellingly OT: RE: [CONLANG] English diglossia (35 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Peter-Clark-repellingly OT: RE: [CONLANG] English diglossia (32 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Peter-Clark-repellingly OT: RE: [CONLANG] English diglossia (32 lines)
      From: Jeff Jones <[log in to unmask]>

32. Peter-Clark-repellingly OT: RE: [CONLANG] English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants)
    • Peter-Clark-repellingly OT: RE: [CONLANG] English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants) (56 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

33. retroflex consonants
    • Re: retroflex consonants (37 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: retroflex consonants (43 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: retroflex consonants (38 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: retroflex consonants (85 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: retroflex consonants (102 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: retroflex consonants (35 lines)
      From: Isaac A. Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: retroflex consonants (38 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: retroflex consonants (47 lines)
      From: Jake X <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: retroflex consonants (38 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: retroflex consonants (38 lines)
      From: Isaac A. Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: retroflex consonants (43 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: retroflex consonants (41 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: retroflex consonants (45 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: retroflex consonants (69 lines)
      From: Isaac A. Penzev <[log in to unmask]>

34. Russian and Ukrainian (was: Re: semi-OT: bilingual communication)
    • Re: Russian and Ukrainian (was: Re: semi-OT: bilingual communication) (75 lines)
      From: Isaac A. Penzev <[log in to unmask]>

35. Russian and Ukrainian was Re: semi-OT: bilingual communication
    • Re: Russian and Ukrainian was Re: semi-OT: bilingual communication (48 lines)
      From: Isaac A. Penzev <[log in to unmask]>

36. Site update
    • Site update (35 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

37. SPONT: Re: Peter-Clark-repellingly OT: RE: [CONLANG] English diglossia
    • SPONT: Re: Peter-Clark-repellingly OT: RE: [CONLANG] English diglossia (57 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>

38. Trigger language?
    • Re: Trigger language? (61 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>

39. Triggers and infinitives
    • Triggers and infinitives (29 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

40. Vocab #10a and b
    • Re: Vocab #10a and b (118 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vocab #10a and b (42 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vocab #10a and b (167 lines)
      From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vocab #10a and b (159 lines)
      From: Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vocab #10a and b (143 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vocab #10a and b (60 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

41. Vocabs 10a and 10b (KuJomu)
    • Re: Vocabs 10a and 10b (KuJomu) (195 lines)
      From: Gracie V. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vocabs 10a and 10b (KuJomu) (36 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>

42. X-SAMPA to IPA gif translator (not chart)
    • X-SAMPA to IPA gif translator (not chart) (35 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: X-SAMPA to IPA gif translator (not chart) (43 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

43. YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (69 lines)
      From: J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (115 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (108 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (38 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (60 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (43 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (92 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (49 lines)
      From: Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (82 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (86 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (97 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (42 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (87 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (37 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (82 lines)
      From: Tristan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (50 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (39 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (58 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (43 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (81 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (47 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (41 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAC: Widse -- a conlang based on Ygyde (52 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>

44. [poll]
    • [poll] (43 lines)
      From: Isaac A. Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [poll] (48 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [poll] (51 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [poll] (45 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [poll] (53 lines)
      From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [poll] (47 lines)
      From: Isaac A. Penzev <[log in to unmask]>