Conlang
Mailing List March 2003, week 1
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"How are you", in different languages?
(Warning: DEP) vowel to velar offglide (was Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
(3 messages)
A collectivizing affix in Jouevyaix Cherani
a request for input.... vocalic inventory
American cities was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(7 messages)
And is completely insane
Another IPA site
(2 messages)
C-IPA
(23 messages)
C-IPA underlying principles and methods
C.S. Lewis and various ways of saying "I am your father" was Re:
C.S. Lewis and various ways of saying "I am your father" was Re: Martian conlangs?
CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
(11 messages)
CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(20 messages)
CHAT: Johannes (jara: Daniel and Andreas)
(2 messages)
CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(12 messages)
CHAT: US locations (was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(2 messages)
CHAT: which's
(10 messages)
Colloquial English English (was Re: Probability of Article
(3 messages)
Conlang using hanzi... legal?
(6 messages)
DUTCH: I am your father
(9 messages)
Ebisedian, or takrem e Teoh (earth to Teoh) :)
(3 messages)
FAQ
fastly spoken english
(2 messages)
font creation
ghoti? was Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(2 messages)
Going NOMAIL
(3 messages)
Good-bye for now
(3 messages)
Haceks and letters with ascenders
(7 messages)
Harpelan number system
(2 messages)
Hebrew and Conlangs
(4 messages)
Hebrew Ferrets (was: Relay)
(2 messages)
Hello again...
Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
(9 messages)
Ich Bin ein Berliner
(2 messages)
Inspiration
(3 messages)
interesting dream
Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(15 messages)
Introductory Post
(10 messages)
Kinship terms?
(2 messages)
Law of ten times worse natlangs
(21 messages)
Martian conlangs?
(13 messages)
More information
More on the Hermetic Language
Non-verbal communication
number system for kxqqhwiiallccre
OT Prime numbers / Telona number system
(2 messages)
OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(88 messages)
OT: French language instruction books
OT: Mail clients and servers (was Re: Workshops Review #10)
OT: Revelations (was Re: Saprutum website update)
OT: Swedish greetings (was Re: "How are you" etc.)
(3 messages)
Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
(6 messages)
Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(23 messages)
phonemic ex-/inhalation
(4 messages)
Poll by Email No. 25
Probability of a definite article becoming a topicaliser?
(4 messages)
Probability of Article Replacement?
(16 messages)
Related conlangs (jara: Saprutum website update)
(2 messages)
Relay
(8 messages)
Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(31 messages)
Saprutum website update
(17 messages)
Shayanan background and biology; was Re: Kinship terms?
sound change resource?
(2 messages)
Stress shift
(17 messages)
TECH: Easy way to build you conlang vocab
Telenzh Articles (was: Re: Probability of Article Replacement)
Telona number system
(17 messages)
Två frågor om svenska
Workshops Review #10
(7 messages)
[tT] affricate
"How are you", in different languages?
Re: "How are you", in different languages?
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
(Warning: DEP) vowel to velar offglide (was Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
Re: (Warning: DEP) vowel to velar offglide (was Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: (Warning: DEP) vowel to velar offglide (was Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
(64 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: (Warning: DEP) vowel to velar offglide (was Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
(47 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
A collectivizing affix in Jouevyaix Cherani
A collectivizing affix in Jouevyaix Cherani
(102 lines)
From:
Elyse Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
a request for input.... vocalic inventory
a request for input.... vocalic inventory
(74 lines)
From:
b walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
American cities was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
American cities was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(37 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: American cities was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(46 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: American cities was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(53 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: American cities was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(38 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: American cities was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(64 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: American cities was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(34 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: American cities was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(38 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
And is completely insane
And is completely insane
(50 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Another IPA site
Another IPA site
(35 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another IPA site
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
C-IPA
Re: C-IPA
(35 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(35 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(37 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(68 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(33 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(48 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(94 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(41 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(44 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(37 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(67 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(48 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(118 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(118 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(86 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(39 lines)
From:
Apollo Hogan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(46 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(76 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C-IPA
(47 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
C-IPA underlying principles and methods
Re: C-IPA underlying principles and methods
(64 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
C.S. Lewis and various ways of saying "I am your father" was Re:
Re: C.S. Lewis and various ways of saying "I am your father" was Re:
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
C.S. Lewis and various ways of saying "I am your father" was Re: Martian conlangs?
C.S. Lewis and various ways of saying "I am your father" was Re: Martian conlangs?
(58 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
(48 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
(42 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
(35 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
(50 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
(58 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
(45 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Daniel and Andreas (was: Another IPA site)
(35 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(172 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(53 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(43 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(43 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(62 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(66 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(32 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(53 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(91 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(74 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(43 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(106 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(34 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(39 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(43 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(48 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Dutch dictionary recommendations?
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Johannes (jara: Daniel and Andreas)
CHAT: Johannes (jara: Daniel and Andreas)
(54 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Johannes (jara: Daniel and Andreas)
(127 lines)
From:
João Ricardo Oliveira <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(37 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(56 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(51 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(42 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(45 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: US locations (was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
Re: CHAT: US locations (was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(51 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: US locations (was Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(48 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: which's
Re: CHAT: which's
(39 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: which's
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: which's
(41 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: which's
(36 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: which's
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: which's
(44 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: which's
(38 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: which's
(49 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: which's
(52 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: which's
(54 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Colloquial English English (was Re: Probability of Article
Re: Colloquial English English (was Re: Probability of Article
(41 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Colloquial English English (was Re: Probability of Article
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Colloquial English English (was Re: Probability of Article
(36 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang using hanzi... legal?
Conlang using hanzi... legal?
(20 lines)
From:
Fabrizio R. Del Ferraro <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang using hanzi... legal?
(52 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang using hanzi... legal?
(45 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang using hanzi... legal?
(42 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang using hanzi... legal?
(25 lines)
From:
ancient_wildfire <
[log in to unmask]
> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang using hanzi... legal?
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
DUTCH: I am your father
DUTCH: I am your father
(32 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DUTCH: I am your father
(51 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DUTCH: I am your father
(32 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DUTCH: I am your father
(54 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DUTCH: I am your father
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DUTCH: I am your father
(45 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DUTCH: I am your father
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DUTCH: I am your father
(32 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DUTCH: I am your father
(41 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ebisedian, or takrem e Teoh (earth to Teoh) :)
Ebisedian, or takrem e Teoh (earth to Teoh) :)
(108 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ebisedian, or takrem e Teoh (earth to Teoh) :)
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ebisedian, or takrem e Teoh (earth to Teoh) :)
(158 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
FAQ
FAQ
(62 lines)
From:
João Ricardo Oliveira <
[log in to unmask]
>
fastly spoken english
Re: fastly spoken english
(35 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: fastly spoken english
(53 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
font creation
font creation
(30 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
ghoti? was Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
ghoti? was Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(33 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ghoti? was Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(51 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going NOMAIL
Going NOMAIL
(30 lines)
From:
Matthew Kehrt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Going NOMAIL
(41 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Going NOMAIL
(37 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Good-bye for now
Good-bye for now
(47 lines)
From:
Fredrik Ekman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Good-bye for now
(61 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Good-bye for now
(56 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Haceks and letters with ascenders
Haceks and letters with ascenders
(52 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Haceks and letters with ascenders
(54 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Haceks and letters with ascenders
(43 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Haceks and letters with ascenders
(38 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Haceks and letters with ascenders
(63 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Haceks and letters with ascenders
(58 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Haceks and letters with ascenders
(56 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Harpelan number system
Harpelan number system
(80 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Harpelan number system
(119 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hebrew and Conlangs
Re: Hebrew and Conlangs
(74 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hebrew and Conlangs
(89 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hebrew and Conlangs
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hebrew and Conlangs
(55 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hebrew Ferrets (was: Relay)
Hebrew Ferrets (was: Relay)
(72 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hebrew Ferrets (was: Relay)
(53 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hello again...
Hello again...
(34 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
(82 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
(115 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
(35 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
(56 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
(45 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
(45 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hressa-Hlab (was: Re: Martian conlangs?)
(41 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ich Bin ein Berliner
Ich Bin ein Berliner
(46 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ich Bin ein Berliner
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Inspiration
Inspiration
(36 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inspiration
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inspiration
(45 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
interesting dream
interesting dream
(44 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(63 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(39 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(49 lines)
From:
mna_vanantha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(100 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(136 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(83 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(131 lines)
From:
João Ricardo Oliveira <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(96 lines)
From:
Paul Burgess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(74 lines)
From:
Paul Burgess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(77 lines)
From:
Paul Burgess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(45 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(72 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
(50 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Introductory Post
Introductory Post
(53 lines)
From:
Kallah <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductory Post
(63 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductory Post
(57 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductory Post
(104 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductory Post
(97 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductory Post
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductory Post
(47 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductory Post
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductory Post
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introductory Post
(39 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kinship terms?
Kinship terms?
(52 lines)
From:
Elyse Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kinship terms?
(101 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Law of ten times worse natlangs
Law of ten times worse natlangs
(34 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(46 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(43 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(36 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(38 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(42 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(47 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(53 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(45 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(59 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(34 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(65 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(40 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(55 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(40 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Law of ten times worse natlangs
(46 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Martian conlangs?
Martian conlangs?
(63 lines)
From:
Fredrik Ekman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Martian conlangs?
(62 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Martian conlangs?
(38 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Martian conlangs?
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Martian conlangs?
(69 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Martian conlangs?
(104 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Martian conlangs?
(45 lines)
From:
Fredrik Ekman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Martian conlangs?
(70 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Martian conlangs?
(59 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Martian conlangs?
(47 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Martian conlangs?
(54 lines)
From:
Fredrik Ekman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Martian conlangs?
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Martian conlangs?
(87 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
More information
More information
(62 lines)
From:
Kallah <
[log in to unmask]
>
More on the Hermetic Language
More on the Hermetic Language
(118 lines)
From:
Paul Burgess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Non-verbal communication
Re: Non-verbal communication
(55 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
number system for kxqqhwiiallccre
number system for kxqqhwiiallccre
(57 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Prime numbers / Telona number system
Re: OT Prime numbers / Telona number system
(32 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Prime numbers / Telona number system
(39 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(43 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(39 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(85 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(63 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(58 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(54 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(44 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(39 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(63 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(48 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(45 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(36 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(27 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(43 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(46 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(45 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(33 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(49 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(50 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(82 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(63 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(82 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(62 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(152 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(36 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(41 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(51 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(91 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(78 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(48 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(68 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(92 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(124 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(61 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(54 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(91 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(52 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(49 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(57 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(84 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(100 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(54 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(49 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(55 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(45 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(54 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(51 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(52 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(71 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(47 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(47 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(37 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(46 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(50 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(48 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(47 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(85 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(88 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(51 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(74 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(56 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(72 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(61 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(41 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(52 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(35 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: French language instruction books
OT: French language instruction books
(32 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Mail clients and servers (was Re: Workshops Review #10)
OT: Mail clients and servers (was Re: Workshops Review #10)
(53 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Revelations (was Re: Saprutum website update)
OT: Revelations (was Re: Saprutum website update)
(85 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Swedish greetings (was Re: "How are you" etc.)
OT: Swedish greetings (was Re: "How are you" etc.)
(42 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Swedish greetings (was Re: "How are you" etc.)
(53 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Swedish greetings (was Re: "How are you" etc.)
(58 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
(276 lines)
From:
Delirious <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
(307 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
(94 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
(62 lines)
From:
Delirious <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
(47 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazena Lexicon in developement
(37 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(172 lines)
From:
Delirious <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(77 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(114 lines)
From:
Delirious <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(44 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(46 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(51 lines)
From:
Delirious <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(34 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(53 lines)
From:
Elyse Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(46 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(48 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(80 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(68 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(42 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(42 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(60 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(57 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(53 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paxba-Sazna Lexicon (phonetics)
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
phonemic ex-/inhalation
phonemic ex-/inhalation
(30 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonemic ex-/inhalation
(35 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonemic ex-/inhalation
(57 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonemic ex-/inhalation
(52 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poll by Email No. 25
Poll by Email No. 25
(60 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Probability of a definite article becoming a topicaliser?
Probability of a definite article becoming a topicaliser?
(36 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of a definite article becoming a topicaliser?
(58 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of a definite article becoming a topicaliser?
(40 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of a definite article becoming a topicaliser?
(73 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Probability of Article Replacement?
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
(90 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
(100 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
(36 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
(90 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
(43 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
(49 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
(65 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
(76 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
(58 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
(54 lines)
From:
Andrew Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
(39 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
(46 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
(40 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
(121 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
(126 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Related conlangs (jara: Saprutum website update)
Related conlangs (jara: Saprutum website update)
(56 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Related conlangs (jara: Saprutum website update)
(50 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Relay
Relay
(58 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(82 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(111 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(80 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(35 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(42 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(51 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay
(45 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Results of Poll by Email No. 24
Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(101 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(33 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(51 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(25 lines)
From:
E. Notagain <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(38 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(23 lines)
From:
E. Notagain <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(38 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(57 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(40 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(50 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(47 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(48 lines)
From:
E. Notagain <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(37 lines)
From:
E. Notagain <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(26 lines)
From:
E. Notagain <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(71 lines)
From:
Elyse Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(38 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(61 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(48 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(28 lines)
From:
E. Notagain <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(40 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(34 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(36 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(46 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(53 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(60 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(60 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 24
(55 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Saprutum website update
Re: Saprutum website update
(46 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saprutum website update
(102 lines)
From:
Keith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saprutum website update
(52 lines)
From:
Delirious <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saprutum website update
(36 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saprutum website update
(141 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saprutum website update
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saprutum website update
(50 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saprutum website update
(50 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saprutum website update
(52 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saprutum website update
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saprutum website update
(36 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saprutum website update
(61 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saprutum website update
(77 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saprutum website update
(50 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saprutum website update
(103 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saprutum website update
(38 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saprutum website update
(42 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Shayanan background and biology; was Re: Kinship terms?
Shayanan background and biology; was Re: Kinship terms?
(152 lines)
From:
Elyse Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
sound change resource?
sound change resource?
(28 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sound change resource?
(42 lines)
From:
Keith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Stress shift
Stress shift
(35 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress shift
(41 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress shift
(61 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress shift
(42 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress shift
(47 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress shift
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress shift
(39 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress shift
(58 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress shift
(59 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress shift
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress shift
(67 lines)
From:
JS Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress shift
(54 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress shift
(39 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress shift
(43 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress shift
(37 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress shift
(49 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress shift
(62 lines)
From:
Keith <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Easy way to build you conlang vocab
Re: TECH: Easy way to build you conlang vocab
(60 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Telenzh Articles (was: Re: Probability of Article Replacement)
Telenzh Articles (was: Re: Probability of Article Replacement)
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Telona number system
Telona number system
(75 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona number system
(82 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona number system
(50 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona number system
(59 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona number system
(84 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona number system
(105 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona number system
(112 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona number system
(114 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona number system
(51 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona number system
(48 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona number system
(23 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona number system
(122 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona number system
(108 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona number system
(119 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona number system
(77 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona number system
(53 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Telona number system
(69 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Två frågor om svenska
Re: Två frågor om svenska
(53 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Workshops Review #10
Workshops Review #10
(62 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review #10
(50 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review #10
(66 lines)
From:
Isaac A. Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review #10
(49 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review #10
(59 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review #10
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Workshops Review #10
(49 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
[tT] affricate
[tT] affricate
(34 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU