Conlang
Mailing List March 2003, week 5
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
a provocative question
(6 messages)
A very rough draft of Tech orthography
(10 messages)
Active again.
(21 messages)
alphabet-animal books
(2 messages)
Answer to Sally's Question: Elves, Neste
(7 messages)
Carrajena Consonant Clusters . . . MMMMM
(6 messages)
Conlang-to-body-shape connections
(8 messages)
definite/indefinite articles
(23 messages)
Don't mean to offend, but...
(19 messages)
Double Prime?
(18 messages)
Expressing ages
(2 messages)
How many on conlang?
(6 messages)
Is this modal system workable?
LHL was Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(6 messages)
MEDIA ADVISORY - Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200213
more conlangs
More Gothic text
(6 messages)
Murdering a Thread; was: Don't mean to offend, but...
my iconic alphabet
my ideas for a "logical alphabet"
ng vs w
(17 messages)
OT/CHAT: YATT (Yet Another Teohie Thread ;) (wasRe: Results of Poll by Email No. 26)
(3 messages)
OT: German pronunciation question
(3 messages)
OT: Official language post
(31 messages)
OT: Re: LHL was Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
Personal Conjugation based on Closeness
(14 messages)
Poll by Email No. 27
(4 messages)
Pronoun gender in Ikanirae Seru
(6 messages)
Recent upheavals in Sturnan
(2 messages)
Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(11 messages)
Rs
(16 messages)
Streaming foreign languages was Re: Maltese Phonology
The latest revision of the LANCA alphabet
(3 messages)
Website updated
(4 messages)
Weekly Vocab again?
(12 messages)
Weekly Vocab Half
Workshops Review #14
a provocative question
a provocative question
(47 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a provocative question
(33 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a provocative question
(88 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a provocative question
(50 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a provocative question
(43 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a provocative question
(37 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
A very rough draft of Tech orthography
A very rough draft of Tech orthography
(42 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A very rough draft of Tech orthography
(44 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A very rough draft of Tech orthography
(49 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A very rough draft of Tech orthography
(35 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A very rough draft of Tech orthography
(45 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A very rough draft of Tech orthography
(42 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A very rough draft of Tech orthography
(51 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A very rough draft of Tech orthography
(32 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A very rough draft of Tech orthography
(40 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A very rough draft of Tech orthography
(40 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Active again.
Active again.
(281 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(180 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(92 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(58 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(183 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(137 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(33 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(303 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(51 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(239 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(62 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(66 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(49 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(65 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(79 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(48 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(49 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(83 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(57 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Active again.
(136 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
alphabet-animal books
Re: alphabet-animal books
(91 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: alphabet-animal books
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Answer to Sally's Question: Elves, Neste
Re: Answer to Sally's Question: Elves, Neste
(286 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Answer to Sally's Question: Elves, Neste
(101 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Answer to Sally's Question: Elves, Neste
(156 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Answer to Sally's Question: Elves, Neste
(52 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Answer to Sally's Question: Elves, Neste
(95 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Answer to Sally's Question: Elves, Neste
(186 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Answer to Sally's Question: Elves, Neste
(52 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Carrajena Consonant Clusters . . . MMMMM
Carrajena Consonant Clusters . . . MMMMM
(121 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Carrajena Consonant Clusters . . . MMMMM
(65 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Carrajena Consonant Clusters . . . MMMMM
(57 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Carrajena Consonant Clusters . . . MMMMM
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Carrajena Consonant Clusters . . . MMMMM
(52 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Carrajena Consonant Clusters . . . MMMMM
(44 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang-to-body-shape connections
Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections
(50 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections
(36 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections
(34 lines)
From:
daniel andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections
(37 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections
(44 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections
(45 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections
(29 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang-to-body-shape connections
(40 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
definite/indefinite articles
definite/indefinite articles
(37 lines)
From:
Michael David Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(37 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(52 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(99 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(60 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(54 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(82 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(76 lines)
From:
João Ricardo Oliveira <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(105 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(100 lines)
From:
Paul Burgess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(77 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(45 lines)
From:
Paul Burgess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(59 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(94 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(54 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(24 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(81 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(46 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(38 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(142 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(39 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: definite/indefinite articles
(46 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Don't mean to offend, but...
Don't mean to offend, but...
(79 lines)
From:
João Ricardo Oliveira <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(48 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(83 lines)
From:
João Ricardo Oliveira <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(53 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(87 lines)
From:
João Ricardo Oliveira <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(169 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(54 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(55 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(37 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(38 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(148 lines)
From:
João Ricardo Oliveira <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(176 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(85 lines)
From:
João Ricardo Oliveira <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(40 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(35 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(69 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(74 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Don't mean to offend, but...
(35 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Double Prime?
Double Prime?
(44 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double Prime?
(55 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double Prime?
(56 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double Prime?
(81 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double Prime?
(77 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double Prime?
(86 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double Prime?
(95 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double Prime?
(79 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double Prime?
(88 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double Prime?
(39 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double Prime?
(85 lines)
From:
Elyse Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double Prime?
(49 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double Prime?
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double Prime?
(51 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double Prime?
(63 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double Prime?
(32 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double Prime?
(58 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Double Prime?
(47 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Expressing ages
Re: Expressing ages
(146 lines)
From:
João Ricardo Oliveira <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Expressing ages
(39 lines)
From:
Gracie V. <
[log in to unmask]
>
How many on conlang?
How many on conlang?
(33 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How many on conlang?
(43 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How many on conlang?
(23 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How many on conlang?
(48 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How many on conlang?
(53 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How many on conlang?
(29 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is this modal system workable?
Is this modal system workable?
(76 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
LHL was Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
LHL was Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(39 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LHL was Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(42 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LHL was Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(43 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LHL was Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LHL was Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(34 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LHL was Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(43 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
MEDIA ADVISORY - Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200213
MEDIA ADVISORY - Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200213
(73 lines)
From:
Kvasir <
[log in to unmask]
>
more conlangs
more conlangs
(50 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
More Gothic text
More Gothic text
(64 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More Gothic text
(79 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More Gothic text
(49 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More Gothic text
(74 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More Gothic text
(71 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More Gothic text
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Murdering a Thread; was: Don't mean to offend, but...
Murdering a Thread; was: Don't mean to offend, but...
(169 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
my iconic alphabet
Re: my iconic alphabet
(65 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
my ideas for a "logical alphabet"
my ideas for a "logical alphabet"
(59 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
ng vs w
ng vs w
(45 lines)
From:
alexandre lang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ng vs w
(34 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ng vs w
(67 lines)
From:
alexandre lang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ng vs w
(51 lines)
From:
alexandre lang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ng vs w
(34 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ng vs w
(67 lines)
From:
alexandre lang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ng vs w
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ng vs w
(64 lines)
From:
alexandre lang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ng vs w
(34 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ng vs w
(49 lines)
From:
alexandre lang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ng vs w
(50 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ng vs w
(46 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ng vs w
(37 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ng vs w
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ng vs w
(51 lines)
From:
alexandre lang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ng vs w
(33 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ng vs w
(67 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT/CHAT: YATT (Yet Another Teohie Thread ;) (wasRe: Results of Poll by Email No. 26)
OT/CHAT: YATT (Yet Another Teohie Thread ;) (wasRe: Results of Poll by Email No. 26)
(114 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT/CHAT: YATT (Yet Another Teohie Thread ;) (wasRe: Results of Poll by Email No. 26)
(47 lines)
From:
Dan Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT/CHAT: YATT (Yet Another Teohie Thread ;) (wasRe: Results of Poll by Email No. 26)
(56 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: German pronunciation question
OT: German pronunciation question
(29 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: German pronunciation question
(37 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: German pronunciation question
(51 lines)
From:
Harald Stoiber <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Official language post
OT: Official language post
(31 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(48 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(72 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(32 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(52 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(58 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(40 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(53 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(52 lines)
From:
David Barrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(35 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(66 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(49 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(30 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(56 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(55 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(64 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(74 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(51 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(48 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(33 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(65 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(78 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(66 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(50 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Official language post
(56 lines)
From:
Jake X <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: LHL was Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
OT: Re: LHL was Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(50 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Personal Conjugation based on Closeness
Re: Personal Conjugation based on Closeness
(69 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal Conjugation based on Closeness
(48 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal Conjugation based on Closeness
(36 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal Conjugation based on Closeness
(29 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal Conjugation based on Closeness
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal Conjugation based on Closeness
(113 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal Conjugation based on Closeness
(47 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal Conjugation based on Closeness
(64 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal Conjugation based on Closeness
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal Conjugation based on Closeness
(47 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal Conjugation based on Closeness
(143 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal Conjugation based on Closeness
(37 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal Conjugation based on Closeness
(43 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personal Conjugation based on Closeness
(66 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poll by Email No. 27
Poll by Email No. 27
(54 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 27
(45 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 27
(85 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll by Email No. 27
(48 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pronoun gender in Ikanirae Seru
Pronoun gender in Ikanirae Seru
(52 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronoun gender in Ikanirae Seru
(83 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronoun gender in Ikanirae Seru
(43 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronoun gender in Ikanirae Seru
(48 lines)
From:
Pavel Iosad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronoun gender in Ikanirae Seru
(90 lines)
From:
Elyse Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronoun gender in Ikanirae Seru
(41 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Recent upheavals in Sturnan
Re: Recent upheavals in Sturnan
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Recent upheavals in Sturnan
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Results of Poll by Email No. 26
Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(98 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(75 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(37 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(46 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(43 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(73 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(150 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(41 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(36 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 26
(34 lines)
From:
Tristan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rs
Rs
(31 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rs
(41 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rs
(46 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rs
(65 lines)
From:
Elyse Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rs
(75 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rs
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rs
(52 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rs
(89 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rs
(46 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rs
(105 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rs
(156 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rs
(66 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rs
(42 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rs
(42 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rs
(45 lines)
From:
Joe Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rs
(42 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Streaming foreign languages was Re: Maltese Phonology
Re: Streaming foreign languages was Re: Maltese Phonology
(50 lines)
From:
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
The latest revision of the LANCA alphabet
The latest revision of the LANCA alphabet
(60 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The latest revision of the LANCA alphabet
(71 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The latest revision of the LANCA alphabet
(52 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Website updated
Website updated
(41 lines)
From:
Elyse Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Website updated
(42 lines)
From:
Elyse Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Website updated
(39 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Website updated
(53 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab again?
Weekly Vocab again?
(54 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab again?
(113 lines)
From:
Mike Ellis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab again?
(234 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab again?
(40 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab again?
(155 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab again?
(27 lines)
From:
Christopher Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab again?
(69 lines)
From:
Rachel Klippenstein <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab again?
(211 lines)
From:
Robert B Wilson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab again?
(72 lines)
From:
michael poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab again?
(98 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab again?
(43 lines)
From:
J Y S Czhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab again?
(40 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab Half
Re: Weekly Vocab Half
(63 lines)
From:
Mau Rauszer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Workshops Review #14
Workshops Review #14
(67 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU